Rethinking the Rethinking Negotiation Teaching Series
Rethinking the Rethinking Negotiation Teaching Series Rethinking Negotiation Teaching Edited by Christopher Honeyman, James Cohen, Giuseppe De Palo, Noam Ebner, and Andrew Web Min Lee Reviewed by Robert C. Bordone and Rachel A. Viscomi In 2008, the Hamline University School of Law, in cooperation wi...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Dispute resolution magazine 2014, Vol.20 (4), p.20 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Review |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 4 |
| container_start_page | 20 |
| container_title | Dispute resolution magazine |
| container_volume | 20 |
| creator | Bordone, Robert C Viscomi, Rachel A |
| description | Rethinking the Rethinking Negotiation Teaching Series Rethinking Negotiation Teaching Edited by Christopher Honeyman, James Cohen, Giuseppe De Palo, Noam Ebner, and Andrew Web Min Lee Reviewed by Robert C. Bordone and Rachel A. Viscomi In 2008, the Hamline University School of Law, in cooperation with several ADR organizations,1 convened a global discussion to reassess contemporary negotiation pedagogy and guide its future. [...]it is not the audacious attempt to rethink the field that becomes the defining message of the project, but rather the humility and courage to rethink the rethinking. ? |
| format | Review |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_reports_1778400903</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4009999601</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_reports_17784009033</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpjYeA0NDA31zU2tTTiYOAqLs4yMDAzMDI04GQwDUotycjMy87MS1coyUhVQOL6pabnl2QmlmTm5ymEpCYmZ4AEg1OLMlOLeRhY0xJzilN5oTQ3g5Kba4izh25BUX5haWpxSXxRakF-UUlxvKG5uYWJgYGlgbExUYoAz-4zwQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>review</recordtype><pqid>1778400903</pqid></control><display><type>review</type><title>Rethinking the Rethinking Negotiation Teaching Series</title><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><creator>Bordone, Robert C ; Viscomi, Rachel A</creator><creatorcontrib>Bordone, Robert C ; Viscomi, Rachel A</creatorcontrib><description>Rethinking the Rethinking Negotiation Teaching Series Rethinking Negotiation Teaching Edited by Christopher Honeyman, James Cohen, Giuseppe De Palo, Noam Ebner, and Andrew Web Min Lee Reviewed by Robert C. Bordone and Rachel A. Viscomi In 2008, the Hamline University School of Law, in cooperation with several ADR organizations,1 convened a global discussion to reassess contemporary negotiation pedagogy and guide its future. [...]it is not the audacious attempt to rethink the field that becomes the defining message of the project, but rather the humility and courage to rethink the rethinking. ?</description><identifier>ISSN: 1077-3592</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: American Bar Association</publisher><subject>Classrooms ; Learning ; Teaching</subject><ispartof>Dispute resolution magazine, 2014, Vol.20 (4), p.20</ispartof><rights>Copyright American Bar Association Summer 2014</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>313,780,784,792</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bordone, Robert C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Viscomi, Rachel A</creatorcontrib><title>Rethinking the Rethinking Negotiation Teaching Series</title><title>Dispute resolution magazine</title><description>Rethinking the Rethinking Negotiation Teaching Series Rethinking Negotiation Teaching Edited by Christopher Honeyman, James Cohen, Giuseppe De Palo, Noam Ebner, and Andrew Web Min Lee Reviewed by Robert C. Bordone and Rachel A. Viscomi In 2008, the Hamline University School of Law, in cooperation with several ADR organizations,1 convened a global discussion to reassess contemporary negotiation pedagogy and guide its future. [...]it is not the audacious attempt to rethink the field that becomes the defining message of the project, but rather the humility and courage to rethink the rethinking. ?</description><subject>Classrooms</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Teaching</subject><issn>1077-3592</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>review</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>review</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNpjYeA0NDA31zU2tTTiYOAqLs4yMDAzMDI04GQwDUotycjMy87MS1coyUhVQOL6pabnl2QmlmTm5ymEpCYmZ4AEg1OLMlOLeRhY0xJzilN5oTQ3g5Kba4izh25BUX5haWpxSXxRakF-UUlxvKG5uYWJgYGlgbExUYoAz-4zwQ</recordid><startdate>20140701</startdate><enddate>20140701</enddate><creator>Bordone, Robert C</creator><creator>Viscomi, Rachel A</creator><general>American Bar Association</general><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140701</creationdate><title>Rethinking the Rethinking Negotiation Teaching Series</title><author>Bordone, Robert C ; Viscomi, Rachel A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_reports_17784009033</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>reviews</rsrctype><prefilter>reviews</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Classrooms</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Teaching</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bordone, Robert C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Viscomi, Rachel A</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bordone, Robert C</au><au>Viscomi, Rachel A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>GEN</ristype><atitle>Rethinking the Rethinking Negotiation Teaching Series</atitle><jtitle>Dispute resolution magazine</jtitle><date>2014-07-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>20</spage><pages>20-</pages><issn>1077-3592</issn><abstract>Rethinking the Rethinking Negotiation Teaching Series Rethinking Negotiation Teaching Edited by Christopher Honeyman, James Cohen, Giuseppe De Palo, Noam Ebner, and Andrew Web Min Lee Reviewed by Robert C. Bordone and Rachel A. Viscomi In 2008, the Hamline University School of Law, in cooperation with several ADR organizations,1 convened a global discussion to reassess contemporary negotiation pedagogy and guide its future. [...]it is not the audacious attempt to rethink the field that becomes the defining message of the project, but rather the humility and courage to rethink the rethinking. ?</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>American Bar Association</pub></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1077-3592 |
| ispartof | Dispute resolution magazine, 2014, Vol.20 (4), p.20 |
| issn | 1077-3592 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_reports_1778400903 |
| source | HeinOnline Law Journal Library |
| subjects | Classrooms Learning Teaching |
| title | Rethinking the Rethinking Negotiation Teaching Series |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T15%3A42%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Rethinking%20the%20Rethinking%20Negotiation%20Teaching%20Series&rft.jtitle=Dispute%20resolution%20magazine&rft.au=Bordone,%20Robert%20C&rft.date=2014-07-01&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=20&rft.pages=20-&rft.issn=1077-3592&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E4009999601%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1778400903&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |