Think or swim
Jones opines that the debate on climate change has probably become boring for most in recent years. Two polarized and entrenched camps with over-rehearsed positions have offered little possibility of progress. When the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change released their latest assessment of the...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | The Architectural Review 2014-07, Vol.236 (1409), p.18-14 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Magazinearticle |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 14 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1409 |
| container_start_page | 18 |
| container_title | The Architectural Review |
| container_volume | 236 |
| creator | Jones, Kit |
| description | Jones opines that the debate on climate change has probably become boring for most in recent years. Two polarized and entrenched camps with over-rehearsed positions have offered little possibility of progress. When the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change released their latest assessment of the science of climate change this spring, they were faced with the unappealing task of communicating to an audience whose minds were made up. |
| format | Magazinearticle |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_reports_1547526767</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3381070611</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p145t-a1741446f8838e43c5e0cc16eebda2faf7ab7901bf91955fa3abb6f881d9f7fa3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdzzsLwjAUBeAMCj7_gzi5FHLbPJpRii8QXCq4SVJvsFrbmlT8-7bo5HQ48HHg9MiQUhoFsYDTgIy8v7VVhkCHZJpe8_I-q9zMv_PHhPStLjxOfzkmx_UqTbbB_rDZJct9UAPjTaBBMmBM2DiOYmRRxpFmGQhEc9Gh1VZqIxUFYxUozq2OtDGdhouysq1jMv_u1q56vtA3Z4d15Rp_Bs4kD4UUskWLP_TIfYZFoUusXh3lqj3R0Q8ibj95</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>magazinearticle</recordtype><pqid>1547526767</pqid></control><display><type>magazinearticle</type><title>Think or swim</title><source>Art, Design and Architecture Collection</source><source>ProQuest Arts & Humanities Database</source><source>Arts Premium Collection</source><creator>Jones, Kit</creator><creatorcontrib>Jones, Kit</creatorcontrib><description>Jones opines that the debate on climate change has probably become boring for most in recent years. Two polarized and entrenched camps with over-rehearsed positions have offered little possibility of progress. When the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change released their latest assessment of the science of climate change this spring, they were faced with the unappealing task of communicating to an audience whose minds were made up.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-861X</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ARRVAV</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Emap Limited</publisher><subject>Adaptation ; Architecture ; Assessments ; Boring ; Climate change ; Communicating ; Environmental policy ; Greenhouse gases ; Panels ; Springs ; Tasks</subject><ispartof>The Architectural Review, 2014-07, Vol.236 (1409), p.18-14</ispartof><rights>Copyright Emap Limited Jul 2014</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1547526767?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>312,776,780,787,15306,16467,21467,33658,33660,34753,34754,36128,36129,43749,44176,44356</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jones, Kit</creatorcontrib><title>Think or swim</title><title>The Architectural Review</title><description>Jones opines that the debate on climate change has probably become boring for most in recent years. Two polarized and entrenched camps with over-rehearsed positions have offered little possibility of progress. When the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change released their latest assessment of the science of climate change this spring, they were faced with the unappealing task of communicating to an audience whose minds were made up.</description><subject>Adaptation</subject><subject>Architecture</subject><subject>Assessments</subject><subject>Boring</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Communicating</subject><subject>Environmental policy</subject><subject>Greenhouse gases</subject><subject>Panels</subject><subject>Springs</subject><subject>Tasks</subject><issn>0003-861X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>magazinearticle</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>magazinearticle</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>AVQMV</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>K50</sourceid><sourceid>M1D</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNpdzzsLwjAUBeAMCj7_gzi5FHLbPJpRii8QXCq4SVJvsFrbmlT8-7bo5HQ48HHg9MiQUhoFsYDTgIy8v7VVhkCHZJpe8_I-q9zMv_PHhPStLjxOfzkmx_UqTbbB_rDZJct9UAPjTaBBMmBM2DiOYmRRxpFmGQhEc9Gh1VZqIxUFYxUozq2OtDGdhouysq1jMv_u1q56vtA3Z4d15Rp_Bs4kD4UUskWLP_TIfYZFoUusXh3lqj3R0Q8ibj95</recordid><startdate>20140701</startdate><enddate>20140701</enddate><creator>Jones, Kit</creator><general>Emap Limited</general><scope>8FD</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>0TT</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RQ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AVQMV</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F29</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K50</scope><scope>KB~</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M1D</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140701</creationdate><title>Think or swim</title><author>Jones, Kit</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p145t-a1741446f8838e43c5e0cc16eebda2faf7ab7901bf91955fa3abb6f881d9f7fa3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>magazinearticle</rsrctype><prefilter>magazinearticle</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Adaptation</topic><topic>Architecture</topic><topic>Assessments</topic><topic>Boring</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Communicating</topic><topic>Environmental policy</topic><topic>Greenhouse gases</topic><topic>Panels</topic><topic>Springs</topic><topic>Tasks</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jones, Kit</creatorcontrib><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>News PRO</collection><collection>Global News & ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Career & Technical Education Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Database (Proquest)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Arts Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Design & Applied Arts Index (DAAI)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Art, Design and Architecture Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Newsstand Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Arts & Humanities Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Research Library</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>The Architectural Review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jones, Kit</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Think or swim</atitle><jtitle>The Architectural Review</jtitle><date>2014-07-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>236</volume><issue>1409</issue><spage>18</spage><epage>14</epage><pages>18-14</pages><issn>0003-861X</issn><coden>ARRVAV</coden><abstract>Jones opines that the debate on climate change has probably become boring for most in recent years. Two polarized and entrenched camps with over-rehearsed positions have offered little possibility of progress. When the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change released their latest assessment of the science of climate change this spring, they were faced with the unappealing task of communicating to an audience whose minds were made up.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Emap Limited</pub><tpages>-3</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0003-861X |
| ispartof | The Architectural Review, 2014-07, Vol.236 (1409), p.18-14 |
| issn | 0003-861X |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_reports_1547526767 |
| source | Art, Design and Architecture Collection; ProQuest Arts & Humanities Database; Arts Premium Collection |
| subjects | Adaptation Architecture Assessments Boring Climate change Communicating Environmental policy Greenhouse gases Panels Springs Tasks |
| title | Think or swim |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-11T16%3A43%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Think%20or%20swim&rft.jtitle=The%20Architectural%20Review&rft.au=Jones,%20Kit&rft.date=2014-07-01&rft.volume=236&rft.issue=1409&rft.spage=18&rft.epage=14&rft.pages=18-14&rft.issn=0003-861X&rft.coden=ARRVAV&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E3381070611%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1547526767&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |