National socioeconomic surveys in forestry: Guidance and survey modules for measuring the multiple roles of forests in household welfare and livelihoods
Forests play important provisioning and supporting roles in the livelihoods of rural households and many of those who live in extreme poverty are to some degree reliant on forests for their livelihood. Products from non-cultivated ecosystems such as natural forests, woodlands, wetlands, lakes, river...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | FAO Forestry Paper 2016 (179), p.I |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Report |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 179 |
container_start_page | I |
container_title | FAO Forestry Paper |
container_volume | |
creator | Bakkegaard, Riyong Kim Agrawal, Arun Animon, Illias Hogarth, Nicholas Miller, Daniel Persha, Lauren Rametsteiner, Ewald Wunder, Sven Zezza, Alberto |
description | Forests play important provisioning and supporting roles in the livelihoods of rural households and many of those who live in extreme poverty are to some degree reliant on forests for their livelihood. Products from non-cultivated ecosystems such as natural forests, woodlands, wetlands, lakes, rivers and grasslands can be a significant income source for rural households, providing energy, food, construction materials and medicines both for subsistence and cash uses. Evidence from seminal studies on the use of these environmental resources, shows that the contribution of forest and other environmental resources to household income accounts is significant. Standard methodologies that could consistently measure the welfare contribution of forests and environment to household income and poverty alleviation could eventually ensure that the true value of forests and other environmental products is captured in a range of standard and important livelihood metrics, such as national poverty measurements and GDP. |
format | Report |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_reports_1872208466</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4317245661</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_reports_18722084663</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNzE1uwjAQhmEvWgnUcocReyQnJSGwrfqz6qp7ZMUTMmjiCR6bipv0uIU2B-jqkz69eu7M3JZVs6qLys7MQvVorS2q9abc1nPz_eESSXAMKi0JthJkoBY0xzNeFChAJxE1xcsO3jJ5F1oEF_xUwCA-M-qtggHd9aVwgNQjDJkTjYwQ5RZIN0m_aC9ZsRf28IXcufhnMp2RqRfx-mjuO8eKi2kfzPL15fP5fTVGOeUrs484Sky6L5pNWdpmXddP_4p-ADvlWqM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>report</recordtype><pqid>1872208466</pqid></control><display><type>report</type><title>National socioeconomic surveys in forestry: Guidance and survey modules for measuring the multiple roles of forests in household welfare and livelihoods</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Bakkegaard, Riyong Kim ; Agrawal, Arun ; Animon, Illias ; Hogarth, Nicholas ; Miller, Daniel ; Persha, Lauren ; Rametsteiner, Ewald ; Wunder, Sven ; Zezza, Alberto</creator><creatorcontrib>Bakkegaard, Riyong Kim ; Agrawal, Arun ; Animon, Illias ; Hogarth, Nicholas ; Miller, Daniel ; Persha, Lauren ; Rametsteiner, Ewald ; Wunder, Sven ; Zezza, Alberto</creatorcontrib><description>Forests play important provisioning and supporting roles in the livelihoods of rural households and many of those who live in extreme poverty are to some degree reliant on forests for their livelihood. Products from non-cultivated ecosystems such as natural forests, woodlands, wetlands, lakes, rivers and grasslands can be a significant income source for rural households, providing energy, food, construction materials and medicines both for subsistence and cash uses. Evidence from seminal studies on the use of these environmental resources, shows that the contribution of forest and other environmental resources to household income accounts is significant. Standard methodologies that could consistently measure the welfare contribution of forests and environment to household income and poverty alleviation could eventually ensure that the true value of forests and other environmental products is captured in a range of standard and important livelihood metrics, such as national poverty measurements and GDP.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0258-6150</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations</publisher><subject>Food ; Forest products ; Forestry ; Households ; Poverty ; Roles ; Rural areas ; Standard of living ; Sustainable development</subject><ispartof>FAO Forestry Paper, 2016 (179), p.I</ispartof><rights>Copyright Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations 2016</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>776,780,4476</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bakkegaard, Riyong Kim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Agrawal, Arun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Animon, Illias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hogarth, Nicholas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miller, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Persha, Lauren</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rametsteiner, Ewald</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wunder, Sven</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zezza, Alberto</creatorcontrib><title>National socioeconomic surveys in forestry: Guidance and survey modules for measuring the multiple roles of forests in household welfare and livelihoods</title><title>FAO Forestry Paper</title><description>Forests play important provisioning and supporting roles in the livelihoods of rural households and many of those who live in extreme poverty are to some degree reliant on forests for their livelihood. Products from non-cultivated ecosystems such as natural forests, woodlands, wetlands, lakes, rivers and grasslands can be a significant income source for rural households, providing energy, food, construction materials and medicines both for subsistence and cash uses. Evidence from seminal studies on the use of these environmental resources, shows that the contribution of forest and other environmental resources to household income accounts is significant. Standard methodologies that could consistently measure the welfare contribution of forests and environment to household income and poverty alleviation could eventually ensure that the true value of forests and other environmental products is captured in a range of standard and important livelihood metrics, such as national poverty measurements and GDP.</description><subject>Food</subject><subject>Forest products</subject><subject>Forestry</subject><subject>Households</subject><subject>Poverty</subject><subject>Roles</subject><subject>Rural areas</subject><subject>Standard of living</subject><subject>Sustainable development</subject><issn>0258-6150</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>report</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>report</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNqNzE1uwjAQhmEvWgnUcocReyQnJSGwrfqz6qp7ZMUTMmjiCR6bipv0uIU2B-jqkz69eu7M3JZVs6qLys7MQvVorS2q9abc1nPz_eESSXAMKi0JthJkoBY0xzNeFChAJxE1xcsO3jJ5F1oEF_xUwCA-M-qtggHd9aVwgNQjDJkTjYwQ5RZIN0m_aC9ZsRf28IXcufhnMp2RqRfx-mjuO8eKi2kfzPL15fP5fTVGOeUrs484Sky6L5pNWdpmXddP_4p-ADvlWqM</recordid><startdate>20160101</startdate><enddate>20160101</enddate><creator>Bakkegaard, Riyong Kim</creator><creator>Agrawal, Arun</creator><creator>Animon, Illias</creator><creator>Hogarth, Nicholas</creator><creator>Miller, Daniel</creator><creator>Persha, Lauren</creator><creator>Rametsteiner, Ewald</creator><creator>Wunder, Sven</creator><creator>Zezza, Alberto</creator><general>Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations</general><scope>0TU</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>883</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>KC~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.~</scope><scope>M0F</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>PYYUZ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160101</creationdate><title>National socioeconomic surveys in forestry: Guidance and survey modules for measuring the multiple roles of forests in household welfare and livelihoods</title><author>Bakkegaard, Riyong Kim ; Agrawal, Arun ; Animon, Illias ; Hogarth, Nicholas ; Miller, Daniel ; Persha, Lauren ; Rametsteiner, Ewald ; Wunder, Sven ; Zezza, Alberto</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_reports_18722084663</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>reports</rsrctype><prefilter>reports</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Food</topic><topic>Forest products</topic><topic>Forestry</topic><topic>Households</topic><topic>Poverty</topic><topic>Roles</topic><topic>Rural areas</topic><topic>Standard of living</topic><topic>Sustainable development</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bakkegaard, Riyong Kim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Agrawal, Arun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Animon, Illias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hogarth, Nicholas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miller, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Persha, Lauren</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rametsteiner, Ewald</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wunder, Sven</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zezza, Alberto</creatorcontrib><collection>Market Research PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI-INFORM Complete</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Trade & Industry (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Research</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Market Research</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Trade & Industry</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bakkegaard, Riyong Kim</au><au>Agrawal, Arun</au><au>Animon, Illias</au><au>Hogarth, Nicholas</au><au>Miller, Daniel</au><au>Persha, Lauren</au><au>Rametsteiner, Ewald</au><au>Wunder, Sven</au><au>Zezza, Alberto</au><format>book</format><genre>unknown</genre><ristype>RPRT</ristype><atitle>National socioeconomic surveys in forestry: Guidance and survey modules for measuring the multiple roles of forests in household welfare and livelihoods</atitle><jtitle>FAO Forestry Paper</jtitle><date>2016-01-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><issue>179</issue><spage>I</spage><pages>I-</pages><issn>0258-6150</issn><abstract>Forests play important provisioning and supporting roles in the livelihoods of rural households and many of those who live in extreme poverty are to some degree reliant on forests for their livelihood. Products from non-cultivated ecosystems such as natural forests, woodlands, wetlands, lakes, rivers and grasslands can be a significant income source for rural households, providing energy, food, construction materials and medicines both for subsistence and cash uses. Evidence from seminal studies on the use of these environmental resources, shows that the contribution of forest and other environmental resources to household income accounts is significant. Standard methodologies that could consistently measure the welfare contribution of forests and environment to household income and poverty alleviation could eventually ensure that the true value of forests and other environmental products is captured in a range of standard and important livelihood metrics, such as national poverty measurements and GDP.</abstract><cop>Rome</cop><pub>Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations</pub></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0258-6150 |
ispartof | FAO Forestry Paper, 2016 (179), p.I |
issn | 0258-6150 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_reports_1872208466 |
source | Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Food Forest products Forestry Households Poverty Roles Rural areas Standard of living Sustainable development |
title | National socioeconomic surveys in forestry: Guidance and survey modules for measuring the multiple roles of forests in household welfare and livelihoods |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T16%3A14%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=unknown&rft.atitle=National%20socioeconomic%20surveys%20in%20forestry:%20Guidance%20and%20survey%20modules%20for%20measuring%20the%20multiple%20roles%20of%20forests%20in%20household%20welfare%20and%20livelihoods&rft.jtitle=FAO%20Forestry%20Paper&rft.au=Bakkegaard,%20Riyong%20Kim&rft.date=2016-01-01&rft.issue=179&rft.spage=I&rft.pages=I-&rft.issn=0258-6150&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E4317245661%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1872208466&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |