Let's Talk About Sex
If one views the purpose of a court or jury trial to be to determine the truth, one might assume that the plaintiffs contributions to the workplace atmosphere should be taken fully into account in the course of ascertaining whether a sexually hostile and offensive working environment existed. But a...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Employee Relations Law Journal 2005-07, Vol.31 (1), p.90 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 90 |
container_title | Employee Relations Law Journal |
container_volume | 31 |
creator | McDonald, James J |
description | If one views the purpose of a court or jury trial to be to determine the truth, one might assume that the plaintiffs contributions to the workplace atmosphere should be taken fully into account in the course of ascertaining whether a sexually hostile and offensive working environment existed. But a substantial barrier has been erected in the path toward the search for the truth, however, in the form of the revised Rule 412 of the Federal Rules of Evidence. An extension of the "rape shield" rule that prohibits a criminal defendant in a rape case from attacking the sexual history of the accuser, Rule 412 was applied to sexual harassment cases beginning in 1994 and it has produced a confusing and often counterintuitive jurisprudence in the decade that followed. Although courts initially applied the revised rule in a way that often made it impossible for a defendant to make use of the "welcomeness" defense in a sexual harassment case, some courts more recently have taken a more sensible view. |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_reports_194222501</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>846306001</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p96t-3c8737563bb5982f74919f8c76174605c47d3ae4fbe74e7168124cd123bb18883</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotjrsKwjAUQDMoWKubH1Anp0Jezb0ZS_EFBQe7l6ZNBi20Nin4-Qo6nekczoJElGpMETWuyNr7B6VMSFAR2ZU2HHxSNf0zyc0wh-Ru3xuydE3v7fbPmFSnY1Vc0vJ2vhZ5mY5ahVS0CAIyJYzJNHIHUjPtsAXFQCqatRI60VjpjAVpgSlkXLYd41-BIaKIyf6XHafhNVsf6smOwxR8zbTknGffyQ8gZzFG</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>194222501</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Let's Talk About Sex</title><source>Business Source Complete</source><creator>McDonald, James J</creator><creatorcontrib>McDonald, James J</creatorcontrib><description>If one views the purpose of a court or jury trial to be to determine the truth, one might assume that the plaintiffs contributions to the workplace atmosphere should be taken fully into account in the course of ascertaining whether a sexually hostile and offensive working environment existed. But a substantial barrier has been erected in the path toward the search for the truth, however, in the form of the revised Rule 412 of the Federal Rules of Evidence. An extension of the "rape shield" rule that prohibits a criminal defendant in a rape case from attacking the sexual history of the accuser, Rule 412 was applied to sexual harassment cases beginning in 1994 and it has produced a confusing and often counterintuitive jurisprudence in the decade that followed. Although courts initially applied the revised rule in a way that often made it impossible for a defendant to make use of the "welcomeness" defense in a sexual harassment case, some courts more recently have taken a more sensible view.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0098-8898</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ERLJDC</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Aspen Publishers, Inc</publisher><subject>Crime prevention ; Employees ; Federal court decisions ; Federal Rules of Evidence ; Labor law ; Rape ; Right of privacy ; Sex crimes ; Sexual behavior ; Sexual harassment ; Trials ; Victims of crime ; Work environment</subject><ispartof>Employee Relations Law Journal, 2005-07, Vol.31 (1), p.90</ispartof><rights>Copyright Aspen Publishers, Inc. Summer 2005</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>312,776,780,787</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>McDonald, James J</creatorcontrib><title>Let's Talk About Sex</title><title>Employee Relations Law Journal</title><description>If one views the purpose of a court or jury trial to be to determine the truth, one might assume that the plaintiffs contributions to the workplace atmosphere should be taken fully into account in the course of ascertaining whether a sexually hostile and offensive working environment existed. But a substantial barrier has been erected in the path toward the search for the truth, however, in the form of the revised Rule 412 of the Federal Rules of Evidence. An extension of the "rape shield" rule that prohibits a criminal defendant in a rape case from attacking the sexual history of the accuser, Rule 412 was applied to sexual harassment cases beginning in 1994 and it has produced a confusing and often counterintuitive jurisprudence in the decade that followed. Although courts initially applied the revised rule in a way that often made it impossible for a defendant to make use of the "welcomeness" defense in a sexual harassment case, some courts more recently have taken a more sensible view.</description><subject>Crime prevention</subject><subject>Employees</subject><subject>Federal court decisions</subject><subject>Federal Rules of Evidence</subject><subject>Labor law</subject><subject>Rape</subject><subject>Right of privacy</subject><subject>Sex crimes</subject><subject>Sexual behavior</subject><subject>Sexual harassment</subject><subject>Trials</subject><subject>Victims of crime</subject><subject>Work environment</subject><issn>0098-8898</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNotjrsKwjAUQDMoWKubH1Anp0Jezb0ZS_EFBQe7l6ZNBi20Nin4-Qo6nekczoJElGpMETWuyNr7B6VMSFAR2ZU2HHxSNf0zyc0wh-Ru3xuydE3v7fbPmFSnY1Vc0vJ2vhZ5mY5ahVS0CAIyJYzJNHIHUjPtsAXFQCqatRI60VjpjAVpgSlkXLYd41-BIaKIyf6XHafhNVsf6smOwxR8zbTknGffyQ8gZzFG</recordid><startdate>20050701</startdate><enddate>20050701</enddate><creator>McDonald, James J</creator><general>Aspen Publishers, Inc</general><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0F</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20050701</creationdate><title>Let's Talk About Sex</title><author>McDonald, James J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p96t-3c8737563bb5982f74919f8c76174605c47d3ae4fbe74e7168124cd123bb18883</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Crime prevention</topic><topic>Employees</topic><topic>Federal court decisions</topic><topic>Federal Rules of Evidence</topic><topic>Labor law</topic><topic>Rape</topic><topic>Right of privacy</topic><topic>Sex crimes</topic><topic>Sexual behavior</topic><topic>Sexual harassment</topic><topic>Trials</topic><topic>Victims of crime</topic><topic>Work environment</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>McDonald, James J</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Trade & Industry</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Employee Relations Law Journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>McDonald, James J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Let's Talk About Sex</atitle><jtitle>Employee Relations Law Journal</jtitle><date>2005-07-01</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>90</spage><pages>90-</pages><issn>0098-8898</issn><coden>ERLJDC</coden><abstract>If one views the purpose of a court or jury trial to be to determine the truth, one might assume that the plaintiffs contributions to the workplace atmosphere should be taken fully into account in the course of ascertaining whether a sexually hostile and offensive working environment existed. But a substantial barrier has been erected in the path toward the search for the truth, however, in the form of the revised Rule 412 of the Federal Rules of Evidence. An extension of the "rape shield" rule that prohibits a criminal defendant in a rape case from attacking the sexual history of the accuser, Rule 412 was applied to sexual harassment cases beginning in 1994 and it has produced a confusing and often counterintuitive jurisprudence in the decade that followed. Although courts initially applied the revised rule in a way that often made it impossible for a defendant to make use of the "welcomeness" defense in a sexual harassment case, some courts more recently have taken a more sensible view.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Aspen Publishers, Inc</pub></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0098-8898 |
ispartof | Employee Relations Law Journal, 2005-07, Vol.31 (1), p.90 |
issn | 0098-8898 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_reports_194222501 |
source | Business Source Complete |
subjects | Crime prevention Employees Federal court decisions Federal Rules of Evidence Labor law Rape Right of privacy Sex crimes Sexual behavior Sexual harassment Trials Victims of crime Work environment |
title | Let's Talk About Sex |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T17%3A38%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Let's%20Talk%20About%20Sex&rft.jtitle=Employee%20Relations%20Law%20Journal&rft.au=McDonald,%20James%20J&rft.date=2005-07-01&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=90&rft.pages=90-&rft.issn=0098-8898&rft.coden=ERLJDC&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E846306001%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=194222501&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |