THE CURRICULAR CRISIS OF TECHNOLOGY: COMPLEXITIES AND PRACTICALITIES
According to the National Conference of State Legislatures, in "at least" 15 U.S. states now offer "some type of bonus or premium for certain high-demand degrees," where politicians have dismissed liberal arts education as "expendable," a "frivolous luxury" fo...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Antistasis 2016-01, Vol.6 (1), p.3 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 3 |
container_title | Antistasis |
container_volume | 6 |
creator | Pinar, William F |
description | According to the National Conference of State Legislatures, in "at least" 15 U.S. states now offer "some type of bonus or premium for certain high-demand degrees," where politicians have dismissed liberal arts education as "expendable," a "frivolous luxury" for which taxpayers should not pay (quoted passages in Cohen 2016, B1). What, Jung and Yang ask, are we trading for technology? Because technology requires us to operate its simplest mechanical operations, it shifts the curriculum from academic knowledge of the material, embodied world to the machines themselves, emphasizing "how" over "what," ensuring that education becomes, as Cameron Duncan and Mathew Kruger-Ross point out, "analogous to job training." |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_reports_1788509960</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4054361851</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_reports_17885099603</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNik8LgjAcQEcUJOV3GN2Fzf_rNn7OHCwnc0KdpIMdItCcff8g-gCd3uPxVsijLGRBQmi8_nocpCQLt8h37kEIoTTKQpJ4qLCVwNAZI6FT3GAwspUt1iW2AqpaK326HjHoc6PERVopWszrAjeGg5XA1Tft0eZ-e7rB_3GHDqWwUAXTPL7eg1v6eZjGeXE9zfI8IYylJPpr-gDtTjUW</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1788509960</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>THE CURRICULAR CRISIS OF TECHNOLOGY: COMPLEXITIES AND PRACTICALITIES</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Pinar, William F</creator><creatorcontrib>Pinar, William F</creatorcontrib><description>According to the National Conference of State Legislatures, in "at least" 15 U.S. states now offer "some type of bonus or premium for certain high-demand degrees," where politicians have dismissed liberal arts education as "expendable," a "frivolous luxury" for which taxpayers should not pay (quoted passages in Cohen 2016, B1). What, Jung and Yang ask, are we trading for technology? Because technology requires us to operate its simplest mechanical operations, it shifts the curriculum from academic knowledge of the material, embodied world to the machines themselves, emphasizing "how" over "what," ensuring that education becomes, as Cameron Duncan and Mathew Kruger-Ross point out, "analogous to job training."</description><identifier>ISSN: 1924-6072</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1929-5014</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Fredericton: University of New Brunswick, Faculty of Education</publisher><subject>21st Century Skills ; Academic Achievement ; Bullying ; College Students ; Curriculum Development ; Educational Change ; Educational technology ; Employment ; French Literature ; Higher Education ; Homework ; Internet ; Internet access ; Labor Force ; Library Services ; National Curriculum ; School Buses ; Standardized Tests ; Students ; World Literature</subject><ispartof>Antistasis, 2016-01, Vol.6 (1), p.3</ispartof><rights>Copyright University of New Brunswick, Faculty of Education 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>312,780,784,791</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pinar, William F</creatorcontrib><title>THE CURRICULAR CRISIS OF TECHNOLOGY: COMPLEXITIES AND PRACTICALITIES</title><title>Antistasis</title><description>According to the National Conference of State Legislatures, in "at least" 15 U.S. states now offer "some type of bonus or premium for certain high-demand degrees," where politicians have dismissed liberal arts education as "expendable," a "frivolous luxury" for which taxpayers should not pay (quoted passages in Cohen 2016, B1). What, Jung and Yang ask, are we trading for technology? Because technology requires us to operate its simplest mechanical operations, it shifts the curriculum from academic knowledge of the material, embodied world to the machines themselves, emphasizing "how" over "what," ensuring that education becomes, as Cameron Duncan and Mathew Kruger-Ross point out, "analogous to job training."</description><subject>21st Century Skills</subject><subject>Academic Achievement</subject><subject>Bullying</subject><subject>College Students</subject><subject>Curriculum Development</subject><subject>Educational Change</subject><subject>Educational technology</subject><subject>Employment</subject><subject>French Literature</subject><subject>Higher Education</subject><subject>Homework</subject><subject>Internet</subject><subject>Internet access</subject><subject>Labor Force</subject><subject>Library Services</subject><subject>National Curriculum</subject><subject>School Buses</subject><subject>Standardized Tests</subject><subject>Students</subject><subject>World Literature</subject><issn>1924-6072</issn><issn>1929-5014</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNik8LgjAcQEcUJOV3GN2Fzf_rNn7OHCwnc0KdpIMdItCcff8g-gCd3uPxVsijLGRBQmi8_nocpCQLt8h37kEIoTTKQpJ4qLCVwNAZI6FT3GAwspUt1iW2AqpaK326HjHoc6PERVopWszrAjeGg5XA1Tft0eZ-e7rB_3GHDqWwUAXTPL7eg1v6eZjGeXE9zfI8IYylJPpr-gDtTjUW</recordid><startdate>20160101</startdate><enddate>20160101</enddate><creator>Pinar, William F</creator><general>University of New Brunswick, Faculty of Education</general><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>8A4</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FQ</scope><scope>8FV</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160101</creationdate><title>THE CURRICULAR CRISIS OF TECHNOLOGY: COMPLEXITIES AND PRACTICALITIES</title><author>Pinar, William F</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_reports_17885099603</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>21st Century Skills</topic><topic>Academic Achievement</topic><topic>Bullying</topic><topic>College Students</topic><topic>Curriculum Development</topic><topic>Educational Change</topic><topic>Educational technology</topic><topic>Employment</topic><topic>French Literature</topic><topic>Higher Education</topic><topic>Homework</topic><topic>Internet</topic><topic>Internet access</topic><topic>Labor Force</topic><topic>Library Services</topic><topic>National Curriculum</topic><topic>School Buses</topic><topic>Standardized Tests</topic><topic>Students</topic><topic>World Literature</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pinar, William F</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Education Periodicals</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Canadian Business & Current Affairs Database</collection><collection>Canadian Business & Current Affairs Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Antistasis</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pinar, William F</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>THE CURRICULAR CRISIS OF TECHNOLOGY: COMPLEXITIES AND PRACTICALITIES</atitle><jtitle>Antistasis</jtitle><date>2016-01-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>6</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>3</spage><pages>3-</pages><issn>1924-6072</issn><eissn>1929-5014</eissn><abstract>According to the National Conference of State Legislatures, in "at least" 15 U.S. states now offer "some type of bonus or premium for certain high-demand degrees," where politicians have dismissed liberal arts education as "expendable," a "frivolous luxury" for which taxpayers should not pay (quoted passages in Cohen 2016, B1). What, Jung and Yang ask, are we trading for technology? Because technology requires us to operate its simplest mechanical operations, it shifts the curriculum from academic knowledge of the material, embodied world to the machines themselves, emphasizing "how" over "what," ensuring that education becomes, as Cameron Duncan and Mathew Kruger-Ross point out, "analogous to job training."</abstract><cop>Fredericton</cop><pub>University of New Brunswick, Faculty of Education</pub></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1924-6072 |
ispartof | Antistasis, 2016-01, Vol.6 (1), p.3 |
issn | 1924-6072 1929-5014 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_reports_1788509960 |
source | Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals |
subjects | 21st Century Skills Academic Achievement Bullying College Students Curriculum Development Educational Change Educational technology Employment French Literature Higher Education Homework Internet Internet access Labor Force Library Services National Curriculum School Buses Standardized Tests Students World Literature |
title | THE CURRICULAR CRISIS OF TECHNOLOGY: COMPLEXITIES AND PRACTICALITIES |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T04%3A27%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=THE%20CURRICULAR%20CRISIS%20OF%20TECHNOLOGY:%20COMPLEXITIES%20AND%20PRACTICALITIES&rft.jtitle=Antistasis&rft.au=Pinar,%20William%20F&rft.date=2016-01-01&rft.volume=6&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=3&rft.pages=3-&rft.issn=1924-6072&rft.eissn=1929-5014&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E4054361851%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1788509960&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |