A Practical Guide to UIFSA
The Uniform Interstate Family Support Act (UIFSA) is the only truly uniform act in family law. Because it is a federally mandated state statute and has recently been revised, all states have the same Act. All U.S. states and territories have adopted the 2008 version. [...]the passage of this current...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Family Advocate 2017-03, Vol.39 (4), p.10-15 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Magazinearticle |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 15 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 10 |
container_title | Family Advocate |
container_volume | 39 |
creator | BOOTH, JOSEPH W. |
description | The Uniform Interstate Family Support Act (UIFSA) is the only truly uniform act in family law. Because it is a federally mandated state statute and has recently been revised, all states have the same Act. All U.S. states and territories have adopted the 2008 version. [...]the passage of this current version of UIFSA, there were three prior versions: 1992, 1996, and 2001. [...]a "support order" is defined as a j udgment, decree, order, decision, or directive, whether temporary, final, or subject to modification, issued in a state or foreign country for the benefit of a child, a spouse, or a former spouse, which provides for monetary support, health care, arrearages, retroactive support, or reimbursement for financial assistance provided to an individual obligee in place of child support. [...]child custody jurisdiction is almost universally controlled by the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act (UCCJEA), which follows the child's location with only some regard to the location of the parents once all have vacated the last state in which a child custody order was issued. The definitive case is Kulko v. Superior Court, 436 U.S. 84 (1978), which mandates personal jurisdiction over the obligor for issuance of support orders. Because of the ongoing nature of child support, there is a likelihood that these orders will need to change as material changes occur for the obligee, obligor, and the beneficiary. International Application A discussion on the international aspects of the new Act and the associated treaty enacting the Hague Convention on the... |
format | Magazinearticle |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_reports_1894905769</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A497177960</galeid><jstor_id>26426783</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>A497177960</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-g1549-e6baca2c7ecf6eda5726804a8289ff29d915eb372054b862e03a872cad47eeb13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpt0E1LAzEQBuAgCtbqHxCERc8rySSbj-NSbC0UFLTgbclmJyVlP2qyPfjvXagXocxhYHjeYZgLMgMOKtecs0syo0zyXDH6dU1uUtpTCsaAmZH7MnuP1o3B2TZbHUOD2Thk2_Xyo7wlV962Ce_--pxsly-fi9d887ZaL8pNvmOFMDnK2joLTqHzEhtbKJCaCqtBG-_BNIYVWHMFtBC1loCUW63A2UYoxJrxOXk87T3E4fuIaawiHoY4poppIwwtlDQTejqhnW2xCr0fxunsLiRXlcIoppSRdFL5GbXDHqNthx59mMb__PMZP1WDXXBnAw-nwD6NQ6wOMXQ2_lQgBUg1vfoXoYBrNg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>magazinearticle</recordtype><pqid>1894905769</pqid></control><display><type>magazinearticle</type><title>A Practical Guide to UIFSA</title><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>BOOTH, JOSEPH W.</creator><creatorcontrib>BOOTH, JOSEPH W.</creatorcontrib><description>The Uniform Interstate Family Support Act (UIFSA) is the only truly uniform act in family law. Because it is a federally mandated state statute and has recently been revised, all states have the same Act. All U.S. states and territories have adopted the 2008 version. [...]the passage of this current version of UIFSA, there were three prior versions: 1992, 1996, and 2001. [...]a "support order" is defined as a j udgment, decree, order, decision, or directive, whether temporary, final, or subject to modification, issued in a state or foreign country for the benefit of a child, a spouse, or a former spouse, which provides for monetary support, health care, arrearages, retroactive support, or reimbursement for financial assistance provided to an individual obligee in place of child support. [...]child custody jurisdiction is almost universally controlled by the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act (UCCJEA), which follows the child's location with only some regard to the location of the parents once all have vacated the last state in which a child custody order was issued. The definitive case is Kulko v. Superior Court, 436 U.S. 84 (1978), which mandates personal jurisdiction over the obligor for issuance of support orders. Because of the ongoing nature of child support, there is a likelihood that these orders will need to change as material changes occur for the obligee, obligor, and the beneficiary. International Application A discussion on the international aspects of the new Act and the associated treaty enacting the Hague Convention on the...</description><identifier>ISSN: 0163-710X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2327-8331</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chicago: American Bar Association Section of Family Law</publisher><subject>Child custody ; Child support ; Enforcement ; Family law ; Federal court decisions ; Jurisdiction ; Law ; Laws, regulations and rules ; Legislation ; Provisions ; State laws ; Support (Domestic relations) ; Tribunals & commissions</subject><ispartof>Family Advocate, 2017-03, Vol.39 (4), p.10-15</ispartof><rights>2017 American Bar Association</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2017 American Bar Association</rights><rights>Copyright American Bar Association Spring 2017</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26426783$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/26426783$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>312,780,784,791,803,58015,58248</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>BOOTH, JOSEPH W.</creatorcontrib><title>A Practical Guide to UIFSA</title><title>Family Advocate</title><description>The Uniform Interstate Family Support Act (UIFSA) is the only truly uniform act in family law. Because it is a federally mandated state statute and has recently been revised, all states have the same Act. All U.S. states and territories have adopted the 2008 version. [...]the passage of this current version of UIFSA, there were three prior versions: 1992, 1996, and 2001. [...]a "support order" is defined as a j udgment, decree, order, decision, or directive, whether temporary, final, or subject to modification, issued in a state or foreign country for the benefit of a child, a spouse, or a former spouse, which provides for monetary support, health care, arrearages, retroactive support, or reimbursement for financial assistance provided to an individual obligee in place of child support. [...]child custody jurisdiction is almost universally controlled by the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act (UCCJEA), which follows the child's location with only some regard to the location of the parents once all have vacated the last state in which a child custody order was issued. The definitive case is Kulko v. Superior Court, 436 U.S. 84 (1978), which mandates personal jurisdiction over the obligor for issuance of support orders. Because of the ongoing nature of child support, there is a likelihood that these orders will need to change as material changes occur for the obligee, obligor, and the beneficiary. International Application A discussion on the international aspects of the new Act and the associated treaty enacting the Hague Convention on the...</description><subject>Child custody</subject><subject>Child support</subject><subject>Enforcement</subject><subject>Family law</subject><subject>Federal court decisions</subject><subject>Jurisdiction</subject><subject>Law</subject><subject>Laws, regulations and rules</subject><subject>Legislation</subject><subject>Provisions</subject><subject>State laws</subject><subject>Support (Domestic relations)</subject><subject>Tribunals & commissions</subject><issn>0163-710X</issn><issn>2327-8331</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>magazinearticle</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>magazinearticle</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNpt0E1LAzEQBuAgCtbqHxCERc8rySSbj-NSbC0UFLTgbclmJyVlP2qyPfjvXagXocxhYHjeYZgLMgMOKtecs0syo0zyXDH6dU1uUtpTCsaAmZH7MnuP1o3B2TZbHUOD2Thk2_Xyo7wlV962Ce_--pxsly-fi9d887ZaL8pNvmOFMDnK2joLTqHzEhtbKJCaCqtBG-_BNIYVWHMFtBC1loCUW63A2UYoxJrxOXk87T3E4fuIaawiHoY4poppIwwtlDQTejqhnW2xCr0fxunsLiRXlcIoppSRdFL5GbXDHqNthx59mMb__PMZP1WDXXBnAw-nwD6NQ6wOMXQ2_lQgBUg1vfoXoYBrNg</recordid><startdate>20170322</startdate><enddate>20170322</enddate><creator>BOOTH, JOSEPH W.</creator><general>American Bar Association Section of Family Law</general><general>American Bar Association</general><scope>ILT</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>883</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0F</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYYUZ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170322</creationdate><title>A Practical Guide to UIFSA</title><author>BOOTH, JOSEPH W.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-g1549-e6baca2c7ecf6eda5726804a8289ff29d915eb372054b862e03a872cad47eeb13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>magazinearticle</rsrctype><prefilter>magazinearticle</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Child custody</topic><topic>Child support</topic><topic>Enforcement</topic><topic>Family law</topic><topic>Federal court decisions</topic><topic>Jurisdiction</topic><topic>Law</topic><topic>Laws, regulations and rules</topic><topic>Legislation</topic><topic>Provisions</topic><topic>State laws</topic><topic>Support (Domestic relations)</topic><topic>Tribunals & commissions</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>BOOTH, JOSEPH W.</creatorcontrib><collection>Gale OneFile: LegalTrac</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Trade & Industry (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Trade & Industry</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Family Advocate</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>BOOTH, JOSEPH W.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Practical Guide to UIFSA</atitle><jtitle>Family Advocate</jtitle><date>2017-03-22</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>39</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>10</spage><epage>15</epage><pages>10-15</pages><issn>0163-710X</issn><eissn>2327-8331</eissn><abstract>The Uniform Interstate Family Support Act (UIFSA) is the only truly uniform act in family law. Because it is a federally mandated state statute and has recently been revised, all states have the same Act. All U.S. states and territories have adopted the 2008 version. [...]the passage of this current version of UIFSA, there were three prior versions: 1992, 1996, and 2001. [...]a "support order" is defined as a j udgment, decree, order, decision, or directive, whether temporary, final, or subject to modification, issued in a state or foreign country for the benefit of a child, a spouse, or a former spouse, which provides for monetary support, health care, arrearages, retroactive support, or reimbursement for financial assistance provided to an individual obligee in place of child support. [...]child custody jurisdiction is almost universally controlled by the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act (UCCJEA), which follows the child's location with only some regard to the location of the parents once all have vacated the last state in which a child custody order was issued. The definitive case is Kulko v. Superior Court, 436 U.S. 84 (1978), which mandates personal jurisdiction over the obligor for issuance of support orders. Because of the ongoing nature of child support, there is a likelihood that these orders will need to change as material changes occur for the obligee, obligor, and the beneficiary. International Application A discussion on the international aspects of the new Act and the associated treaty enacting the Hague Convention on the...</abstract><cop>Chicago</cop><pub>American Bar Association Section of Family Law</pub><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0163-710X |
ispartof | Family Advocate, 2017-03, Vol.39 (4), p.10-15 |
issn | 0163-710X 2327-8331 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_reports_1894905769 |
source | HeinOnline Law Journal Library; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing |
subjects | Child custody Child support Enforcement Family law Federal court decisions Jurisdiction Law Laws, regulations and rules Legislation Provisions State laws Support (Domestic relations) Tribunals & commissions |
title | A Practical Guide to UIFSA |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T12%3A52%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Practical%20Guide%20to%20UIFSA&rft.jtitle=Family%20Advocate&rft.au=BOOTH,%20JOSEPH%20W.&rft.date=2017-03-22&rft.volume=39&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=10&rft.epage=15&rft.pages=10-15&rft.issn=0163-710X&rft.eissn=2327-8331&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA497177960%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1894905769&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A497177960&rft_jstor_id=26426783&rfr_iscdi=true |