Postretirement health benefits: Are corporations accurately estimating future cost trend rates?

Much attention has been paid to the FAS 106 requirement to change the accounting for retiree health care benefits from a cash to an accrual basis. But less noted was another disclosure requirement: health care cost trend rate assumptions, which have a significant effect on the expense and liability...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of corporate accounting & finance 1995-06, Vol.6 (4), p.59-70
Hauptverfasser: Langsam, Sheldon A., Newell, Gale E., Kreuze, Jerry G.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 70
container_issue 4
container_start_page 59
container_title The Journal of corporate accounting & finance
container_volume 6
creator Langsam, Sheldon A.
Newell, Gale E.
Kreuze, Jerry G.
description Much attention has been paid to the FAS 106 requirement to change the accounting for retiree health care benefits from a cash to an accrual basis. But less noted was another disclosure requirement: health care cost trend rate assumptions, which have a significant effect on the expense and liability reported on the firm's financial statements. The authors report on their study to determine if the assumed trend rates have been reliable estimates of actual health care cost increases, and if the assumed trend rates have been consistent among corporations.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/jcaf.3970060407
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_reports_201612811</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>6937456</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2267-1dbeb31eb2a5d0074b26c2dcc255c7ba1506a02776820bfa2b25d91a13a303a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkF1LwzAUhosoOKfX3sYf0O2c9COrXsiobipjigwEb0Kapq5za2eSovv3plYUr7wIORye5_Dyet4pwgAB6HAlRTEIEgYQQwhsz-shJMwHiIL9dg5Df4RBfOgdGbMCt2YY9jz-UBurlS212qjKkqUSa7skmapUUVpzTsZaEVnrba2FLevKECFl42a13hFlbLlx6-qFFI1tvkhjibtX5aRlzOWxd1CItVEn33_fW0yuF-mNP7uf3qbjmS8pjZmPeaayAFVGRZQDsDCjsaS5lDSKJMsERhALoIzFIwpZIWhGozxBgYEIwL2-d9ad3er6rXG5uFYusjWcAsZIR4iOGXaM1LUxWhV8q118veMIvK2QtxXy3wqdcdEZ7-Va7f7D-V06nvyx_c4ujVUfP7bQrzxmAYv403zK8epxjun8mSfBJ-mRhlU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>201612811</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Postretirement health benefits: Are corporations accurately estimating future cost trend rates?</title><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><creator>Langsam, Sheldon A. ; Newell, Gale E. ; Kreuze, Jerry G.</creator><creatorcontrib>Langsam, Sheldon A. ; Newell, Gale E. ; Kreuze, Jerry G.</creatorcontrib><description>Much attention has been paid to the FAS 106 requirement to change the accounting for retiree health care benefits from a cash to an accrual basis. But less noted was another disclosure requirement: health care cost trend rate assumptions, which have a significant effect on the expense and liability reported on the firm's financial statements. The authors report on their study to determine if the assumed trend rates have been reliable estimates of actual health care cost increases, and if the assumed trend rates have been consistent among corporations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1044-8136</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-0053</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/jcaf.3970060407</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</publisher><subject>FASB statements ; Financial accounting standards ; Health care expenditures ; Other postemployment benefits ; Rates ; SFAS 106 ; Statistical analysis ; Studies ; Trends</subject><ispartof>The Journal of corporate accounting &amp; finance, 1995-06, Vol.6 (4), p.59-70</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 1995 Wiley Periodicals, Inc., A Wiley Company</rights><rights>Copyright Wiley Periodicals Inc. Summer 1995</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Langsam, Sheldon A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Newell, Gale E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kreuze, Jerry G.</creatorcontrib><title>Postretirement health benefits: Are corporations accurately estimating future cost trend rates?</title><title>The Journal of corporate accounting &amp; finance</title><addtitle>J. Corp. Acct. Fin</addtitle><description>Much attention has been paid to the FAS 106 requirement to change the accounting for retiree health care benefits from a cash to an accrual basis. But less noted was another disclosure requirement: health care cost trend rate assumptions, which have a significant effect on the expense and liability reported on the firm's financial statements. The authors report on their study to determine if the assumed trend rates have been reliable estimates of actual health care cost increases, and if the assumed trend rates have been consistent among corporations.</description><subject>FASB statements</subject><subject>Financial accounting standards</subject><subject>Health care expenditures</subject><subject>Other postemployment benefits</subject><subject>Rates</subject><subject>SFAS 106</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Trends</subject><issn>1044-8136</issn><issn>1097-0053</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1995</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkF1LwzAUhosoOKfX3sYf0O2c9COrXsiobipjigwEb0Kapq5za2eSovv3plYUr7wIORye5_Dyet4pwgAB6HAlRTEIEgYQQwhsz-shJMwHiIL9dg5Df4RBfOgdGbMCt2YY9jz-UBurlS212qjKkqUSa7skmapUUVpzTsZaEVnrba2FLevKECFl42a13hFlbLlx6-qFFI1tvkhjibtX5aRlzOWxd1CItVEn33_fW0yuF-mNP7uf3qbjmS8pjZmPeaayAFVGRZQDsDCjsaS5lDSKJMsERhALoIzFIwpZIWhGozxBgYEIwL2-d9ad3er6rXG5uFYusjWcAsZIR4iOGXaM1LUxWhV8q118veMIvK2QtxXy3wqdcdEZ7-Va7f7D-V06nvyx_c4ujVUfP7bQrzxmAYv403zK8epxjun8mSfBJ-mRhlU</recordid><startdate>19950601</startdate><enddate>19950601</enddate><creator>Langsam, Sheldon A.</creator><creator>Newell, Gale E.</creator><creator>Kreuze, Jerry G.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</general><general>Wiley Periodicals Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19950601</creationdate><title>Postretirement health benefits: Are corporations accurately estimating future cost trend rates?</title><author>Langsam, Sheldon A. ; Newell, Gale E. ; Kreuze, Jerry G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2267-1dbeb31eb2a5d0074b26c2dcc255c7ba1506a02776820bfa2b25d91a13a303a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1995</creationdate><topic>FASB statements</topic><topic>Financial accounting standards</topic><topic>Health care expenditures</topic><topic>Other postemployment benefits</topic><topic>Rates</topic><topic>SFAS 106</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Trends</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Langsam, Sheldon A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Newell, Gale E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kreuze, Jerry G.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>The Journal of corporate accounting &amp; finance</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Langsam, Sheldon A.</au><au>Newell, Gale E.</au><au>Kreuze, Jerry G.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Postretirement health benefits: Are corporations accurately estimating future cost trend rates?</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of corporate accounting &amp; finance</jtitle><addtitle>J. Corp. Acct. Fin</addtitle><date>1995-06-01</date><risdate>1995</risdate><volume>6</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>59</spage><epage>70</epage><pages>59-70</pages><issn>1044-8136</issn><eissn>1097-0053</eissn><abstract>Much attention has been paid to the FAS 106 requirement to change the accounting for retiree health care benefits from a cash to an accrual basis. But less noted was another disclosure requirement: health care cost trend rate assumptions, which have a significant effect on the expense and liability reported on the firm's financial statements. The authors report on their study to determine if the assumed trend rates have been reliable estimates of actual health care cost increases, and if the assumed trend rates have been consistent among corporations.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</pub><doi>10.1002/jcaf.3970060407</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1044-8136
ispartof The Journal of corporate accounting & finance, 1995-06, Vol.6 (4), p.59-70
issn 1044-8136
1097-0053
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_reports_201612811
source EBSCOhost Business Source Complete
subjects FASB statements
Financial accounting standards
Health care expenditures
Other postemployment benefits
Rates
SFAS 106
Statistical analysis
Studies
Trends
title Postretirement health benefits: Are corporations accurately estimating future cost trend rates?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T14%3A18%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Postretirement%20health%20benefits:%20Are%20corporations%20accurately%20estimating%20future%20cost%20trend%20rates?&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20corporate%20accounting%20&%20finance&rft.au=Langsam,%20Sheldon%20A.&rft.date=1995-06-01&rft.volume=6&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=59&rft.epage=70&rft.pages=59-70&rft.issn=1044-8136&rft.eissn=1097-0053&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/jcaf.3970060407&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E6937456%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=201612811&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true