Baka v. Hungary (Eur. Ct. H.R.)
[...]the newly established Kúria has essentially the same powers and competences as the former Supreme Court, and all judges remained in their positions on the court--except for Baka. [...]the new Organization and Administration of the Court Act8(adopted by Parliament in 2011) introduced a new crite...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | International legal materials 2017-04, Vol.56 (2), p.273-357 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 357 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 273 |
| container_title | International legal materials |
| container_volume | 56 |
| creator | Szemesi, Sandor |
| description | [...]the newly established Kúria has essentially the same powers and competences as the former Supreme Court, and all judges remained in their positions on the court--except for Baka. [...]the new Organization and Administration of the Court Act8(adopted by Parliament in 2011) introduced a new criterion for the election of the new president of the Kúria, requiring the president to have at least five years of experience as a judge in Hungary. According to this criterion, time served as a judge of an international court was not counted. [...]the ECtHR considered that the changes made to the tasks of the president of the supreme judicial body of Hungary were not of such a fundamental nature that they should or could have prompted the termination of Baka's mandate. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1017/ilm.2017.5 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_reports_1969025895</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_ilm_2017_5</cupid><sourcerecordid>1969025895</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c995-7285b8e5484de18415e3b165ac4b3424aa728b1dab2b77ac41cbb7fea1aad3ca3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptj1FLwzAUhYMoOKcv_gGLTyo25qZJkzxqmU4YCLL3cNNmY3Nba9IK_nsztkefzuXwcTkfIdfAKDBQT6vNlvJ0UHlCRmAKlpdSwSkZMcZZrjQ35-QixjVjIHgJI3Lzgl-Y_dBsOuyWGH6zu8kQaFb1qaGf9P6SnC1wE_3VMcdk_jqZV9N89vH2Xj3P8toYmSuupdNeCi0aD1qA9IWDUmItXCG4QEyEgwYdd0qlFmrn1MIjIDZFjcWY3B7edqH9HnzsbfBdG_powZSGcamNTNDDAapDG2PwC9uF1TaNtsDsXt8mfbvXt3v48Qjj1oVVs_R23Q5hlyT-w_8A9MlYFg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1969025895</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Baka v. Hungary (Eur. Ct. H.R.)</title><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><source>Cambridge Journals</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><creator>Szemesi, Sandor</creator><creatorcontrib>Szemesi, Sandor</creatorcontrib><description>[...]the newly established Kúria has essentially the same powers and competences as the former Supreme Court, and all judges remained in their positions on the court--except for Baka. [...]the new Organization and Administration of the Court Act8(adopted by Parliament in 2011) introduced a new criterion for the election of the new president of the Kúria, requiring the president to have at least five years of experience as a judge in Hungary. According to this criterion, time served as a judge of an international court was not counted. [...]the ECtHR considered that the changes made to the tasks of the president of the supreme judicial body of Hungary were not of such a fundamental nature that they should or could have prompted the termination of Baka's mandate.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0020-7829</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1930-6571</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/ilm.2017.5</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, USA: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Archives & records ; Councils ; Human rights ; International Legal Documents ; Judges & magistrates ; Judicial reviews ; Judiciary ; Parliaments ; Presidents ; Rule of law</subject><ispartof>International legal materials, 2017-04, Vol.56 (2), p.273-357</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2017 by The American Society of International Law</rights><rights>Copyright © 2017 by The American Society of International Law</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0020782917000055/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,314,777,781,27905,27906,55609</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Szemesi, Sandor</creatorcontrib><title>Baka v. Hungary (Eur. Ct. H.R.)</title><title>International legal materials</title><addtitle>Int. leg. mater</addtitle><description>[...]the newly established Kúria has essentially the same powers and competences as the former Supreme Court, and all judges remained in their positions on the court--except for Baka. [...]the new Organization and Administration of the Court Act8(adopted by Parliament in 2011) introduced a new criterion for the election of the new president of the Kúria, requiring the president to have at least five years of experience as a judge in Hungary. According to this criterion, time served as a judge of an international court was not counted. [...]the ECtHR considered that the changes made to the tasks of the president of the supreme judicial body of Hungary were not of such a fundamental nature that they should or could have prompted the termination of Baka's mandate.</description><subject>Archives & records</subject><subject>Councils</subject><subject>Human rights</subject><subject>International Legal Documents</subject><subject>Judges & magistrates</subject><subject>Judicial reviews</subject><subject>Judiciary</subject><subject>Parliaments</subject><subject>Presidents</subject><subject>Rule of law</subject><issn>0020-7829</issn><issn>1930-6571</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNptj1FLwzAUhYMoOKcv_gGLTyo25qZJkzxqmU4YCLL3cNNmY3Nba9IK_nsztkefzuXwcTkfIdfAKDBQT6vNlvJ0UHlCRmAKlpdSwSkZMcZZrjQ35-QixjVjIHgJI3Lzgl-Y_dBsOuyWGH6zu8kQaFb1qaGf9P6SnC1wE_3VMcdk_jqZV9N89vH2Xj3P8toYmSuupdNeCi0aD1qA9IWDUmItXCG4QEyEgwYdd0qlFmrn1MIjIDZFjcWY3B7edqH9HnzsbfBdG_powZSGcamNTNDDAapDG2PwC9uF1TaNtsDsXt8mfbvXt3v48Qjj1oVVs_R23Q5hlyT-w_8A9MlYFg</recordid><startdate>201704</startdate><enddate>201704</enddate><creator>Szemesi, Sandor</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88F</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>M1Q</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201704</creationdate><title>Baka v. Hungary (Eur. Ct. H.R.)</title><author>Szemesi, Sandor</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c995-7285b8e5484de18415e3b165ac4b3424aa728b1dab2b77ac41cbb7fea1aad3ca3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Archives & records</topic><topic>Councils</topic><topic>Human rights</topic><topic>International Legal Documents</topic><topic>Judges & magistrates</topic><topic>Judicial reviews</topic><topic>Judiciary</topic><topic>Parliaments</topic><topic>Presidents</topic><topic>Rule of law</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Szemesi, Sandor</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Military Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Military Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>International legal materials</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Szemesi, Sandor</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Baka v. Hungary (Eur. Ct. H.R.)</atitle><jtitle>International legal materials</jtitle><addtitle>Int. leg. mater</addtitle><date>2017-04</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>56</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>273</spage><epage>357</epage><pages>273-357</pages><issn>0020-7829</issn><eissn>1930-6571</eissn><abstract>[...]the newly established Kúria has essentially the same powers and competences as the former Supreme Court, and all judges remained in their positions on the court--except for Baka. [...]the new Organization and Administration of the Court Act8(adopted by Parliament in 2011) introduced a new criterion for the election of the new president of the Kúria, requiring the president to have at least five years of experience as a judge in Hungary. According to this criterion, time served as a judge of an international court was not counted. [...]the ECtHR considered that the changes made to the tasks of the president of the supreme judicial body of Hungary were not of such a fundamental nature that they should or could have prompted the termination of Baka's mandate.</abstract><cop>New York, USA</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/ilm.2017.5</doi><tpages>85</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0020-7829 |
| ispartof | International legal materials, 2017-04, Vol.56 (2), p.273-357 |
| issn | 0020-7829 1930-6571 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_reports_1969025895 |
| source | HeinOnline Law Journal Library; Cambridge Journals; Jstor Complete Legacy |
| subjects | Archives & records Councils Human rights International Legal Documents Judges & magistrates Judicial reviews Judiciary Parliaments Presidents Rule of law |
| title | Baka v. Hungary (Eur. Ct. H.R.) |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-18T12%3A56%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Baka%20v.%20Hungary%20(Eur.%20Ct.%20H.R.)&rft.jtitle=International%20legal%20materials&rft.au=Szemesi,%20Sandor&rft.date=2017-04&rft.volume=56&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=273&rft.epage=357&rft.pages=273-357&rft.issn=0020-7829&rft.eissn=1930-6571&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/ilm.2017.5&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1969025895%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1969025895&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_ilm_2017_5&rfr_iscdi=true |