NZIM : The index is slipping - What's going wrong?; Management capability is a critical indicator of management performance. And in 2006 the New Zealand Institute of Management's Management Capability Index slipped. Doug Matheson wonders why
NZIM's Management Capability Index (MCI) provides an annual tracking and assessment of management capability in New Zealand. The MCI reflects chief executive assessment of their organizations. In 2005, the All India Management Association conducted the MCI in India for the first time. The overa...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | New Zealand Management 2007-02, p.26 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | |
|---|---|
| container_issue | |
| container_start_page | 26 |
| container_title | New Zealand Management |
| container_volume | |
| creator | Matheson, Doug |
| description | NZIM's Management Capability Index (MCI) provides an annual tracking and assessment of management capability in New Zealand. The MCI reflects chief executive assessment of their organizations. In 2005, the All India Management Association conducted the MCI in India for the first time. The overall 2005 index for India was 76.4, versus New Zealand's 70.3. At 71.2 the 2006 MCI for Malaysia is 2.6 points higher than New Zealand. The 2006 MCI results raise some important issues for New Zealand management. The most heavily weighted (15%) management capability factor is "visionary and strategic leadership". This dropped the most in the 2006 survey (-3.7%). "People leadership" was the second largest drop in the 2006 survey (-3.1%). "Innovation in products and services" is consistently the lowest response by New Zealand chief executives. New Zealand chief executives rate themselves at 64.5, Malaysian at 72, and Indian at 73. |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_reports_201655405</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1211710141</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_reports_2016554053</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNTs1Kw0AQDqJg_XmH8eQpZbNpKtGDSLWYQ3sqFHopazJJVtLddWdD7GP7Bm6CEI89zcw3399ZMImihzSM04idD_ssTOI4vQyuiD4Z45xHfBL8rHfZCh5hUyNIVeA3SAJqpDFSVRDCthbunqDS_dlZrarnJ1gJJSo8oHKQCyM-ZCPdsRcKyK10MhdNb-an0xZ0CYdRYNCW2nogxym8qMITgTM2B-cbrLGDHYpGeDxT5KRrHfYGY6Iv8y9-McZnQ_uhOhZTeNVt5ZnelbSCTvuvJejq401wUYqG8PZvXgd3y7fN4j00Vn-1SG5v0WjraM9ZNE-SGUviUzi_5ix3kw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>201655405</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>NZIM : The index is slipping - What's going wrong?; Management capability is a critical indicator of management performance. And in 2006 the New Zealand Institute of Management's Management Capability Index slipped. Doug Matheson wonders why</title><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><creator>Matheson, Doug</creator><creatorcontrib>Matheson, Doug</creatorcontrib><description>NZIM's Management Capability Index (MCI) provides an annual tracking and assessment of management capability in New Zealand. The MCI reflects chief executive assessment of their organizations. In 2005, the All India Management Association conducted the MCI in India for the first time. The overall 2005 index for India was 76.4, versus New Zealand's 70.3. At 71.2 the 2006 MCI for Malaysia is 2.6 points higher than New Zealand. The 2006 MCI results raise some important issues for New Zealand management. The most heavily weighted (15%) management capability factor is "visionary and strategic leadership". This dropped the most in the 2006 survey (-3.7%). "People leadership" was the second largest drop in the 2006 survey (-3.1%). "Innovation in products and services" is consistently the lowest response by New Zealand chief executives. New Zealand chief executives rate themselves at 64.5, Malaysian at 72, and Indian at 73.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1174-5339</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1179-3910</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Auckland: Adrenalin Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Ability ; Executives ; Financial management ; Indexes ; International comparisons ; Leadership ; Managerial skills ; Polls & surveys ; Stockholders</subject><ispartof>New Zealand Management, 2007-02, p.26</ispartof><rights>(c) Profile Publishing Ltd, Auckland, New Zealand, and can not be used without prior permission of the publisher.</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>312,778,782,789</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Matheson, Doug</creatorcontrib><title>NZIM : The index is slipping - What's going wrong?; Management capability is a critical indicator of management performance. And in 2006 the New Zealand Institute of Management's Management Capability Index slipped. Doug Matheson wonders why</title><title>New Zealand Management</title><description>NZIM's Management Capability Index (MCI) provides an annual tracking and assessment of management capability in New Zealand. The MCI reflects chief executive assessment of their organizations. In 2005, the All India Management Association conducted the MCI in India for the first time. The overall 2005 index for India was 76.4, versus New Zealand's 70.3. At 71.2 the 2006 MCI for Malaysia is 2.6 points higher than New Zealand. The 2006 MCI results raise some important issues for New Zealand management. The most heavily weighted (15%) management capability factor is "visionary and strategic leadership". This dropped the most in the 2006 survey (-3.7%). "People leadership" was the second largest drop in the 2006 survey (-3.1%). "Innovation in products and services" is consistently the lowest response by New Zealand chief executives. New Zealand chief executives rate themselves at 64.5, Malaysian at 72, and Indian at 73.</description><subject>Ability</subject><subject>Executives</subject><subject>Financial management</subject><subject>Indexes</subject><subject>International comparisons</subject><subject>Leadership</subject><subject>Managerial skills</subject><subject>Polls & surveys</subject><subject>Stockholders</subject><issn>1174-5339</issn><issn>1179-3910</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNqNTs1Kw0AQDqJg_XmH8eQpZbNpKtGDSLWYQ3sqFHopazJJVtLddWdD7GP7Bm6CEI89zcw3399ZMImihzSM04idD_ssTOI4vQyuiD4Z45xHfBL8rHfZCh5hUyNIVeA3SAJqpDFSVRDCthbunqDS_dlZrarnJ1gJJSo8oHKQCyM-ZCPdsRcKyK10MhdNb-an0xZ0CYdRYNCW2nogxym8qMITgTM2B-cbrLGDHYpGeDxT5KRrHfYGY6Iv8y9-McZnQ_uhOhZTeNVt5ZnelbSCTvuvJejq401wUYqG8PZvXgd3y7fN4j00Vn-1SG5v0WjraM9ZNE-SGUviUzi_5ix3kw</recordid><startdate>20070201</startdate><enddate>20070201</enddate><creator>Matheson, Doug</creator><general>Adrenalin Publishing Ltd</general><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RO</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8AI</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AXJJW</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FREBS</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20070201</creationdate><title>NZIM : The index is slipping - What's going wrong?; Management capability is a critical indicator of management performance. And in 2006 the New Zealand Institute of Management's Management Capability Index slipped. Doug Matheson wonders why</title><author>Matheson, Doug</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_reports_2016554053</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Ability</topic><topic>Executives</topic><topic>Financial management</topic><topic>Indexes</topic><topic>International comparisons</topic><topic>Leadership</topic><topic>Managerial skills</topic><topic>Polls & surveys</topic><topic>Stockholders</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Matheson, Doug</creatorcontrib><collection>Global News & ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Asian Business Database</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Asian Business Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Asian & European Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Asian & European Business Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>New Zealand Management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Matheson, Doug</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>NZIM : The index is slipping - What's going wrong?; Management capability is a critical indicator of management performance. And in 2006 the New Zealand Institute of Management's Management Capability Index slipped. Doug Matheson wonders why</atitle><jtitle>New Zealand Management</jtitle><date>2007-02-01</date><risdate>2007</risdate><spage>26</spage><pages>26-</pages><issn>1174-5339</issn><eissn>1179-3910</eissn><abstract>NZIM's Management Capability Index (MCI) provides an annual tracking and assessment of management capability in New Zealand. The MCI reflects chief executive assessment of their organizations. In 2005, the All India Management Association conducted the MCI in India for the first time. The overall 2005 index for India was 76.4, versus New Zealand's 70.3. At 71.2 the 2006 MCI for Malaysia is 2.6 points higher than New Zealand. The 2006 MCI results raise some important issues for New Zealand management. The most heavily weighted (15%) management capability factor is "visionary and strategic leadership". This dropped the most in the 2006 survey (-3.7%). "People leadership" was the second largest drop in the 2006 survey (-3.1%). "Innovation in products and services" is consistently the lowest response by New Zealand chief executives. New Zealand chief executives rate themselves at 64.5, Malaysian at 72, and Indian at 73.</abstract><cop>Auckland</cop><pub>Adrenalin Publishing Ltd</pub></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1174-5339 |
| ispartof | New Zealand Management, 2007-02, p.26 |
| issn | 1174-5339 1179-3910 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_reports_201655405 |
| source | EBSCOhost Business Source Complete |
| subjects | Ability Executives Financial management Indexes International comparisons Leadership Managerial skills Polls & surveys Stockholders |
| title | NZIM : The index is slipping - What's going wrong?; Management capability is a critical indicator of management performance. And in 2006 the New Zealand Institute of Management's Management Capability Index slipped. Doug Matheson wonders why |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T04%3A02%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=NZIM%20:%20The%20index%20is%20slipping%20-%20What's%20going%20wrong?;%20Management%20capability%20is%20a%20critical%20indicator%20of%20management%20performance.%20And%20in%202006%20the%20New%20Zealand%20Institute%20of%20Management's%20Management%20Capability%20Index%20slipped.%20Doug%20Matheson%20wonders%20why&rft.jtitle=New%20Zealand%20Management&rft.au=Matheson,%20Doug&rft.date=2007-02-01&rft.spage=26&rft.pages=26-&rft.issn=1174-5339&rft.eissn=1179-3910&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E1211710141%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=201655405&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |