Barriers facing women in the IT work force
The percentage of women working in Information Technology (IT) is falling as revealed by the 2003 Information Technology Association of America (ITAA) Blue Ribbon Panel on Information Technology (IT) Diversity report; the percentage of women in the IT workforce fell to 34.9% in 2002 down from 41% in...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | ACM SIGMIS Database: the DATABASE for Advances in Information Systems 2006-10, Vol.37 (4), p.58-78 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 78 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 58 |
container_title | ACM SIGMIS Database: the DATABASE for Advances in Information Systems |
container_volume | 37 |
creator | Riemenschneider, Cynthia K Armstrong, Deborah J Allen, Myria W Reid, Margaret F |
description | The percentage of women working in Information Technology (IT) is falling as revealed by the 2003 Information Technology Association of America (ITAA) Blue Ribbon Panel on Information Technology (IT) Diversity report; the percentage of women in the IT workforce fell to 34.9% in 2002 down from 41% in 1996. Several studies have indicated this issue is reaching a crisis level and needs to be explored. Women working in IT at a Fortune 500 company were asked what workplace barriers they faced that had influenced their voluntary turnover decisions or the decisions of their female counterparts. Revealed causal mapping was used to evoke representations of the cognitions surrounding the barriers women face in the IT field. A causal map was developed that indicated women's actual turnover was linked to their views of their family responsibilities, the stresses they face within the workplace, various qualities of their jobs, and the flexibility they were given to determine their work schedule. Their statements regarding the barriers they faced in terms of promotion opportunities (both perceived and actual) were linked to the same four concepts. Interestingly, there was no link between promotion opportunities and voluntary turnover. Reciprocal relationships were identified between managing family responsibility and stress, work schedule flexibility and stress, managing family responsibility and job qualities, and job qualities and stress. Discrimination and lack of consistency in how management treated employees, while important, were not central to how the women in this sample thought about issues related to promotion and voluntary turnover. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1145/1185335.1185345 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_reports_196633404</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>30935241</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c244t-133a72d5098ffb035c37cba4fbf49a9588726c3b17d5bd280de4da45ace5bc963</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkMFLwzAYxYMoWKdnr_XiQeiW5MuXNEcdUwcDL_Mc0jTR6trOpEP8761uJy-eHg9-PHg_Qi4ZnTImcMZYiQA4_U2BRyRjCLygGuQxySjVWFAKcErOUnqjlCspMSM3dzbGxseUB-ua7iX_7Fvf5U2XD68-X67HHt_z0Efnz8lJsJvkLw45Ic_3i_X8sVg9PSznt6vCcSGGggFYxWukugyhooAOlKusCFUQ2mosS8Wlg4qpGqual7T2orYCrfNYOS1hQq72u9vYf-x8Gkz02z4OyTAtJYCgYmSu_zBtk5zfbGzn-10yMN5GLti_INcgFHA1grM96GKfUvTBbGPT2vhlGDU_gs1BsDkIhm9d1mq6</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>196633404</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Barriers facing women in the IT work force</title><source>ACM Digital Library</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Riemenschneider, Cynthia K ; Armstrong, Deborah J ; Allen, Myria W ; Reid, Margaret F</creator><creatorcontrib>Riemenschneider, Cynthia K ; Armstrong, Deborah J ; Allen, Myria W ; Reid, Margaret F</creatorcontrib><description>The percentage of women working in Information Technology (IT) is falling as revealed by the 2003 Information Technology Association of America (ITAA) Blue Ribbon Panel on Information Technology (IT) Diversity report; the percentage of women in the IT workforce fell to 34.9% in 2002 down from 41% in 1996. Several studies have indicated this issue is reaching a crisis level and needs to be explored. Women working in IT at a Fortune 500 company were asked what workplace barriers they faced that had influenced their voluntary turnover decisions or the decisions of their female counterparts. Revealed causal mapping was used to evoke representations of the cognitions surrounding the barriers women face in the IT field. A causal map was developed that indicated women's actual turnover was linked to their views of their family responsibilities, the stresses they face within the workplace, various qualities of their jobs, and the flexibility they were given to determine their work schedule. Their statements regarding the barriers they faced in terms of promotion opportunities (both perceived and actual) were linked to the same four concepts. Interestingly, there was no link between promotion opportunities and voluntary turnover. Reciprocal relationships were identified between managing family responsibility and stress, work schedule flexibility and stress, managing family responsibility and job qualities, and job qualities and stress. Discrimination and lack of consistency in how management treated employees, while important, were not central to how the women in this sample thought about issues related to promotion and voluntary turnover.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0095-0033</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1532-0936</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-0936</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1145/1185335.1185345</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: ACM-SIGMIS</publisher><subject>Costs ; Employee turnover ; Female employees ; Flexible hours ; Gender ; Information technology ; Literature reviews ; Retention ; Studies ; Women ; Workforce</subject><ispartof>ACM SIGMIS Database: the DATABASE for Advances in Information Systems, 2006-10, Vol.37 (4), p.58-78</ispartof><rights>Copyright ACM-SIGMIS Fall 2006</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c244t-133a72d5098ffb035c37cba4fbf49a9588726c3b17d5bd280de4da45ace5bc963</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c244t-133a72d5098ffb035c37cba4fbf49a9588726c3b17d5bd280de4da45ace5bc963</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>312,314,780,784,791,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Riemenschneider, Cynthia K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Armstrong, Deborah J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Allen, Myria W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reid, Margaret F</creatorcontrib><title>Barriers facing women in the IT work force</title><title>ACM SIGMIS Database: the DATABASE for Advances in Information Systems</title><description>The percentage of women working in Information Technology (IT) is falling as revealed by the 2003 Information Technology Association of America (ITAA) Blue Ribbon Panel on Information Technology (IT) Diversity report; the percentage of women in the IT workforce fell to 34.9% in 2002 down from 41% in 1996. Several studies have indicated this issue is reaching a crisis level and needs to be explored. Women working in IT at a Fortune 500 company were asked what workplace barriers they faced that had influenced their voluntary turnover decisions or the decisions of their female counterparts. Revealed causal mapping was used to evoke representations of the cognitions surrounding the barriers women face in the IT field. A causal map was developed that indicated women's actual turnover was linked to their views of their family responsibilities, the stresses they face within the workplace, various qualities of their jobs, and the flexibility they were given to determine their work schedule. Their statements regarding the barriers they faced in terms of promotion opportunities (both perceived and actual) were linked to the same four concepts. Interestingly, there was no link between promotion opportunities and voluntary turnover. Reciprocal relationships were identified between managing family responsibility and stress, work schedule flexibility and stress, managing family responsibility and job qualities, and job qualities and stress. Discrimination and lack of consistency in how management treated employees, while important, were not central to how the women in this sample thought about issues related to promotion and voluntary turnover.</description><subject>Costs</subject><subject>Employee turnover</subject><subject>Female employees</subject><subject>Flexible hours</subject><subject>Gender</subject><subject>Information technology</subject><subject>Literature reviews</subject><subject>Retention</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Women</subject><subject>Workforce</subject><issn>0095-0033</issn><issn>1532-0936</issn><issn>1532-0936</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkMFLwzAYxYMoWKdnr_XiQeiW5MuXNEcdUwcDL_Mc0jTR6trOpEP8761uJy-eHg9-PHg_Qi4ZnTImcMZYiQA4_U2BRyRjCLygGuQxySjVWFAKcErOUnqjlCspMSM3dzbGxseUB-ua7iX_7Fvf5U2XD68-X67HHt_z0Efnz8lJsJvkLw45Ic_3i_X8sVg9PSznt6vCcSGGggFYxWukugyhooAOlKusCFUQ2mosS8Wlg4qpGqual7T2orYCrfNYOS1hQq72u9vYf-x8Gkz02z4OyTAtJYCgYmSu_zBtk5zfbGzn-10yMN5GLti_INcgFHA1grM96GKfUvTBbGPT2vhlGDU_gs1BsDkIhm9d1mq6</recordid><startdate>20061001</startdate><enddate>20061001</enddate><creator>Riemenschneider, Cynthia K</creator><creator>Armstrong, Deborah J</creator><creator>Allen, Myria W</creator><creator>Reid, Margaret F</creator><general>ACM-SIGMIS</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8AL</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K7-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0N</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20061001</creationdate><title>Barriers facing women in the IT work force</title><author>Riemenschneider, Cynthia K ; Armstrong, Deborah J ; Allen, Myria W ; Reid, Margaret F</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c244t-133a72d5098ffb035c37cba4fbf49a9588726c3b17d5bd280de4da45ace5bc963</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Costs</topic><topic>Employee turnover</topic><topic>Female employees</topic><topic>Flexible hours</topic><topic>Gender</topic><topic>Information technology</topic><topic>Literature reviews</topic><topic>Retention</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Women</topic><topic>Workforce</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Riemenschneider, Cynthia K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Armstrong, Deborah J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Allen, Myria W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reid, Margaret F</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>Global News & ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Computing Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>Computer Science Database</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Computing Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>ACM SIGMIS Database: the DATABASE for Advances in Information Systems</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Riemenschneider, Cynthia K</au><au>Armstrong, Deborah J</au><au>Allen, Myria W</au><au>Reid, Margaret F</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Barriers facing women in the IT work force</atitle><jtitle>ACM SIGMIS Database: the DATABASE for Advances in Information Systems</jtitle><date>2006-10-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>37</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>58</spage><epage>78</epage><pages>58-78</pages><issn>0095-0033</issn><issn>1532-0936</issn><eissn>1532-0936</eissn><abstract>The percentage of women working in Information Technology (IT) is falling as revealed by the 2003 Information Technology Association of America (ITAA) Blue Ribbon Panel on Information Technology (IT) Diversity report; the percentage of women in the IT workforce fell to 34.9% in 2002 down from 41% in 1996. Several studies have indicated this issue is reaching a crisis level and needs to be explored. Women working in IT at a Fortune 500 company were asked what workplace barriers they faced that had influenced their voluntary turnover decisions or the decisions of their female counterparts. Revealed causal mapping was used to evoke representations of the cognitions surrounding the barriers women face in the IT field. A causal map was developed that indicated women's actual turnover was linked to their views of their family responsibilities, the stresses they face within the workplace, various qualities of their jobs, and the flexibility they were given to determine their work schedule. Their statements regarding the barriers they faced in terms of promotion opportunities (both perceived and actual) were linked to the same four concepts. Interestingly, there was no link between promotion opportunities and voluntary turnover. Reciprocal relationships were identified between managing family responsibility and stress, work schedule flexibility and stress, managing family responsibility and job qualities, and job qualities and stress. Discrimination and lack of consistency in how management treated employees, while important, were not central to how the women in this sample thought about issues related to promotion and voluntary turnover.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>ACM-SIGMIS</pub><doi>10.1145/1185335.1185345</doi><tpages>21</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0095-0033 |
ispartof | ACM SIGMIS Database: the DATABASE for Advances in Information Systems, 2006-10, Vol.37 (4), p.58-78 |
issn | 0095-0033 1532-0936 1532-0936 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_reports_196633404 |
source | ACM Digital Library; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Costs Employee turnover Female employees Flexible hours Gender Information technology Literature reviews Retention Studies Women Workforce |
title | Barriers facing women in the IT work force |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T06%3A22%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Barriers%20facing%20women%20in%20the%20IT%20work%20force&rft.jtitle=ACM%20SIGMIS%20Database:%20the%20DATABASE%20for%20Advances%20in%20Information%20Systems&rft.au=Riemenschneider,%20Cynthia%20K&rft.date=2006-10-01&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=58&rft.epage=78&rft.pages=58-78&rft.issn=0095-0033&rft.eissn=1532-0936&rft_id=info:doi/10.1145/1185335.1185345&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E30935241%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=196633404&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |