"No" to Port Reform

The European Parliament voted 229 to 209 against a port-services directive that proponents said would have encouraged competition and reduced costs in ports but which opponents said would have undermined unions and endangered workers. The defeat of the directive leaves EU ports in a regulatory and l...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Traffic World 2003-12, p.1
1. Verfasser: Barnard, Bruce
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page 1
container_title Traffic World
container_volume
creator Barnard, Bruce
description The European Parliament voted 229 to 209 against a port-services directive that proponents said would have encouraged competition and reduced costs in ports but which opponents said would have undermined unions and endangered workers. The defeat of the directive leaves EU ports in a regulatory and legal quagmire. While other industries have been reshaped under liberalized laws and regulations, EU ports and terminals have stood aloof from major change. The reform directive was voted down after dockworkers, coordinated by the International Transport Workers Federation, threatened widespread strikes in European ports. The unions were particularly upset by a clause in the directive that would have allowed shipowners to bypass dockworkers and use ships' crews to load and discharge cargo. The European Commission said it will hold a new round of consultations with ports, port users and unions before deciding whether to table a new proposal.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_reports_195679995</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>708823331</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_reports_1956799953</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpjYeA0MDAx1DUwN47gYOAqLs4yMDAwNTEw5WQQVvLLV1IoyVcIyC8qUQhKTcsvyuVhYE1LzClO5YXS3AyKbq4hzh66BUX5haWpxSXxRakFQOXF8YaWpmbmlpaWpsbEqAEAKDYlvw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>195679995</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>"No" to Port Reform</title><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><creator>Barnard, Bruce</creator><creatorcontrib>Barnard, Bruce</creatorcontrib><description>The European Parliament voted 229 to 209 against a port-services directive that proponents said would have encouraged competition and reduced costs in ports but which opponents said would have undermined unions and endangered workers. The defeat of the directive leaves EU ports in a regulatory and legal quagmire. While other industries have been reshaped under liberalized laws and regulations, EU ports and terminals have stood aloof from major change. The reform directive was voted down after dockworkers, coordinated by the International Transport Workers Federation, threatened widespread strikes in European ports. The unions were particularly upset by a clause in the directive that would have allowed shipowners to bypass dockworkers and use ships' crews to load and discharge cargo. The European Commission said it will hold a new round of consultations with ports, port users and unions before deciding whether to table a new proposal.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0041-073X</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Newark: IHS Maritime &amp; Trade</publisher><subject>Competition ; EU directives ; Labor unions ; Ports ; Reforms ; Ships</subject><ispartof>Traffic World, 2003-12, p.1</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2003 Commonwealth Business Media. All rights reserved.</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>312,776,780,787</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Barnard, Bruce</creatorcontrib><title>"No" to Port Reform</title><title>Traffic World</title><description>The European Parliament voted 229 to 209 against a port-services directive that proponents said would have encouraged competition and reduced costs in ports but which opponents said would have undermined unions and endangered workers. The defeat of the directive leaves EU ports in a regulatory and legal quagmire. While other industries have been reshaped under liberalized laws and regulations, EU ports and terminals have stood aloof from major change. The reform directive was voted down after dockworkers, coordinated by the International Transport Workers Federation, threatened widespread strikes in European ports. The unions were particularly upset by a clause in the directive that would have allowed shipowners to bypass dockworkers and use ships' crews to load and discharge cargo. The European Commission said it will hold a new round of consultations with ports, port users and unions before deciding whether to table a new proposal.</description><subject>Competition</subject><subject>EU directives</subject><subject>Labor unions</subject><subject>Ports</subject><subject>Reforms</subject><subject>Ships</subject><issn>0041-073X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNpjYeA0MDAx1DUwN47gYOAqLs4yMDAwNTEw5WQQVvLLV1IoyVcIyC8qUQhKTcsvyuVhYE1LzClO5YXS3AyKbq4hzh66BUX5haWpxSXxRakFQOXF8YaWpmbmlpaWpsbEqAEAKDYlvw</recordid><startdate>20031201</startdate><enddate>20031201</enddate><creator>Barnard, Bruce</creator><general>IHS Maritime &amp; Trade</general><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>883</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0F</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20031201</creationdate><title>"No" to Port Reform</title><author>Barnard, Bruce</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_reports_1956799953</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Competition</topic><topic>EU directives</topic><topic>Labor unions</topic><topic>Ports</topic><topic>Reforms</topic><topic>Ships</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Barnard, Bruce</creatorcontrib><collection>Global News &amp; ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Trade &amp; Industry (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Trade &amp; Industry</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Traffic World</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Barnard, Bruce</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>"No" to Port Reform</atitle><jtitle>Traffic World</jtitle><date>2003-12-01</date><risdate>2003</risdate><spage>1</spage><pages>1-</pages><issn>0041-073X</issn><abstract>The European Parliament voted 229 to 209 against a port-services directive that proponents said would have encouraged competition and reduced costs in ports but which opponents said would have undermined unions and endangered workers. The defeat of the directive leaves EU ports in a regulatory and legal quagmire. While other industries have been reshaped under liberalized laws and regulations, EU ports and terminals have stood aloof from major change. The reform directive was voted down after dockworkers, coordinated by the International Transport Workers Federation, threatened widespread strikes in European ports. The unions were particularly upset by a clause in the directive that would have allowed shipowners to bypass dockworkers and use ships' crews to load and discharge cargo. The European Commission said it will hold a new round of consultations with ports, port users and unions before deciding whether to table a new proposal.</abstract><cop>Newark</cop><pub>IHS Maritime &amp; Trade</pub></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0041-073X
ispartof Traffic World, 2003-12, p.1
issn 0041-073X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_reports_195679995
source EBSCOhost Business Source Complete
subjects Competition
EU directives
Labor unions
Ports
Reforms
Ships
title "No" to Port Reform
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T15%3A10%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=%22No%22%20to%20Port%20Reform&rft.jtitle=Traffic%20World&rft.au=Barnard,%20Bruce&rft.date=2003-12-01&rft.spage=1&rft.pages=1-&rft.issn=0041-073X&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E708823331%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=195679995&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true