Use of a pelleted corn-residue complete feed in calf receiving diets 1 1 A contribution of the University of Nebraska Agricultural Research Division, supported in part by funds through the Hatch Act

A receiving experiment compared a complete pelleted feed (PEL) to a mixed receiving diet (CON) on performance and morbidity of newly received calves. The pellets consisted primarily of corn residue and were designed to replace a conventional grain and forage diet, whereas CON consisted of 32% distil...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Professional animal scientist 2015-06, Vol.31 (3), p.201
Hauptverfasser: Peterson, S.J, Nuttelman, B.L, Burken, D.B, Luebbe, M.K, Erickson, G.E, MacDonald, J.C
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 3
container_start_page 201
container_title The Professional animal scientist
container_volume 31
creator Peterson, S.J
Nuttelman, B.L
Burken, D.B
Luebbe, M.K
Erickson, G.E
MacDonald, J.C
description A receiving experiment compared a complete pelleted feed (PEL) to a mixed receiving diet (CON) on performance and morbidity of newly received calves. The pellets consisted primarily of corn residue and were designed to replace a conventional grain and forage diet, whereas CON consisted of 32% distillers grains, 32% dry-rolled corn, 32% alfalfa, and 4% supplement to provide vitamins, minerals, and 150 mg per steer monensin daily. The experiment used crossbred steer calves (n = 1,318; initial BW = 266 ± 1.57 kg) in 2 separate locations (an eastern Nebraska location and a western Nebraska location). Within location, steers were blocked by date received and source, and then assigned randomly to pen. Pens within location were assigned randomly to CON or PEL. A treatment × location interaction was observed for DMI (P = 0.03). At the western Nebraska location, no difference in DMI was observed (5.8 vs. 5.9 kg/d for CON and PEL, respectively; P = 0.46); however, DMI was greater for PEL at the eastern Nebraska location (6.7 vs. 7.0 kg/d for CON and PEL, respectively; P < 0.01). No treatment × location interaction was detected for ADG or G:F (P > 0.18). The PEL decreased ADG and G:F (P < 0.01) compared with the CON. Morbidity did not differ among treatments (P = 0.13). Receiving calves on PEL may have a positive effect on DMI but a negative effect on ADG and G:F when compared with a traditional receiving diet.
doi_str_mv 10.15232/pas.2014-01363
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_reports_1752356059</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3907604341</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_reports_17523560593</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkE1PwzAMhiMEEuPjzNXiTEfSrvs4VnxoJw6ISdymLHXbQEmDnUzaH-R3kQI_APlg-7Xfx5KFuFJyqsq8yG-95mku1SyTqpgXR2KS5DIr1PL1ONVyKbPFbDY_FWfMb1LmKl8tJuJrwwhDAxo89j0GrMEM5DJCtnXE1Hz4UYYG08g6MLpvgNCg3VvXQm0xMKgUVdp1gewuBju4kRk6hI2zeyS24TAqT7gjze8aqpasiX2IpHt4RkZNpoP7xORkvgGO3g8Ufk96TQF2B2iiqzlRaYht90Nf65BslQkX4qTRPePlXz4X148PL3frzNPwGZHDlnAE8lYt0rPKuSxXxb-WvgGKpW9g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1752356059</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Use of a pelleted corn-residue complete feed in calf receiving diets 1 1 A contribution of the University of Nebraska Agricultural Research Division, supported in part by funds through the Hatch Act</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Peterson, S.J ; Nuttelman, B.L ; Burken, D.B ; Luebbe, M.K ; Erickson, G.E ; MacDonald, J.C</creator><creatorcontrib>Peterson, S.J ; Nuttelman, B.L ; Burken, D.B ; Luebbe, M.K ; Erickson, G.E ; MacDonald, J.C</creatorcontrib><description>A receiving experiment compared a complete pelleted feed (PEL) to a mixed receiving diet (CON) on performance and morbidity of newly received calves. The pellets consisted primarily of corn residue and were designed to replace a conventional grain and forage diet, whereas CON consisted of 32% distillers grains, 32% dry-rolled corn, 32% alfalfa, and 4% supplement to provide vitamins, minerals, and 150 mg per steer monensin daily. The experiment used crossbred steer calves (n = 1,318; initial BW = 266 ± 1.57 kg) in 2 separate locations (an eastern Nebraska location and a western Nebraska location). Within location, steers were blocked by date received and source, and then assigned randomly to pen. Pens within location were assigned randomly to CON or PEL. A treatment × location interaction was observed for DMI (P = 0.03). At the western Nebraska location, no difference in DMI was observed (5.8 vs. 5.9 kg/d for CON and PEL, respectively; P = 0.46); however, DMI was greater for PEL at the eastern Nebraska location (6.7 vs. 7.0 kg/d for CON and PEL, respectively; P &lt; 0.01). No treatment × location interaction was detected for ADG or G:F (P &gt; 0.18). The PEL decreased ADG and G:F (P &lt; 0.01) compared with the CON. Morbidity did not differ among treatments (P = 0.13). Receiving calves on PEL may have a positive effect on DMI but a negative effect on ADG and G:F when compared with a traditional receiving diet.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1080-7446</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1525-318X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.15232/pas.2014-01363</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Champaign: American Registry of Professional Animal Scientists</publisher><ispartof>The Professional animal scientist, 2015-06, Vol.31 (3), p.201</ispartof><rights>2015 American Registry of Professional Animal Scientists</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Peterson, S.J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nuttelman, B.L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burken, D.B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luebbe, M.K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Erickson, G.E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MacDonald, J.C</creatorcontrib><title>Use of a pelleted corn-residue complete feed in calf receiving diets 1 1 A contribution of the University of Nebraska Agricultural Research Division, supported in part by funds through the Hatch Act</title><title>The Professional animal scientist</title><description>A receiving experiment compared a complete pelleted feed (PEL) to a mixed receiving diet (CON) on performance and morbidity of newly received calves. The pellets consisted primarily of corn residue and were designed to replace a conventional grain and forage diet, whereas CON consisted of 32% distillers grains, 32% dry-rolled corn, 32% alfalfa, and 4% supplement to provide vitamins, minerals, and 150 mg per steer monensin daily. The experiment used crossbred steer calves (n = 1,318; initial BW = 266 ± 1.57 kg) in 2 separate locations (an eastern Nebraska location and a western Nebraska location). Within location, steers were blocked by date received and source, and then assigned randomly to pen. Pens within location were assigned randomly to CON or PEL. A treatment × location interaction was observed for DMI (P = 0.03). At the western Nebraska location, no difference in DMI was observed (5.8 vs. 5.9 kg/d for CON and PEL, respectively; P = 0.46); however, DMI was greater for PEL at the eastern Nebraska location (6.7 vs. 7.0 kg/d for CON and PEL, respectively; P &lt; 0.01). No treatment × location interaction was detected for ADG or G:F (P &gt; 0.18). The PEL decreased ADG and G:F (P &lt; 0.01) compared with the CON. Morbidity did not differ among treatments (P = 0.13). Receiving calves on PEL may have a positive effect on DMI but a negative effect on ADG and G:F when compared with a traditional receiving diet.</description><issn>1080-7446</issn><issn>1525-318X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkE1PwzAMhiMEEuPjzNXiTEfSrvs4VnxoJw6ISdymLHXbQEmDnUzaH-R3kQI_APlg-7Xfx5KFuFJyqsq8yG-95mku1SyTqpgXR2KS5DIr1PL1ONVyKbPFbDY_FWfMb1LmKl8tJuJrwwhDAxo89j0GrMEM5DJCtnXE1Hz4UYYG08g6MLpvgNCg3VvXQm0xMKgUVdp1gewuBju4kRk6hI2zeyS24TAqT7gjze8aqpasiX2IpHt4RkZNpoP7xORkvgGO3g8Ufk96TQF2B2iiqzlRaYht90Nf65BslQkX4qTRPePlXz4X148PL3frzNPwGZHDlnAE8lYt0rPKuSxXxb-WvgGKpW9g</recordid><startdate>20150601</startdate><enddate>20150601</enddate><creator>Peterson, S.J</creator><creator>Nuttelman, B.L</creator><creator>Burken, D.B</creator><creator>Luebbe, M.K</creator><creator>Erickson, G.E</creator><creator>MacDonald, J.C</creator><general>American Registry of Professional Animal Scientists</general><scope>4T-</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150601</creationdate><title>Use of a pelleted corn-residue complete feed in calf receiving diets 1 1 A contribution of the University of Nebraska Agricultural Research Division, supported in part by funds through the Hatch Act</title><author>Peterson, S.J ; Nuttelman, B.L ; Burken, D.B ; Luebbe, M.K ; Erickson, G.E ; MacDonald, J.C</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_reports_17523560593</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Peterson, S.J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nuttelman, B.L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burken, D.B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luebbe, M.K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Erickson, G.E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MacDonald, J.C</creatorcontrib><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>The Professional animal scientist</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Peterson, S.J</au><au>Nuttelman, B.L</au><au>Burken, D.B</au><au>Luebbe, M.K</au><au>Erickson, G.E</au><au>MacDonald, J.C</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Use of a pelleted corn-residue complete feed in calf receiving diets 1 1 A contribution of the University of Nebraska Agricultural Research Division, supported in part by funds through the Hatch Act</atitle><jtitle>The Professional animal scientist</jtitle><date>2015-06-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>201</spage><pages>201-</pages><issn>1080-7446</issn><eissn>1525-318X</eissn><abstract>A receiving experiment compared a complete pelleted feed (PEL) to a mixed receiving diet (CON) on performance and morbidity of newly received calves. The pellets consisted primarily of corn residue and were designed to replace a conventional grain and forage diet, whereas CON consisted of 32% distillers grains, 32% dry-rolled corn, 32% alfalfa, and 4% supplement to provide vitamins, minerals, and 150 mg per steer monensin daily. The experiment used crossbred steer calves (n = 1,318; initial BW = 266 ± 1.57 kg) in 2 separate locations (an eastern Nebraska location and a western Nebraska location). Within location, steers were blocked by date received and source, and then assigned randomly to pen. Pens within location were assigned randomly to CON or PEL. A treatment × location interaction was observed for DMI (P = 0.03). At the western Nebraska location, no difference in DMI was observed (5.8 vs. 5.9 kg/d for CON and PEL, respectively; P = 0.46); however, DMI was greater for PEL at the eastern Nebraska location (6.7 vs. 7.0 kg/d for CON and PEL, respectively; P &lt; 0.01). No treatment × location interaction was detected for ADG or G:F (P &gt; 0.18). The PEL decreased ADG and G:F (P &lt; 0.01) compared with the CON. Morbidity did not differ among treatments (P = 0.13). Receiving calves on PEL may have a positive effect on DMI but a negative effect on ADG and G:F when compared with a traditional receiving diet.</abstract><cop>Champaign</cop><pub>American Registry of Professional Animal Scientists</pub><doi>10.15232/pas.2014-01363</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1080-7446
ispartof The Professional animal scientist, 2015-06, Vol.31 (3), p.201
issn 1080-7446
1525-318X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_reports_1752356059
source Alma/SFX Local Collection
title Use of a pelleted corn-residue complete feed in calf receiving diets 1 1 A contribution of the University of Nebraska Agricultural Research Division, supported in part by funds through the Hatch Act
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T09%3A32%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Use%20of%20a%20pelleted%20corn-residue%20complete%20feed%20in%20calf%20receiving%20diets%201%201%20A%20contribution%20of%20the%20University%20of%20Nebraska%20Agricultural%20Research%20Division,%20supported%20in%20part%20by%20funds%20through%20the%20Hatch%20Act&rft.jtitle=The%20Professional%20animal%20scientist&rft.au=Peterson,%20S.J&rft.date=2015-06-01&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=201&rft.pages=201-&rft.issn=1080-7446&rft.eissn=1525-318X&rft_id=info:doi/10.15232/pas.2014-01363&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E3907604341%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1752356059&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true