THE CURRICULAR CRISIS OF TECHNOLOGY: COMPLEXITIES AND PRACTICALITIES

According to the National Conference of State Legislatures, in "at least" 15 U.S. states now offer "some type of bonus or premium for certain high-demand degrees," where politicians have dismissed liberal arts education as "expendable," a "frivolous luxury" fo...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Antistasis 2016-01, Vol.6 (1), p.3
1. Verfasser: Pinar, William F
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 1
container_start_page 3
container_title Antistasis
container_volume 6
creator Pinar, William F
description According to the National Conference of State Legislatures, in "at least" 15 U.S. states now offer "some type of bonus or premium for certain high-demand degrees," where politicians have dismissed liberal arts education as "expendable," a "frivolous luxury" for which taxpayers should not pay (quoted passages in Cohen 2016, B1). What, Jung and Yang ask, are we trading for technology? Because technology requires us to operate its simplest mechanical operations, it shifts the curriculum from academic knowledge of the material, embodied world to the machines themselves, emphasizing "how" over "what," ensuring that education becomes, as Cameron Duncan and Mathew Kruger-Ross point out, "analogous to job training."
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_reports_1788509960</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4054361851</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_reports_17885099603</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNik8LgjAcQEcUJOV3GN2Fzf_rNn7OHCwnc0KdpIMdItCcff8g-gCd3uPxVsijLGRBQmi8_nocpCQLt8h37kEIoTTKQpJ4qLCVwNAZI6FT3GAwspUt1iW2AqpaK326HjHoc6PERVopWszrAjeGg5XA1Tft0eZ-e7rB_3GHDqWwUAXTPL7eg1v6eZjGeXE9zfI8IYylJPpr-gDtTjUW</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1788509960</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>THE CURRICULAR CRISIS OF TECHNOLOGY: COMPLEXITIES AND PRACTICALITIES</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Pinar, William F</creator><creatorcontrib>Pinar, William F</creatorcontrib><description>According to the National Conference of State Legislatures, in "at least" 15 U.S. states now offer "some type of bonus or premium for certain high-demand degrees," where politicians have dismissed liberal arts education as "expendable," a "frivolous luxury" for which taxpayers should not pay (quoted passages in Cohen 2016, B1). What, Jung and Yang ask, are we trading for technology? Because technology requires us to operate its simplest mechanical operations, it shifts the curriculum from academic knowledge of the material, embodied world to the machines themselves, emphasizing "how" over "what," ensuring that education becomes, as Cameron Duncan and Mathew Kruger-Ross point out, "analogous to job training."</description><identifier>ISSN: 1924-6072</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1929-5014</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Fredericton: University of New Brunswick, Faculty of Education</publisher><subject>21st Century Skills ; Academic Achievement ; Bullying ; College Students ; Curriculum Development ; Educational Change ; Educational technology ; Employment ; French Literature ; Higher Education ; Homework ; Internet ; Internet access ; Labor Force ; Library Services ; National Curriculum ; School Buses ; Standardized Tests ; Students ; World Literature</subject><ispartof>Antistasis, 2016-01, Vol.6 (1), p.3</ispartof><rights>Copyright University of New Brunswick, Faculty of Education 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>312,780,784,791</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pinar, William F</creatorcontrib><title>THE CURRICULAR CRISIS OF TECHNOLOGY: COMPLEXITIES AND PRACTICALITIES</title><title>Antistasis</title><description>According to the National Conference of State Legislatures, in "at least" 15 U.S. states now offer "some type of bonus or premium for certain high-demand degrees," where politicians have dismissed liberal arts education as "expendable," a "frivolous luxury" for which taxpayers should not pay (quoted passages in Cohen 2016, B1). What, Jung and Yang ask, are we trading for technology? Because technology requires us to operate its simplest mechanical operations, it shifts the curriculum from academic knowledge of the material, embodied world to the machines themselves, emphasizing "how" over "what," ensuring that education becomes, as Cameron Duncan and Mathew Kruger-Ross point out, "analogous to job training."</description><subject>21st Century Skills</subject><subject>Academic Achievement</subject><subject>Bullying</subject><subject>College Students</subject><subject>Curriculum Development</subject><subject>Educational Change</subject><subject>Educational technology</subject><subject>Employment</subject><subject>French Literature</subject><subject>Higher Education</subject><subject>Homework</subject><subject>Internet</subject><subject>Internet access</subject><subject>Labor Force</subject><subject>Library Services</subject><subject>National Curriculum</subject><subject>School Buses</subject><subject>Standardized Tests</subject><subject>Students</subject><subject>World Literature</subject><issn>1924-6072</issn><issn>1929-5014</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNik8LgjAcQEcUJOV3GN2Fzf_rNn7OHCwnc0KdpIMdItCcff8g-gCd3uPxVsijLGRBQmi8_nocpCQLt8h37kEIoTTKQpJ4qLCVwNAZI6FT3GAwspUt1iW2AqpaK326HjHoc6PERVopWszrAjeGg5XA1Tft0eZ-e7rB_3GHDqWwUAXTPL7eg1v6eZjGeXE9zfI8IYylJPpr-gDtTjUW</recordid><startdate>20160101</startdate><enddate>20160101</enddate><creator>Pinar, William F</creator><general>University of New Brunswick, Faculty of Education</general><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>8A4</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FQ</scope><scope>8FV</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160101</creationdate><title>THE CURRICULAR CRISIS OF TECHNOLOGY: COMPLEXITIES AND PRACTICALITIES</title><author>Pinar, William F</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_reports_17885099603</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>21st Century Skills</topic><topic>Academic Achievement</topic><topic>Bullying</topic><topic>College Students</topic><topic>Curriculum Development</topic><topic>Educational Change</topic><topic>Educational technology</topic><topic>Employment</topic><topic>French Literature</topic><topic>Higher Education</topic><topic>Homework</topic><topic>Internet</topic><topic>Internet access</topic><topic>Labor Force</topic><topic>Library Services</topic><topic>National Curriculum</topic><topic>School Buses</topic><topic>Standardized Tests</topic><topic>Students</topic><topic>World Literature</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pinar, William F</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Education Periodicals</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Canadian Business &amp; Current Affairs Database</collection><collection>Canadian Business &amp; Current Affairs Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Antistasis</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pinar, William F</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>THE CURRICULAR CRISIS OF TECHNOLOGY: COMPLEXITIES AND PRACTICALITIES</atitle><jtitle>Antistasis</jtitle><date>2016-01-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>6</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>3</spage><pages>3-</pages><issn>1924-6072</issn><eissn>1929-5014</eissn><abstract>According to the National Conference of State Legislatures, in "at least" 15 U.S. states now offer "some type of bonus or premium for certain high-demand degrees," where politicians have dismissed liberal arts education as "expendable," a "frivolous luxury" for which taxpayers should not pay (quoted passages in Cohen 2016, B1). What, Jung and Yang ask, are we trading for technology? Because technology requires us to operate its simplest mechanical operations, it shifts the curriculum from academic knowledge of the material, embodied world to the machines themselves, emphasizing "how" over "what," ensuring that education becomes, as Cameron Duncan and Mathew Kruger-Ross point out, "analogous to job training."</abstract><cop>Fredericton</cop><pub>University of New Brunswick, Faculty of Education</pub></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1924-6072
ispartof Antistasis, 2016-01, Vol.6 (1), p.3
issn 1924-6072
1929-5014
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_reports_1788509960
source Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
subjects 21st Century Skills
Academic Achievement
Bullying
College Students
Curriculum Development
Educational Change
Educational technology
Employment
French Literature
Higher Education
Homework
Internet
Internet access
Labor Force
Library Services
National Curriculum
School Buses
Standardized Tests
Students
World Literature
title THE CURRICULAR CRISIS OF TECHNOLOGY: COMPLEXITIES AND PRACTICALITIES
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T04%3A27%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=THE%20CURRICULAR%20CRISIS%20OF%20TECHNOLOGY:%20COMPLEXITIES%20AND%20PRACTICALITIES&rft.jtitle=Antistasis&rft.au=Pinar,%20William%20F&rft.date=2016-01-01&rft.volume=6&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=3&rft.pages=3-&rft.issn=1924-6072&rft.eissn=1929-5014&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E4054361851%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1788509960&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true