American military justice: responding to the siren songs for reform
[...]Part VI offers concluding thoughts and a framework for considering the proposed reforms to the military justice system.\n219 The final product was considered a compromise.220 On the one hand, there was concern about the ability of the commander to maintain discipline within the ranks. The propo...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | The Air Force Law Review 2015-06, Vol.73, p.193 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | |
|---|---|
| container_issue | |
| container_start_page | 193 |
| container_title | The Air Force Law Review |
| container_volume | 73 |
| creator | Schlueter, David A |
| description | [...]Part VI offers concluding thoughts and a framework for considering the proposed reforms to the military justice system.\n219 The final product was considered a compromise.220 On the one hand, there was concern about the ability of the commander to maintain discipline within the ranks. The proposed amendments discussed in this article clearly undermine the commander's authority. [...]whether intended or not, the balance tips in favor of the accused, even though the apparent intent is to ensure that more cases go to trial. [...]in responding to the siren songs of reform, Congress should carefully analyze the proposed changes, consider the myriad potential problems of administering any proposed reforms, as discussed supra, and determine whether less drastic measures can be taken to remedy any perceived problems in the military justice system. |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_reports_1717978525</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A433385991</galeid><sourcerecordid>A433385991</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-g1325-e8e3acf065bb36797d1de50da1b00dbc1254539e873ff776f709dfb2a96249733</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptzE1LxDAQBuAgCq6r_yHouZI0TZN4Wxa_YMGLgreSNpOapU3WJHvw3xtYL0IZmIGXZ94ztKKcN5WS9PMcrQhRTSWZpJfoKqU9IZTQpl2h7WaG6Abt8ewml3X8wftjym6ABxwhHYI3zo84B5y_ACcXweMU_JiwDbGIsudrdGH1lODm767Rx9Pj-_al2r09v243u2qkrOYVSGB6sKTlfc9aoYShBjgxmvaEmH6gNW84UyAFs1aI1gqijO1rrdq6UYKxNbo99R5i-D5Cyl2EQ4g5dVTQ0id5zQu6O6FRT9A5b0OOephdGrpNwxiTXClaVLWgRvAQ9RQ8WFfif_5-wZcxMLth4eEXmOlx6A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1717978525</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>American military justice: responding to the siren songs for reform</title><source>US Government Documents</source><source>HeinOnline</source><source>EZB Free E-Journals</source><creator>Schlueter, David A</creator><creatorcontrib>Schlueter, David A</creatorcontrib><description>[...]Part VI offers concluding thoughts and a framework for considering the proposed reforms to the military justice system.\n219 The final product was considered a compromise.220 On the one hand, there was concern about the ability of the commander to maintain discipline within the ranks. The proposed amendments discussed in this article clearly undermine the commander's authority. [...]whether intended or not, the balance tips in favor of the accused, even though the apparent intent is to ensure that more cases go to trial. [...]in responding to the siren songs of reform, Congress should carefully analyze the proposed changes, consider the myriad potential problems of administering any proposed reforms, as discussed supra, and determine whether less drastic measures can be taken to remedy any perceived problems in the military justice system.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0094-8381</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1554-981X</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AFLRDA</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Maxwell AFB: U.S. Air Force Academy, Department of Law</publisher><subject>Armed forces ; Courts martial ; Courts-martial and courts of inquiry ; Criminal procedure ; Discipline ; Evaluation ; Jurisdiction ; Military law ; Military personnel ; National security ; Plea bargaining ; Reforms ; Sex crimes ; Speedy trial ; Trials</subject><ispartof>The Air Force Law Review, 2015-06, Vol.73, p.193</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2015 U.S. Air Force Academy, Department of Law</rights><rights>Copyright Office of the Judge Advocate General 2015</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>312,314,776,780,787</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Schlueter, David A</creatorcontrib><title>American military justice: responding to the siren songs for reform</title><title>The Air Force Law Review</title><description>[...]Part VI offers concluding thoughts and a framework for considering the proposed reforms to the military justice system.\n219 The final product was considered a compromise.220 On the one hand, there was concern about the ability of the commander to maintain discipline within the ranks. The proposed amendments discussed in this article clearly undermine the commander's authority. [...]whether intended or not, the balance tips in favor of the accused, even though the apparent intent is to ensure that more cases go to trial. [...]in responding to the siren songs of reform, Congress should carefully analyze the proposed changes, consider the myriad potential problems of administering any proposed reforms, as discussed supra, and determine whether less drastic measures can be taken to remedy any perceived problems in the military justice system.</description><subject>Armed forces</subject><subject>Courts martial</subject><subject>Courts-martial and courts of inquiry</subject><subject>Criminal procedure</subject><subject>Discipline</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Jurisdiction</subject><subject>Military law</subject><subject>Military personnel</subject><subject>National security</subject><subject>Plea bargaining</subject><subject>Reforms</subject><subject>Sex crimes</subject><subject>Speedy trial</subject><subject>Trials</subject><issn>0094-8381</issn><issn>1554-981X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNptzE1LxDAQBuAgCq6r_yHouZI0TZN4Wxa_YMGLgreSNpOapU3WJHvw3xtYL0IZmIGXZ94ztKKcN5WS9PMcrQhRTSWZpJfoKqU9IZTQpl2h7WaG6Abt8ewml3X8wftjym6ABxwhHYI3zo84B5y_ACcXweMU_JiwDbGIsudrdGH1lODm767Rx9Pj-_al2r09v243u2qkrOYVSGB6sKTlfc9aoYShBjgxmvaEmH6gNW84UyAFs1aI1gqijO1rrdq6UYKxNbo99R5i-D5Cyl2EQ4g5dVTQ0id5zQu6O6FRT9A5b0OOephdGrpNwxiTXClaVLWgRvAQ9RQ8WFfif_5-wZcxMLth4eEXmOlx6A</recordid><startdate>20150622</startdate><enddate>20150622</enddate><creator>Schlueter, David A</creator><general>U.S. Air Force Academy, Department of Law</general><general>Office of the Judge Advocate General</general><scope>ILT</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88F</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>M1Q</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150622</creationdate><title>American military justice: responding to the siren songs for reform</title><author>Schlueter, David A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-g1325-e8e3acf065bb36797d1de50da1b00dbc1254539e873ff776f709dfb2a96249733</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Armed forces</topic><topic>Courts martial</topic><topic>Courts-martial and courts of inquiry</topic><topic>Criminal procedure</topic><topic>Discipline</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Jurisdiction</topic><topic>Military law</topic><topic>Military personnel</topic><topic>National security</topic><topic>Plea bargaining</topic><topic>Reforms</topic><topic>Sex crimes</topic><topic>Speedy trial</topic><topic>Trials</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Schlueter, David A</creatorcontrib><collection>LegalTrac</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Military Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Military Database</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>The Air Force Law Review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Schlueter, David A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>American military justice: responding to the siren songs for reform</atitle><jtitle>The Air Force Law Review</jtitle><date>2015-06-22</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>73</volume><spage>193</spage><pages>193-</pages><issn>0094-8381</issn><eissn>1554-981X</eissn><coden>AFLRDA</coden><abstract>[...]Part VI offers concluding thoughts and a framework for considering the proposed reforms to the military justice system.\n219 The final product was considered a compromise.220 On the one hand, there was concern about the ability of the commander to maintain discipline within the ranks. The proposed amendments discussed in this article clearly undermine the commander's authority. [...]whether intended or not, the balance tips in favor of the accused, even though the apparent intent is to ensure that more cases go to trial. [...]in responding to the siren songs of reform, Congress should carefully analyze the proposed changes, consider the myriad potential problems of administering any proposed reforms, as discussed supra, and determine whether less drastic measures can be taken to remedy any perceived problems in the military justice system.</abstract><cop>Maxwell AFB</cop><pub>U.S. Air Force Academy, Department of Law</pub></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0094-8381 |
| ispartof | The Air Force Law Review, 2015-06, Vol.73, p.193 |
| issn | 0094-8381 1554-981X |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_reports_1717978525 |
| source | US Government Documents; HeinOnline; EZB Free E-Journals |
| subjects | Armed forces Courts martial Courts-martial and courts of inquiry Criminal procedure Discipline Evaluation Jurisdiction Military law Military personnel National security Plea bargaining Reforms Sex crimes Speedy trial Trials |
| title | American military justice: responding to the siren songs for reform |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T14%3A40%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=American%20military%20justice:%20responding%20to%20the%20siren%20songs%20for%20reform&rft.jtitle=The%20Air%20Force%20Law%20Review&rft.au=Schlueter,%20David%20A&rft.date=2015-06-22&rft.volume=73&rft.spage=193&rft.pages=193-&rft.issn=0094-8381&rft.eissn=1554-981X&rft.coden=AFLRDA&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA433385991%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1717978525&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A433385991&rfr_iscdi=true |