A comparison of spring- and fall-calving beef herds grazing tall fescue

Nineteen years of beef cow herd records were obtained from the Research and Education Center at Ames Plantation, near Grand Junction, Tennessee. The cow herds were under the same management, and all cows were strictly culled for reproductive failure, age, and low performance of their calves. The cow...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Professional Animal Scientist 2013-04, Vol.29 (2), p.172-178
Hauptverfasser: Campbell, B.T., Backus, W.M., Dixon, C.M., Carlisle, R.J., Waller, J.C.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 178
container_issue 2
container_start_page 172
container_title Professional Animal Scientist
container_volume 29
creator Campbell, B.T.
Backus, W.M.
Dixon, C.M.
Carlisle, R.J.
Waller, J.C.
description Nineteen years of beef cow herd records were obtained from the Research and Education Center at Ames Plantation, near Grand Junction, Tennessee. The cow herds were under the same management, and all cows were strictly culled for reproductive failure, age, and low performance of their calves. The cows primarily grazed tall fescue (Lolium arundinaceum Schreb.) with the wild-type endophyte (Neotyphodium coenophialum) that is known to cause the symptoms of tall fescue toxicosis. For 19yr the total number of cows and calves were 478 and 1,534 for the spring-calving herds and 474 and 1,727 for the fall-calving herds, respectively. Phenotypic parameters were days to first calf, calving interval, number of calves born, birth BW, weaning weight (WW), adjusted 205-d WW, ADG from birth to weaning, and weight/day of age. The data were analyzed from a historical standpoint using herd as a fixed effect and years as replicates. Heifers in the spring-calving herd averaged 27 d older (P < 0.0001) at calving than the fall-calving heifers. The spring-calving herd had a shorter calving interval (P < 0.05) and produced fewer calves per cow (P < 0.05). Although calves born in the spring and fall herd had similar birth BW (P = 0.751), the calves born in the spring had a higher ADG and higher 205-d WW than did those born in the fall. Even though the spring-born calves gained faster and had higher 205-d WW, the fall-calving herd increased the income of the farm because of greater number of calves and reduced need for replacement heifers.
doi_str_mv 10.15232/S1080-7446(15)30216-3
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_reports_1752581935</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1080744615302163</els_id><sourcerecordid>3908377151</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c281t-797cb0f812c3c9c72b151ba397c99b47d57275b68a3b8e5f20e6d70da5e53b373</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkEFLAzEQhYMoWKt_QYInPUQzyWaze7OIVqHgQQVvIcnO1pV2d022Bf31pq1e9TTDe98MvEfIKfBLUEKKqyfgBWc6y_JzUBeSC8iZ3COj5ComoXjdT_svckiOYnznCRKlHpHphPpu2dvQxK6lXU1jH5p2zqhtK1rbxYJ5u1gnhTrEmr5hqCKdB_u1kYbk0xqjX-ExOUh0xJOfOSYvd7fPN_ds9jh9uJnMmBcFDEyX2jteFyC89KXXwoECZ2WSy9JlulJaaOXywkpXoKoFx7zSvLIKlXRSyzE52_3tQ_exwjiYgH0XhmhAp7gFlFL9BcmszCHTIBOU7yAfuhgD1iYlX9rwaYCbbbFmW6zZtJYEsy3WbA6vd4eYcq4bDCb6BluPVRPQD6bqmv9efAMw5H2r</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1349614713</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A comparison of spring- and fall-calving beef herds grazing tall fescue</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Campbell, B.T. ; Backus, W.M. ; Dixon, C.M. ; Carlisle, R.J. ; Waller, J.C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Campbell, B.T. ; Backus, W.M. ; Dixon, C.M. ; Carlisle, R.J. ; Waller, J.C.</creatorcontrib><description>Nineteen years of beef cow herd records were obtained from the Research and Education Center at Ames Plantation, near Grand Junction, Tennessee. The cow herds were under the same management, and all cows were strictly culled for reproductive failure, age, and low performance of their calves. The cows primarily grazed tall fescue (Lolium arundinaceum Schreb.) with the wild-type endophyte (Neotyphodium coenophialum) that is known to cause the symptoms of tall fescue toxicosis. For 19yr the total number of cows and calves were 478 and 1,534 for the spring-calving herds and 474 and 1,727 for the fall-calving herds, respectively. Phenotypic parameters were days to first calf, calving interval, number of calves born, birth BW, weaning weight (WW), adjusted 205-d WW, ADG from birth to weaning, and weight/day of age. The data were analyzed from a historical standpoint using herd as a fixed effect and years as replicates. Heifers in the spring-calving herd averaged 27 d older (P &lt; 0.0001) at calving than the fall-calving heifers. The spring-calving herd had a shorter calving interval (P &lt; 0.05) and produced fewer calves per cow (P &lt; 0.05). Although calves born in the spring and fall herd had similar birth BW (P = 0.751), the calves born in the spring had a higher ADG and higher 205-d WW than did those born in the fall. Even though the spring-born calves gained faster and had higher 205-d WW, the fall-calving herd increased the income of the farm because of greater number of calves and reduced need for replacement heifers.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1080-7446</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1525-318X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.15232/S1080-7446(15)30216-3</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Champaign: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Age ; beef ; calving ; Cattle ; Cost control ; fall ; fescue ; Genetic diversity ; Seasons ; spring ; Weaning ; Winter</subject><ispartof>Professional Animal Scientist, 2013-04, Vol.29 (2), p.172-178</ispartof><rights>2013 American Registry of Professional Animal Scientists</rights><rights>Copyright American Registry of Professional Animal Scientists Apr 2013</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c281t-797cb0f812c3c9c72b151ba397c99b47d57275b68a3b8e5f20e6d70da5e53b373</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c281t-797cb0f812c3c9c72b151ba397c99b47d57275b68a3b8e5f20e6d70da5e53b373</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>312,314,776,780,787,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Campbell, B.T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Backus, W.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dixon, C.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carlisle, R.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Waller, J.C.</creatorcontrib><title>A comparison of spring- and fall-calving beef herds grazing tall fescue</title><title>Professional Animal Scientist</title><description>Nineteen years of beef cow herd records were obtained from the Research and Education Center at Ames Plantation, near Grand Junction, Tennessee. The cow herds were under the same management, and all cows were strictly culled for reproductive failure, age, and low performance of their calves. The cows primarily grazed tall fescue (Lolium arundinaceum Schreb.) with the wild-type endophyte (Neotyphodium coenophialum) that is known to cause the symptoms of tall fescue toxicosis. For 19yr the total number of cows and calves were 478 and 1,534 for the spring-calving herds and 474 and 1,727 for the fall-calving herds, respectively. Phenotypic parameters were days to first calf, calving interval, number of calves born, birth BW, weaning weight (WW), adjusted 205-d WW, ADG from birth to weaning, and weight/day of age. The data were analyzed from a historical standpoint using herd as a fixed effect and years as replicates. Heifers in the spring-calving herd averaged 27 d older (P &lt; 0.0001) at calving than the fall-calving heifers. The spring-calving herd had a shorter calving interval (P &lt; 0.05) and produced fewer calves per cow (P &lt; 0.05). Although calves born in the spring and fall herd had similar birth BW (P = 0.751), the calves born in the spring had a higher ADG and higher 205-d WW than did those born in the fall. Even though the spring-born calves gained faster and had higher 205-d WW, the fall-calving herd increased the income of the farm because of greater number of calves and reduced need for replacement heifers.</description><subject>Age</subject><subject>beef</subject><subject>calving</subject><subject>Cattle</subject><subject>Cost control</subject><subject>fall</subject><subject>fescue</subject><subject>Genetic diversity</subject><subject>Seasons</subject><subject>spring</subject><subject>Weaning</subject><subject>Winter</subject><issn>1080-7446</issn><issn>1525-318X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkEFLAzEQhYMoWKt_QYInPUQzyWaze7OIVqHgQQVvIcnO1pV2d022Bf31pq1e9TTDe98MvEfIKfBLUEKKqyfgBWc6y_JzUBeSC8iZ3COj5ComoXjdT_svckiOYnznCRKlHpHphPpu2dvQxK6lXU1jH5p2zqhtK1rbxYJ5u1gnhTrEmr5hqCKdB_u1kYbk0xqjX-ExOUh0xJOfOSYvd7fPN_ds9jh9uJnMmBcFDEyX2jteFyC89KXXwoECZ2WSy9JlulJaaOXywkpXoKoFx7zSvLIKlXRSyzE52_3tQ_exwjiYgH0XhmhAp7gFlFL9BcmszCHTIBOU7yAfuhgD1iYlX9rwaYCbbbFmW6zZtJYEsy3WbA6vd4eYcq4bDCb6BluPVRPQD6bqmv9efAMw5H2r</recordid><startdate>201304</startdate><enddate>201304</enddate><creator>Campbell, B.T.</creator><creator>Backus, W.M.</creator><creator>Dixon, C.M.</creator><creator>Carlisle, R.J.</creator><creator>Waller, J.C.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>American Registry of Professional Animal Scientists</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201304</creationdate><title>A comparison of spring- and fall-calving beef herds grazing tall fescue</title><author>Campbell, B.T. ; Backus, W.M. ; Dixon, C.M. ; Carlisle, R.J. ; Waller, J.C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c281t-797cb0f812c3c9c72b151ba397c99b47d57275b68a3b8e5f20e6d70da5e53b373</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Age</topic><topic>beef</topic><topic>calving</topic><topic>Cattle</topic><topic>Cost control</topic><topic>fall</topic><topic>fescue</topic><topic>Genetic diversity</topic><topic>Seasons</topic><topic>spring</topic><topic>Weaning</topic><topic>Winter</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Campbell, B.T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Backus, W.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dixon, C.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carlisle, R.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Waller, J.C.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Professional Animal Scientist</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Campbell, B.T.</au><au>Backus, W.M.</au><au>Dixon, C.M.</au><au>Carlisle, R.J.</au><au>Waller, J.C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A comparison of spring- and fall-calving beef herds grazing tall fescue</atitle><jtitle>Professional Animal Scientist</jtitle><date>2013-04</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>172</spage><epage>178</epage><pages>172-178</pages><issn>1080-7446</issn><eissn>1525-318X</eissn><abstract>Nineteen years of beef cow herd records were obtained from the Research and Education Center at Ames Plantation, near Grand Junction, Tennessee. The cow herds were under the same management, and all cows were strictly culled for reproductive failure, age, and low performance of their calves. The cows primarily grazed tall fescue (Lolium arundinaceum Schreb.) with the wild-type endophyte (Neotyphodium coenophialum) that is known to cause the symptoms of tall fescue toxicosis. For 19yr the total number of cows and calves were 478 and 1,534 for the spring-calving herds and 474 and 1,727 for the fall-calving herds, respectively. Phenotypic parameters were days to first calf, calving interval, number of calves born, birth BW, weaning weight (WW), adjusted 205-d WW, ADG from birth to weaning, and weight/day of age. The data were analyzed from a historical standpoint using herd as a fixed effect and years as replicates. Heifers in the spring-calving herd averaged 27 d older (P &lt; 0.0001) at calving than the fall-calving heifers. The spring-calving herd had a shorter calving interval (P &lt; 0.05) and produced fewer calves per cow (P &lt; 0.05). Although calves born in the spring and fall herd had similar birth BW (P = 0.751), the calves born in the spring had a higher ADG and higher 205-d WW than did those born in the fall. Even though the spring-born calves gained faster and had higher 205-d WW, the fall-calving herd increased the income of the farm because of greater number of calves and reduced need for replacement heifers.</abstract><cop>Champaign</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><doi>10.15232/S1080-7446(15)30216-3</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1080-7446
ispartof Professional Animal Scientist, 2013-04, Vol.29 (2), p.172-178
issn 1080-7446
1525-318X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_reports_1752581935
source Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Age
beef
calving
Cattle
Cost control
fall
fescue
Genetic diversity
Seasons
spring
Weaning
Winter
title A comparison of spring- and fall-calving beef herds grazing tall fescue
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T02%3A49%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20comparison%20of%20spring-%20and%20fall-calving%20beef%20herds%20grazing%20tall%20fescue&rft.jtitle=Professional%20Animal%20Scientist&rft.au=Campbell,%20B.T.&rft.date=2013-04&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=172&rft.epage=178&rft.pages=172-178&rft.issn=1080-7446&rft.eissn=1525-318X&rft_id=info:doi/10.15232/S1080-7446(15)30216-3&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3908377151%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1349614713&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S1080744615302163&rfr_iscdi=true