The Significance of Police Misconduct in the Analysis of s. 8 Charter Breaches and the Exclusion of Evidence under s. 24(2) in R. v. Grant, R. v. Harrison and R. v. Morelli

In R. v. Grant, R. v. Harrison, and R. v. Morelli, Porter and Kettles explore the degree to which Grant, Harrison and Morelli represent an increased emphasis in the jurisprudence on police carelessness and lack of candour in both the ITO, and in subsequent testimony about the issuance of a search wa...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Criminal Law Quarterly 2012-05, Vol.58 (3/4), p.510
Hauptverfasser: Porter, David, Kettles, Brent
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 3/4
container_start_page 510
container_title Criminal Law Quarterly
container_volume 58
creator Porter, David
Kettles, Brent
description In R. v. Grant, R. v. Harrison, and R. v. Morelli, Porter and Kettles explore the degree to which Grant, Harrison and Morelli represent an increased emphasis in the jurisprudence on police carelessness and lack of candour in both the ITO, and in subsequent testimony about the issuance of a search warrant during a Charter voir dire. Further, it will examine the effect of carelessness or negligence short of outright fraud in ITOs on the admissibility of evidence subsequently obtained from a breach of s. 8 of the Charter. In R. v. Grant, the Supreme Court of Canada articulated a new test for the exclusion of evidence obtained in a manner that infringed Charter rights under s. 24(2) of the Charter.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_reports_1022964725</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2700938961</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_reports_10229647253</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNzEtOwzAQBmAvQKI87jBiBRKNHDtAuoQqtJtKqO2-spwJGWTZxeNUcCcOSQw9AKt56Pv_EzGRsiynpdb6TJwzv0tZ1XpWT8T3tkfY0JunjqzxFiF08BocjduK2AbfDjYBeUgjfPLGfTFxRlxADfPexIQRniMa2yOD8e2vbD6tG5iCz7Q5UIu5e_DtiMekqm7UbW5dF3AoYBGNT3fHY2liJB6TuevvtQoRnaNLcdoZx3h1nBfi-qXZzpfTfQwfA3LaRdyHmHhXSqVmD9Wjutf_Qj-m51ml</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1022964725</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Significance of Police Misconduct in the Analysis of s. 8 Charter Breaches and the Exclusion of Evidence under s. 24(2) in R. v. Grant, R. v. Harrison and R. v. Morelli</title><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><creator>Porter, David ; Kettles, Brent</creator><creatorcontrib>Porter, David ; Kettles, Brent</creatorcontrib><description>In R. v. Grant, R. v. Harrison, and R. v. Morelli, Porter and Kettles explore the degree to which Grant, Harrison and Morelli represent an increased emphasis in the jurisprudence on police carelessness and lack of candour in both the ITO, and in subsequent testimony about the issuance of a search warrant during a Charter voir dire. Further, it will examine the effect of carelessness or negligence short of outright fraud in ITOs on the admissibility of evidence subsequently obtained from a breach of s. 8 of the Charter. In R. v. Grant, the Supreme Court of Canada articulated a new test for the exclusion of evidence obtained in a manner that infringed Charter rights under s. 24(2) of the Charter.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0011-1333</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Aurora: Canada Law Book Inc</publisher><subject>Evidence ; Negligence ; Police ; Professional misconduct ; Search warrants ; Voir dire</subject><ispartof>Criminal Law Quarterly, 2012-05, Vol.58 (3/4), p.510</ispartof><rights>Copyright Canada Law Book Inc. May 2012</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>312,780,784,791</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Porter, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kettles, Brent</creatorcontrib><title>The Significance of Police Misconduct in the Analysis of s. 8 Charter Breaches and the Exclusion of Evidence under s. 24(2) in R. v. Grant, R. v. Harrison and R. v. Morelli</title><title>Criminal Law Quarterly</title><description>In R. v. Grant, R. v. Harrison, and R. v. Morelli, Porter and Kettles explore the degree to which Grant, Harrison and Morelli represent an increased emphasis in the jurisprudence on police carelessness and lack of candour in both the ITO, and in subsequent testimony about the issuance of a search warrant during a Charter voir dire. Further, it will examine the effect of carelessness or negligence short of outright fraud in ITOs on the admissibility of evidence subsequently obtained from a breach of s. 8 of the Charter. In R. v. Grant, the Supreme Court of Canada articulated a new test for the exclusion of evidence obtained in a manner that infringed Charter rights under s. 24(2) of the Charter.</description><subject>Evidence</subject><subject>Negligence</subject><subject>Police</subject><subject>Professional misconduct</subject><subject>Search warrants</subject><subject>Voir dire</subject><issn>0011-1333</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNzEtOwzAQBmAvQKI87jBiBRKNHDtAuoQqtJtKqO2-spwJGWTZxeNUcCcOSQw9AKt56Pv_EzGRsiynpdb6TJwzv0tZ1XpWT8T3tkfY0JunjqzxFiF08BocjduK2AbfDjYBeUgjfPLGfTFxRlxADfPexIQRniMa2yOD8e2vbD6tG5iCz7Q5UIu5e_DtiMekqm7UbW5dF3AoYBGNT3fHY2liJB6TuevvtQoRnaNLcdoZx3h1nBfi-qXZzpfTfQwfA3LaRdyHmHhXSqVmD9Wjutf_Qj-m51ml</recordid><startdate>20120501</startdate><enddate>20120501</enddate><creator>Porter, David</creator><creator>Kettles, Brent</creator><general>Canada Law Book Inc</general><scope>K7.</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120501</creationdate><title>The Significance of Police Misconduct in the Analysis of s. 8 Charter Breaches and the Exclusion of Evidence under s. 24(2) in R. v. Grant, R. v. Harrison and R. v. Morelli</title><author>Porter, David ; Kettles, Brent</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_reports_10229647253</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Evidence</topic><topic>Negligence</topic><topic>Police</topic><topic>Professional misconduct</topic><topic>Search warrants</topic><topic>Voir dire</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Porter, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kettles, Brent</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice (Alumni)</collection><jtitle>Criminal Law Quarterly</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Porter, David</au><au>Kettles, Brent</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Significance of Police Misconduct in the Analysis of s. 8 Charter Breaches and the Exclusion of Evidence under s. 24(2) in R. v. Grant, R. v. Harrison and R. v. Morelli</atitle><jtitle>Criminal Law Quarterly</jtitle><date>2012-05-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>58</volume><issue>3/4</issue><spage>510</spage><pages>510-</pages><issn>0011-1333</issn><abstract>In R. v. Grant, R. v. Harrison, and R. v. Morelli, Porter and Kettles explore the degree to which Grant, Harrison and Morelli represent an increased emphasis in the jurisprudence on police carelessness and lack of candour in both the ITO, and in subsequent testimony about the issuance of a search warrant during a Charter voir dire. Further, it will examine the effect of carelessness or negligence short of outright fraud in ITOs on the admissibility of evidence subsequently obtained from a breach of s. 8 of the Charter. In R. v. Grant, the Supreme Court of Canada articulated a new test for the exclusion of evidence obtained in a manner that infringed Charter rights under s. 24(2) of the Charter.</abstract><cop>Aurora</cop><pub>Canada Law Book Inc</pub></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0011-1333
ispartof Criminal Law Quarterly, 2012-05, Vol.58 (3/4), p.510
issn 0011-1333
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_reports_1022964725
source HeinOnline Law Journal Library
subjects Evidence
Negligence
Police
Professional misconduct
Search warrants
Voir dire
title The Significance of Police Misconduct in the Analysis of s. 8 Charter Breaches and the Exclusion of Evidence under s. 24(2) in R. v. Grant, R. v. Harrison and R. v. Morelli
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T02%3A42%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Significance%20of%20Police%20Misconduct%20in%20the%20Analysis%20of%20s.%208%20Charter%20Breaches%20and%20the%20Exclusion%20of%20Evidence%20under%20s.%2024(2)%20in%20R.%20v.%20Grant,%20R.%20v.%20Harrison%20and%20R.%20v.%20Morelli&rft.jtitle=Criminal%20Law%20Quarterly&rft.au=Porter,%20David&rft.date=2012-05-01&rft.volume=58&rft.issue=3/4&rft.spage=510&rft.pages=510-&rft.issn=0011-1333&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2700938961%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1022964725&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true