Funding on the Fly

Since September 2001, the Bush administration and members of Congress from both parties repeatedly have stressed the importance of boosting the capabilities of local police, fire, and emergency response officials. However, many cities have received no federal money to help meet new security requirem...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Government Executive 2003-04, Vol.35 (5), p.50
1. Verfasser: Peters, Katherine McIntire
Format: Magazinearticle
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 5
container_start_page 50
container_title Government Executive
container_volume 35
creator Peters, Katherine McIntire
description Since September 2001, the Bush administration and members of Congress from both parties repeatedly have stressed the importance of boosting the capabilities of local police, fire, and emergency response officials. However, many cities have received no federal money to help meet new security requirements. To understand where that money went, and why so little of it ended up in the hands of first responders, is to delve into the messy world of politics, pork, and budget rhetoric. Moreover, the windfall in security spending may be over, leaving many on the home front of the war on terrorism without funds to pay for critical needs. According to national security analyst Frank Hoffman, the combination of current spending and the amount proposed by the Bush administration for 2004 is far too little for programs expected to secure U.S. borders and reduce the vulnerability of critical infrastructure to terrorist attack.
format Magazinearticle
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_reports_204317885</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A211496964</galeid><sourcerecordid>A211496964</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-g1405-6b9a066c05b7ed950af483b2b4cb8ec3838a56fba3673bfa780d30d8218fa82e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptzE1LxDAQBuAgCtbVi7-g3o3kO-lxWVwVFrzouSTtJBup6dq0B_-9gfWwh2Vghhmedy5QxahkWGnCLlFFCNWYKaau0U3OX2UlnMkK3W-X1McU6jHV8x7q7fB7i668HTLc_c8V-tw-f2xe8e795W2z3uFABZFYucYSpToinYa-kcR6YbhjTnTOQMcNN1Yq7yxXmjtvtSE9J71h1HhrGPAVejj-PUzjzwJ5bic4jNOcW0YEp9oYWQw-mmAHaGPy4zzZLkCCyQ5jAh_Lec0oFY1qlCj-6Ywv1cN37M4GHk8CbskxQS4tx7Cfc7BLzqf8D_NYYqM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>magazinearticle</recordtype><pqid>204317885</pqid></control><display><type>magazinearticle</type><title>Funding on the Fly</title><source>Free E- Journals</source><creator>Peters, Katherine McIntire</creator><creatorcontrib>Peters, Katherine McIntire</creatorcontrib><description>Since September 2001, the Bush administration and members of Congress from both parties repeatedly have stressed the importance of boosting the capabilities of local police, fire, and emergency response officials. However, many cities have received no federal money to help meet new security requirements. To understand where that money went, and why so little of it ended up in the hands of first responders, is to delve into the messy world of politics, pork, and budget rhetoric. Moreover, the windfall in security spending may be over, leaving many on the home front of the war on terrorism without funds to pay for critical needs. According to national security analyst Frank Hoffman, the combination of current spending and the amount proposed by the Bush administration for 2004 is far too little for programs expected to secure U.S. borders and reduce the vulnerability of critical infrastructure to terrorist attack.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0017-2626</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2152-6702</identifier><identifier>CODEN: GVEXAW</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: Government Executive Media Group LLC</publisher><subject>Appropriations ; Cities ; Civil defense ; Cost estimates ; Criminal investigations ; Defense ; Emergency services ; Federal budget ; Federal funding ; Law enforcement ; Military bases ; National security ; Politics ; Presidents ; Rhetoric ; Safety and security measures ; Security management ; Terrorism</subject><ispartof>Government Executive, 2003-04, Vol.35 (5), p.50</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2003 Government Executive Media Group LLC</rights><rights>Copyright National Journal Group, Inc. Apr 2003</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>312,776,780,787</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Peters, Katherine McIntire</creatorcontrib><title>Funding on the Fly</title><title>Government Executive</title><description>Since September 2001, the Bush administration and members of Congress from both parties repeatedly have stressed the importance of boosting the capabilities of local police, fire, and emergency response officials. However, many cities have received no federal money to help meet new security requirements. To understand where that money went, and why so little of it ended up in the hands of first responders, is to delve into the messy world of politics, pork, and budget rhetoric. Moreover, the windfall in security spending may be over, leaving many on the home front of the war on terrorism without funds to pay for critical needs. According to national security analyst Frank Hoffman, the combination of current spending and the amount proposed by the Bush administration for 2004 is far too little for programs expected to secure U.S. borders and reduce the vulnerability of critical infrastructure to terrorist attack.</description><subject>Appropriations</subject><subject>Cities</subject><subject>Civil defense</subject><subject>Cost estimates</subject><subject>Criminal investigations</subject><subject>Defense</subject><subject>Emergency services</subject><subject>Federal budget</subject><subject>Federal funding</subject><subject>Law enforcement</subject><subject>Military bases</subject><subject>National security</subject><subject>Politics</subject><subject>Presidents</subject><subject>Rhetoric</subject><subject>Safety and security measures</subject><subject>Security management</subject><subject>Terrorism</subject><issn>0017-2626</issn><issn>2152-6702</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>magazinearticle</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>magazinearticle</recordtype><sourceid>N95</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNptzE1LxDAQBuAgCtbVi7-g3o3kO-lxWVwVFrzouSTtJBup6dq0B_-9gfWwh2Vghhmedy5QxahkWGnCLlFFCNWYKaau0U3OX2UlnMkK3W-X1McU6jHV8x7q7fB7i668HTLc_c8V-tw-f2xe8e795W2z3uFABZFYucYSpToinYa-kcR6YbhjTnTOQMcNN1Yq7yxXmjtvtSE9J71h1HhrGPAVejj-PUzjzwJ5bic4jNOcW0YEp9oYWQw-mmAHaGPy4zzZLkCCyQ5jAh_Lec0oFY1qlCj-6Ywv1cN37M4GHk8CbskxQS4tx7Cfc7BLzqf8D_NYYqM</recordid><startdate>20030415</startdate><enddate>20030415</enddate><creator>Peters, Katherine McIntire</creator><general>Government Executive Media Group LLC</general><general>Atlantic Media, Inc</general><scope>N95</scope><scope>XI7</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>883</scope><scope>88F</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0F</scope><scope>M1Q</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20030415</creationdate><title>Funding on the Fly</title><author>Peters, Katherine McIntire</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-g1405-6b9a066c05b7ed950af483b2b4cb8ec3838a56fba3673bfa780d30d8218fa82e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>magazinearticle</rsrctype><prefilter>magazinearticle</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Appropriations</topic><topic>Cities</topic><topic>Civil defense</topic><topic>Cost estimates</topic><topic>Criminal investigations</topic><topic>Defense</topic><topic>Emergency services</topic><topic>Federal budget</topic><topic>Federal funding</topic><topic>Law enforcement</topic><topic>Military bases</topic><topic>National security</topic><topic>Politics</topic><topic>Presidents</topic><topic>Rhetoric</topic><topic>Safety and security measures</topic><topic>Security management</topic><topic>Terrorism</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Peters, Katherine McIntire</creatorcontrib><collection>Gale Business: Insights</collection><collection>Business Insights: Essentials</collection><collection>Global News &amp; ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Trade &amp; Industry (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Military Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Trade &amp; Industry</collection><collection>Military Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Government Executive</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Peters, Katherine McIntire</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Funding on the Fly</atitle><jtitle>Government Executive</jtitle><date>2003-04-15</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>50</spage><pages>50-</pages><issn>0017-2626</issn><eissn>2152-6702</eissn><coden>GVEXAW</coden><abstract>Since September 2001, the Bush administration and members of Congress from both parties repeatedly have stressed the importance of boosting the capabilities of local police, fire, and emergency response officials. However, many cities have received no federal money to help meet new security requirements. To understand where that money went, and why so little of it ended up in the hands of first responders, is to delve into the messy world of politics, pork, and budget rhetoric. Moreover, the windfall in security spending may be over, leaving many on the home front of the war on terrorism without funds to pay for critical needs. According to national security analyst Frank Hoffman, the combination of current spending and the amount proposed by the Bush administration for 2004 is far too little for programs expected to secure U.S. borders and reduce the vulnerability of critical infrastructure to terrorist attack.</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>Government Executive Media Group LLC</pub></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0017-2626
ispartof Government Executive, 2003-04, Vol.35 (5), p.50
issn 0017-2626
2152-6702
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_reports_204317885
source Free E- Journals
subjects Appropriations
Cities
Civil defense
Cost estimates
Criminal investigations
Defense
Emergency services
Federal budget
Federal funding
Law enforcement
Military bases
National security
Politics
Presidents
Rhetoric
Safety and security measures
Security management
Terrorism
title Funding on the Fly
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T06%3A19%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Funding%20on%20the%20Fly&rft.jtitle=Government%20Executive&rft.au=Peters,%20Katherine%20McIntire&rft.date=2003-04-15&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=50&rft.pages=50-&rft.issn=0017-2626&rft.eissn=2152-6702&rft.coden=GVEXAW&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA211496964%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=204317885&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A211496964&rfr_iscdi=true