Update on Progress in Electronic Reporting of Laboratory Results to Public Health Agencies - United States, 2014
Lambs et al provide update about the progress in electronic laboratory reporting (ELR) to public health agencies in the US during 2014. The results indicate that, as of Jul 2014, 67% of the approximately 20 million laboratory reports received annually for notifiable conditions were received electron...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | MMWR. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report 2015, Vol.64 (12), p.328 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Report |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 12 |
| container_start_page | 328 |
| container_title | MMWR. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report |
| container_volume | 64 |
| creator | Lamb, Emilie Satre, John Pon, Steve Hurd-Kundeti, Glorietta Liscek, Bonnie Hall, C Jason Pinner, Robert W Conn, Laura Zajac, Julie Smallwood, Megan Smith, Kaley |
| description | Lambs et al provide update about the progress in electronic laboratory reporting (ELR) to public health agencies in the US during 2014. The results indicate that, as of Jul 2014, 67% of the approximately 20 million laboratory reports received annually for notifiable conditions were received electronically, compared with 62% in Jul 2013. The proportion of laboratory reports received electronically varied by jurisdiction. In 2014, compared with 2013, the number of jurisdictions receiving >75% of laboratory reports electronically was higher (21 versus 14), and the number of jurisdictions receiving |
| format | Report |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_reports_1673051242</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3654538101</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_reports_16730512423</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNjs2KwkAQhAdZwaz6Do1nA5n8uHoUUTx4EHcD3mSMbZxlmI7TnYNvb5R9gK1LQfHBVz0V6SIv4vlMHz9UlOh8Ead6UQzUJ_Nv8kqWRKopm4sRBPKwD1QHZAbrYe2wkkDeVnDAhoJYXwNdYWfOFIxQeHQ7t04YhGDfnl1HbtE4ucGyRl9ZZIih9FbwAt_SKXgKafdipPpX4xjHfz1Uk836Z7WNm0D3FllO4S3kk559ZUmh0zzN_gU9AcjfSZM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>report</recordtype><pqid>1673051242</pqid></control><display><type>report</type><title>Update on Progress in Electronic Reporting of Laboratory Results to Public Health Agencies - United States, 2014</title><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Lamb, Emilie ; Satre, John ; Pon, Steve ; Hurd-Kundeti, Glorietta ; Liscek, Bonnie ; Hall, C Jason ; Pinner, Robert W ; Conn, Laura ; Zajac, Julie ; Smallwood, Megan ; Smith, Kaley</creator><creatorcontrib>Lamb, Emilie ; Satre, John ; Pon, Steve ; Hurd-Kundeti, Glorietta ; Liscek, Bonnie ; Hall, C Jason ; Pinner, Robert W ; Conn, Laura ; Zajac, Julie ; Smallwood, Megan ; Smith, Kaley</creatorcontrib><description>Lambs et al provide update about the progress in electronic laboratory reporting (ELR) to public health agencies in the US during 2014. The results indicate that, as of Jul 2014, 67% of the approximately 20 million laboratory reports received annually for notifiable conditions were received electronically, compared with 62% in Jul 2013. The proportion of laboratory reports received electronically varied by jurisdiction. In 2014, compared with 2013, the number of jurisdictions receiving >75% of laboratory reports electronically was higher (21 versus 14), and the number of jurisdictions receiving <25% of reports electronically was lower (seven versus nine). National implementation of ELR continues to increase and appears it might reach 80% of total laboratory report volume by 2016.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0149-2195</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1545-861X</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Atlanta: U.S. Center for Disease Control</publisher><subject>Disease ; Electronic health records ; Epidemiology ; Medical statistics ; Public health ; Regulatory agencies ; Testing laboratories</subject><ispartof>MMWR. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 2015, Vol.64 (12), p.328</ispartof><rights>Copyright U.S. Center for Disease Control Apr 3, 2015</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>780,784,4490</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lamb, Emilie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Satre, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pon, Steve</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hurd-Kundeti, Glorietta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liscek, Bonnie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hall, C Jason</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pinner, Robert W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Conn, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zajac, Julie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smallwood, Megan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Kaley</creatorcontrib><title>Update on Progress in Electronic Reporting of Laboratory Results to Public Health Agencies - United States, 2014</title><title>MMWR. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report</title><description>Lambs et al provide update about the progress in electronic laboratory reporting (ELR) to public health agencies in the US during 2014. The results indicate that, as of Jul 2014, 67% of the approximately 20 million laboratory reports received annually for notifiable conditions were received electronically, compared with 62% in Jul 2013. The proportion of laboratory reports received electronically varied by jurisdiction. In 2014, compared with 2013, the number of jurisdictions receiving >75% of laboratory reports electronically was higher (21 versus 14), and the number of jurisdictions receiving <25% of reports electronically was lower (seven versus nine). National implementation of ELR continues to increase and appears it might reach 80% of total laboratory report volume by 2016.</description><subject>Disease</subject><subject>Electronic health records</subject><subject>Epidemiology</subject><subject>Medical statistics</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Regulatory agencies</subject><subject>Testing laboratories</subject><issn>0149-2195</issn><issn>1545-861X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>report</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>report</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqNjs2KwkAQhAdZwaz6Do1nA5n8uHoUUTx4EHcD3mSMbZxlmI7TnYNvb5R9gK1LQfHBVz0V6SIv4vlMHz9UlOh8Ead6UQzUJ_Nv8kqWRKopm4sRBPKwD1QHZAbrYe2wkkDeVnDAhoJYXwNdYWfOFIxQeHQ7t04YhGDfnl1HbtE4ucGyRl9ZZIih9FbwAt_SKXgKafdipPpX4xjHfz1Uk836Z7WNm0D3FllO4S3kk559ZUmh0zzN_gU9AcjfSZM</recordid><startdate>20150403</startdate><enddate>20150403</enddate><creator>Lamb, Emilie</creator><creator>Satre, John</creator><creator>Pon, Steve</creator><creator>Hurd-Kundeti, Glorietta</creator><creator>Liscek, Bonnie</creator><creator>Hall, C Jason</creator><creator>Pinner, Robert W</creator><creator>Conn, Laura</creator><creator>Zajac, Julie</creator><creator>Smallwood, Megan</creator><creator>Smith, Kaley</creator><general>U.S. Center for Disease Control</general><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88F</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M1Q</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150403</creationdate><title>Update on Progress in Electronic Reporting of Laboratory Results to Public Health Agencies - United States, 2014</title><author>Lamb, Emilie ; Satre, John ; Pon, Steve ; Hurd-Kundeti, Glorietta ; Liscek, Bonnie ; Hall, C Jason ; Pinner, Robert W ; Conn, Laura ; Zajac, Julie ; Smallwood, Megan ; Smith, Kaley</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_reports_16730512423</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>reports</rsrctype><prefilter>reports</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Disease</topic><topic>Electronic health records</topic><topic>Epidemiology</topic><topic>Medical statistics</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Regulatory agencies</topic><topic>Testing laboratories</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lamb, Emilie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Satre, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pon, Steve</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hurd-Kundeti, Glorietta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liscek, Bonnie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hall, C Jason</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pinner, Robert W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Conn, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zajac, Julie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smallwood, Megan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Kaley</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Military Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Military Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lamb, Emilie</au><au>Satre, John</au><au>Pon, Steve</au><au>Hurd-Kundeti, Glorietta</au><au>Liscek, Bonnie</au><au>Hall, C Jason</au><au>Pinner, Robert W</au><au>Conn, Laura</au><au>Zajac, Julie</au><au>Smallwood, Megan</au><au>Smith, Kaley</au><format>book</format><genre>unknown</genre><ristype>RPRT</ristype><atitle>Update on Progress in Electronic Reporting of Laboratory Results to Public Health Agencies - United States, 2014</atitle><jtitle>MMWR. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report</jtitle><date>2015-04-03</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>64</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>328</spage><pages>328-</pages><issn>0149-2195</issn><eissn>1545-861X</eissn><abstract>Lambs et al provide update about the progress in electronic laboratory reporting (ELR) to public health agencies in the US during 2014. The results indicate that, as of Jul 2014, 67% of the approximately 20 million laboratory reports received annually for notifiable conditions were received electronically, compared with 62% in Jul 2013. The proportion of laboratory reports received electronically varied by jurisdiction. In 2014, compared with 2013, the number of jurisdictions receiving >75% of laboratory reports electronically was higher (21 versus 14), and the number of jurisdictions receiving <25% of reports electronically was lower (seven versus nine). National implementation of ELR continues to increase and appears it might reach 80% of total laboratory report volume by 2016.</abstract><cop>Atlanta</cop><pub>U.S. Center for Disease Control</pub></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0149-2195 |
| ispartof | MMWR. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 2015, Vol.64 (12), p.328 |
| issn | 0149-2195 1545-861X |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_reports_1673051242 |
| source | PubMed Central Open Access; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central |
| subjects | Disease Electronic health records Epidemiology Medical statistics Public health Regulatory agencies Testing laboratories |
| title | Update on Progress in Electronic Reporting of Laboratory Results to Public Health Agencies - United States, 2014 |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T00%3A07%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=unknown&rft.atitle=Update%20on%20Progress%20in%20Electronic%20Reporting%20of%20Laboratory%20Results%20to%20Public%20Health%20Agencies%20-%20United%20States,%202014&rft.jtitle=MMWR.%20Morbidity%20and%20Mortality%20Weekly%20Report&rft.au=Lamb,%20Emilie&rft.date=2015-04-03&rft.volume=64&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=328&rft.pages=328-&rft.issn=0149-2195&rft.eissn=1545-861X&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E3654538101%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1673051242&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |