EPA greenhouse gas rules at stake in U.S. Supreme Court
The US Supreme Court is considering an important challenge to the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) greenhouse gas (GHG) air permitting rules under the Clean Air Act (CAA). At stake in Utility Air Regulatory Group v EPA (one of six related cases on which the Court granted certiorari) is t...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Trends : ABA Section of Environment, Energy, and Resources Newsletter Energy, and Resources Newsletter, 2014-03, Vol.45 (4), p.2 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 4 |
| container_start_page | 2 |
| container_title | Trends : ABA Section of Environment, Energy, and Resources Newsletter |
| container_volume | 45 |
| creator | Carlson, Ann Herzog, Megan |
| description | The US Supreme Court is considering an important challenge to the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) greenhouse gas (GHG) air permitting rules under the Clean Air Act (CAA). At stake in Utility Air Regulatory Group v EPA (one of six related cases on which the Court granted certiorari) is the validity of EPA's rules for stationary sources of GHG emissions under the Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) provisions of the CAA. The petitions challenged the DC Circuit's unanimous decision upholding the rules in Coalition for Responsible Regulation v EPA, 684 F.3d 102. The Court has now granted review of EPA's determination that regulation of vehicle GHG emissions triggers the application of PSD and Title V permitting programs to stationary sources. The bottom line is that the Supreme Court's decision will be an important next step in defining how far EPA can extend the CAA to regulate GHGs. The decision will by no means, however, be the final word. |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_reports_1638525822</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3532359501</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_reports_16385258223</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNzrsOgjAUgOHGaCJe3uHEHUJbS3E0BONogs6kwxEvSPGc9v118AGc_uUb_olIlCx0Kq02U5FIo3W6M6aYiwXzI8-LrZUqEbY-7aEjxOHmIyN0joFijwwuAAf3RLgPcMmaDJo4Er4QKh8prMTs6nrG9a9LsTnU5-qYjuTfETm0hKOnwO13ojTKlErpv9AH3BM03A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1638525822</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>EPA greenhouse gas rules at stake in U.S. Supreme Court</title><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><creator>Carlson, Ann ; Herzog, Megan</creator><creatorcontrib>Carlson, Ann ; Herzog, Megan</creatorcontrib><description>The US Supreme Court is considering an important challenge to the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) greenhouse gas (GHG) air permitting rules under the Clean Air Act (CAA). At stake in Utility Air Regulatory Group v EPA (one of six related cases on which the Court granted certiorari) is the validity of EPA's rules for stationary sources of GHG emissions under the Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) provisions of the CAA. The petitions challenged the DC Circuit's unanimous decision upholding the rules in Coalition for Responsible Regulation v EPA, 684 F.3d 102. The Court has now granted review of EPA's determination that regulation of vehicle GHG emissions triggers the application of PSD and Title V permitting programs to stationary sources. The bottom line is that the Supreme Court's decision will be an important next step in defining how far EPA can extend the CAA to regulate GHGs. The decision will by no means, however, be the final word.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1533-9556</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2163-1735</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chicago: American Bar Association</publisher><subject>Air pollution ; Clean Air Act-US ; Climate change ; Councils ; Emission standards ; Emissions ; Environmental regulations ; Federal regulation ; Government agencies ; Greenhouse effect ; Greenhouse gases ; Industrial plant emissions ; Outdoor air quality ; Pollutants ; Provisions ; Supreme Court decisions ; Tobacco ; Validity</subject><ispartof>Trends : ABA Section of Environment, Energy, and Resources Newsletter, 2014-03, Vol.45 (4), p.2</ispartof><rights>Copyright American Bar Association Mar/Apr 2014</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>312,776,780,787</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Carlson, Ann</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Herzog, Megan</creatorcontrib><title>EPA greenhouse gas rules at stake in U.S. Supreme Court</title><title>Trends : ABA Section of Environment, Energy, and Resources Newsletter</title><description>The US Supreme Court is considering an important challenge to the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) greenhouse gas (GHG) air permitting rules under the Clean Air Act (CAA). At stake in Utility Air Regulatory Group v EPA (one of six related cases on which the Court granted certiorari) is the validity of EPA's rules for stationary sources of GHG emissions under the Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) provisions of the CAA. The petitions challenged the DC Circuit's unanimous decision upholding the rules in Coalition for Responsible Regulation v EPA, 684 F.3d 102. The Court has now granted review of EPA's determination that regulation of vehicle GHG emissions triggers the application of PSD and Title V permitting programs to stationary sources. The bottom line is that the Supreme Court's decision will be an important next step in defining how far EPA can extend the CAA to regulate GHGs. The decision will by no means, however, be the final word.</description><subject>Air pollution</subject><subject>Clean Air Act-US</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Councils</subject><subject>Emission standards</subject><subject>Emissions</subject><subject>Environmental regulations</subject><subject>Federal regulation</subject><subject>Government agencies</subject><subject>Greenhouse effect</subject><subject>Greenhouse gases</subject><subject>Industrial plant emissions</subject><subject>Outdoor air quality</subject><subject>Pollutants</subject><subject>Provisions</subject><subject>Supreme Court decisions</subject><subject>Tobacco</subject><subject>Validity</subject><issn>1533-9556</issn><issn>2163-1735</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNqNzrsOgjAUgOHGaCJe3uHEHUJbS3E0BONogs6kwxEvSPGc9v118AGc_uUb_olIlCx0Kq02U5FIo3W6M6aYiwXzI8-LrZUqEbY-7aEjxOHmIyN0joFijwwuAAf3RLgPcMmaDJo4Er4QKh8prMTs6nrG9a9LsTnU5-qYjuTfETm0hKOnwO13ojTKlErpv9AH3BM03A</recordid><startdate>20140301</startdate><enddate>20140301</enddate><creator>Carlson, Ann</creator><creator>Herzog, Megan</creator><general>American Bar Association</general><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>PYYUZ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140301</creationdate><title>EPA greenhouse gas rules at stake in U.S. Supreme Court</title><author>Carlson, Ann ; Herzog, Megan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_reports_16385258223</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Air pollution</topic><topic>Clean Air Act-US</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Councils</topic><topic>Emission standards</topic><topic>Emissions</topic><topic>Environmental regulations</topic><topic>Federal regulation</topic><topic>Government agencies</topic><topic>Greenhouse effect</topic><topic>Greenhouse gases</topic><topic>Industrial plant emissions</topic><topic>Outdoor air quality</topic><topic>Pollutants</topic><topic>Provisions</topic><topic>Supreme Court decisions</topic><topic>Tobacco</topic><topic>Validity</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Carlson, Ann</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Herzog, Megan</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Trends : ABA Section of Environment, Energy, and Resources Newsletter</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Carlson, Ann</au><au>Herzog, Megan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>EPA greenhouse gas rules at stake in U.S. Supreme Court</atitle><jtitle>Trends : ABA Section of Environment, Energy, and Resources Newsletter</jtitle><date>2014-03-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>45</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>2</spage><pages>2-</pages><issn>1533-9556</issn><eissn>2163-1735</eissn><abstract>The US Supreme Court is considering an important challenge to the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) greenhouse gas (GHG) air permitting rules under the Clean Air Act (CAA). At stake in Utility Air Regulatory Group v EPA (one of six related cases on which the Court granted certiorari) is the validity of EPA's rules for stationary sources of GHG emissions under the Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) provisions of the CAA. The petitions challenged the DC Circuit's unanimous decision upholding the rules in Coalition for Responsible Regulation v EPA, 684 F.3d 102. The Court has now granted review of EPA's determination that regulation of vehicle GHG emissions triggers the application of PSD and Title V permitting programs to stationary sources. The bottom line is that the Supreme Court's decision will be an important next step in defining how far EPA can extend the CAA to regulate GHGs. The decision will by no means, however, be the final word.</abstract><cop>Chicago</cop><pub>American Bar Association</pub></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1533-9556 |
| ispartof | Trends : ABA Section of Environment, Energy, and Resources Newsletter, 2014-03, Vol.45 (4), p.2 |
| issn | 1533-9556 2163-1735 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_reports_1638525822 |
| source | HeinOnline Law Journal Library |
| subjects | Air pollution Clean Air Act-US Climate change Councils Emission standards Emissions Environmental regulations Federal regulation Government agencies Greenhouse effect Greenhouse gases Industrial plant emissions Outdoor air quality Pollutants Provisions Supreme Court decisions Tobacco Validity |
| title | EPA greenhouse gas rules at stake in U.S. Supreme Court |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T02%3A13%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=EPA%20greenhouse%20gas%20rules%20at%20stake%20in%20U.S.%20Supreme%20Court&rft.jtitle=Trends%20:%20ABA%20Section%20of%20Environment,%20Energy,%20and%20Resources%20Newsletter&rft.au=Carlson,%20Ann&rft.date=2014-03-01&rft.volume=45&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=2&rft.pages=2-&rft.issn=1533-9556&rft.eissn=2163-1735&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E3532359501%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1638525822&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |