Comparison of Revalor XS, a new single-dose implant, to a Revalor IS and Revalor S implant strategy in finishing steers 1
A commercial feedlot study compared effects of a Revalor IS/Revalor S implant program to a Revalor XS single-implant program on performance and carcass characteristics of feedlot cattle. Yearling crossbred steers (1,356; BW = 313.3 ± 16.0 kg) were used in a randomized complete block designed trial....
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Professional animal scientist 2014-02, Vol.30 (1), p.51 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 51 |
container_title | The Professional animal scientist |
container_volume | 30 |
creator | Nichols, C.A Erickson, G.E Vasconcelos, J.T Streeter, M.N Dicke, B.D Jordon, D.J Cooper, R.J Scott, T.L Klopfenstein, T.J |
description | A commercial feedlot study compared effects of a Revalor IS/Revalor S implant program to a Revalor XS single-implant program on performance and carcass characteristics of feedlot cattle. Yearling crossbred steers (1,356; BW = 313.3 ± 16.0 kg) were used in a randomized complete block designed trial. Pens were assigned randomly to 1 of 2 implant treatments. Cattle on the Revalor IS/Revalor S treatment were reimplanted on d 80 with Revalor S. Diets consisted of 54.9% dry-rolled corn, 35% wet distillers grains plus solubles, 5.5% mixed hay, and 4.6% liquid supplement (DM basis). There were no differences (P = 0.96) in DMI because of treatment. Also, no differences (P > 0.90) in final BW, ADG, or G:F were observed on a carcass-adjusted basis. No differences in final BW, ADG, and G:F (P > 0.50) were observed for live performance. Marbling score, 12th-rib fat thickness, LM area, and YG were unaffected (P > 0.69) by implant strategies. Steers on the Revalor XS treatment had a greater number of Low Choice carcasses (P = 0.01) and a lower number of Select carcasses (P = 0.02) compared with Revalor IS/Revalor S, with 58% of Revalor XS cattle grading Low Choice and 50% of Revalor IS/Revalor S cattle grading Low Choice. Steers on the Revalor XS treatment tended to have a greater (P = 0.11) number of USDA YG 5 carcasses. Steers implanted with Revalor XS performed similar to cattle implanted initially with Revalor IS followed by Revalor S. |
doi_str_mv | 10.15232/S1080-7446(15)30082-6 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_reports_1752356003</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3907604051</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_reports_17523560033</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNj01PAjEQhhujiYj8BTPxpAmFact-eCYSubIcuJEmzELN0q6dquHf24Pr2dM7M8-TSV4hHhTOVKGNnjcKa5TVYlE-qeLZINZalldilGkhjap313kelFtxx_yOqJV-qUbisgzn3kbHwUNoYUNftgsRds0ULHj6Bnb-2JE8BCZw576zPk0hhUwHd92A9Ye_tRk04BRtouMFnIfWecen_CtfiSKDuhc3re2YJr85Fo-r1-3yTfYxfHwSp32kPsTEe1XlmkWJaMy_pB_AF1MZ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1752356003</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of Revalor XS, a new single-dose implant, to a Revalor IS and Revalor S implant strategy in finishing steers 1</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Nichols, C.A ; Erickson, G.E ; Vasconcelos, J.T ; Streeter, M.N ; Dicke, B.D ; Jordon, D.J ; Cooper, R.J ; Scott, T.L ; Klopfenstein, T.J</creator><creatorcontrib>Nichols, C.A ; Erickson, G.E ; Vasconcelos, J.T ; Streeter, M.N ; Dicke, B.D ; Jordon, D.J ; Cooper, R.J ; Scott, T.L ; Klopfenstein, T.J</creatorcontrib><description>A commercial feedlot study compared effects of a Revalor IS/Revalor S implant program to a Revalor XS single-implant program on performance and carcass characteristics of feedlot cattle. Yearling crossbred steers (1,356; BW = 313.3 ± 16.0 kg) were used in a randomized complete block designed trial. Pens were assigned randomly to 1 of 2 implant treatments. Cattle on the Revalor IS/Revalor S treatment were reimplanted on d 80 with Revalor S. Diets consisted of 54.9% dry-rolled corn, 35% wet distillers grains plus solubles, 5.5% mixed hay, and 4.6% liquid supplement (DM basis). There were no differences (P = 0.96) in DMI because of treatment. Also, no differences (P > 0.90) in final BW, ADG, or G:F were observed on a carcass-adjusted basis. No differences in final BW, ADG, and G:F (P > 0.50) were observed for live performance. Marbling score, 12th-rib fat thickness, LM area, and YG were unaffected (P > 0.69) by implant strategies. Steers on the Revalor XS treatment had a greater number of Low Choice carcasses (P = 0.01) and a lower number of Select carcasses (P = 0.02) compared with Revalor IS/Revalor S, with 58% of Revalor XS cattle grading Low Choice and 50% of Revalor IS/Revalor S cattle grading Low Choice. Steers on the Revalor XS treatment tended to have a greater (P = 0.11) number of USDA YG 5 carcasses. Steers implanted with Revalor XS performed similar to cattle implanted initially with Revalor IS followed by Revalor S.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1080-7446</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1525-318X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.15232/S1080-7446(15)30082-6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Champaign: American Registry of Professional Animal Scientists</publisher><ispartof>The Professional animal scientist, 2014-02, Vol.30 (1), p.51</ispartof><rights>2014 American Registry of Professional Animal Scientists</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nichols, C.A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Erickson, G.E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vasconcelos, J.T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Streeter, M.N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dicke, B.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jordon, D.J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cooper, R.J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scott, T.L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klopfenstein, T.J</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of Revalor XS, a new single-dose implant, to a Revalor IS and Revalor S implant strategy in finishing steers 1</title><title>The Professional animal scientist</title><description>A commercial feedlot study compared effects of a Revalor IS/Revalor S implant program to a Revalor XS single-implant program on performance and carcass characteristics of feedlot cattle. Yearling crossbred steers (1,356; BW = 313.3 ± 16.0 kg) were used in a randomized complete block designed trial. Pens were assigned randomly to 1 of 2 implant treatments. Cattle on the Revalor IS/Revalor S treatment were reimplanted on d 80 with Revalor S. Diets consisted of 54.9% dry-rolled corn, 35% wet distillers grains plus solubles, 5.5% mixed hay, and 4.6% liquid supplement (DM basis). There were no differences (P = 0.96) in DMI because of treatment. Also, no differences (P > 0.90) in final BW, ADG, or G:F were observed on a carcass-adjusted basis. No differences in final BW, ADG, and G:F (P > 0.50) were observed for live performance. Marbling score, 12th-rib fat thickness, LM area, and YG were unaffected (P > 0.69) by implant strategies. Steers on the Revalor XS treatment had a greater number of Low Choice carcasses (P = 0.01) and a lower number of Select carcasses (P = 0.02) compared with Revalor IS/Revalor S, with 58% of Revalor XS cattle grading Low Choice and 50% of Revalor IS/Revalor S cattle grading Low Choice. Steers on the Revalor XS treatment tended to have a greater (P = 0.11) number of USDA YG 5 carcasses. Steers implanted with Revalor XS performed similar to cattle implanted initially with Revalor IS followed by Revalor S.</description><issn>1080-7446</issn><issn>1525-318X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNj01PAjEQhhujiYj8BTPxpAmFact-eCYSubIcuJEmzELN0q6dquHf24Pr2dM7M8-TSV4hHhTOVKGNnjcKa5TVYlE-qeLZINZalldilGkhjap313kelFtxx_yOqJV-qUbisgzn3kbHwUNoYUNftgsRds0ULHj6Bnb-2JE8BCZw576zPk0hhUwHd92A9Ye_tRk04BRtouMFnIfWecen_CtfiSKDuhc3re2YJr85Fo-r1-3yTfYxfHwSp32kPsTEe1XlmkWJaMy_pB_AF1MZ</recordid><startdate>20140201</startdate><enddate>20140201</enddate><creator>Nichols, C.A</creator><creator>Erickson, G.E</creator><creator>Vasconcelos, J.T</creator><creator>Streeter, M.N</creator><creator>Dicke, B.D</creator><creator>Jordon, D.J</creator><creator>Cooper, R.J</creator><creator>Scott, T.L</creator><creator>Klopfenstein, T.J</creator><general>American Registry of Professional Animal Scientists</general><scope>4T-</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140201</creationdate><title>Comparison of Revalor XS, a new single-dose implant, to a Revalor IS and Revalor S implant strategy in finishing steers 1</title><author>Nichols, C.A ; Erickson, G.E ; Vasconcelos, J.T ; Streeter, M.N ; Dicke, B.D ; Jordon, D.J ; Cooper, R.J ; Scott, T.L ; Klopfenstein, T.J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_reports_17523560033</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nichols, C.A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Erickson, G.E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vasconcelos, J.T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Streeter, M.N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dicke, B.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jordon, D.J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cooper, R.J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scott, T.L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klopfenstein, T.J</creatorcontrib><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>The Professional animal scientist</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nichols, C.A</au><au>Erickson, G.E</au><au>Vasconcelos, J.T</au><au>Streeter, M.N</au><au>Dicke, B.D</au><au>Jordon, D.J</au><au>Cooper, R.J</au><au>Scott, T.L</au><au>Klopfenstein, T.J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of Revalor XS, a new single-dose implant, to a Revalor IS and Revalor S implant strategy in finishing steers 1</atitle><jtitle>The Professional animal scientist</jtitle><date>2014-02-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>51</spage><pages>51-</pages><issn>1080-7446</issn><eissn>1525-318X</eissn><abstract>A commercial feedlot study compared effects of a Revalor IS/Revalor S implant program to a Revalor XS single-implant program on performance and carcass characteristics of feedlot cattle. Yearling crossbred steers (1,356; BW = 313.3 ± 16.0 kg) were used in a randomized complete block designed trial. Pens were assigned randomly to 1 of 2 implant treatments. Cattle on the Revalor IS/Revalor S treatment were reimplanted on d 80 with Revalor S. Diets consisted of 54.9% dry-rolled corn, 35% wet distillers grains plus solubles, 5.5% mixed hay, and 4.6% liquid supplement (DM basis). There were no differences (P = 0.96) in DMI because of treatment. Also, no differences (P > 0.90) in final BW, ADG, or G:F were observed on a carcass-adjusted basis. No differences in final BW, ADG, and G:F (P > 0.50) were observed for live performance. Marbling score, 12th-rib fat thickness, LM area, and YG were unaffected (P > 0.69) by implant strategies. Steers on the Revalor XS treatment had a greater number of Low Choice carcasses (P = 0.01) and a lower number of Select carcasses (P = 0.02) compared with Revalor IS/Revalor S, with 58% of Revalor XS cattle grading Low Choice and 50% of Revalor IS/Revalor S cattle grading Low Choice. Steers on the Revalor XS treatment tended to have a greater (P = 0.11) number of USDA YG 5 carcasses. Steers implanted with Revalor XS performed similar to cattle implanted initially with Revalor IS followed by Revalor S.</abstract><cop>Champaign</cop><pub>American Registry of Professional Animal Scientists</pub><doi>10.15232/S1080-7446(15)30082-6</doi></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1080-7446 |
ispartof | The Professional animal scientist, 2014-02, Vol.30 (1), p.51 |
issn | 1080-7446 1525-318X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_reports_1752356003 |
source | Alma/SFX Local Collection |
title | Comparison of Revalor XS, a new single-dose implant, to a Revalor IS and Revalor S implant strategy in finishing steers 1 |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-14T17%3A59%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20Revalor%20XS,%20a%20new%20single-dose%20implant,%20to%20a%20Revalor%20IS%20and%20Revalor%20S%20implant%20strategy%20in%20finishing%20steers%201&rft.jtitle=The%20Professional%20animal%20scientist&rft.au=Nichols,%20C.A&rft.date=2014-02-01&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=51&rft.pages=51-&rft.issn=1080-7446&rft.eissn=1525-318X&rft_id=info:doi/10.15232/S1080-7446(15)30082-6&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E3907604051%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1752356003&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |