Foreign Tax Credits

In CCA 200920051, the IRS reviewed another fact pattern where the foreign entity that is required to pay foreign income tax is not the same foreign entity that earned the income, under US federal income tax principles, on which the tax was imposed. In Guardian Industries, the IRS used the combined i...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International Tax Journal 2009-11, Vol.35 (6), p.11
1. Verfasser: Riedy, James A
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 6
container_start_page 11
container_title International Tax Journal
container_volume 35
creator Riedy, James A
description In CCA 200920051, the IRS reviewed another fact pattern where the foreign entity that is required to pay foreign income tax is not the same foreign entity that earned the income, under US federal income tax principles, on which the tax was imposed. In Guardian Industries, the IRS used the combined income/joint and several liability rule of Reg. §1.901 -2(f)(3) to challenge foreign tax credits separated from income under a foreign consolidated regime. The taxpayer prevailed. The approach of the IRS in Guardian Industries was to argue that GIE and the Luxembourg subsidiaries and several liability for the Luxembourg corporate tax and, accordingly, the tax paid should be allocated among the subsidiaries pursuant to Reg. §1.901-2(f)(3). The trial court in Guardian concluded that GIE and its subsidiaries did not have joint and several liability for the Luxembourg corporate income tax paid by GIE. The appeals court affirmed that finding.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_reports_191680739</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1908533041</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_reports_1916807393</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNrjYOAqLs4yMDAwtrA04WQQdssvSs1Mz1MISaxQcC5KTcksKeZhYE1LzClO5YXS3AyKbq4hzh66BUX5haWpxSXxRakF-UUlxfGGloZmFgbmxpbGxKgBAHoHJGk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>191680739</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Foreign Tax Credits</title><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><source>Business Source Complete</source><creator>Riedy, James A</creator><creatorcontrib>Riedy, James A</creatorcontrib><description>In CCA 200920051, the IRS reviewed another fact pattern where the foreign entity that is required to pay foreign income tax is not the same foreign entity that earned the income, under US federal income tax principles, on which the tax was imposed. In Guardian Industries, the IRS used the combined income/joint and several liability rule of Reg. §1.901 -2(f)(3) to challenge foreign tax credits separated from income under a foreign consolidated regime. The taxpayer prevailed. The approach of the IRS in Guardian Industries was to argue that GIE and the Luxembourg subsidiaries and several liability for the Luxembourg corporate tax and, accordingly, the tax paid should be allocated among the subsidiaries pursuant to Reg. §1.901-2(f)(3). The trial court in Guardian concluded that GIE and its subsidiaries did not have joint and several liability for the Luxembourg corporate income tax paid by GIE. The appeals court affirmed that finding.</description><language>eng</language><publisher>Riverwoods: CCH INCORPORATED</publisher><subject>Brother sister corporations ; Controlled foreign corporations ; Corporate income tax ; Corporate taxes ; Disregarded entities ; Elections ; Federal court decisions ; Foreign tax credits ; Liability ; Tax regulations ; Taxable income ; Taxpayers</subject><ispartof>International Tax Journal, 2009-11, Vol.35 (6), p.11</ispartof><rights>Copyright CCH INCORPORATED Nov/Dec 2009</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>312,780,784,791</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Riedy, James A</creatorcontrib><title>Foreign Tax Credits</title><title>International Tax Journal</title><description>In CCA 200920051, the IRS reviewed another fact pattern where the foreign entity that is required to pay foreign income tax is not the same foreign entity that earned the income, under US federal income tax principles, on which the tax was imposed. In Guardian Industries, the IRS used the combined income/joint and several liability rule of Reg. §1.901 -2(f)(3) to challenge foreign tax credits separated from income under a foreign consolidated regime. The taxpayer prevailed. The approach of the IRS in Guardian Industries was to argue that GIE and the Luxembourg subsidiaries and several liability for the Luxembourg corporate tax and, accordingly, the tax paid should be allocated among the subsidiaries pursuant to Reg. §1.901-2(f)(3). The trial court in Guardian concluded that GIE and its subsidiaries did not have joint and several liability for the Luxembourg corporate income tax paid by GIE. The appeals court affirmed that finding.</description><subject>Brother sister corporations</subject><subject>Controlled foreign corporations</subject><subject>Corporate income tax</subject><subject>Corporate taxes</subject><subject>Disregarded entities</subject><subject>Elections</subject><subject>Federal court decisions</subject><subject>Foreign tax credits</subject><subject>Liability</subject><subject>Tax regulations</subject><subject>Taxable income</subject><subject>Taxpayers</subject><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid/><recordid>eNrjYOAqLs4yMDAwtrA04WQQdssvSs1Mz1MISaxQcC5KTcksKeZhYE1LzClO5YXS3AyKbq4hzh66BUX5haWpxSXxRakF-UUlxfGGloZmFgbmxpbGxKgBAHoHJGk</recordid><startdate>20091101</startdate><enddate>20091101</enddate><creator>Riedy, James A</creator><general>CCH INCORPORATED</general><scope/></search><sort><creationdate>20091101</creationdate><title>Foreign Tax Credits</title><author>Riedy, James A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_reports_1916807393</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Brother sister corporations</topic><topic>Controlled foreign corporations</topic><topic>Corporate income tax</topic><topic>Corporate taxes</topic><topic>Disregarded entities</topic><topic>Elections</topic><topic>Federal court decisions</topic><topic>Foreign tax credits</topic><topic>Liability</topic><topic>Tax regulations</topic><topic>Taxable income</topic><topic>Taxpayers</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Riedy, James A</creatorcontrib><jtitle>International Tax Journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Riedy, James A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Foreign Tax Credits</atitle><jtitle>International Tax Journal</jtitle><date>2009-11-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>11</spage><pages>11-</pages><abstract>In CCA 200920051, the IRS reviewed another fact pattern where the foreign entity that is required to pay foreign income tax is not the same foreign entity that earned the income, under US federal income tax principles, on which the tax was imposed. In Guardian Industries, the IRS used the combined income/joint and several liability rule of Reg. §1.901 -2(f)(3) to challenge foreign tax credits separated from income under a foreign consolidated regime. The taxpayer prevailed. The approach of the IRS in Guardian Industries was to argue that GIE and the Luxembourg subsidiaries and several liability for the Luxembourg corporate tax and, accordingly, the tax paid should be allocated among the subsidiaries pursuant to Reg. §1.901-2(f)(3). The trial court in Guardian concluded that GIE and its subsidiaries did not have joint and several liability for the Luxembourg corporate income tax paid by GIE. The appeals court affirmed that finding.</abstract><cop>Riverwoods</cop><pub>CCH INCORPORATED</pub></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier
ispartof International Tax Journal, 2009-11, Vol.35 (6), p.11
issn
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_reports_191680739
source HeinOnline Law Journal Library; Business Source Complete
subjects Brother sister corporations
Controlled foreign corporations
Corporate income tax
Corporate taxes
Disregarded entities
Elections
Federal court decisions
Foreign tax credits
Liability
Tax regulations
Taxable income
Taxpayers
title Foreign Tax Credits
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T23%3A27%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Foreign%20Tax%20Credits&rft.jtitle=International%20Tax%20Journal&rft.au=Riedy,%20James%20A&rft.date=2009-11-01&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=11&rft.pages=11-&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E1908533041%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=191680739&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true