In defense of middle management
The National Performance Review's (NPR) decision to cut 252,000 employees, of whom 140,000 are middle managers, from the federal workforce is considered to be based on instinct rather than logic. The NPR, like recent private sector downsizing efforts, focuses on eliminating middle management; t...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Government executive 1994-05, Vol.26 (5), p.57 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Magazinearticle |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 57 |
container_title | Government executive |
container_volume | 26 |
creator | Colvard, James E |
description | The National Performance Review's (NPR) decision to cut 252,000 employees, of whom 140,000 are middle managers, from the federal workforce is considered to be based on instinct rather than logic. The NPR, like recent private sector downsizing efforts, focuses on eliminating middle management; that is, reducing vertical layers of organizations. The intent it to improve efficiency by reducing the numbers of people between the decision-maker at the top and the worker at the bottom. This assumes that those in the middle neither decide nor act and thus can be eliminated. However, it must be determined if organizational relationships are that simple. Organizations exist to do work. The work of organizations can be divided into 4 functions: conceiving, connecting, conducting, and confirming. Organizational structure should enhance those activities, or it does not add value. These functions are discussed and conclusions given. |
format | Magazinearticle |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_reports_204305099</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>8954826</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_reports_2043050993</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpjYuA0MjQ10jUzNzBiYeA0MDA01zUyMzLjYOAqLs4Ccg2MjUw5GeQ98xRSUtNS84pTFfLTFHIzU1JyUhVyE_MS01NzU_NKeBhY0xJzilN5oTQ3g6Kba4izh25BUX5haWpxSXxRakF-UUlxvJGBibGBqYGlpTExagCecixg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>magazinearticle</recordtype><pqid>204305099</pqid></control><display><type>magazinearticle</type><title>In defense of middle management</title><source>Free E- Journals</source><creator>Colvard, James E</creator><creatorcontrib>Colvard, James E</creatorcontrib><description>The National Performance Review's (NPR) decision to cut 252,000 employees, of whom 140,000 are middle managers, from the federal workforce is considered to be based on instinct rather than logic. The NPR, like recent private sector downsizing efforts, focuses on eliminating middle management; that is, reducing vertical layers of organizations. The intent it to improve efficiency by reducing the numbers of people between the decision-maker at the top and the worker at the bottom. This assumes that those in the middle neither decide nor act and thus can be eliminated. However, it must be determined if organizational relationships are that simple. Organizations exist to do work. The work of organizations can be divided into 4 functions: conceiving, connecting, conducting, and confirming. Organizational structure should enhance those activities, or it does not add value. These functions are discussed and conclusions given.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0017-2626</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2152-6702</identifier><identifier>CODEN: GVEXAW</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: Atlantic Media, Inc</publisher><subject>Accountability ; Defense contracts ; Downsizing ; Employees ; Employment ; Federal employees ; Line managers ; Management decisions ; Middle management ; Organizational structure ; Performance evaluation ; Political appointments ; Politics ; Recommendations ; Roles ; Workers</subject><ispartof>Government executive, 1994-05, Vol.26 (5), p.57</ispartof><rights>Copyright National Journal, Inc. May 1994</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>776,780</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Colvard, James E</creatorcontrib><title>In defense of middle management</title><title>Government executive</title><description>The National Performance Review's (NPR) decision to cut 252,000 employees, of whom 140,000 are middle managers, from the federal workforce is considered to be based on instinct rather than logic. The NPR, like recent private sector downsizing efforts, focuses on eliminating middle management; that is, reducing vertical layers of organizations. The intent it to improve efficiency by reducing the numbers of people between the decision-maker at the top and the worker at the bottom. This assumes that those in the middle neither decide nor act and thus can be eliminated. However, it must be determined if organizational relationships are that simple. Organizations exist to do work. The work of organizations can be divided into 4 functions: conceiving, connecting, conducting, and confirming. Organizational structure should enhance those activities, or it does not add value. These functions are discussed and conclusions given.</description><subject>Accountability</subject><subject>Defense contracts</subject><subject>Downsizing</subject><subject>Employees</subject><subject>Employment</subject><subject>Federal employees</subject><subject>Line managers</subject><subject>Management decisions</subject><subject>Middle management</subject><subject>Organizational structure</subject><subject>Performance evaluation</subject><subject>Political appointments</subject><subject>Politics</subject><subject>Recommendations</subject><subject>Roles</subject><subject>Workers</subject><issn>0017-2626</issn><issn>2152-6702</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>magazinearticle</rsrctype><creationdate>1994</creationdate><recordtype>magazinearticle</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNpjYuA0MjQ10jUzNzBiYeA0MDA01zUyMzLjYOAqLs4Ccg2MjUw5GeQ98xRSUtNS84pTFfLTFHIzU1JyUhVyE_MS01NzU_NKeBhY0xJzilN5oTQ3g6Kba4izh25BUX5haWpxSXxRakF-UUlxvJGBibGBqYGlpTExagCecixg</recordid><startdate>19940501</startdate><enddate>19940501</enddate><creator>Colvard, James E</creator><general>Atlantic Media, Inc</general><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>883</scope><scope>88F</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0F</scope><scope>M1Q</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19940501</creationdate><title>In defense of middle management</title><author>Colvard, James E</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_reports_2043050993</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>magazinearticle</rsrctype><prefilter>magazinearticle</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1994</creationdate><topic>Accountability</topic><topic>Defense contracts</topic><topic>Downsizing</topic><topic>Employees</topic><topic>Employment</topic><topic>Federal employees</topic><topic>Line managers</topic><topic>Management decisions</topic><topic>Middle management</topic><topic>Organizational structure</topic><topic>Performance evaluation</topic><topic>Political appointments</topic><topic>Politics</topic><topic>Recommendations</topic><topic>Roles</topic><topic>Workers</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Colvard, James E</creatorcontrib><collection>Global News & ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Trade & Industry (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Military Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Trade & Industry</collection><collection>Military Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Government executive</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Colvard, James E</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>In defense of middle management</atitle><jtitle>Government executive</jtitle><date>1994-05-01</date><risdate>1994</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>57</spage><pages>57-</pages><issn>0017-2626</issn><eissn>2152-6702</eissn><coden>GVEXAW</coden><abstract>The National Performance Review's (NPR) decision to cut 252,000 employees, of whom 140,000 are middle managers, from the federal workforce is considered to be based on instinct rather than logic. The NPR, like recent private sector downsizing efforts, focuses on eliminating middle management; that is, reducing vertical layers of organizations. The intent it to improve efficiency by reducing the numbers of people between the decision-maker at the top and the worker at the bottom. This assumes that those in the middle neither decide nor act and thus can be eliminated. However, it must be determined if organizational relationships are that simple. Organizations exist to do work. The work of organizations can be divided into 4 functions: conceiving, connecting, conducting, and confirming. Organizational structure should enhance those activities, or it does not add value. These functions are discussed and conclusions given.</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>Atlantic Media, Inc</pub></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0017-2626 |
ispartof | Government executive, 1994-05, Vol.26 (5), p.57 |
issn | 0017-2626 2152-6702 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_reports_204305099 |
source | Free E- Journals |
subjects | Accountability Defense contracts Downsizing Employees Employment Federal employees Line managers Management decisions Middle management Organizational structure Performance evaluation Political appointments Politics Recommendations Roles Workers |
title | In defense of middle management |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T02%3A57%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=In%20defense%20of%20middle%20management&rft.jtitle=Government%20executive&rft.au=Colvard,%20James%20E&rft.date=1994-05-01&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=57&rft.pages=57-&rft.issn=0017-2626&rft.eissn=2152-6702&rft.coden=GVEXAW&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E8954826%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=204305099&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |