Tackling Taxes

In this column, the authors will explore the income tax consequences of debt extinguishment in three types of nontaxable corporate transactions when both the debtor and creditor are members of a consolidated return group: 1. Transfers to controlled corporations under Code Sec. 351. 2. Subsidiary liq...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Taxes 2013-10, Vol.91 (10), p.11
Hauptverfasser: Lau, Paul C, Jolley, Mark, Piwko, Kurt
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 10
container_start_page 11
container_title Taxes
container_volume 91
creator Lau, Paul C
Jolley, Mark
Piwko, Kurt
description In this column, the authors will explore the income tax consequences of debt extinguishment in three types of nontaxable corporate transactions when both the debtor and creditor are members of a consolidated return group: 1. Transfers to controlled corporations under Code Sec. 351. 2. Subsidiary liquidations under Code Sec. 332. 3. Acquisitive reorganizations under Code Sec. 368(a). Unless stated otherwise, both the transferor and the transferee corporations are solvent for purposes of this tax column. The income tax treatment of a debt extinguishment within a separate return context does not necessarily apply to intercompany obligations of members in a consolidated return group. An intercompany obligation is an obligation between members of a consolidated group, but only for the period during which both parties are members. Reg. Section 1.1502-13(g)(3)(i)(B) provides a number of exceptions to the deemed satisfaction and reissuance regime.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_reports_1522801754</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3298498521</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_reports_15228017543</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpjYeA0MDAx0DUwtDDkYOAqLs4yMDAwMzGy5GTgC0lMzs7JzEtXCEmsSC3mYWBNS8wpTuWF0twMSm6uIc4eugVF-YWlqcUl8UWpBflFJcXxhqZGRhYGhuamJsZEKQIA1BYkxg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1522801754</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Tackling Taxes</title><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><creator>Lau, Paul C ; Jolley, Mark ; Piwko, Kurt</creator><creatorcontrib>Lau, Paul C ; Jolley, Mark ; Piwko, Kurt</creatorcontrib><description>In this column, the authors will explore the income tax consequences of debt extinguishment in three types of nontaxable corporate transactions when both the debtor and creditor are members of a consolidated return group: 1. Transfers to controlled corporations under Code Sec. 351. 2. Subsidiary liquidations under Code Sec. 332. 3. Acquisitive reorganizations under Code Sec. 368(a). Unless stated otherwise, both the transferor and the transferee corporations are solvent for purposes of this tax column. The income tax treatment of a debt extinguishment within a separate return context does not necessarily apply to intercompany obligations of members in a consolidated return group. An intercompany obligation is an obligation between members of a consolidated group, but only for the period during which both parties are members. Reg. Section 1.1502-13(g)(3)(i)(B) provides a number of exceptions to the deemed satisfaction and reissuance regime.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0040-0181</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Riverwoods: CCH INCORPORATED</publisher><subject>Built-in gains &amp; losses ; Capital gains ; Consolidated groups ; Corporate debt ; Corporate income tax ; Debt ; Debt cancellation ; Income taxes ; Tax benefit rule ; Tax regulations ; Taxable income</subject><ispartof>Taxes, 2013-10, Vol.91 (10), p.11</ispartof><rights>Copyright CCH INCORPORATED Oct 2013</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>312,776,780,787</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lau, Paul C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jolley, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Piwko, Kurt</creatorcontrib><title>Tackling Taxes</title><title>Taxes</title><description>In this column, the authors will explore the income tax consequences of debt extinguishment in three types of nontaxable corporate transactions when both the debtor and creditor are members of a consolidated return group: 1. Transfers to controlled corporations under Code Sec. 351. 2. Subsidiary liquidations under Code Sec. 332. 3. Acquisitive reorganizations under Code Sec. 368(a). Unless stated otherwise, both the transferor and the transferee corporations are solvent for purposes of this tax column. The income tax treatment of a debt extinguishment within a separate return context does not necessarily apply to intercompany obligations of members in a consolidated return group. An intercompany obligation is an obligation between members of a consolidated group, but only for the period during which both parties are members. Reg. Section 1.1502-13(g)(3)(i)(B) provides a number of exceptions to the deemed satisfaction and reissuance regime.</description><subject>Built-in gains &amp; losses</subject><subject>Capital gains</subject><subject>Consolidated groups</subject><subject>Corporate debt</subject><subject>Corporate income tax</subject><subject>Debt</subject><subject>Debt cancellation</subject><subject>Income taxes</subject><subject>Tax benefit rule</subject><subject>Tax regulations</subject><subject>Taxable income</subject><issn>0040-0181</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNpjYeA0MDAx0DUwtDDkYOAqLs4yMDAwMzGy5GTgC0lMzs7JzEtXCEmsSC3mYWBNS8wpTuWF0twMSm6uIc4eugVF-YWlqcUl8UWpBflFJcXxhqZGRhYGhuamJsZEKQIA1BYkxg</recordid><startdate>20131001</startdate><enddate>20131001</enddate><creator>Lau, Paul C</creator><creator>Jolley, Mark</creator><creator>Piwko, Kurt</creator><general>CCH INCORPORATED</general><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X1</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8A9</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ANIOZ</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRAZJ</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20131001</creationdate><title>Tackling Taxes</title><author>Lau, Paul C ; Jolley, Mark ; Piwko, Kurt</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_reports_15228017543</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Built-in gains &amp; losses</topic><topic>Capital gains</topic><topic>Consolidated groups</topic><topic>Corporate debt</topic><topic>Corporate income tax</topic><topic>Debt</topic><topic>Debt cancellation</topic><topic>Income taxes</topic><topic>Tax benefit rule</topic><topic>Tax regulations</topic><topic>Taxable income</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lau, Paul C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jolley, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Piwko, Kurt</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Accounting &amp; Tax Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Accounting &amp; Tax Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Accounting, Tax &amp; Banking Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Accounting, Tax &amp; Banking Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Taxes</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lau, Paul C</au><au>Jolley, Mark</au><au>Piwko, Kurt</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Tackling Taxes</atitle><jtitle>Taxes</jtitle><date>2013-10-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>91</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>11</spage><pages>11-</pages><issn>0040-0181</issn><abstract>In this column, the authors will explore the income tax consequences of debt extinguishment in three types of nontaxable corporate transactions when both the debtor and creditor are members of a consolidated return group: 1. Transfers to controlled corporations under Code Sec. 351. 2. Subsidiary liquidations under Code Sec. 332. 3. Acquisitive reorganizations under Code Sec. 368(a). Unless stated otherwise, both the transferor and the transferee corporations are solvent for purposes of this tax column. The income tax treatment of a debt extinguishment within a separate return context does not necessarily apply to intercompany obligations of members in a consolidated return group. An intercompany obligation is an obligation between members of a consolidated group, but only for the period during which both parties are members. Reg. Section 1.1502-13(g)(3)(i)(B) provides a number of exceptions to the deemed satisfaction and reissuance regime.</abstract><cop>Riverwoods</cop><pub>CCH INCORPORATED</pub></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0040-0181
ispartof Taxes, 2013-10, Vol.91 (10), p.11
issn 0040-0181
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_reports_1522801754
source HeinOnline Law Journal Library
subjects Built-in gains & losses
Capital gains
Consolidated groups
Corporate debt
Corporate income tax
Debt
Debt cancellation
Income taxes
Tax benefit rule
Tax regulations
Taxable income
title Tackling Taxes
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T20%3A08%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Tackling%20Taxes&rft.jtitle=Taxes&rft.au=Lau,%20Paul%20C&rft.date=2013-10-01&rft.volume=91&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=11&rft.pages=11-&rft.issn=0040-0181&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E3298498521%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1522801754&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true