Do Economic Profit Companies Walk Their Compensation Talk?

Do Economic Profit Companies Walk Their Compensation Talk?

This article reports the results of an analysis of a matched sample of companies that use economic profit (EP) as part of their criteria for awarding incentive compensation for their Named Executive Officers (NEO) compared with competitor firms that do not (non-EP firms). Companies using EP display...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Compensation and Benefits Review 2016-01, Vol.48 (1-2), p.29-46
Hauptverfasser: Farris, Paul W., Haskins, Mark E., Pfeifer, Phillip E.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Companies
Compensation
Criteria
Economic value added
Executive compensation
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 46
container_issue 1-2
container_start_page 29
container_title Compensation and Benefits Review
container_volume 48
creator Farris, Paul W.
Haskins, Mark E.
Pfeifer, Phillip E.
description This article reports the results of an analysis of a matched sample of companies that use economic profit (EP) as part of their criteria for awarding incentive compensation for their Named Executive Officers (NEO) compared with competitor firms that do not (non-EP firms). Companies using EP display stronger relationships between changes in estimated EP and changes in yearly NEO average total compensation. A number of other financial metrics are compared between the two samples. Interestingly, the within sample, cross-firm analyses show weaker relationships between compensation and estimated EP for EP firms than for non-EP firms. This weaker relationship may be due to an unobservable, underlying factor stimulating a company’s adoption of EP as a criterion for the incentive compensation part of yearly NEO average total compensation.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/0886368717718337
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_reports_1932834640</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_0886368717718337</sage_id><sourcerecordid>1932834640</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c176t-7c1f2e14f6b2708479f80f6776812fe29fb3ca0e2fd6711c045735425d5a58123</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kL1PwzAQxS0EEqWwM0bsAZ8d-xwWhEr5kCrBUMRoua4NKW0c7HTof49DmZC45U7v_d5Jd4ScA70EQLyiSkkuFeYZFOd4QEYgBCu54nhIRoNdDv4xOUlpRXNlbkSu70IxtaENm8YWLzH4pi8mYdOZtnGpeDPrz2L-4Zr4I7o2mb4JbTHP-s0pOfJmndzZbx-T1_vpfPJYzp4fnia3s9ICyr5EC545qLxcMKSqwtor6iWiVMC8Y7VfcGuoY34pEcDSSiAXFRNLYURG-Jhc7Pd2MXxtXep1dF2IfdJQc6Z4JSuaIbqHbAwpRed1F5uNiTsNVA8P0n8flCPlPpLMu9OrsI1tPuN__hv0-mJ0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1932834640</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Do Economic Profit Companies Walk Their Compensation Talk?</title><source>Access via SAGE</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Farris, Paul W. ; Haskins, Mark E. ; Pfeifer, Phillip E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Farris, Paul W. ; Haskins, Mark E. ; Pfeifer, Phillip E.</creatorcontrib><description>This article reports the results of an analysis of a matched sample of companies that use economic profit (EP) as part of their criteria for awarding incentive compensation for their Named Executive Officers (NEO) compared with competitor firms that do not (non-EP firms). Companies using EP display stronger relationships between changes in estimated EP and changes in yearly NEO average total compensation. A number of other financial metrics are compared between the two samples. Interestingly, the within sample, cross-firm analyses show weaker relationships between compensation and estimated EP for EP firms than for non-EP firms. This weaker relationship may be due to an unobservable, underlying factor stimulating a company’s adoption of EP as a criterion for the incentive compensation part of yearly NEO average total compensation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0886-3687</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-3837</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0886368717718337</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Companies ; Compensation ; Criteria ; Economic value added ; Executive compensation</subject><ispartof>Compensation and Benefits Review, 2016-01, Vol.48 (1-2), p.29-46</ispartof><rights>2017 SAGE Publishing</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0886368717718337$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0886368717718337$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>313,315,781,785,792,21821,27866,27926,27927,43623,43624</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Farris, Paul W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haskins, Mark E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pfeifer, Phillip E.</creatorcontrib><title>Do Economic Profit Companies Walk Their Compensation Talk?</title><title>Compensation and Benefits Review</title><description>This article reports the results of an analysis of a matched sample of companies that use economic profit (EP) as part of their criteria for awarding incentive compensation for their Named Executive Officers (NEO) compared with competitor firms that do not (non-EP firms). Companies using EP display stronger relationships between changes in estimated EP and changes in yearly NEO average total compensation. A number of other financial metrics are compared between the two samples. Interestingly, the within sample, cross-firm analyses show weaker relationships between compensation and estimated EP for EP firms than for non-EP firms. This weaker relationship may be due to an unobservable, underlying factor stimulating a company’s adoption of EP as a criterion for the incentive compensation part of yearly NEO average total compensation.</description><subject>Companies</subject><subject>Compensation</subject><subject>Criteria</subject><subject>Economic value added</subject><subject>Executive compensation</subject><issn>0886-3687</issn><issn>1552-3837</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kL1PwzAQxS0EEqWwM0bsAZ8d-xwWhEr5kCrBUMRoua4NKW0c7HTof49DmZC45U7v_d5Jd4ScA70EQLyiSkkuFeYZFOd4QEYgBCu54nhIRoNdDv4xOUlpRXNlbkSu70IxtaENm8YWLzH4pi8mYdOZtnGpeDPrz2L-4Zr4I7o2mb4JbTHP-s0pOfJmndzZbx-T1_vpfPJYzp4fnia3s9ICyr5EC545qLxcMKSqwtor6iWiVMC8Y7VfcGuoY34pEcDSSiAXFRNLYURG-Jhc7Pd2MXxtXep1dF2IfdJQc6Z4JSuaIbqHbAwpRed1F5uNiTsNVA8P0n8flCPlPpLMu9OrsI1tPuN__hv0-mJ0</recordid><startdate>201601</startdate><enddate>201601</enddate><creator>Farris, Paul W.</creator><creator>Haskins, Mark E.</creator><creator>Pfeifer, Phillip E.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>K9.</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201601</creationdate><title>Do Economic Profit Companies Walk Their Compensation Talk?</title><author>Farris, Paul W. ; Haskins, Mark E. ; Pfeifer, Phillip E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c176t-7c1f2e14f6b2708479f80f6776812fe29fb3ca0e2fd6711c045735425d5a58123</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Companies</topic><topic>Compensation</topic><topic>Criteria</topic><topic>Economic value added</topic><topic>Executive compensation</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Farris, Paul W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haskins, Mark E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pfeifer, Phillip E.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><jtitle>Compensation and Benefits Review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Farris, Paul W.</au><au>Haskins, Mark E.</au><au>Pfeifer, Phillip E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Do Economic Profit Companies Walk Their Compensation Talk?</atitle><jtitle>Compensation and Benefits Review</jtitle><date>2016-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>48</volume><issue>1-2</issue><spage>29</spage><epage>46</epage><pages>29-46</pages><issn>0886-3687</issn><eissn>1552-3837</eissn><abstract>This article reports the results of an analysis of a matched sample of companies that use economic profit (EP) as part of their criteria for awarding incentive compensation for their Named Executive Officers (NEO) compared with competitor firms that do not (non-EP firms). Companies using EP display stronger relationships between changes in estimated EP and changes in yearly NEO average total compensation. A number of other financial metrics are compared between the two samples. Interestingly, the within sample, cross-firm analyses show weaker relationships between compensation and estimated EP for EP firms than for non-EP firms. This weaker relationship may be due to an unobservable, underlying factor stimulating a company’s adoption of EP as a criterion for the incentive compensation part of yearly NEO average total compensation.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/0886368717718337</doi><tpages>18</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0886-3687
ispartof Compensation and Benefits Review, 2016-01, Vol.48 (1-2), p.29-46
issn 0886-3687
1552-3837
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_reports_1932834640
source Access via SAGE; PAIS Index; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Companies
Compensation
Criteria
Economic value added
Executive compensation
title Do Economic Profit Companies Walk Their Compensation Talk?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-17T23%3A30%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Do%20Economic%20Profit%20Companies%20Walk%20Their%20Compensation%20Talk?&rft.jtitle=Compensation%20and%20Benefits%20Review&rft.au=Farris,%20Paul%20W.&rft.date=2016-01&rft.volume=48&rft.issue=1-2&rft.spage=29&rft.epage=46&rft.pages=29-46&rft.issn=0886-3687&rft.eissn=1552-3837&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0886368717718337&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1932834640%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1932834640&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0886368717718337&rfr_iscdi=true