Inter-Rater Reliability in Psychiatric Diagnosis

Other important sources of inter-rater divergence are external pressures, such as different reimbursement practices by insurance companies, exposure to popular diagnoses through the media or pharmaceutical marketing, and the cognitive biases and heuristics that affect the practice of all medical spe...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Psychiatric times 2012-10, Vol.29 (10), p.12
Hauptverfasser: Matuszak, Jeremy, Piasecki, Melissa
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 10
container_start_page 12
container_title The Psychiatric times
container_volume 29
creator Matuszak, Jeremy
Piasecki, Melissa
description Other important sources of inter-rater divergence are external pressures, such as different reimbursement practices by insurance companies, exposure to popular diagnoses through the media or pharmaceutical marketing, and the cognitive biases and heuristics that affect the practice of all medical specialties.8 Clearly, interview styles vary widely and no single approach is the right one. While some validated structured instruments (eg, the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM Disorders-Clinician Version [SCID-CV]) require too much time for administration to be practical in everyday clinical work, others (eg, the Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children [DISC]) may be successfully administered by lay providers or by computer, allowing the clinician to subsequently focus on one or more identified areas of concern.9,10 Similarly, systematic screening instruments are available for all major categories of psychiatric illness.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_reports_1151083512</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2813478731</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p97t-2c7d2df7ab44d6c744ff24fe95de0d99c6711256018fe84dfebabf39476183bc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotjktrAjEYAHOoULX9D0vvgbwfx2JrFQTL4l3y-NKmLLvbJD347yvoZeY2zANaEmM5ZpbIR7Sq9YcQarQyS0T2Y4OCe3dl18OQnc9Dbpcuj91nvYTv7FrJoXvL7mucaq5PaJHcUOH57jU6bd9Pmx0-HD_2m9cDnq1umAUdWUzaeSGiClqIlJhIYGUEEq0NSlPKpLpuJDAiJvDOJ26FVtRwH_gavdyyc5l-_6C2c4F5Kq2eKZWUGC4p4_8IYD6C</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1151083512</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Inter-Rater Reliability in Psychiatric Diagnosis</title><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Matuszak, Jeremy ; Piasecki, Melissa</creator><creatorcontrib>Matuszak, Jeremy ; Piasecki, Melissa</creatorcontrib><description>Other important sources of inter-rater divergence are external pressures, such as different reimbursement practices by insurance companies, exposure to popular diagnoses through the media or pharmaceutical marketing, and the cognitive biases and heuristics that affect the practice of all medical specialties.8 Clearly, interview styles vary widely and no single approach is the right one. While some validated structured instruments (eg, the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM Disorders-Clinician Version [SCID-CV]) require too much time for administration to be practical in everyday clinical work, others (eg, the Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children [DISC]) may be successfully administered by lay providers or by computer, allowing the clinician to subsequently focus on one or more identified areas of concern.9,10 Similarly, systematic screening instruments are available for all major categories of psychiatric illness.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0893-2905</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Monmouth Junction: UBM LLC</publisher><subject>Agreements ; Bipolar disorder ; Interviews ; Studies</subject><ispartof>The Psychiatric times, 2012-10, Vol.29 (10), p.12</ispartof><rights>Copyright United Business Media LLC Oct 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Matuszak, Jeremy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Piasecki, Melissa</creatorcontrib><title>Inter-Rater Reliability in Psychiatric Diagnosis</title><title>The Psychiatric times</title><description>Other important sources of inter-rater divergence are external pressures, such as different reimbursement practices by insurance companies, exposure to popular diagnoses through the media or pharmaceutical marketing, and the cognitive biases and heuristics that affect the practice of all medical specialties.8 Clearly, interview styles vary widely and no single approach is the right one. While some validated structured instruments (eg, the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM Disorders-Clinician Version [SCID-CV]) require too much time for administration to be practical in everyday clinical work, others (eg, the Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children [DISC]) may be successfully administered by lay providers or by computer, allowing the clinician to subsequently focus on one or more identified areas of concern.9,10 Similarly, systematic screening instruments are available for all major categories of psychiatric illness.</description><subject>Agreements</subject><subject>Bipolar disorder</subject><subject>Interviews</subject><subject>Studies</subject><issn>0893-2905</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNotjktrAjEYAHOoULX9D0vvgbwfx2JrFQTL4l3y-NKmLLvbJD347yvoZeY2zANaEmM5ZpbIR7Sq9YcQarQyS0T2Y4OCe3dl18OQnc9Dbpcuj91nvYTv7FrJoXvL7mucaq5PaJHcUOH57jU6bd9Pmx0-HD_2m9cDnq1umAUdWUzaeSGiClqIlJhIYGUEEq0NSlPKpLpuJDAiJvDOJ26FVtRwH_gavdyyc5l-_6C2c4F5Kq2eKZWUGC4p4_8IYD6C</recordid><startdate>20121001</startdate><enddate>20121001</enddate><creator>Matuszak, Jeremy</creator><creator>Piasecki, Melissa</creator><general>UBM LLC</general><scope>0-V</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20121001</creationdate><title>Inter-Rater Reliability in Psychiatric Diagnosis</title><author>Matuszak, Jeremy ; Piasecki, Melissa</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p97t-2c7d2df7ab44d6c744ff24fe95de0d99c6711256018fe84dfebabf39476183bc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Agreements</topic><topic>Bipolar disorder</topic><topic>Interviews</topic><topic>Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Matuszak, Jeremy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Piasecki, Melissa</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>The Psychiatric times</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Matuszak, Jeremy</au><au>Piasecki, Melissa</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Inter-Rater Reliability in Psychiatric Diagnosis</atitle><jtitle>The Psychiatric times</jtitle><date>2012-10-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>12</spage><pages>12-</pages><issn>0893-2905</issn><abstract>Other important sources of inter-rater divergence are external pressures, such as different reimbursement practices by insurance companies, exposure to popular diagnoses through the media or pharmaceutical marketing, and the cognitive biases and heuristics that affect the practice of all medical specialties.8 Clearly, interview styles vary widely and no single approach is the right one. While some validated structured instruments (eg, the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM Disorders-Clinician Version [SCID-CV]) require too much time for administration to be practical in everyday clinical work, others (eg, the Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children [DISC]) may be successfully administered by lay providers or by computer, allowing the clinician to subsequently focus on one or more identified areas of concern.9,10 Similarly, systematic screening instruments are available for all major categories of psychiatric illness.</abstract><cop>Monmouth Junction</cop><pub>UBM LLC</pub></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0893-2905
ispartof The Psychiatric times, 2012-10, Vol.29 (10), p.12
issn 0893-2905
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_reports_1151083512
source EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Agreements
Bipolar disorder
Interviews
Studies
title Inter-Rater Reliability in Psychiatric Diagnosis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T08%3A10%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Inter-Rater%20Reliability%20in%20Psychiatric%20Diagnosis&rft.jtitle=The%20Psychiatric%20times&rft.au=Matuszak,%20Jeremy&rft.date=2012-10-01&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=12&rft.pages=12-&rft.issn=0893-2905&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2813478731%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1151083512&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true