Health care: An issue that merits special consideration
[...]we have been somewhat taken aback by the fact that most, if not all, of those "in-the-know" seem to agree that the individual mandate presents the key issue, and that that provision will be upheld; they may disagree as to how we will get there, but the safe money seems to be on the in...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Preview of United States Supreme Court Cases 2012-01, Vol.39 (6), p.3 |
|---|---|
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 6 |
| container_start_page | 3 |
| container_title | Preview of United States Supreme Court Cases |
| container_volume | 39 |
| description | [...]we have been somewhat taken aback by the fact that most, if not all, of those "in-the-know" seem to agree that the individual mandate presents the key issue, and that that provision will be upheld; they may disagree as to how we will get there, but the safe money seems to be on the individual mandate making it through the summer. [...]the depth of the issues the ACA has put before the Court, given that this is just one Congressional act, is breathtaking. |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_reports_1009905660</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2645619741</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_reports_10099056603</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNyksKwjAQANAsFKyfOwzuCxPaRutOROkB3JcQRxqJScxM7-_GA7h6m7dQFTamqRHb40qtmV-IndamrdRhIBtkAmcLneAcwTPPBDJZgTcVLwycyXkbwKXI_kHFik9xq5ZPG5h2Pzdqf7veL0OdS_rMxDIWyqkIjxqx77EzBpu_0hcEyzQg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1009905660</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Health care: An issue that merits special consideration</title><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><contributor>Catherine Hawke</contributor><creatorcontrib>Catherine Hawke</creatorcontrib><description>[...]we have been somewhat taken aback by the fact that most, if not all, of those "in-the-know" seem to agree that the individual mandate presents the key issue, and that that provision will be upheld; they may disagree as to how we will get there, but the safe money seems to be on the individual mandate making it through the summer. [...]the depth of the issues the ACA has put before the Court, given that this is just one Congressional act, is breathtaking.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0363-0048</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chicago: American Bar Association</publisher><subject>Experts ; Health care policy ; Injunctions ; Studies</subject><ispartof>Preview of United States Supreme Court Cases, 2012-01, Vol.39 (6), p.3</ispartof><rights>Copyright American Bar Association 2012</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>312,780,784,791</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Catherine Hawke</contributor><title>Health care: An issue that merits special consideration</title><title>Preview of United States Supreme Court Cases</title><description>[...]we have been somewhat taken aback by the fact that most, if not all, of those "in-the-know" seem to agree that the individual mandate presents the key issue, and that that provision will be upheld; they may disagree as to how we will get there, but the safe money seems to be on the individual mandate making it through the summer. [...]the depth of the issues the ACA has put before the Court, given that this is just one Congressional act, is breathtaking.</description><subject>Experts</subject><subject>Health care policy</subject><subject>Injunctions</subject><subject>Studies</subject><issn>0363-0048</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNqNyksKwjAQANAsFKyfOwzuCxPaRutOROkB3JcQRxqJScxM7-_GA7h6m7dQFTamqRHb40qtmV-IndamrdRhIBtkAmcLneAcwTPPBDJZgTcVLwycyXkbwKXI_kHFik9xq5ZPG5h2Pzdqf7veL0OdS_rMxDIWyqkIjxqx77EzBpu_0hcEyzQg</recordid><startdate>20120101</startdate><enddate>20120101</enddate><general>American Bar Association</general><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8AM</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGRYB</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>K7.</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>M0O</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120101</creationdate><title>Health care: An issue that merits special consideration</title></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_reports_10099056603</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Experts</topic><topic>Health care policy</topic><topic>Injunctions</topic><topic>Studies</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Criminal Justice Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Criminology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>Criminal Justice Database</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Preview of United States Supreme Court Cases</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Catherine Hawke</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Health care: An issue that merits special consideration</atitle><jtitle>Preview of United States Supreme Court Cases</jtitle><date>2012-01-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>39</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>3</spage><pages>3-</pages><issn>0363-0048</issn><abstract>[...]we have been somewhat taken aback by the fact that most, if not all, of those "in-the-know" seem to agree that the individual mandate presents the key issue, and that that provision will be upheld; they may disagree as to how we will get there, but the safe money seems to be on the individual mandate making it through the summer. [...]the depth of the issues the ACA has put before the Court, given that this is just one Congressional act, is breathtaking.</abstract><cop>Chicago</cop><pub>American Bar Association</pub></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0363-0048 |
| ispartof | Preview of United States Supreme Court Cases, 2012-01, Vol.39 (6), p.3 |
| issn | 0363-0048 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_reports_1009905660 |
| source | HeinOnline Law Journal Library |
| subjects | Experts Health care policy Injunctions Studies |
| title | Health care: An issue that merits special consideration |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T00%3A18%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Health%20care:%20An%20issue%20that%20merits%20special%20consideration&rft.jtitle=Preview%20of%20United%20States%20Supreme%20Court%20Cases&rft.au=Catherine%20Hawke&rft.date=2012-01-01&rft.volume=39&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=3&rft.pages=3-&rft.issn=0363-0048&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2645619741%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1009905660&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |