Doing disability differently
This article looks at how design for disability might be more creatively reconceptualised. When grounded in accessibility and compliance, design tends to perpetuate historically stereotyped divisions between disabled and able individuals; it is unable to get far beyond architectural Modernism's...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Architectural Review 2014-09, Vol.236 (1411), p.30-31 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Magazinearticle |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 31 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1411 |
container_start_page | 30 |
container_title | The Architectural Review |
container_volume | 236 |
creator | Boys, Jos |
description | This article looks at how design for disability might be more creatively reconceptualised. When grounded in accessibility and compliance, design tends to perpetuate historically stereotyped divisions between disabled and able individuals; it is unable to get far beyond architectural Modernism's simplistic and functionalist concepts of the generic user. Even OMA's rightly celebrated 1998 Villa in Bordeaux, for a wheelchair user and his family, is troubling in this respect. The same architects' more recent Maggie's Centre in Gartnavel, Glasgow, represents a far more radical programme of design for disability. It shows that, like every other aspect of design, disability can be negotiated within a range of messy parameters. To call for architects to rethink disability as generative and creative is not to criticise them for not being inclusive enough but is intended to open the way for new forms of questioning to become embedded in education and practice. (Quotes from original text) |
format | Magazinearticle |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_reports_1564440426</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1725466497</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p178t-9a32d2eb35ce5178a6e39d1a0a513441c356d296e946feb85040bb00861bd54c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFjjtLBDEUhVMouK7-AwuxshlIcm9uJqWsT1iwUbBbkskdGYkz4yRb7L83oJWN1XnwcThHYiWlhKYl9XYiTnP-qNFqJVfi4nYaxvfLOGQfhjSUQ7V9zwuPJR3OxHHvU-bzX12L1_u7l81js31-eNrcbJtZ2bY0zoOOmgOYjk1tPDG4qLz0RgGi6sBQ1I7YIfUcWiNRhiBlvROiwQ7W4upnd16mrz3nslt4npaSd8oQIkrUVKHrP9DnkDtOyY887StqtUEidPZ_lBAUWIcGvgFxzVHt</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>magazinearticle</recordtype><pqid>1564440426</pqid></control><display><type>magazinearticle</type><title>Doing disability differently</title><source>Arts & Humanities Database</source><source>Arts Premium Collection</source><source>Art, Design & Architecture Collection</source><creator>Boys, Jos</creator><creatorcontrib>Boys, Jos</creatorcontrib><description>This article looks at how design for disability might be more creatively reconceptualised. When grounded in accessibility and compliance, design tends to perpetuate historically stereotyped divisions between disabled and able individuals; it is unable to get far beyond architectural Modernism's simplistic and functionalist concepts of the generic user. Even OMA's rightly celebrated 1998 Villa in Bordeaux, for a wheelchair user and his family, is troubling in this respect. The same architects' more recent Maggie's Centre in Gartnavel, Glasgow, represents a far more radical programme of design for disability. It shows that, like every other aspect of design, disability can be negotiated within a range of messy parameters. To call for architects to rethink disability as generative and creative is not to criticise them for not being inclusive enough but is intended to open the way for new forms of questioning to become embedded in education and practice. (Quotes from original text)</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-861X</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ARRVAV</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Emap Limited</publisher><subject>Architectural services ; Architecture ; Creativity ; Design ; Handicapped accessibility</subject><ispartof>The Architectural Review, 2014-09, Vol.236 (1411), p.30-31</ispartof><rights>Copyright Emap Limited Sep 2014</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1564440426?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>312,776,780,787,15306,16467,21467,33658,33660,34753,34754,36128,36129,43749,44176,44356</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Boys, Jos</creatorcontrib><title>Doing disability differently</title><title>The Architectural Review</title><description>This article looks at how design for disability might be more creatively reconceptualised. When grounded in accessibility and compliance, design tends to perpetuate historically stereotyped divisions between disabled and able individuals; it is unable to get far beyond architectural Modernism's simplistic and functionalist concepts of the generic user. Even OMA's rightly celebrated 1998 Villa in Bordeaux, for a wheelchair user and his family, is troubling in this respect. The same architects' more recent Maggie's Centre in Gartnavel, Glasgow, represents a far more radical programme of design for disability. It shows that, like every other aspect of design, disability can be negotiated within a range of messy parameters. To call for architects to rethink disability as generative and creative is not to criticise them for not being inclusive enough but is intended to open the way for new forms of questioning to become embedded in education and practice. (Quotes from original text)</description><subject>Architectural services</subject><subject>Architecture</subject><subject>Creativity</subject><subject>Design</subject><subject>Handicapped accessibility</subject><issn>0003-861X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>magazinearticle</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>magazinearticle</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>AVQMV</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>K50</sourceid><sourceid>M1D</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqFjjtLBDEUhVMouK7-AwuxshlIcm9uJqWsT1iwUbBbkskdGYkz4yRb7L83oJWN1XnwcThHYiWlhKYl9XYiTnP-qNFqJVfi4nYaxvfLOGQfhjSUQ7V9zwuPJR3OxHHvU-bzX12L1_u7l81js31-eNrcbJtZ2bY0zoOOmgOYjk1tPDG4qLz0RgGi6sBQ1I7YIfUcWiNRhiBlvROiwQ7W4upnd16mrz3nslt4npaSd8oQIkrUVKHrP9DnkDtOyY887StqtUEidPZ_lBAUWIcGvgFxzVHt</recordid><startdate>20140901</startdate><enddate>20140901</enddate><creator>Boys, Jos</creator><general>Emap Limited</general><scope>F29</scope><scope>C18</scope><scope>0TT</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RQ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AVQMV</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K50</scope><scope>KB~</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M1D</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140901</creationdate><title>Doing disability differently</title><author>Boys, Jos</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p178t-9a32d2eb35ce5178a6e39d1a0a513441c356d296e946feb85040bb00861bd54c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>magazinearticle</rsrctype><prefilter>magazinearticle</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Architectural services</topic><topic>Architecture</topic><topic>Creativity</topic><topic>Design</topic><topic>Handicapped accessibility</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Boys, Jos</creatorcontrib><collection>Design & Applied Arts Index (DAAI)</collection><collection>Humanities Index</collection><collection>News PRO</collection><collection>Global News & ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Career & Technical Education Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Arts Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Art, Design & Architecture Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Newsstand Professional</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Arts & Humanities Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Research Library</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>The Architectural Review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Boys, Jos</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Doing disability differently</atitle><jtitle>The Architectural Review</jtitle><date>2014-09-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>236</volume><issue>1411</issue><spage>30</spage><epage>31</epage><pages>30-31</pages><issn>0003-861X</issn><coden>ARRVAV</coden><abstract>This article looks at how design for disability might be more creatively reconceptualised. When grounded in accessibility and compliance, design tends to perpetuate historically stereotyped divisions between disabled and able individuals; it is unable to get far beyond architectural Modernism's simplistic and functionalist concepts of the generic user. Even OMA's rightly celebrated 1998 Villa in Bordeaux, for a wheelchair user and his family, is troubling in this respect. The same architects' more recent Maggie's Centre in Gartnavel, Glasgow, represents a far more radical programme of design for disability. It shows that, like every other aspect of design, disability can be negotiated within a range of messy parameters. To call for architects to rethink disability as generative and creative is not to criticise them for not being inclusive enough but is intended to open the way for new forms of questioning to become embedded in education and practice. (Quotes from original text)</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Emap Limited</pub><tpages>2</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0003-861X |
ispartof | The Architectural Review, 2014-09, Vol.236 (1411), p.30-31 |
issn | 0003-861X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_reports_1564440426 |
source | Arts & Humanities Database; Arts Premium Collection; Art, Design & Architecture Collection |
subjects | Architectural services Architecture Creativity Design Handicapped accessibility |
title | Doing disability differently |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T00%3A19%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Doing%20disability%20differently&rft.jtitle=The%20Architectural%20Review&rft.au=Boys,%20Jos&rft.date=2014-09-01&rft.volume=236&rft.issue=1411&rft.spage=30&rft.epage=31&rft.pages=30-31&rft.issn=0003-861X&rft.coden=ARRVAV&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E1725466497%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1564440426&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |