Tackling Taxes
In this column, the authors will explore the income tax consequences of debt extinguishment in three types of nontaxable corporate transactions when both the debtor and creditor are members of a consolidated return group: 1. Transfers to controlled corporations under Code Sec. 351. 2. Subsidiary liq...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Taxes 2013-10, Vol.91 (10), p.11 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 10 |
container_start_page | 11 |
container_title | Taxes |
container_volume | 91 |
creator | Lau, Paul C Jolley, Mark Piwko, Kurt |
description | In this column, the authors will explore the income tax consequences of debt extinguishment in three types of nontaxable corporate transactions when both the debtor and creditor are members of a consolidated return group: 1. Transfers to controlled corporations under Code Sec. 351. 2. Subsidiary liquidations under Code Sec. 332. 3. Acquisitive reorganizations under Code Sec. 368(a). Unless stated otherwise, both the transferor and the transferee corporations are solvent for purposes of this tax column. The income tax treatment of a debt extinguishment within a separate return context does not necessarily apply to intercompany obligations of members in a consolidated return group. An intercompany obligation is an obligation between members of a consolidated group, but only for the period during which both parties are members. Reg. Section 1.1502-13(g)(3)(i)(B) provides a number of exceptions to the deemed satisfaction and reissuance regime. |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_reports_1522801754</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3298498521</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_reports_15228017543</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpjYeA0MDAx0DUwtDDkYOAqLs4yMDAwMzGy5GTgC0lMzs7JzEtXCEmsSC3mYWBNS8wpTuWF0twMSm6uIc4eugVF-YWlqcUl8UWpBflFJcXxhqZGRhYGhuamJsZEKQIA1BYkxg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1522801754</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Tackling Taxes</title><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><creator>Lau, Paul C ; Jolley, Mark ; Piwko, Kurt</creator><creatorcontrib>Lau, Paul C ; Jolley, Mark ; Piwko, Kurt</creatorcontrib><description>In this column, the authors will explore the income tax consequences of debt extinguishment in three types of nontaxable corporate transactions when both the debtor and creditor are members of a consolidated return group: 1. Transfers to controlled corporations under Code Sec. 351. 2. Subsidiary liquidations under Code Sec. 332. 3. Acquisitive reorganizations under Code Sec. 368(a). Unless stated otherwise, both the transferor and the transferee corporations are solvent for purposes of this tax column. The income tax treatment of a debt extinguishment within a separate return context does not necessarily apply to intercompany obligations of members in a consolidated return group. An intercompany obligation is an obligation between members of a consolidated group, but only for the period during which both parties are members. Reg. Section 1.1502-13(g)(3)(i)(B) provides a number of exceptions to the deemed satisfaction and reissuance regime.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0040-0181</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Riverwoods: CCH INCORPORATED</publisher><subject>Built-in gains & losses ; Capital gains ; Consolidated groups ; Corporate debt ; Corporate income tax ; Debt ; Debt cancellation ; Income taxes ; Tax benefit rule ; Tax regulations ; Taxable income</subject><ispartof>Taxes, 2013-10, Vol.91 (10), p.11</ispartof><rights>Copyright CCH INCORPORATED Oct 2013</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>312,776,780,787</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lau, Paul C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jolley, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Piwko, Kurt</creatorcontrib><title>Tackling Taxes</title><title>Taxes</title><description>In this column, the authors will explore the income tax consequences of debt extinguishment in three types of nontaxable corporate transactions when both the debtor and creditor are members of a consolidated return group: 1. Transfers to controlled corporations under Code Sec. 351. 2. Subsidiary liquidations under Code Sec. 332. 3. Acquisitive reorganizations under Code Sec. 368(a). Unless stated otherwise, both the transferor and the transferee corporations are solvent for purposes of this tax column. The income tax treatment of a debt extinguishment within a separate return context does not necessarily apply to intercompany obligations of members in a consolidated return group. An intercompany obligation is an obligation between members of a consolidated group, but only for the period during which both parties are members. Reg. Section 1.1502-13(g)(3)(i)(B) provides a number of exceptions to the deemed satisfaction and reissuance regime.</description><subject>Built-in gains & losses</subject><subject>Capital gains</subject><subject>Consolidated groups</subject><subject>Corporate debt</subject><subject>Corporate income tax</subject><subject>Debt</subject><subject>Debt cancellation</subject><subject>Income taxes</subject><subject>Tax benefit rule</subject><subject>Tax regulations</subject><subject>Taxable income</subject><issn>0040-0181</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNpjYeA0MDAx0DUwtDDkYOAqLs4yMDAwMzGy5GTgC0lMzs7JzEtXCEmsSC3mYWBNS8wpTuWF0twMSm6uIc4eugVF-YWlqcUl8UWpBflFJcXxhqZGRhYGhuamJsZEKQIA1BYkxg</recordid><startdate>20131001</startdate><enddate>20131001</enddate><creator>Lau, Paul C</creator><creator>Jolley, Mark</creator><creator>Piwko, Kurt</creator><general>CCH INCORPORATED</general><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X1</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8A9</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ANIOZ</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRAZJ</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20131001</creationdate><title>Tackling Taxes</title><author>Lau, Paul C ; Jolley, Mark ; Piwko, Kurt</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_reports_15228017543</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Built-in gains & losses</topic><topic>Capital gains</topic><topic>Consolidated groups</topic><topic>Corporate debt</topic><topic>Corporate income tax</topic><topic>Debt</topic><topic>Debt cancellation</topic><topic>Income taxes</topic><topic>Tax benefit rule</topic><topic>Tax regulations</topic><topic>Taxable income</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lau, Paul C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jolley, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Piwko, Kurt</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Accounting & Tax Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Accounting & Tax Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Accounting, Tax & Banking Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Accounting, Tax & Banking Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Taxes</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lau, Paul C</au><au>Jolley, Mark</au><au>Piwko, Kurt</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Tackling Taxes</atitle><jtitle>Taxes</jtitle><date>2013-10-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>91</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>11</spage><pages>11-</pages><issn>0040-0181</issn><abstract>In this column, the authors will explore the income tax consequences of debt extinguishment in three types of nontaxable corporate transactions when both the debtor and creditor are members of a consolidated return group: 1. Transfers to controlled corporations under Code Sec. 351. 2. Subsidiary liquidations under Code Sec. 332. 3. Acquisitive reorganizations under Code Sec. 368(a). Unless stated otherwise, both the transferor and the transferee corporations are solvent for purposes of this tax column. The income tax treatment of a debt extinguishment within a separate return context does not necessarily apply to intercompany obligations of members in a consolidated return group. An intercompany obligation is an obligation between members of a consolidated group, but only for the period during which both parties are members. Reg. Section 1.1502-13(g)(3)(i)(B) provides a number of exceptions to the deemed satisfaction and reissuance regime.</abstract><cop>Riverwoods</cop><pub>CCH INCORPORATED</pub></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0040-0181 |
ispartof | Taxes, 2013-10, Vol.91 (10), p.11 |
issn | 0040-0181 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_reports_1522801754 |
source | HeinOnline Law Journal Library |
subjects | Built-in gains & losses Capital gains Consolidated groups Corporate debt Corporate income tax Debt Debt cancellation Income taxes Tax benefit rule Tax regulations Taxable income |
title | Tackling Taxes |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T20%3A08%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Tackling%20Taxes&rft.jtitle=Taxes&rft.au=Lau,%20Paul%20C&rft.date=2013-10-01&rft.volume=91&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=11&rft.pages=11-&rft.issn=0040-0181&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E3298498521%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1522801754&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |