Newborn Screening for Critical Congenital Heart Disease: Potential Roles of Birth Defects Surveillance Programs — United States, 2010–2011
In September 2011, the Secretary of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) approved the Secretary's Advisory Committee on Heritable Disorders in Newborns and Children (SACHDNC) 2010 recommendation that all newborns be screened for critical congenital heart disease (CCHD) using p...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | MMWR. Morbidity and mortality weekly report 2012-10, Vol.61 (42), p.849-853 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 853 |
---|---|
container_issue | 42 |
container_start_page | 849 |
container_title | MMWR. Morbidity and mortality weekly report |
container_volume | 61 |
creator | Copeland, Glenn Feldkamp, Marcia Beres, Leslie M Mai, Cara T Hinton, Cynthia F Glidewell, Jill |
description | In September 2011, the Secretary of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) approved the Secretary's Advisory Committee on Heritable Disorders in Newborns and Children (SACHDNC) 2010 recommendation that all newborns be screened for critical congenital heart disease (CCHD) using pulse oximetry, a noninvasive test of blood oxygenation, to prevent mortality and morbidity. CDC partnered with the National Birth Defects Prevention Network (NBDPN) to conduct a survey designed to assess state birth defect surveillance programs' potential roles, capabilities, and readiness to assist with newborn screening activities for CCHD. States were surveyed in November 2010, after the initial SACHDNC recommendation, and again in November 2011, after the Secretary's approval. From 2010 to 2011, the number of birth defects surveillance programs involved in CCHD screening increased from one to 10. Barriers exist, such as the lack of legislative authority, staffing, funding, and informatics infrastructure. Sixty-seven percent of programs take an average of more than 12 months to collect complete data on birth defect cases, including congenital heart defects. An assessment of state birth defects programs' existing data and capability to lead the evaluation of screening for CCHD is warranted. |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_reports_1151856241</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A309729177</galeid><jstor_id>24845876</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>A309729177</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-g311t-5ca78e38f7d44b9520a3af8ca0dfa5b8e27ac11da9b448dbe4f212f67d8484403</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpt0V1LwzAUBuAiis7pT1CKgnhTadJkSS5lfkwYeqGCd-W0PdkiXTOTDPHfm7GJTpZcJJw8J5A3O0mPcMYzOSBvu0kvJ0xllCh-kBx6_54vR5HvJwe0yBVXvOgl4hE_K-u69Ll2iJ3pJqm2Lh06E0wNbTq03SSWQ9yOEFxIb4xH8HiU7GloPR6v137yenf7Mhxl46f7h-H1OJsUhISM1yAkFlKLhrFKcZpDAVrWkDcaeCWRCqgJaUBVjMmmQqYpoXogGskkY3nRT85W986d_VigD6XDuXXBl4RwIvmAMhLR5T80M77GtoUO7WJJCedU5VJFer6iE2ixNJ22wUG95OV1DEVQRYSIKtuiYhDooLUdahPLG_5qi4-zwZmptzZc_GmYIrRh6m27CMZ2fhOerp-2qGbYlHNnZuC-yp8fjOBkBd59sO73PMbHpRgU3zsCnTM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1151856241</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Newborn Screening for Critical Congenital Heart Disease: Potential Roles of Birth Defects Surveillance Programs — United States, 2010–2011</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Copeland, Glenn ; Feldkamp, Marcia ; Beres, Leslie M ; Mai, Cara T ; Hinton, Cynthia F ; Glidewell, Jill</creator><creatorcontrib>Copeland, Glenn ; Feldkamp, Marcia ; Beres, Leslie M ; Mai, Cara T ; Hinton, Cynthia F ; Glidewell, Jill ; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention</creatorcontrib><description>In September 2011, the Secretary of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) approved the Secretary's Advisory Committee on Heritable Disorders in Newborns and Children (SACHDNC) 2010 recommendation that all newborns be screened for critical congenital heart disease (CCHD) using pulse oximetry, a noninvasive test of blood oxygenation, to prevent mortality and morbidity. CDC partnered with the National Birth Defects Prevention Network (NBDPN) to conduct a survey designed to assess state birth defect surveillance programs' potential roles, capabilities, and readiness to assist with newborn screening activities for CCHD. States were surveyed in November 2010, after the initial SACHDNC recommendation, and again in November 2011, after the Secretary's approval. From 2010 to 2011, the number of birth defects surveillance programs involved in CCHD screening increased from one to 10. Barriers exist, such as the lack of legislative authority, staffing, funding, and informatics infrastructure. Sixty-seven percent of programs take an average of more than 12 months to collect complete data on birth defect cases, including congenital heart defects. An assessment of state birth defects programs' existing data and capability to lead the evaluation of screening for CCHD is warranted.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0149-2195</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1545-861X</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23095953</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Office of Surveillance, Epidemiology, and Laboratory Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), U.S. Department of Health and Human Services</publisher><subject>Birth defects ; Cardiovascular disease ; Congenital heart defects ; Congenital heart disease ; Data Collection ; Disease prevention ; Genetic aspects ; Genetic screening ; Government agencies ; Heart Defects, Congenital - diagnosis ; Heart diseases ; Humans ; Infant, Newborn ; Infants (Newborn) ; Medical screening ; Morbidity ; Mortality ; Neonatal disorders ; Neonatal screening ; Neonatal Screening - organization & administration ; Newborn babies ; Newborns ; Oximetry ; Population Surveillance ; Pulse oximetry ; Screening questions ; Surveillance ; United States - epidemiology</subject><ispartof>MMWR. Morbidity and mortality weekly report, 2012-10, Vol.61 (42), p.849-853</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2012 U.S. Government Printing Office</rights><rights>Copyright U.S. Center for Disease Control Oct 26, 2012</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/24845876$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/24845876$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,57992,58225</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23095953$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Copeland, Glenn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feldkamp, Marcia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beres, Leslie M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mai, Cara T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hinton, Cynthia F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Glidewell, Jill</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Centers for Disease Control and Prevention</creatorcontrib><title>Newborn Screening for Critical Congenital Heart Disease: Potential Roles of Birth Defects Surveillance Programs — United States, 2010–2011</title><title>MMWR. Morbidity and mortality weekly report</title><addtitle>MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep</addtitle><description>In September 2011, the Secretary of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) approved the Secretary's Advisory Committee on Heritable Disorders in Newborns and Children (SACHDNC) 2010 recommendation that all newborns be screened for critical congenital heart disease (CCHD) using pulse oximetry, a noninvasive test of blood oxygenation, to prevent mortality and morbidity. CDC partnered with the National Birth Defects Prevention Network (NBDPN) to conduct a survey designed to assess state birth defect surveillance programs' potential roles, capabilities, and readiness to assist with newborn screening activities for CCHD. States were surveyed in November 2010, after the initial SACHDNC recommendation, and again in November 2011, after the Secretary's approval. From 2010 to 2011, the number of birth defects surveillance programs involved in CCHD screening increased from one to 10. Barriers exist, such as the lack of legislative authority, staffing, funding, and informatics infrastructure. Sixty-seven percent of programs take an average of more than 12 months to collect complete data on birth defect cases, including congenital heart defects. An assessment of state birth defects programs' existing data and capability to lead the evaluation of screening for CCHD is warranted.</description><subject>Birth defects</subject><subject>Cardiovascular disease</subject><subject>Congenital heart defects</subject><subject>Congenital heart disease</subject><subject>Data Collection</subject><subject>Disease prevention</subject><subject>Genetic aspects</subject><subject>Genetic screening</subject><subject>Government agencies</subject><subject>Heart Defects, Congenital - diagnosis</subject><subject>Heart diseases</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infant, Newborn</subject><subject>Infants (Newborn)</subject><subject>Medical screening</subject><subject>Morbidity</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>Neonatal disorders</subject><subject>Neonatal screening</subject><subject>Neonatal Screening - organization & administration</subject><subject>Newborn babies</subject><subject>Newborns</subject><subject>Oximetry</subject><subject>Population Surveillance</subject><subject>Pulse oximetry</subject><subject>Screening questions</subject><subject>Surveillance</subject><subject>United States - epidemiology</subject><issn>0149-2195</issn><issn>1545-861X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNpt0V1LwzAUBuAiis7pT1CKgnhTadJkSS5lfkwYeqGCd-W0PdkiXTOTDPHfm7GJTpZcJJw8J5A3O0mPcMYzOSBvu0kvJ0xllCh-kBx6_54vR5HvJwe0yBVXvOgl4hE_K-u69Ll2iJ3pJqm2Lh06E0wNbTq03SSWQ9yOEFxIb4xH8HiU7GloPR6v137yenf7Mhxl46f7h-H1OJsUhISM1yAkFlKLhrFKcZpDAVrWkDcaeCWRCqgJaUBVjMmmQqYpoXogGskkY3nRT85W986d_VigD6XDuXXBl4RwIvmAMhLR5T80M77GtoUO7WJJCedU5VJFer6iE2ixNJ22wUG95OV1DEVQRYSIKtuiYhDooLUdahPLG_5qi4-zwZmptzZc_GmYIrRh6m27CMZ2fhOerp-2qGbYlHNnZuC-yp8fjOBkBd59sO73PMbHpRgU3zsCnTM</recordid><startdate>20121026</startdate><enddate>20121026</enddate><creator>Copeland, Glenn</creator><creator>Feldkamp, Marcia</creator><creator>Beres, Leslie M</creator><creator>Mai, Cara T</creator><creator>Hinton, Cynthia F</creator><creator>Glidewell, Jill</creator><general>Office of Surveillance, Epidemiology, and Laboratory Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), U.S. Department of Health and Human Services</general><general>U.S. Government Printing Office</general><general>U.S. Center for Disease Control</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88F</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M1Q</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20121026</creationdate><title>Newborn Screening for Critical Congenital Heart Disease</title><author>Copeland, Glenn ; Feldkamp, Marcia ; Beres, Leslie M ; Mai, Cara T ; Hinton, Cynthia F ; Glidewell, Jill</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-g311t-5ca78e38f7d44b9520a3af8ca0dfa5b8e27ac11da9b448dbe4f212f67d8484403</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Birth defects</topic><topic>Cardiovascular disease</topic><topic>Congenital heart defects</topic><topic>Congenital heart disease</topic><topic>Data Collection</topic><topic>Disease prevention</topic><topic>Genetic aspects</topic><topic>Genetic screening</topic><topic>Government agencies</topic><topic>Heart Defects, Congenital - diagnosis</topic><topic>Heart diseases</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infant, Newborn</topic><topic>Infants (Newborn)</topic><topic>Medical screening</topic><topic>Morbidity</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>Neonatal disorders</topic><topic>Neonatal screening</topic><topic>Neonatal Screening - organization & administration</topic><topic>Newborn babies</topic><topic>Newborns</topic><topic>Oximetry</topic><topic>Population Surveillance</topic><topic>Pulse oximetry</topic><topic>Screening questions</topic><topic>Surveillance</topic><topic>United States - epidemiology</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Copeland, Glenn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feldkamp, Marcia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beres, Leslie M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mai, Cara T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hinton, Cynthia F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Glidewell, Jill</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Centers for Disease Control and Prevention</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Military Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Military Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>MMWR. Morbidity and mortality weekly report</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Copeland, Glenn</au><au>Feldkamp, Marcia</au><au>Beres, Leslie M</au><au>Mai, Cara T</au><au>Hinton, Cynthia F</au><au>Glidewell, Jill</au><aucorp>Centers for Disease Control and Prevention</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Newborn Screening for Critical Congenital Heart Disease: Potential Roles of Birth Defects Surveillance Programs — United States, 2010–2011</atitle><jtitle>MMWR. Morbidity and mortality weekly report</jtitle><addtitle>MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep</addtitle><date>2012-10-26</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>61</volume><issue>42</issue><spage>849</spage><epage>853</epage><pages>849-853</pages><issn>0149-2195</issn><eissn>1545-861X</eissn><abstract>In September 2011, the Secretary of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) approved the Secretary's Advisory Committee on Heritable Disorders in Newborns and Children (SACHDNC) 2010 recommendation that all newborns be screened for critical congenital heart disease (CCHD) using pulse oximetry, a noninvasive test of blood oxygenation, to prevent mortality and morbidity. CDC partnered with the National Birth Defects Prevention Network (NBDPN) to conduct a survey designed to assess state birth defect surveillance programs' potential roles, capabilities, and readiness to assist with newborn screening activities for CCHD. States were surveyed in November 2010, after the initial SACHDNC recommendation, and again in November 2011, after the Secretary's approval. From 2010 to 2011, the number of birth defects surveillance programs involved in CCHD screening increased from one to 10. Barriers exist, such as the lack of legislative authority, staffing, funding, and informatics infrastructure. Sixty-seven percent of programs take an average of more than 12 months to collect complete data on birth defect cases, including congenital heart defects. An assessment of state birth defects programs' existing data and capability to lead the evaluation of screening for CCHD is warranted.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Office of Surveillance, Epidemiology, and Laboratory Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), U.S. Department of Health and Human Services</pub><pmid>23095953</pmid><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0149-2195 |
ispartof | MMWR. Morbidity and mortality weekly report, 2012-10, Vol.61 (42), p.849-853 |
issn | 0149-2195 1545-861X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_reports_1151856241 |
source | Jstor Complete Legacy; MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals |
subjects | Birth defects Cardiovascular disease Congenital heart defects Congenital heart disease Data Collection Disease prevention Genetic aspects Genetic screening Government agencies Heart Defects, Congenital - diagnosis Heart diseases Humans Infant, Newborn Infants (Newborn) Medical screening Morbidity Mortality Neonatal disorders Neonatal screening Neonatal Screening - organization & administration Newborn babies Newborns Oximetry Population Surveillance Pulse oximetry Screening questions Surveillance United States - epidemiology |
title | Newborn Screening for Critical Congenital Heart Disease: Potential Roles of Birth Defects Surveillance Programs — United States, 2010–2011 |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T09%3A53%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Newborn%20Screening%20for%20Critical%20Congenital%20Heart%20Disease:%20Potential%20Roles%20of%20Birth%20Defects%20Surveillance%20Programs%20%E2%80%94%20United%20States,%202010%E2%80%932011&rft.jtitle=MMWR.%20Morbidity%20and%20mortality%20weekly%20report&rft.au=Copeland,%20Glenn&rft.aucorp=Centers%20for%20Disease%20Control%20and%20Prevention&rft.date=2012-10-26&rft.volume=61&rft.issue=42&rft.spage=849&rft.epage=853&rft.pages=849-853&rft.issn=0149-2195&rft.eissn=1545-861X&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA309729177%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1151856241&rft_id=info:pmid/23095953&rft_galeid=A309729177&rft_jstor_id=24845876&rfr_iscdi=true |