Morrisey Hopes Trump Seeks Broad Rollback Of EPA Power Plant GHG Rules

West Virginia Attorney General (AG) Patrick Morrisey (R), one of the most ardent critics of EPA's power plant greenhouse gas (GHG) rules, hopes that an executive order President Donald Trump is slated to sign will seek a broad rollback of the agency's rules for both new and existing source...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Inside EPA's Clean Air Report 2017-03, Vol.28 (5), p.33-34
1. Verfasser: Smith, Abby
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 34
container_issue 5
container_start_page 33
container_title Inside EPA's Clean Air Report
container_volume 28
creator Smith, Abby
description West Virginia Attorney General (AG) Patrick Morrisey (R), one of the most ardent critics of EPA's power plant greenhouse gas (GHG) rules, hopes that an executive order President Donald Trump is slated to sign will seek a broad rollback of the agency's rules for both new and existing sources, suggesting some uncertainty about the scope of the order. The Trump administration has not been as vocal about its plans for the NSPS and has not yet indicated it would change course in the pending litigation over that rule, which is slated to go to oral argument in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit in April. [...]they could be considering whether to bar the use of section 111 -- the section of the Clean Air Act EPA used to write the rules -- as a means of addressing GHGs, or they could be considering whether to try to narrow the CPP's scope to actions inside the fenceline of coal-fired power plants rather than including electricity system-wide options like generation shifting to gas and renewables as the Obama EPA did. [...]Bloomberg Government notes that if the administration decides not to regulate GHGs, it could create tort liability for power plant operators given Supreme Court precedent in American Electric Power (AEP) v. Connecticut that held there is a private right of action over GHG emissions absent EPA regulation. [...]nervous coal plant owners may wonder, could they then face private lawsuits because EPA action is foreclosed?" the article says...
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_reports_1875074899</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>48534713</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>48534713</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-j499-97db0091eff3380f4e1bc393158299193cae6ffaef0a68b7e8a94f3bfc5de4fb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotzE9LwzAYgPEcFJzTjyAE74VkSfPnOMfWCpOV2XtJ2veFdZ2pSYvs2yvM03P58dyRxYormWkj1AN5TKlnTHGp2ILsPkKMpwRXWoYREq3jfBnpJ8A50bcYXEePYRi8a8_0gHRbrWkVfiDSanBfEy3Kgh7nAdITuUc3JHj-75LUu229KbP9oXjfrPdZL63NrO48Y5YDohCGoQTuW2EFz83KWm5F60AhOkDmlPEajLMShcc270CiF0vyetuOMXzPkKYmwhjilBpudM60NNb-oZcb6tMUYjPG08XFayNNLqTmQvwCvWhOgw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1875074899</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Morrisey Hopes Trump Seeks Broad Rollback Of EPA Power Plant GHG Rules</title><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>Smith, Abby</creator><creatorcontrib>Smith, Abby</creatorcontrib><description>West Virginia Attorney General (AG) Patrick Morrisey (R), one of the most ardent critics of EPA's power plant greenhouse gas (GHG) rules, hopes that an executive order President Donald Trump is slated to sign will seek a broad rollback of the agency's rules for both new and existing sources, suggesting some uncertainty about the scope of the order. The Trump administration has not been as vocal about its plans for the NSPS and has not yet indicated it would change course in the pending litigation over that rule, which is slated to go to oral argument in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit in April. [...]they could be considering whether to bar the use of section 111 -- the section of the Clean Air Act EPA used to write the rules -- as a means of addressing GHGs, or they could be considering whether to try to narrow the CPP's scope to actions inside the fenceline of coal-fired power plants rather than including electricity system-wide options like generation shifting to gas and renewables as the Obama EPA did. [...]Bloomberg Government notes that if the administration decides not to regulate GHGs, it could create tort liability for power plant operators given Supreme Court precedent in American Electric Power (AEP) v. Connecticut that held there is a private right of action over GHG emissions absent EPA regulation. [...]nervous coal plant owners may wonder, could they then face private lawsuits because EPA action is foreclosed?" the article says...</description><identifier>ISSN: 2164-7836</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Arlington: Inside Washington Publishers</publisher><subject>Air cleanliness ; Climate ESPS ; Coal-fired power plants ; Electricity distribution ; Executive orders ; Federal court decisions ; Litigation ; Regulation ; Trump, Donald J</subject><ispartof>Inside EPA's Clean Air Report, 2017-03, Vol.28 (5), p.33-34</ispartof><rights>Copyright Inside Washington Publishers Mar 9, 2017</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/48534713$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/48534713$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>312,314,780,784,791,803,58016,58249</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Smith, Abby</creatorcontrib><title>Morrisey Hopes Trump Seeks Broad Rollback Of EPA Power Plant GHG Rules</title><title>Inside EPA's Clean Air Report</title><description>West Virginia Attorney General (AG) Patrick Morrisey (R), one of the most ardent critics of EPA's power plant greenhouse gas (GHG) rules, hopes that an executive order President Donald Trump is slated to sign will seek a broad rollback of the agency's rules for both new and existing sources, suggesting some uncertainty about the scope of the order. The Trump administration has not been as vocal about its plans for the NSPS and has not yet indicated it would change course in the pending litigation over that rule, which is slated to go to oral argument in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit in April. [...]they could be considering whether to bar the use of section 111 -- the section of the Clean Air Act EPA used to write the rules -- as a means of addressing GHGs, or they could be considering whether to try to narrow the CPP's scope to actions inside the fenceline of coal-fired power plants rather than including electricity system-wide options like generation shifting to gas and renewables as the Obama EPA did. [...]Bloomberg Government notes that if the administration decides not to regulate GHGs, it could create tort liability for power plant operators given Supreme Court precedent in American Electric Power (AEP) v. Connecticut that held there is a private right of action over GHG emissions absent EPA regulation. [...]nervous coal plant owners may wonder, could they then face private lawsuits because EPA action is foreclosed?" the article says...</description><subject>Air cleanliness</subject><subject>Climate ESPS</subject><subject>Coal-fired power plants</subject><subject>Electricity distribution</subject><subject>Executive orders</subject><subject>Federal court decisions</subject><subject>Litigation</subject><subject>Regulation</subject><subject>Trump, Donald J</subject><issn>2164-7836</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNotzE9LwzAYgPEcFJzTjyAE74VkSfPnOMfWCpOV2XtJ2veFdZ2pSYvs2yvM03P58dyRxYormWkj1AN5TKlnTHGp2ILsPkKMpwRXWoYREq3jfBnpJ8A50bcYXEePYRi8a8_0gHRbrWkVfiDSanBfEy3Kgh7nAdITuUc3JHj-75LUu229KbP9oXjfrPdZL63NrO48Y5YDohCGoQTuW2EFz83KWm5F60AhOkDmlPEajLMShcc270CiF0vyetuOMXzPkKYmwhjilBpudM60NNb-oZcb6tMUYjPG08XFayNNLqTmQvwCvWhOgw</recordid><startdate>20170309</startdate><enddate>20170309</enddate><creator>Smith, Abby</creator><general>Inside Washington Publishers</general><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>883</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>M0F</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>PYYUZ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170309</creationdate><title>Morrisey Hopes Trump Seeks Broad Rollback Of EPA Power Plant GHG Rules</title><author>Smith, Abby</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-j499-97db0091eff3380f4e1bc393158299193cae6ffaef0a68b7e8a94f3bfc5de4fb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Air cleanliness</topic><topic>Climate ESPS</topic><topic>Coal-fired power plants</topic><topic>Electricity distribution</topic><topic>Executive orders</topic><topic>Federal court decisions</topic><topic>Litigation</topic><topic>Regulation</topic><topic>Trump, Donald J</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Smith, Abby</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Trade &amp; Industry (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Trade &amp; Industry</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Inside EPA's Clean Air Report</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Smith, Abby</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Morrisey Hopes Trump Seeks Broad Rollback Of EPA Power Plant GHG Rules</atitle><jtitle>Inside EPA's Clean Air Report</jtitle><date>2017-03-09</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>28</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>33</spage><epage>34</epage><pages>33-34</pages><issn>2164-7836</issn><abstract>West Virginia Attorney General (AG) Patrick Morrisey (R), one of the most ardent critics of EPA's power plant greenhouse gas (GHG) rules, hopes that an executive order President Donald Trump is slated to sign will seek a broad rollback of the agency's rules for both new and existing sources, suggesting some uncertainty about the scope of the order. The Trump administration has not been as vocal about its plans for the NSPS and has not yet indicated it would change course in the pending litigation over that rule, which is slated to go to oral argument in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit in April. [...]they could be considering whether to bar the use of section 111 -- the section of the Clean Air Act EPA used to write the rules -- as a means of addressing GHGs, or they could be considering whether to try to narrow the CPP's scope to actions inside the fenceline of coal-fired power plants rather than including electricity system-wide options like generation shifting to gas and renewables as the Obama EPA did. [...]Bloomberg Government notes that if the administration decides not to regulate GHGs, it could create tort liability for power plant operators given Supreme Court precedent in American Electric Power (AEP) v. Connecticut that held there is a private right of action over GHG emissions absent EPA regulation. [...]nervous coal plant owners may wonder, could they then face private lawsuits because EPA action is foreclosed?" the article says...</abstract><cop>Arlington</cop><pub>Inside Washington Publishers</pub><tpages>2</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2164-7836
ispartof Inside EPA's Clean Air Report, 2017-03, Vol.28 (5), p.33-34
issn 2164-7836
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_reports_1875074899
source JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing
subjects Air cleanliness
Climate ESPS
Coal-fired power plants
Electricity distribution
Executive orders
Federal court decisions
Litigation
Regulation
Trump, Donald J
title Morrisey Hopes Trump Seeks Broad Rollback Of EPA Power Plant GHG Rules
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T04%3A14%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Morrisey%20Hopes%20Trump%20Seeks%20Broad%20Rollback%20Of%20EPA%20Power%20Plant%20GHG%20Rules&rft.jtitle=Inside%20EPA's%20Clean%20Air%20Report&rft.au=Smith,%20Abby&rft.date=2017-03-09&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=33&rft.epage=34&rft.pages=33-34&rft.issn=2164-7836&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E48534713%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1875074899&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=48534713&rfr_iscdi=true