Barriers facing women in the IT work force

The percentage of women working in Information Technology (IT) is falling as revealed by the 2003 Information Technology Association of America (ITAA) Blue Ribbon Panel on Information Technology (IT) Diversity report; the percentage of women in the IT workforce fell to 34.9% in 2002 down from 41% in...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:ACM SIGMIS Database: the DATABASE for Advances in Information Systems 2006-10, Vol.37 (4), p.58-78
Hauptverfasser: Riemenschneider, Cynthia K, Armstrong, Deborah J, Allen, Myria W, Reid, Margaret F
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 78
container_issue 4
container_start_page 58
container_title ACM SIGMIS Database: the DATABASE for Advances in Information Systems
container_volume 37
creator Riemenschneider, Cynthia K
Armstrong, Deborah J
Allen, Myria W
Reid, Margaret F
description The percentage of women working in Information Technology (IT) is falling as revealed by the 2003 Information Technology Association of America (ITAA) Blue Ribbon Panel on Information Technology (IT) Diversity report; the percentage of women in the IT workforce fell to 34.9% in 2002 down from 41% in 1996. Several studies have indicated this issue is reaching a crisis level and needs to be explored. Women working in IT at a Fortune 500 company were asked what workplace barriers they faced that had influenced their voluntary turnover decisions or the decisions of their female counterparts. Revealed causal mapping was used to evoke representations of the cognitions surrounding the barriers women face in the IT field. A causal map was developed that indicated women's actual turnover was linked to their views of their family responsibilities, the stresses they face within the workplace, various qualities of their jobs, and the flexibility they were given to determine their work schedule. Their statements regarding the barriers they faced in terms of promotion opportunities (both perceived and actual) were linked to the same four concepts. Interestingly, there was no link between promotion opportunities and voluntary turnover. Reciprocal relationships were identified between managing family responsibility and stress, work schedule flexibility and stress, managing family responsibility and job qualities, and job qualities and stress. Discrimination and lack of consistency in how management treated employees, while important, were not central to how the women in this sample thought about issues related to promotion and voluntary turnover.
doi_str_mv 10.1145/1185335.1185345
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_reports_196633404</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>30935241</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c244t-133a72d5098ffb035c37cba4fbf49a9588726c3b17d5bd280de4da45ace5bc963</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkMFLwzAYxYMoWKdnr_XiQeiW5MuXNEcdUwcDL_Mc0jTR6trOpEP8761uJy-eHg9-PHg_Qi4ZnTImcMZYiQA4_U2BRyRjCLygGuQxySjVWFAKcErOUnqjlCspMSM3dzbGxseUB-ua7iX_7Fvf5U2XD68-X67HHt_z0Efnz8lJsJvkLw45Ic_3i_X8sVg9PSznt6vCcSGGggFYxWukugyhooAOlKusCFUQ2mosS8Wlg4qpGqual7T2orYCrfNYOS1hQq72u9vYf-x8Gkz02z4OyTAtJYCgYmSu_zBtk5zfbGzn-10yMN5GLti_INcgFHA1grM96GKfUvTBbGPT2vhlGDU_gs1BsDkIhm9d1mq6</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>196633404</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Barriers facing women in the IT work force</title><source>ACM Digital Library</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Riemenschneider, Cynthia K ; Armstrong, Deborah J ; Allen, Myria W ; Reid, Margaret F</creator><creatorcontrib>Riemenschneider, Cynthia K ; Armstrong, Deborah J ; Allen, Myria W ; Reid, Margaret F</creatorcontrib><description>The percentage of women working in Information Technology (IT) is falling as revealed by the 2003 Information Technology Association of America (ITAA) Blue Ribbon Panel on Information Technology (IT) Diversity report; the percentage of women in the IT workforce fell to 34.9% in 2002 down from 41% in 1996. Several studies have indicated this issue is reaching a crisis level and needs to be explored. Women working in IT at a Fortune 500 company were asked what workplace barriers they faced that had influenced their voluntary turnover decisions or the decisions of their female counterparts. Revealed causal mapping was used to evoke representations of the cognitions surrounding the barriers women face in the IT field. A causal map was developed that indicated women's actual turnover was linked to their views of their family responsibilities, the stresses they face within the workplace, various qualities of their jobs, and the flexibility they were given to determine their work schedule. Their statements regarding the barriers they faced in terms of promotion opportunities (both perceived and actual) were linked to the same four concepts. Interestingly, there was no link between promotion opportunities and voluntary turnover. Reciprocal relationships were identified between managing family responsibility and stress, work schedule flexibility and stress, managing family responsibility and job qualities, and job qualities and stress. Discrimination and lack of consistency in how management treated employees, while important, were not central to how the women in this sample thought about issues related to promotion and voluntary turnover.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0095-0033</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1532-0936</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-0936</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1145/1185335.1185345</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: ACM-SIGMIS</publisher><subject>Costs ; Employee turnover ; Female employees ; Flexible hours ; Gender ; Information technology ; Literature reviews ; Retention ; Studies ; Women ; Workforce</subject><ispartof>ACM SIGMIS Database: the DATABASE for Advances in Information Systems, 2006-10, Vol.37 (4), p.58-78</ispartof><rights>Copyright ACM-SIGMIS Fall 2006</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c244t-133a72d5098ffb035c37cba4fbf49a9588726c3b17d5bd280de4da45ace5bc963</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c244t-133a72d5098ffb035c37cba4fbf49a9588726c3b17d5bd280de4da45ace5bc963</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>312,314,780,784,791,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Riemenschneider, Cynthia K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Armstrong, Deborah J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Allen, Myria W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reid, Margaret F</creatorcontrib><title>Barriers facing women in the IT work force</title><title>ACM SIGMIS Database: the DATABASE for Advances in Information Systems</title><description>The percentage of women working in Information Technology (IT) is falling as revealed by the 2003 Information Technology Association of America (ITAA) Blue Ribbon Panel on Information Technology (IT) Diversity report; the percentage of women in the IT workforce fell to 34.9% in 2002 down from 41% in 1996. Several studies have indicated this issue is reaching a crisis level and needs to be explored. Women working in IT at a Fortune 500 company were asked what workplace barriers they faced that had influenced their voluntary turnover decisions or the decisions of their female counterparts. Revealed causal mapping was used to evoke representations of the cognitions surrounding the barriers women face in the IT field. A causal map was developed that indicated women's actual turnover was linked to their views of their family responsibilities, the stresses they face within the workplace, various qualities of their jobs, and the flexibility they were given to determine their work schedule. Their statements regarding the barriers they faced in terms of promotion opportunities (both perceived and actual) were linked to the same four concepts. Interestingly, there was no link between promotion opportunities and voluntary turnover. Reciprocal relationships were identified between managing family responsibility and stress, work schedule flexibility and stress, managing family responsibility and job qualities, and job qualities and stress. Discrimination and lack of consistency in how management treated employees, while important, were not central to how the women in this sample thought about issues related to promotion and voluntary turnover.</description><subject>Costs</subject><subject>Employee turnover</subject><subject>Female employees</subject><subject>Flexible hours</subject><subject>Gender</subject><subject>Information technology</subject><subject>Literature reviews</subject><subject>Retention</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Women</subject><subject>Workforce</subject><issn>0095-0033</issn><issn>1532-0936</issn><issn>1532-0936</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkMFLwzAYxYMoWKdnr_XiQeiW5MuXNEcdUwcDL_Mc0jTR6trOpEP8761uJy-eHg9-PHg_Qi4ZnTImcMZYiQA4_U2BRyRjCLygGuQxySjVWFAKcErOUnqjlCspMSM3dzbGxseUB-ua7iX_7Fvf5U2XD68-X67HHt_z0Efnz8lJsJvkLw45Ic_3i_X8sVg9PSznt6vCcSGGggFYxWukugyhooAOlKusCFUQ2mosS8Wlg4qpGqual7T2orYCrfNYOS1hQq72u9vYf-x8Gkz02z4OyTAtJYCgYmSu_zBtk5zfbGzn-10yMN5GLti_INcgFHA1grM96GKfUvTBbGPT2vhlGDU_gs1BsDkIhm9d1mq6</recordid><startdate>20061001</startdate><enddate>20061001</enddate><creator>Riemenschneider, Cynthia K</creator><creator>Armstrong, Deborah J</creator><creator>Allen, Myria W</creator><creator>Reid, Margaret F</creator><general>ACM-SIGMIS</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8AL</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K7-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0N</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20061001</creationdate><title>Barriers facing women in the IT work force</title><author>Riemenschneider, Cynthia K ; Armstrong, Deborah J ; Allen, Myria W ; Reid, Margaret F</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c244t-133a72d5098ffb035c37cba4fbf49a9588726c3b17d5bd280de4da45ace5bc963</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Costs</topic><topic>Employee turnover</topic><topic>Female employees</topic><topic>Flexible hours</topic><topic>Gender</topic><topic>Information technology</topic><topic>Literature reviews</topic><topic>Retention</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Women</topic><topic>Workforce</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Riemenschneider, Cynthia K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Armstrong, Deborah J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Allen, Myria W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reid, Margaret F</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>Global News &amp; ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Computing Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>Computer Science Database</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Computing Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>ACM SIGMIS Database: the DATABASE for Advances in Information Systems</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Riemenschneider, Cynthia K</au><au>Armstrong, Deborah J</au><au>Allen, Myria W</au><au>Reid, Margaret F</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Barriers facing women in the IT work force</atitle><jtitle>ACM SIGMIS Database: the DATABASE for Advances in Information Systems</jtitle><date>2006-10-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>37</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>58</spage><epage>78</epage><pages>58-78</pages><issn>0095-0033</issn><issn>1532-0936</issn><eissn>1532-0936</eissn><abstract>The percentage of women working in Information Technology (IT) is falling as revealed by the 2003 Information Technology Association of America (ITAA) Blue Ribbon Panel on Information Technology (IT) Diversity report; the percentage of women in the IT workforce fell to 34.9% in 2002 down from 41% in 1996. Several studies have indicated this issue is reaching a crisis level and needs to be explored. Women working in IT at a Fortune 500 company were asked what workplace barriers they faced that had influenced their voluntary turnover decisions or the decisions of their female counterparts. Revealed causal mapping was used to evoke representations of the cognitions surrounding the barriers women face in the IT field. A causal map was developed that indicated women's actual turnover was linked to their views of their family responsibilities, the stresses they face within the workplace, various qualities of their jobs, and the flexibility they were given to determine their work schedule. Their statements regarding the barriers they faced in terms of promotion opportunities (both perceived and actual) were linked to the same four concepts. Interestingly, there was no link between promotion opportunities and voluntary turnover. Reciprocal relationships were identified between managing family responsibility and stress, work schedule flexibility and stress, managing family responsibility and job qualities, and job qualities and stress. Discrimination and lack of consistency in how management treated employees, while important, were not central to how the women in this sample thought about issues related to promotion and voluntary turnover.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>ACM-SIGMIS</pub><doi>10.1145/1185335.1185345</doi><tpages>21</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0095-0033
ispartof ACM SIGMIS Database: the DATABASE for Advances in Information Systems, 2006-10, Vol.37 (4), p.58-78
issn 0095-0033
1532-0936
1532-0936
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_reports_196633404
source ACM Digital Library; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Costs
Employee turnover
Female employees
Flexible hours
Gender
Information technology
Literature reviews
Retention
Studies
Women
Workforce
title Barriers facing women in the IT work force
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T06%3A22%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Barriers%20facing%20women%20in%20the%20IT%20work%20force&rft.jtitle=ACM%20SIGMIS%20Database:%20the%20DATABASE%20for%20Advances%20in%20Information%20Systems&rft.au=Riemenschneider,%20Cynthia%20K&rft.date=2006-10-01&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=58&rft.epage=78&rft.pages=58-78&rft.issn=0095-0033&rft.eissn=1532-0936&rft_id=info:doi/10.1145/1185335.1185345&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E30935241%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=196633404&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true