Changing Probation Officer Attitudes: Training Experience, Motivation, and Knowledge
[...]meta-analytic evidence has suggested that the clinically relevant and psychologically informed principles of risk, need, and responsivity are associated with significant reductions in recidivism (Andrews et al., 1990; Dowden & Andrews, 1999a, 1999b; Lipsey, 1989). [...]the responsivity prin...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Federal Probation 2013-09, Vol.77 (2), p.54 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 54 |
| container_title | Federal Probation |
| container_volume | 77 |
| creator | Lowenkamp, Christopher T Holsinger, Alexander M Flores, Anthony W Koutsenok, Igor Pearl, Natalie |
| description | [...]meta-analytic evidence has suggested that the clinically relevant and psychologically informed principles of risk, need, and responsivity are associated with significant reductions in recidivism (Andrews et al., 1990; Dowden & Andrews, 1999a, 1999b; Lipsey, 1989). [...]the responsivity principle denotes the importance of matching the style and mode of intervention to the abilities, motivation, and learning style of the offender. |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_reports_1459406094</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3130193681</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p97t-9481993814d45cab167d6a413a70eaaf0ab403cadbcb21da026403ddc44e624a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotjF1LwzAYhYMoWKf_IXi9QtIkbePdKFOHk3nR-_E2eVsjI6lJpv5858e5OTxwnnNGCq6UKplg4pwUjHFZal61l-QqpTd2imqbgvTdK_jJ-Ym-xDBAdsHT3Tg6g5Gucnb5aDHd0T6C8z-r9deM0aE3uKTPIbuPX2VJwVv65MPnAe2E1-RihEPCm_9ekP5-3XeP5Xb3sOlW23LWTS61bLnWouXSSmVg4HVja5BcQMMQYGQwSCYM2MEMFbfAqvrE1hopsa4kiAW5_budY3g_Ysr7iHOIOe25VFqymmkpvgHo6Uzs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1459406094</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Changing Probation Officer Attitudes: Training Experience, Motivation, and Knowledge</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><creator>Lowenkamp, Christopher T ; Holsinger, Alexander M ; Flores, Anthony W ; Koutsenok, Igor ; Pearl, Natalie</creator><creatorcontrib>Lowenkamp, Christopher T ; Holsinger, Alexander M ; Flores, Anthony W ; Koutsenok, Igor ; Pearl, Natalie</creatorcontrib><description>[...]meta-analytic evidence has suggested that the clinically relevant and psychologically informed principles of risk, need, and responsivity are associated with significant reductions in recidivism (Andrews et al., 1990; Dowden & Andrews, 1999a, 1999b; Lipsey, 1989). [...]the responsivity principle denotes the importance of matching the style and mode of intervention to the abilities, motivation, and learning style of the offender.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0014-9128</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1555-0303</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: Administrative Office of the United States Courts</publisher><subject>Attitudes ; Behavior ; Correctional treatment programs ; Intervention ; Motivation ; Principles ; Rehabilitation ; Supervision</subject><ispartof>Federal Probation, 2013-09, Vol.77 (2), p.54</ispartof><rights>Copyright Administrative Office of the United States Courts Sep 2013</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>312,776,780,787</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lowenkamp, Christopher T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holsinger, Alexander M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Flores, Anthony W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koutsenok, Igor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pearl, Natalie</creatorcontrib><title>Changing Probation Officer Attitudes: Training Experience, Motivation, and Knowledge</title><title>Federal Probation</title><description>[...]meta-analytic evidence has suggested that the clinically relevant and psychologically informed principles of risk, need, and responsivity are associated with significant reductions in recidivism (Andrews et al., 1990; Dowden & Andrews, 1999a, 1999b; Lipsey, 1989). [...]the responsivity principle denotes the importance of matching the style and mode of intervention to the abilities, motivation, and learning style of the offender.</description><subject>Attitudes</subject><subject>Behavior</subject><subject>Correctional treatment programs</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Motivation</subject><subject>Principles</subject><subject>Rehabilitation</subject><subject>Supervision</subject><issn>0014-9128</issn><issn>1555-0303</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNotjF1LwzAYhYMoWKf_IXi9QtIkbePdKFOHk3nR-_E2eVsjI6lJpv5858e5OTxwnnNGCq6UKplg4pwUjHFZal61l-QqpTd2imqbgvTdK_jJ-Ym-xDBAdsHT3Tg6g5Gucnb5aDHd0T6C8z-r9deM0aE3uKTPIbuPX2VJwVv65MPnAe2E1-RihEPCm_9ekP5-3XeP5Xb3sOlW23LWTS61bLnWouXSSmVg4HVja5BcQMMQYGQwSCYM2MEMFbfAqvrE1hopsa4kiAW5_budY3g_Ysr7iHOIOe25VFqymmkpvgHo6Uzs</recordid><startdate>20130901</startdate><enddate>20130901</enddate><creator>Lowenkamp, Christopher T</creator><creator>Holsinger, Alexander M</creator><creator>Flores, Anthony W</creator><creator>Koutsenok, Igor</creator><creator>Pearl, Natalie</creator><general>Administrative Office of the United States Courts</general><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>7RQ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AM</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGRYB</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K7.</scope><scope>M0O</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>U9A</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130901</creationdate><title>Changing Probation Officer Attitudes: Training Experience, Motivation, and Knowledge</title><author>Lowenkamp, Christopher T ; Holsinger, Alexander M ; Flores, Anthony W ; Koutsenok, Igor ; Pearl, Natalie</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p97t-9481993814d45cab167d6a413a70eaaf0ab403cadbcb21da026403ddc44e624a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Attitudes</topic><topic>Behavior</topic><topic>Correctional treatment programs</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Motivation</topic><topic>Principles</topic><topic>Rehabilitation</topic><topic>Supervision</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lowenkamp, Christopher T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holsinger, Alexander M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Flores, Anthony W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koutsenok, Igor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pearl, Natalie</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>Career & Technical Education Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Criminal Justice Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Criminology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Federal Probation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lowenkamp, Christopher T</au><au>Holsinger, Alexander M</au><au>Flores, Anthony W</au><au>Koutsenok, Igor</au><au>Pearl, Natalie</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Changing Probation Officer Attitudes: Training Experience, Motivation, and Knowledge</atitle><jtitle>Federal Probation</jtitle><date>2013-09-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>77</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>54</spage><pages>54-</pages><issn>0014-9128</issn><eissn>1555-0303</eissn><abstract>[...]meta-analytic evidence has suggested that the clinically relevant and psychologically informed principles of risk, need, and responsivity are associated with significant reductions in recidivism (Andrews et al., 1990; Dowden & Andrews, 1999a, 1999b; Lipsey, 1989). [...]the responsivity principle denotes the importance of matching the style and mode of intervention to the abilities, motivation, and learning style of the offender.</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>Administrative Office of the United States Courts</pub></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0014-9128 |
| ispartof | Federal Probation, 2013-09, Vol.77 (2), p.54 |
| issn | 0014-9128 1555-0303 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_reports_1459406094 |
| source | Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; HeinOnline Law Journal Library |
| subjects | Attitudes Behavior Correctional treatment programs Intervention Motivation Principles Rehabilitation Supervision |
| title | Changing Probation Officer Attitudes: Training Experience, Motivation, and Knowledge |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T10%3A06%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Changing%20Probation%20Officer%20Attitudes:%20Training%20Experience,%20Motivation,%20and%20Knowledge&rft.jtitle=Federal%20Probation&rft.au=Lowenkamp,%20Christopher%20T&rft.date=2013-09-01&rft.volume=77&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=54&rft.pages=54-&rft.issn=0014-9128&rft.eissn=1555-0303&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E3130193681%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1459406094&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |