Postretirement health benefits: Are corporations accurately estimating future cost trend rates?
Much attention has been paid to the FAS 106 requirement to change the accounting for retiree health care benefits from a cash to an accrual basis. But less noted was another disclosure requirement: health care cost trend rate assumptions, which have a significant effect on the expense and liability...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Journal of corporate accounting & finance 1995-06, Vol.6 (4), p.59-70 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 70 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 59 |
container_title | The Journal of corporate accounting & finance |
container_volume | 6 |
creator | Langsam, Sheldon A. Newell, Gale E. Kreuze, Jerry G. |
description | Much attention has been paid to the FAS 106 requirement to change the accounting for retiree health care benefits from a cash to an accrual basis. But less noted was another disclosure requirement: health care cost trend rate assumptions, which have a significant effect on the expense and liability reported on the firm's financial statements. The authors report on their study to determine if the assumed trend rates have been reliable estimates of actual health care cost increases, and if the assumed trend rates have been consistent among corporations. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/jcaf.3970060407 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_reports_201612811</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>6937456</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2267-1dbeb31eb2a5d0074b26c2dcc255c7ba1506a02776820bfa2b25d91a13a303a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkF1LwzAUhosoOKfX3sYf0O2c9COrXsiobipjigwEb0Kapq5za2eSovv3plYUr7wIORye5_Dyet4pwgAB6HAlRTEIEgYQQwhsz-shJMwHiIL9dg5Df4RBfOgdGbMCt2YY9jz-UBurlS212qjKkqUSa7skmapUUVpzTsZaEVnrba2FLevKECFl42a13hFlbLlx6-qFFI1tvkhjibtX5aRlzOWxd1CItVEn33_fW0yuF-mNP7uf3qbjmS8pjZmPeaayAFVGRZQDsDCjsaS5lDSKJMsERhALoIzFIwpZIWhGozxBgYEIwL2-d9ad3er6rXG5uFYusjWcAsZIR4iOGXaM1LUxWhV8q118veMIvK2QtxXy3wqdcdEZ7-Va7f7D-V06nvyx_c4ujVUfP7bQrzxmAYv403zK8epxjun8mSfBJ-mRhlU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>201612811</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Postretirement health benefits: Are corporations accurately estimating future cost trend rates?</title><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><creator>Langsam, Sheldon A. ; Newell, Gale E. ; Kreuze, Jerry G.</creator><creatorcontrib>Langsam, Sheldon A. ; Newell, Gale E. ; Kreuze, Jerry G.</creatorcontrib><description>Much attention has been paid to the FAS 106 requirement to change the accounting for retiree health care benefits from a cash to an accrual basis. But less noted was another disclosure requirement: health care cost trend rate assumptions, which have a significant effect on the expense and liability reported on the firm's financial statements. The authors report on their study to determine if the assumed trend rates have been reliable estimates of actual health care cost increases, and if the assumed trend rates have been consistent among corporations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1044-8136</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-0053</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/jcaf.3970060407</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</publisher><subject>FASB statements ; Financial accounting standards ; Health care expenditures ; Other postemployment benefits ; Rates ; SFAS 106 ; Statistical analysis ; Studies ; Trends</subject><ispartof>The Journal of corporate accounting & finance, 1995-06, Vol.6 (4), p.59-70</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 1995 Wiley Periodicals, Inc., A Wiley Company</rights><rights>Copyright Wiley Periodicals Inc. Summer 1995</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Langsam, Sheldon A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Newell, Gale E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kreuze, Jerry G.</creatorcontrib><title>Postretirement health benefits: Are corporations accurately estimating future cost trend rates?</title><title>The Journal of corporate accounting & finance</title><addtitle>J. Corp. Acct. Fin</addtitle><description>Much attention has been paid to the FAS 106 requirement to change the accounting for retiree health care benefits from a cash to an accrual basis. But less noted was another disclosure requirement: health care cost trend rate assumptions, which have a significant effect on the expense and liability reported on the firm's financial statements. The authors report on their study to determine if the assumed trend rates have been reliable estimates of actual health care cost increases, and if the assumed trend rates have been consistent among corporations.</description><subject>FASB statements</subject><subject>Financial accounting standards</subject><subject>Health care expenditures</subject><subject>Other postemployment benefits</subject><subject>Rates</subject><subject>SFAS 106</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Trends</subject><issn>1044-8136</issn><issn>1097-0053</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1995</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkF1LwzAUhosoOKfX3sYf0O2c9COrXsiobipjigwEb0Kapq5za2eSovv3plYUr7wIORye5_Dyet4pwgAB6HAlRTEIEgYQQwhsz-shJMwHiIL9dg5Df4RBfOgdGbMCt2YY9jz-UBurlS212qjKkqUSa7skmapUUVpzTsZaEVnrba2FLevKECFl42a13hFlbLlx6-qFFI1tvkhjibtX5aRlzOWxd1CItVEn33_fW0yuF-mNP7uf3qbjmS8pjZmPeaayAFVGRZQDsDCjsaS5lDSKJMsERhALoIzFIwpZIWhGozxBgYEIwL2-d9ad3er6rXG5uFYusjWcAsZIR4iOGXaM1LUxWhV8q118veMIvK2QtxXy3wqdcdEZ7-Va7f7D-V06nvyx_c4ujVUfP7bQrzxmAYv403zK8epxjun8mSfBJ-mRhlU</recordid><startdate>19950601</startdate><enddate>19950601</enddate><creator>Langsam, Sheldon A.</creator><creator>Newell, Gale E.</creator><creator>Kreuze, Jerry G.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</general><general>Wiley Periodicals Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19950601</creationdate><title>Postretirement health benefits: Are corporations accurately estimating future cost trend rates?</title><author>Langsam, Sheldon A. ; Newell, Gale E. ; Kreuze, Jerry G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2267-1dbeb31eb2a5d0074b26c2dcc255c7ba1506a02776820bfa2b25d91a13a303a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1995</creationdate><topic>FASB statements</topic><topic>Financial accounting standards</topic><topic>Health care expenditures</topic><topic>Other postemployment benefits</topic><topic>Rates</topic><topic>SFAS 106</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Trends</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Langsam, Sheldon A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Newell, Gale E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kreuze, Jerry G.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>The Journal of corporate accounting & finance</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Langsam, Sheldon A.</au><au>Newell, Gale E.</au><au>Kreuze, Jerry G.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Postretirement health benefits: Are corporations accurately estimating future cost trend rates?</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of corporate accounting & finance</jtitle><addtitle>J. Corp. Acct. Fin</addtitle><date>1995-06-01</date><risdate>1995</risdate><volume>6</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>59</spage><epage>70</epage><pages>59-70</pages><issn>1044-8136</issn><eissn>1097-0053</eissn><abstract>Much attention has been paid to the FAS 106 requirement to change the accounting for retiree health care benefits from a cash to an accrual basis. But less noted was another disclosure requirement: health care cost trend rate assumptions, which have a significant effect on the expense and liability reported on the firm's financial statements. The authors report on their study to determine if the assumed trend rates have been reliable estimates of actual health care cost increases, and if the assumed trend rates have been consistent among corporations.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</pub><doi>10.1002/jcaf.3970060407</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1044-8136 |
ispartof | The Journal of corporate accounting & finance, 1995-06, Vol.6 (4), p.59-70 |
issn | 1044-8136 1097-0053 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_reports_201612811 |
source | EBSCOhost Business Source Complete |
subjects | FASB statements Financial accounting standards Health care expenditures Other postemployment benefits Rates SFAS 106 Statistical analysis Studies Trends |
title | Postretirement health benefits: Are corporations accurately estimating future cost trend rates? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T14%3A18%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Postretirement%20health%20benefits:%20Are%20corporations%20accurately%20estimating%20future%20cost%20trend%20rates?&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20corporate%20accounting%20&%20finance&rft.au=Langsam,%20Sheldon%20A.&rft.date=1995-06-01&rft.volume=6&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=59&rft.epage=70&rft.pages=59-70&rft.issn=1044-8136&rft.eissn=1097-0053&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/jcaf.3970060407&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E6937456%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=201612811&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |