PRINCIPLES OF PRESERVATION IN DISSOLUTION ACTIONS: MAKE SURE YOU HAVE THE RECORD YOU NEED FOR APPEAL

You're at an ABA conference, and the chatty gentleman sitting next toyou at the coffee bar is venting about a ruling he recently received from an appellate court. Apparently, the court would not consider the issues he had briefed so carefully, and he was flummoxed. "They said the ?record w...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Family Advocate 2014-03, Vol.36 (4), p.30-34
Hauptverfasser: MORKAN, LINDA, ANDERSON, M. CAITLIN
Format: Magazinearticle
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 34
container_issue 4
container_start_page 30
container_title Family Advocate
container_volume 36
creator MORKAN, LINDA
ANDERSON, M. CAITLIN
description You're at an ABA conference, and the chatty gentleman sitting next toyou at the coffee bar is venting about a ruling he recently received from an appellate court. Apparently, the court would not consider the issues he had briefed so carefully, and he was flummoxed. "They said the ?record wasn't adequate,"' he huffed. "Adequate? I explained everything in my appellate brief!" Not knowing a lot about appellate procedures, you sympathize with the fellow, but you are feeling a little inadequate yourself. Preservation can begin as early as the very first filings: the complaint and answer. Some states require spouses to establish claims for relief in those first papers. For example, in South Carolina, the parties generally must request alimony in either their complaint or answer. See Roes 1er v. Roes 1er, 719 S.E.2d 275, 280 (S.C. Ct. App. 2011). Similarly, in North Carolina, you must lay "sufficient basis" to give your spouse "fair notice of the grounds" for an alimony claim, or else risk being denied the alimony requested. See Quesinberry v. Ques in berry, 709 S.E.2d 367, 377-78 (N.C. Ct. App. 2011). Although there are exceptions to pleading rules and dissolution courts will stretch to apply equity when compliance with the rules is less than perfect, it is not worth risking whether an appellate court will be as accommodating as a lower court. Knowledge of local pleading rules is thus crucial to ensuring that all your claims for relief are preserved. Pendente lite motions (in some states called motions for temporary orders or for interim relief) are a very fertile ground for appellate issues and, therefore, key to preserving-or waiving-issues. You must first know whether your state permits interlocutory appeals from pendente lite orders. Some states do-although a subcategory of those states limit the rule to only certain types of orders, e.g., monetary orders-and will enter relief. Other states, although permitting the interlocutory appeal, will not hesitate to dismiss it as moot if the final dissolution order entered while the appeal was pending. Still, some states conclude that pendente lite orders are not "final judgments" because they will be replaced with dissolution orders. Understand how your state treats pendente lite orders so that you can either: (1) file the interlocutory appeal; (2) raise any necessary objections to preserve an appellate argument for a later appeal; or (3) advise your client that there are no appellate options. Lastly, some states pe
format Magazinearticle
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_reports_1518913817</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A371467289</galeid><jstor_id>24625933</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>A371467289</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-g1547-73e414740e25c87d845a1841a3c19ecefea9352ea6956d64834444f3480ceebb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptjE9Pg0AUxInRxFr9CCYbPWPYP7C73gjdWiICgdLoiWzpo6FpS13w4LcXWy8mnXeYvMlv5sIaEUq4LSjFl9bIwR61OXber62brts4DpGSyJG1SrMwDsI0UjlKpijNVK6yhT8PkxiFMZqEeZ5ExfH1g1_Ln9Gb_6pQXmQKfSQFmvkLheYzhTIVJNnkmMVKTdA0yZCfpsqPbq2rWm87uPvzsVVM1TyY2VHyEgZ-ZK-xy7jNKTDMOHOAuJXgK8FcjQXDmlZYQgU1aEldAtqTrrfymKBsUE2ZcCqA5ZKOrYfT7sG0n1_Q9aWBQ2v6rsQuFhJTgfkAPZ6gtd5C2ezrtje62jVdVfqUY-ZxIuRA2WeoNezB6G27h7oZ4n_80xl-uBXsmups4f5U2HR9a8qDaXbafJeEecSVlNIfRL98_Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>magazinearticle</recordtype><pqid>1518913817</pqid></control><display><type>magazinearticle</type><title>PRINCIPLES OF PRESERVATION IN DISSOLUTION ACTIONS: MAKE SURE YOU HAVE THE RECORD YOU NEED FOR APPEAL</title><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>MORKAN, LINDA ; ANDERSON, M. CAITLIN</creator><creatorcontrib>MORKAN, LINDA ; ANDERSON, M. CAITLIN</creatorcontrib><description>You're at an ABA conference, and the chatty gentleman sitting next toyou at the coffee bar is venting about a ruling he recently received from an appellate court. Apparently, the court would not consider the issues he had briefed so carefully, and he was flummoxed. "They said the ?record wasn't adequate,"' he huffed. "Adequate? I explained everything in my appellate brief!" Not knowing a lot about appellate procedures, you sympathize with the fellow, but you are feeling a little inadequate yourself. Preservation can begin as early as the very first filings: the complaint and answer. Some states require spouses to establish claims for relief in those first papers. For example, in South Carolina, the parties generally must request alimony in either their complaint or answer. See Roes 1er v. Roes 1er, 719 S.E.2d 275, 280 (S.C. Ct. App. 2011). Similarly, in North Carolina, you must lay "sufficient basis" to give your spouse "fair notice of the grounds" for an alimony claim, or else risk being denied the alimony requested. See Quesinberry v. Ques in berry, 709 S.E.2d 367, 377-78 (N.C. Ct. App. 2011). Although there are exceptions to pleading rules and dissolution courts will stretch to apply equity when compliance with the rules is less than perfect, it is not worth risking whether an appellate court will be as accommodating as a lower court. Knowledge of local pleading rules is thus crucial to ensuring that all your claims for relief are preserved. Pendente lite motions (in some states called motions for temporary orders or for interim relief) are a very fertile ground for appellate issues and, therefore, key to preserving-or waiving-issues. You must first know whether your state permits interlocutory appeals from pendente lite orders. Some states do-although a subcategory of those states limit the rule to only certain types of orders, e.g., monetary orders-and will enter relief. Other states, although permitting the interlocutory appeal, will not hesitate to dismiss it as moot if the final dissolution order entered while the appeal was pending. Still, some states conclude that pendente lite orders are not "final judgments" because they will be replaced with dissolution orders. Understand how your state treats pendente lite orders so that you can either: (1) file the interlocutory appeal; (2) raise any necessary objections to preserve an appellate argument for a later appeal; or (3) advise your client that there are no appellate options. Lastly, some states permit parties to submit proposed findings of fact and/or proposed orders prior to trial or after trial ends but before the court issues a decision. Such a filing is crucial for preserving issues for appeal, so treat them carefully. For example, if you include a certain proposed finding of fact or orders and the trial court adopts the proposition, you could be barred from arguing that the finding is erroneous. The appellate court might blame you for "inducing" or "inviting" the error. Similarly, if the opposing party files proposed findings or orders, it behooves you to object as necessary or perhaps file your own. Failing to act could be deemed waiver of any objection if the trial court adopts your opponent's proposed findings.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0163-710X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2327-8331</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chicago: American Bar Association Section of Family Law</publisher><subject>Affidavits ; Alimony ; Appellate courts ; Appellate procedure ; Attorneys ; Court hearings &amp; proceedings ; Court orders ; Court transcripts ; Interlocutory appeals ; Judges &amp; magistrates ; Jurisdiction ; Legal objections ; Methods ; Objections (Evidence) ; Opportunity ; Spouses ; State court decisions ; Testimony ; Trial court proceedings ; Trial courts ; Trials</subject><ispartof>Family Advocate, 2014-03, Vol.36 (4), p.30-34</ispartof><rights>2014 American Bar Association</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2014 American Bar Association</rights><rights>Copyright American Bar Association Spring 2014</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/24625933$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/24625933$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>312,780,784,791,803,58017,58250</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>MORKAN, LINDA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ANDERSON, M. CAITLIN</creatorcontrib><title>PRINCIPLES OF PRESERVATION IN DISSOLUTION ACTIONS: MAKE SURE YOU HAVE THE RECORD YOU NEED FOR APPEAL</title><title>Family Advocate</title><description>You're at an ABA conference, and the chatty gentleman sitting next toyou at the coffee bar is venting about a ruling he recently received from an appellate court. Apparently, the court would not consider the issues he had briefed so carefully, and he was flummoxed. "They said the ?record wasn't adequate,"' he huffed. "Adequate? I explained everything in my appellate brief!" Not knowing a lot about appellate procedures, you sympathize with the fellow, but you are feeling a little inadequate yourself. Preservation can begin as early as the very first filings: the complaint and answer. Some states require spouses to establish claims for relief in those first papers. For example, in South Carolina, the parties generally must request alimony in either their complaint or answer. See Roes 1er v. Roes 1er, 719 S.E.2d 275, 280 (S.C. Ct. App. 2011). Similarly, in North Carolina, you must lay "sufficient basis" to give your spouse "fair notice of the grounds" for an alimony claim, or else risk being denied the alimony requested. See Quesinberry v. Ques in berry, 709 S.E.2d 367, 377-78 (N.C. Ct. App. 2011). Although there are exceptions to pleading rules and dissolution courts will stretch to apply equity when compliance with the rules is less than perfect, it is not worth risking whether an appellate court will be as accommodating as a lower court. Knowledge of local pleading rules is thus crucial to ensuring that all your claims for relief are preserved. Pendente lite motions (in some states called motions for temporary orders or for interim relief) are a very fertile ground for appellate issues and, therefore, key to preserving-or waiving-issues. You must first know whether your state permits interlocutory appeals from pendente lite orders. Some states do-although a subcategory of those states limit the rule to only certain types of orders, e.g., monetary orders-and will enter relief. Other states, although permitting the interlocutory appeal, will not hesitate to dismiss it as moot if the final dissolution order entered while the appeal was pending. Still, some states conclude that pendente lite orders are not "final judgments" because they will be replaced with dissolution orders. Understand how your state treats pendente lite orders so that you can either: (1) file the interlocutory appeal; (2) raise any necessary objections to preserve an appellate argument for a later appeal; or (3) advise your client that there are no appellate options. Lastly, some states permit parties to submit proposed findings of fact and/or proposed orders prior to trial or after trial ends but before the court issues a decision. Such a filing is crucial for preserving issues for appeal, so treat them carefully. For example, if you include a certain proposed finding of fact or orders and the trial court adopts the proposition, you could be barred from arguing that the finding is erroneous. The appellate court might blame you for "inducing" or "inviting" the error. Similarly, if the opposing party files proposed findings or orders, it behooves you to object as necessary or perhaps file your own. Failing to act could be deemed waiver of any objection if the trial court adopts your opponent's proposed findings.</description><subject>Affidavits</subject><subject>Alimony</subject><subject>Appellate courts</subject><subject>Appellate procedure</subject><subject>Attorneys</subject><subject>Court hearings &amp; proceedings</subject><subject>Court orders</subject><subject>Court transcripts</subject><subject>Interlocutory appeals</subject><subject>Judges &amp; magistrates</subject><subject>Jurisdiction</subject><subject>Legal objections</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Objections (Evidence)</subject><subject>Opportunity</subject><subject>Spouses</subject><subject>State court decisions</subject><subject>Testimony</subject><subject>Trial court proceedings</subject><subject>Trial courts</subject><subject>Trials</subject><issn>0163-710X</issn><issn>2327-8331</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>magazinearticle</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>magazinearticle</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNptjE9Pg0AUxInRxFr9CCYbPWPYP7C73gjdWiICgdLoiWzpo6FpS13w4LcXWy8mnXeYvMlv5sIaEUq4LSjFl9bIwR61OXber62brts4DpGSyJG1SrMwDsI0UjlKpijNVK6yhT8PkxiFMZqEeZ5ExfH1g1_Ln9Gb_6pQXmQKfSQFmvkLheYzhTIVJNnkmMVKTdA0yZCfpsqPbq2rWm87uPvzsVVM1TyY2VHyEgZ-ZK-xy7jNKTDMOHOAuJXgK8FcjQXDmlZYQgU1aEldAtqTrrfymKBsUE2ZcCqA5ZKOrYfT7sG0n1_Q9aWBQ2v6rsQuFhJTgfkAPZ6gtd5C2ezrtje62jVdVfqUY-ZxIuRA2WeoNezB6G27h7oZ4n_80xl-uBXsmups4f5U2HR9a8qDaXbafJeEecSVlNIfRL98_Q</recordid><startdate>20140322</startdate><enddate>20140322</enddate><creator>MORKAN, LINDA</creator><creator>ANDERSON, M. CAITLIN</creator><general>American Bar Association Section of Family Law</general><general>American Bar Association</general><scope>ILT</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>883</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0F</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYYUZ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140322</creationdate><title>PRINCIPLES OF PRESERVATION IN DISSOLUTION ACTIONS: MAKE SURE YOU HAVE THE RECORD YOU NEED FOR APPEAL</title><author>MORKAN, LINDA ; ANDERSON, M. CAITLIN</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-g1547-73e414740e25c87d845a1841a3c19ecefea9352ea6956d64834444f3480ceebb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>magazinearticle</rsrctype><prefilter>magazinearticle</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Affidavits</topic><topic>Alimony</topic><topic>Appellate courts</topic><topic>Appellate procedure</topic><topic>Attorneys</topic><topic>Court hearings &amp; proceedings</topic><topic>Court orders</topic><topic>Court transcripts</topic><topic>Interlocutory appeals</topic><topic>Judges &amp; magistrates</topic><topic>Jurisdiction</topic><topic>Legal objections</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Objections (Evidence)</topic><topic>Opportunity</topic><topic>Spouses</topic><topic>State court decisions</topic><topic>Testimony</topic><topic>Trial court proceedings</topic><topic>Trial courts</topic><topic>Trials</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>MORKAN, LINDA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ANDERSON, M. CAITLIN</creatorcontrib><collection>Gale OneFile: LegalTrac</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Access via ABI/INFORM (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Trade &amp; Industry (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Trade &amp; Industry</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Family Advocate</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>MORKAN, LINDA</au><au>ANDERSON, M. CAITLIN</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>PRINCIPLES OF PRESERVATION IN DISSOLUTION ACTIONS: MAKE SURE YOU HAVE THE RECORD YOU NEED FOR APPEAL</atitle><jtitle>Family Advocate</jtitle><date>2014-03-22</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>36</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>30</spage><epage>34</epage><pages>30-34</pages><issn>0163-710X</issn><eissn>2327-8331</eissn><abstract>You're at an ABA conference, and the chatty gentleman sitting next toyou at the coffee bar is venting about a ruling he recently received from an appellate court. Apparently, the court would not consider the issues he had briefed so carefully, and he was flummoxed. "They said the ?record wasn't adequate,"' he huffed. "Adequate? I explained everything in my appellate brief!" Not knowing a lot about appellate procedures, you sympathize with the fellow, but you are feeling a little inadequate yourself. Preservation can begin as early as the very first filings: the complaint and answer. Some states require spouses to establish claims for relief in those first papers. For example, in South Carolina, the parties generally must request alimony in either their complaint or answer. See Roes 1er v. Roes 1er, 719 S.E.2d 275, 280 (S.C. Ct. App. 2011). Similarly, in North Carolina, you must lay "sufficient basis" to give your spouse "fair notice of the grounds" for an alimony claim, or else risk being denied the alimony requested. See Quesinberry v. Ques in berry, 709 S.E.2d 367, 377-78 (N.C. Ct. App. 2011). Although there are exceptions to pleading rules and dissolution courts will stretch to apply equity when compliance with the rules is less than perfect, it is not worth risking whether an appellate court will be as accommodating as a lower court. Knowledge of local pleading rules is thus crucial to ensuring that all your claims for relief are preserved. Pendente lite motions (in some states called motions for temporary orders or for interim relief) are a very fertile ground for appellate issues and, therefore, key to preserving-or waiving-issues. You must first know whether your state permits interlocutory appeals from pendente lite orders. Some states do-although a subcategory of those states limit the rule to only certain types of orders, e.g., monetary orders-and will enter relief. Other states, although permitting the interlocutory appeal, will not hesitate to dismiss it as moot if the final dissolution order entered while the appeal was pending. Still, some states conclude that pendente lite orders are not "final judgments" because they will be replaced with dissolution orders. Understand how your state treats pendente lite orders so that you can either: (1) file the interlocutory appeal; (2) raise any necessary objections to preserve an appellate argument for a later appeal; or (3) advise your client that there are no appellate options. Lastly, some states permit parties to submit proposed findings of fact and/or proposed orders prior to trial or after trial ends but before the court issues a decision. Such a filing is crucial for preserving issues for appeal, so treat them carefully. For example, if you include a certain proposed finding of fact or orders and the trial court adopts the proposition, you could be barred from arguing that the finding is erroneous. The appellate court might blame you for "inducing" or "inviting" the error. Similarly, if the opposing party files proposed findings or orders, it behooves you to object as necessary or perhaps file your own. Failing to act could be deemed waiver of any objection if the trial court adopts your opponent's proposed findings.</abstract><cop>Chicago</cop><pub>American Bar Association Section of Family Law</pub><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0163-710X
ispartof Family Advocate, 2014-03, Vol.36 (4), p.30-34
issn 0163-710X
2327-8331
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_reports_1518913817
source HeinOnline Law Journal Library; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing
subjects Affidavits
Alimony
Appellate courts
Appellate procedure
Attorneys
Court hearings & proceedings
Court orders
Court transcripts
Interlocutory appeals
Judges & magistrates
Jurisdiction
Legal objections
Methods
Objections (Evidence)
Opportunity
Spouses
State court decisions
Testimony
Trial court proceedings
Trial courts
Trials
title PRINCIPLES OF PRESERVATION IN DISSOLUTION ACTIONS: MAKE SURE YOU HAVE THE RECORD YOU NEED FOR APPEAL
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T07%3A30%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=PRINCIPLES%20OF%20PRESERVATION%20IN%20DISSOLUTION%20ACTIONS:%20MAKE%20SURE%20YOU%20HAVE%20THE%20RECORD%20YOU%20NEED%20FOR%20APPEAL&rft.jtitle=Family%20Advocate&rft.au=MORKAN,%20LINDA&rft.date=2014-03-22&rft.volume=36&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=30&rft.epage=34&rft.pages=30-34&rft.issn=0163-710X&rft.eissn=2327-8331&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA371467289%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1518913817&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A371467289&rft_jstor_id=24625933&rfr_iscdi=true