What Did You Say?

The World Health Organization published a study in 2012 revealing that the problem has a worldwide presence. That study drew the line for disabling hearing loss at a loss of greater than 40dB (decibels) in the better hearing ear for adults (defined as people over the age of 15). Generally, audiologi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Experience : the Magazine of the Senior Lawyers Division, American Bar Association American Bar Association, 2014-07, Vol.24 (2), p.41
1. Verfasser: Allen, Jeffrey M
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 2
container_start_page 41
container_title Experience : the Magazine of the Senior Lawyers Division, American Bar Association
container_volume 24
creator Allen, Jeffrey M
description The World Health Organization published a study in 2012 revealing that the problem has a worldwide presence. That study drew the line for disabling hearing loss at a loss of greater than 40dB (decibels) in the better hearing ear for adults (defined as people over the age of 15). Generally, audiologists consider a loss of up to 25dB as "normal," a loss of 26-40dB as a "mild" hearing loss, 41-55dB as a "moderate" loss, 56-70dB as "moderately severe," 71-90dB as "severe," and over 90dB as "profound." Symptomatology of those terms reflects the following deficits: I find it very interesting that so many more people find it a larger psychological hurdle to use an assistive listening device than to use glasses or contact lenses. I use the term "assistive listening devices" to reflect the fact that some, but not all, devices qualify as "hearing aids." Ear trumpets and very large hearing aids have gone the way of the Model T. Assistive listening devices have become very unobtrusive in recent years and, in many cases, almost undetectable, especially when worn with a longer hair style. In talking to audiologists, I have learned anecdotally that the two most popular designs for hearing aids are those that are completely in the ear canal (sometimes referred to as CIC) and those that fit unobtrusively behind the ear with a clear plastic and very hard to see tube carrying the sound into the ear. I actually have tried several devices myself and found that I have a personal preference for the behind-the-ear style, as I like the sound quality better. The CIC hearing aids fit in and fill the ear canal, and my impression of the sound quality (at least on the ones that I tried) was that they had an artificiality that I found bothersome and that I did not experience with the behind-the-ear models. I learned from the audiologists I spoke with that my reaction likely results from the fact that the behind-the-ear devices leave the ear canal open, allowing a combination of amplified sound and natural (unamplified) sound blending together, while with the CIC versions, the sound largely comes through the CIC hearing aid. The audiologists I talked to told me that for people with moderate hearing loss either style will work, but many individuals prefer the behind-the-ear version, likely for the reasons I expressed. For people with more severe hearing loss, I am informed that the CIC style generally works better. Please note that these are anecdotal generalizations and that you should m
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_reports_1778398056</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4009978021</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_reports_17783980563</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpjYeA0NDA10TU2MTfmYOAqLs4yMDAzMTew4GQQDM9ILFFwyUxRiMwvVQhOrLTnYWBNS8wpTuWF0twMSm6uIc4eugVF-YWlqcUl8UWpBflFJcXxhubmFsaWFgamZsZEKQIAG-AlXA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1778398056</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>What Did You Say?</title><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><creator>Allen, Jeffrey M</creator><creatorcontrib>Allen, Jeffrey M</creatorcontrib><description>The World Health Organization published a study in 2012 revealing that the problem has a worldwide presence. That study drew the line for disabling hearing loss at a loss of greater than 40dB (decibels) in the better hearing ear for adults (defined as people over the age of 15). Generally, audiologists consider a loss of up to 25dB as "normal," a loss of 26-40dB as a "mild" hearing loss, 41-55dB as a "moderate" loss, 56-70dB as "moderately severe," 71-90dB as "severe," and over 90dB as "profound." Symptomatology of those terms reflects the following deficits: I find it very interesting that so many more people find it a larger psychological hurdle to use an assistive listening device than to use glasses or contact lenses. I use the term "assistive listening devices" to reflect the fact that some, but not all, devices qualify as "hearing aids." Ear trumpets and very large hearing aids have gone the way of the Model T. Assistive listening devices have become very unobtrusive in recent years and, in many cases, almost undetectable, especially when worn with a longer hair style. In talking to audiologists, I have learned anecdotally that the two most popular designs for hearing aids are those that are completely in the ear canal (sometimes referred to as CIC) and those that fit unobtrusively behind the ear with a clear plastic and very hard to see tube carrying the sound into the ear. I actually have tried several devices myself and found that I have a personal preference for the behind-the-ear style, as I like the sound quality better. The CIC hearing aids fit in and fill the ear canal, and my impression of the sound quality (at least on the ones that I tried) was that they had an artificiality that I found bothersome and that I did not experience with the behind-the-ear models. I learned from the audiologists I spoke with that my reaction likely results from the fact that the behind-the-ear devices leave the ear canal open, allowing a combination of amplified sound and natural (unamplified) sound blending together, while with the CIC versions, the sound largely comes through the CIC hearing aid. The audiologists I talked to told me that for people with moderate hearing loss either style will work, but many individuals prefer the behind-the-ear version, likely for the reasons I expressed. For people with more severe hearing loss, I am informed that the CIC style generally works better. Please note that these are anecdotal generalizations and that you should make your decision as to the hearing aid style you prefer based on the recommendations of your audiologist after an examination of your particular hearing issues. As a rule, expect that the CIC versions will cost more than the behindthe-ear versions. I also had the opportunity to try out the recently released GN ReSound LiNX behind-the-ear hearing aid. The LiNX has Bluetooth capabilities built into the hearing aid so that it connects to an iPod, iPad, or iPhone, providing the ability to stream audio from the device directly to the hearing aids and giving you the ability to use the hearing aids to answer the telephone. The LiNX proved very comfortable to wear and generated a very high-quality sound. One of the nice things about the LiNX is that the hearing aid program self-adjusted the sound to the environment most of the time. ReSound describes the technology that it uses for the LiNX as "Surround Sound by ReSound," which it reports is based on an evolution of its Binaural Directionality sound system and its Binaural Environmental Optimizer II. It also uses a special compression technology to make higher range sounds more "hearable." Unlike the non-prescription assistive devices that simply amplify the sound, the audiologist can program the LiNX (like other prescription hearing aids) to match the user's hearing needs and profile.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1054-3473</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chicago: American Bar Association</publisher><subject>Age ; Audiology ; Contact lenses ; Hearing aids ; Hearing loss ; Listening ; Older people ; Quality of life ; Social conditions &amp; trends ; Sound</subject><ispartof>Experience : the Magazine of the Senior Lawyers Division, American Bar Association, 2014-07, Vol.24 (2), p.41</ispartof><rights>Copyright American Bar Association Summer 2014</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>312,776,780,787</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Allen, Jeffrey M</creatorcontrib><title>What Did You Say?</title><title>Experience : the Magazine of the Senior Lawyers Division, American Bar Association</title><description>The World Health Organization published a study in 2012 revealing that the problem has a worldwide presence. That study drew the line for disabling hearing loss at a loss of greater than 40dB (decibels) in the better hearing ear for adults (defined as people over the age of 15). Generally, audiologists consider a loss of up to 25dB as "normal," a loss of 26-40dB as a "mild" hearing loss, 41-55dB as a "moderate" loss, 56-70dB as "moderately severe," 71-90dB as "severe," and over 90dB as "profound." Symptomatology of those terms reflects the following deficits: I find it very interesting that so many more people find it a larger psychological hurdle to use an assistive listening device than to use glasses or contact lenses. I use the term "assistive listening devices" to reflect the fact that some, but not all, devices qualify as "hearing aids." Ear trumpets and very large hearing aids have gone the way of the Model T. Assistive listening devices have become very unobtrusive in recent years and, in many cases, almost undetectable, especially when worn with a longer hair style. In talking to audiologists, I have learned anecdotally that the two most popular designs for hearing aids are those that are completely in the ear canal (sometimes referred to as CIC) and those that fit unobtrusively behind the ear with a clear plastic and very hard to see tube carrying the sound into the ear. I actually have tried several devices myself and found that I have a personal preference for the behind-the-ear style, as I like the sound quality better. The CIC hearing aids fit in and fill the ear canal, and my impression of the sound quality (at least on the ones that I tried) was that they had an artificiality that I found bothersome and that I did not experience with the behind-the-ear models. I learned from the audiologists I spoke with that my reaction likely results from the fact that the behind-the-ear devices leave the ear canal open, allowing a combination of amplified sound and natural (unamplified) sound blending together, while with the CIC versions, the sound largely comes through the CIC hearing aid. The audiologists I talked to told me that for people with moderate hearing loss either style will work, but many individuals prefer the behind-the-ear version, likely for the reasons I expressed. For people with more severe hearing loss, I am informed that the CIC style generally works better. Please note that these are anecdotal generalizations and that you should make your decision as to the hearing aid style you prefer based on the recommendations of your audiologist after an examination of your particular hearing issues. As a rule, expect that the CIC versions will cost more than the behindthe-ear versions. I also had the opportunity to try out the recently released GN ReSound LiNX behind-the-ear hearing aid. The LiNX has Bluetooth capabilities built into the hearing aid so that it connects to an iPod, iPad, or iPhone, providing the ability to stream audio from the device directly to the hearing aids and giving you the ability to use the hearing aids to answer the telephone. The LiNX proved very comfortable to wear and generated a very high-quality sound. One of the nice things about the LiNX is that the hearing aid program self-adjusted the sound to the environment most of the time. ReSound describes the technology that it uses for the LiNX as "Surround Sound by ReSound," which it reports is based on an evolution of its Binaural Directionality sound system and its Binaural Environmental Optimizer II. It also uses a special compression technology to make higher range sounds more "hearable." Unlike the non-prescription assistive devices that simply amplify the sound, the audiologist can program the LiNX (like other prescription hearing aids) to match the user's hearing needs and profile.</description><subject>Age</subject><subject>Audiology</subject><subject>Contact lenses</subject><subject>Hearing aids</subject><subject>Hearing loss</subject><subject>Listening</subject><subject>Older people</subject><subject>Quality of life</subject><subject>Social conditions &amp; trends</subject><subject>Sound</subject><issn>1054-3473</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNpjYeA0NDA10TU2MTfmYOAqLs4yMDAzMTew4GQQDM9ILFFwyUxRiMwvVQhOrLTnYWBNS8wpTuWF0twMSm6uIc4eugVF-YWlqcUl8UWpBflFJcXxhubmFsaWFgamZsZEKQIAG-AlXA</recordid><startdate>20140701</startdate><enddate>20140701</enddate><creator>Allen, Jeffrey M</creator><general>American Bar Association</general><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>883</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0F</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYYUZ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140701</creationdate><title>What Did You Say?</title><author>Allen, Jeffrey M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_reports_17783980563</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Age</topic><topic>Audiology</topic><topic>Contact lenses</topic><topic>Hearing aids</topic><topic>Hearing loss</topic><topic>Listening</topic><topic>Older people</topic><topic>Quality of life</topic><topic>Social conditions &amp; trends</topic><topic>Sound</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Allen, Jeffrey M</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Trade &amp; Industry (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Trade &amp; Industry</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Experience : the Magazine of the Senior Lawyers Division, American Bar Association</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Allen, Jeffrey M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>What Did You Say?</atitle><jtitle>Experience : the Magazine of the Senior Lawyers Division, American Bar Association</jtitle><date>2014-07-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>41</spage><pages>41-</pages><issn>1054-3473</issn><abstract>The World Health Organization published a study in 2012 revealing that the problem has a worldwide presence. That study drew the line for disabling hearing loss at a loss of greater than 40dB (decibels) in the better hearing ear for adults (defined as people over the age of 15). Generally, audiologists consider a loss of up to 25dB as "normal," a loss of 26-40dB as a "mild" hearing loss, 41-55dB as a "moderate" loss, 56-70dB as "moderately severe," 71-90dB as "severe," and over 90dB as "profound." Symptomatology of those terms reflects the following deficits: I find it very interesting that so many more people find it a larger psychological hurdle to use an assistive listening device than to use glasses or contact lenses. I use the term "assistive listening devices" to reflect the fact that some, but not all, devices qualify as "hearing aids." Ear trumpets and very large hearing aids have gone the way of the Model T. Assistive listening devices have become very unobtrusive in recent years and, in many cases, almost undetectable, especially when worn with a longer hair style. In talking to audiologists, I have learned anecdotally that the two most popular designs for hearing aids are those that are completely in the ear canal (sometimes referred to as CIC) and those that fit unobtrusively behind the ear with a clear plastic and very hard to see tube carrying the sound into the ear. I actually have tried several devices myself and found that I have a personal preference for the behind-the-ear style, as I like the sound quality better. The CIC hearing aids fit in and fill the ear canal, and my impression of the sound quality (at least on the ones that I tried) was that they had an artificiality that I found bothersome and that I did not experience with the behind-the-ear models. I learned from the audiologists I spoke with that my reaction likely results from the fact that the behind-the-ear devices leave the ear canal open, allowing a combination of amplified sound and natural (unamplified) sound blending together, while with the CIC versions, the sound largely comes through the CIC hearing aid. The audiologists I talked to told me that for people with moderate hearing loss either style will work, but many individuals prefer the behind-the-ear version, likely for the reasons I expressed. For people with more severe hearing loss, I am informed that the CIC style generally works better. Please note that these are anecdotal generalizations and that you should make your decision as to the hearing aid style you prefer based on the recommendations of your audiologist after an examination of your particular hearing issues. As a rule, expect that the CIC versions will cost more than the behindthe-ear versions. I also had the opportunity to try out the recently released GN ReSound LiNX behind-the-ear hearing aid. The LiNX has Bluetooth capabilities built into the hearing aid so that it connects to an iPod, iPad, or iPhone, providing the ability to stream audio from the device directly to the hearing aids and giving you the ability to use the hearing aids to answer the telephone. The LiNX proved very comfortable to wear and generated a very high-quality sound. One of the nice things about the LiNX is that the hearing aid program self-adjusted the sound to the environment most of the time. ReSound describes the technology that it uses for the LiNX as "Surround Sound by ReSound," which it reports is based on an evolution of its Binaural Directionality sound system and its Binaural Environmental Optimizer II. It also uses a special compression technology to make higher range sounds more "hearable." Unlike the non-prescription assistive devices that simply amplify the sound, the audiologist can program the LiNX (like other prescription hearing aids) to match the user's hearing needs and profile.</abstract><cop>Chicago</cop><pub>American Bar Association</pub></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1054-3473
ispartof Experience : the Magazine of the Senior Lawyers Division, American Bar Association, 2014-07, Vol.24 (2), p.41
issn 1054-3473
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_reports_1778398056
source HeinOnline Law Journal Library
subjects Age
Audiology
Contact lenses
Hearing aids
Hearing loss
Listening
Older people
Quality of life
Social conditions & trends
Sound
title What Did You Say?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-26T13%3A20%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=What%20Did%20You%20Say?&rft.jtitle=Experience%20:%20the%20Magazine%20of%20the%20Senior%20Lawyers%20Division,%20American%20Bar%20Association&rft.au=Allen,%20Jeffrey%20M&rft.date=2014-07-01&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=41&rft.pages=41-&rft.issn=1054-3473&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E4009978021%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1778398056&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true