A comparison of spring- and fall-calving beef herds grazing tall fescue
Nineteen years of beef cow herd records were obtained from the Research and Education Center at Ames Plantation, near Grand Junction, Tennessee. The cow herds were under the same management, and all cows were strictly culled for reproductive failure, age, and low performance of their calves. The cow...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Professional Animal Scientist 2013-04, Vol.29 (2), p.172-178 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 178 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 172 |
container_title | Professional Animal Scientist |
container_volume | 29 |
creator | Campbell, B.T. Backus, W.M. Dixon, C.M. Carlisle, R.J. Waller, J.C. |
description | Nineteen years of beef cow herd records were obtained from the Research and Education Center at Ames Plantation, near Grand Junction, Tennessee. The cow herds were under the same management, and all cows were strictly culled for reproductive failure, age, and low performance of their calves. The cows primarily grazed tall fescue (Lolium arundinaceum Schreb.) with the wild-type endophyte (Neotyphodium coenophialum) that is known to cause the symptoms of tall fescue toxicosis. For 19yr the total number of cows and calves were 478 and 1,534 for the spring-calving herds and 474 and 1,727 for the fall-calving herds, respectively. Phenotypic parameters were days to first calf, calving interval, number of calves born, birth BW, weaning weight (WW), adjusted 205-d WW, ADG from birth to weaning, and weight/day of age. The data were analyzed from a historical standpoint using herd as a fixed effect and years as replicates. Heifers in the spring-calving herd averaged 27 d older (P < 0.0001) at calving than the fall-calving heifers. The spring-calving herd had a shorter calving interval (P < 0.05) and produced fewer calves per cow (P < 0.05). Although calves born in the spring and fall herd had similar birth BW (P = 0.751), the calves born in the spring had a higher ADG and higher 205-d WW than did those born in the fall. Even though the spring-born calves gained faster and had higher 205-d WW, the fall-calving herd increased the income of the farm because of greater number of calves and reduced need for replacement heifers. |
doi_str_mv | 10.15232/S1080-7446(15)30216-3 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_reports_1752581935</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1080744615302163</els_id><sourcerecordid>3908377151</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c281t-797cb0f812c3c9c72b151ba397c99b47d57275b68a3b8e5f20e6d70da5e53b373</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkEFLAzEQhYMoWKt_QYInPUQzyWaze7OIVqHgQQVvIcnO1pV2d022Bf31pq1e9TTDe98MvEfIKfBLUEKKqyfgBWc6y_JzUBeSC8iZ3COj5ComoXjdT_svckiOYnznCRKlHpHphPpu2dvQxK6lXU1jH5p2zqhtK1rbxYJ5u1gnhTrEmr5hqCKdB_u1kYbk0xqjX-ExOUh0xJOfOSYvd7fPN_ds9jh9uJnMmBcFDEyX2jteFyC89KXXwoECZ2WSy9JlulJaaOXywkpXoKoFx7zSvLIKlXRSyzE52_3tQ_exwjiYgH0XhmhAp7gFlFL9BcmszCHTIBOU7yAfuhgD1iYlX9rwaYCbbbFmW6zZtJYEsy3WbA6vd4eYcq4bDCb6BluPVRPQD6bqmv9efAMw5H2r</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1349614713</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A comparison of spring- and fall-calving beef herds grazing tall fescue</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Campbell, B.T. ; Backus, W.M. ; Dixon, C.M. ; Carlisle, R.J. ; Waller, J.C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Campbell, B.T. ; Backus, W.M. ; Dixon, C.M. ; Carlisle, R.J. ; Waller, J.C.</creatorcontrib><description>Nineteen years of beef cow herd records were obtained from the Research and Education Center at Ames Plantation, near Grand Junction, Tennessee. The cow herds were under the same management, and all cows were strictly culled for reproductive failure, age, and low performance of their calves. The cows primarily grazed tall fescue (Lolium arundinaceum Schreb.) with the wild-type endophyte (Neotyphodium coenophialum) that is known to cause the symptoms of tall fescue toxicosis. For 19yr the total number of cows and calves were 478 and 1,534 for the spring-calving herds and 474 and 1,727 for the fall-calving herds, respectively. Phenotypic parameters were days to first calf, calving interval, number of calves born, birth BW, weaning weight (WW), adjusted 205-d WW, ADG from birth to weaning, and weight/day of age. The data were analyzed from a historical standpoint using herd as a fixed effect and years as replicates. Heifers in the spring-calving herd averaged 27 d older (P < 0.0001) at calving than the fall-calving heifers. The spring-calving herd had a shorter calving interval (P < 0.05) and produced fewer calves per cow (P < 0.05). Although calves born in the spring and fall herd had similar birth BW (P = 0.751), the calves born in the spring had a higher ADG and higher 205-d WW than did those born in the fall. Even though the spring-born calves gained faster and had higher 205-d WW, the fall-calving herd increased the income of the farm because of greater number of calves and reduced need for replacement heifers.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1080-7446</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1525-318X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.15232/S1080-7446(15)30216-3</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Champaign: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Age ; beef ; calving ; Cattle ; Cost control ; fall ; fescue ; Genetic diversity ; Seasons ; spring ; Weaning ; Winter</subject><ispartof>Professional Animal Scientist, 2013-04, Vol.29 (2), p.172-178</ispartof><rights>2013 American Registry of Professional Animal Scientists</rights><rights>Copyright American Registry of Professional Animal Scientists Apr 2013</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c281t-797cb0f812c3c9c72b151ba397c99b47d57275b68a3b8e5f20e6d70da5e53b373</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c281t-797cb0f812c3c9c72b151ba397c99b47d57275b68a3b8e5f20e6d70da5e53b373</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>312,314,776,780,787,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Campbell, B.T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Backus, W.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dixon, C.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carlisle, R.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Waller, J.C.</creatorcontrib><title>A comparison of spring- and fall-calving beef herds grazing tall fescue</title><title>Professional Animal Scientist</title><description>Nineteen years of beef cow herd records were obtained from the Research and Education Center at Ames Plantation, near Grand Junction, Tennessee. The cow herds were under the same management, and all cows were strictly culled for reproductive failure, age, and low performance of their calves. The cows primarily grazed tall fescue (Lolium arundinaceum Schreb.) with the wild-type endophyte (Neotyphodium coenophialum) that is known to cause the symptoms of tall fescue toxicosis. For 19yr the total number of cows and calves were 478 and 1,534 for the spring-calving herds and 474 and 1,727 for the fall-calving herds, respectively. Phenotypic parameters were days to first calf, calving interval, number of calves born, birth BW, weaning weight (WW), adjusted 205-d WW, ADG from birth to weaning, and weight/day of age. The data were analyzed from a historical standpoint using herd as a fixed effect and years as replicates. Heifers in the spring-calving herd averaged 27 d older (P < 0.0001) at calving than the fall-calving heifers. The spring-calving herd had a shorter calving interval (P < 0.05) and produced fewer calves per cow (P < 0.05). Although calves born in the spring and fall herd had similar birth BW (P = 0.751), the calves born in the spring had a higher ADG and higher 205-d WW than did those born in the fall. Even though the spring-born calves gained faster and had higher 205-d WW, the fall-calving herd increased the income of the farm because of greater number of calves and reduced need for replacement heifers.</description><subject>Age</subject><subject>beef</subject><subject>calving</subject><subject>Cattle</subject><subject>Cost control</subject><subject>fall</subject><subject>fescue</subject><subject>Genetic diversity</subject><subject>Seasons</subject><subject>spring</subject><subject>Weaning</subject><subject>Winter</subject><issn>1080-7446</issn><issn>1525-318X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkEFLAzEQhYMoWKt_QYInPUQzyWaze7OIVqHgQQVvIcnO1pV2d022Bf31pq1e9TTDe98MvEfIKfBLUEKKqyfgBWc6y_JzUBeSC8iZ3COj5ComoXjdT_svckiOYnznCRKlHpHphPpu2dvQxK6lXU1jH5p2zqhtK1rbxYJ5u1gnhTrEmr5hqCKdB_u1kYbk0xqjX-ExOUh0xJOfOSYvd7fPN_ds9jh9uJnMmBcFDEyX2jteFyC89KXXwoECZ2WSy9JlulJaaOXywkpXoKoFx7zSvLIKlXRSyzE52_3tQ_exwjiYgH0XhmhAp7gFlFL9BcmszCHTIBOU7yAfuhgD1iYlX9rwaYCbbbFmW6zZtJYEsy3WbA6vd4eYcq4bDCb6BluPVRPQD6bqmv9efAMw5H2r</recordid><startdate>201304</startdate><enddate>201304</enddate><creator>Campbell, B.T.</creator><creator>Backus, W.M.</creator><creator>Dixon, C.M.</creator><creator>Carlisle, R.J.</creator><creator>Waller, J.C.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>American Registry of Professional Animal Scientists</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201304</creationdate><title>A comparison of spring- and fall-calving beef herds grazing tall fescue</title><author>Campbell, B.T. ; Backus, W.M. ; Dixon, C.M. ; Carlisle, R.J. ; Waller, J.C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c281t-797cb0f812c3c9c72b151ba397c99b47d57275b68a3b8e5f20e6d70da5e53b373</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Age</topic><topic>beef</topic><topic>calving</topic><topic>Cattle</topic><topic>Cost control</topic><topic>fall</topic><topic>fescue</topic><topic>Genetic diversity</topic><topic>Seasons</topic><topic>spring</topic><topic>Weaning</topic><topic>Winter</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Campbell, B.T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Backus, W.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dixon, C.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carlisle, R.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Waller, J.C.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Professional Animal Scientist</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Campbell, B.T.</au><au>Backus, W.M.</au><au>Dixon, C.M.</au><au>Carlisle, R.J.</au><au>Waller, J.C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A comparison of spring- and fall-calving beef herds grazing tall fescue</atitle><jtitle>Professional Animal Scientist</jtitle><date>2013-04</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>172</spage><epage>178</epage><pages>172-178</pages><issn>1080-7446</issn><eissn>1525-318X</eissn><abstract>Nineteen years of beef cow herd records were obtained from the Research and Education Center at Ames Plantation, near Grand Junction, Tennessee. The cow herds were under the same management, and all cows were strictly culled for reproductive failure, age, and low performance of their calves. The cows primarily grazed tall fescue (Lolium arundinaceum Schreb.) with the wild-type endophyte (Neotyphodium coenophialum) that is known to cause the symptoms of tall fescue toxicosis. For 19yr the total number of cows and calves were 478 and 1,534 for the spring-calving herds and 474 and 1,727 for the fall-calving herds, respectively. Phenotypic parameters were days to first calf, calving interval, number of calves born, birth BW, weaning weight (WW), adjusted 205-d WW, ADG from birth to weaning, and weight/day of age. The data were analyzed from a historical standpoint using herd as a fixed effect and years as replicates. Heifers in the spring-calving herd averaged 27 d older (P < 0.0001) at calving than the fall-calving heifers. The spring-calving herd had a shorter calving interval (P < 0.05) and produced fewer calves per cow (P < 0.05). Although calves born in the spring and fall herd had similar birth BW (P = 0.751), the calves born in the spring had a higher ADG and higher 205-d WW than did those born in the fall. Even though the spring-born calves gained faster and had higher 205-d WW, the fall-calving herd increased the income of the farm because of greater number of calves and reduced need for replacement heifers.</abstract><cop>Champaign</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><doi>10.15232/S1080-7446(15)30216-3</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1080-7446 |
ispartof | Professional Animal Scientist, 2013-04, Vol.29 (2), p.172-178 |
issn | 1080-7446 1525-318X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_reports_1752581935 |
source | Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Age beef calving Cattle Cost control fall fescue Genetic diversity Seasons spring Weaning Winter |
title | A comparison of spring- and fall-calving beef herds grazing tall fescue |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T02%3A49%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20comparison%20of%20spring-%20and%20fall-calving%20beef%20herds%20grazing%20tall%20fescue&rft.jtitle=Professional%20Animal%20Scientist&rft.au=Campbell,%20B.T.&rft.date=2013-04&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=172&rft.epage=178&rft.pages=172-178&rft.issn=1080-7446&rft.eissn=1525-318X&rft_id=info:doi/10.15232/S1080-7446(15)30216-3&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3908377151%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1349614713&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S1080744615302163&rfr_iscdi=true |