Bottom-up effects of species diversity on the functioning and stability of food webs

1. The importance of species diversity for the stability of populations, communities and ecosystem functions is a central question in ecology. 2. Biodiversity experiments have shown that diversity can impact both the average and variability of stocks and rates at these levels of ecological organizat...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of animal ecology 2012-05, Vol.81 (3), p.701-713
Hauptverfasser: Narwani, Anita, Mazumder, Asit
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 713
container_issue 3
container_start_page 701
container_title The Journal of animal ecology
container_volume 81
creator Narwani, Anita
Mazumder, Asit
description 1. The importance of species diversity for the stability of populations, communities and ecosystem functions is a central question in ecology. 2. Biodiversity experiments have shown that diversity can impact both the average and variability of stocks and rates at these levels of ecological organization in single trophic-level ecosystems. Whether these impacts hold in food webs and across trophic levels is still unclear. 3. We asked whether resource species diversity, community composition and consumer feeding selectivity in planktonic food webs impact the stability of resource or consumer populations, community biomass and ecosystem functions. We also tested the relative importance of resource diversity and community composition. 4. We found that resource diversity negatively affected resource population stability, but had no effect on consumer population stability, regardless of the consumer's feeding selectivity. Resource diversity had positive effects on most ecosystem functions and their stability, including primary production, resource biomass and particulate carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus concentrations. 5. Community composition, however, generally explained more variance in population, community and ecosystem properties than species diversity per se. This result points to the importance of the outcomes of particular species interactions and individual species' effect traits in determining food web properties and stability. 6. Among the stabilizing mechanisms tested, an increase in the average resource community biomass with increasing resource diversity had the greatest positive impact on stability. 7. Our results indicate that resource diversity and composition are generally important for the functioning and stability of whole food webs, but do not have straightforward impacts on consumer populations.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2011.01949.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_993908534</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>41496038</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>41496038</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5319-103aa4dd731f417c9b48904996c7df35e26421fc5348af96b683414f8f4010d33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkctu1DAYRi0EotPCI4AsJFQ2Cb8vcewNUluVS1XBpqwtx7HBUSYe4qTtvD1OZxgkFqje2JLPd3z5EMIESpLH-64kTFQFFZUoKRBSAlFclfdP0Oqw8RStACgpZK3gCB2n1AFATYE9R0eUMloBsBW6OY_TFNfFvMHOe2enhKPHaeNscAm34daNKUxbHAc8_XTYz4OdQhzC8AObocVpMk3oHwCPfYwtvnNNeoGeedMn93I_n6DvHy9vLj4X198-fbk4uy5sxYgqCDBjeNvWjHhOaqsaLhVwpYStW88qRwWnxGeYS-OVaIRknHAvPQcCLWMn6HTn3Yzx1-zSpNchWdf3ZnBxTloppkDmeCbf_ZckAFJywdSCvvkH7eI8Dvkd2UeVlKoSGZI7yI4xpdF5vRnD2ozbbNJLRbrTSxN6aUIvFemHivR9jr7e--dm7dpD8E8nGXi7B0yypvejGWxIf7mqriVnMnMfdtxd6N320RfQV2dfL5dlFrzaCbo0xfEgyF-sBOQDfgOx8LPm</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>992988956</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Bottom-up effects of species diversity on the functioning and stability of food webs</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Wiley Free Content</source><creator>Narwani, Anita ; Mazumder, Asit</creator><creatorcontrib>Narwani, Anita ; Mazumder, Asit</creatorcontrib><description>1. The importance of species diversity for the stability of populations, communities and ecosystem functions is a central question in ecology. 2. Biodiversity experiments have shown that diversity can impact both the average and variability of stocks and rates at these levels of ecological organization in single trophic-level ecosystems. Whether these impacts hold in food webs and across trophic levels is still unclear. 3. We asked whether resource species diversity, community composition and consumer feeding selectivity in planktonic food webs impact the stability of resource or consumer populations, community biomass and ecosystem functions. We also tested the relative importance of resource diversity and community composition. 4. We found that resource diversity negatively affected resource population stability, but had no effect on consumer population stability, regardless of the consumer's feeding selectivity. Resource diversity had positive effects on most ecosystem functions and their stability, including primary production, resource biomass and particulate carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus concentrations. 5. Community composition, however, generally explained more variance in population, community and ecosystem properties than species diversity per se. This result points to the importance of the outcomes of particular species interactions and individual species' effect traits in determining food web properties and stability. 6. Among the stabilizing mechanisms tested, an increase in the average resource community biomass with increasing resource diversity had the greatest positive impact on stability. 7. Our results indicate that resource diversity and composition are generally important for the functioning and stability of whole food webs, but do not have straightforward impacts on consumer populations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-8790</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2656</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2011.01949.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22325003</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JAECAP</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing</publisher><subject>Animal and plant ecology ; Animal ecology ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Animals ; Biodiversity ; Biological and medical sciences ; Biomass ; Cladocera - physiology ; Communities ; community composition ; Community ecology ; consumer feeding selectivity ; covariance ; Ecology ; ecosystem functioning ; Ecosystems ; Feeding Behavior - physiology ; Food Chain ; Food chains ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; General aspects ; nutrient accumulation ; Phytoplankton ; Polyculture ; Predation ; primary production ; Species ; Species diversity ; Species Specificity ; stability ; summed variance ; synchrony ; Synecology ; Zooplankton</subject><ispartof>The Journal of animal ecology, 2012-05, Vol.81 (3), p.701-713</ispartof><rights>2012 British Ecological Society</rights><rights>2012 The Authors. Journal of Animal Ecology © 2012 British Ecological Society</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>2012 The Authors. Journal of Animal Ecology © 2012 British Ecological Society.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5319-103aa4dd731f417c9b48904996c7df35e26421fc5348af96b683414f8f4010d33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5319-103aa4dd731f417c9b48904996c7df35e26421fc5348af96b683414f8f4010d33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/41496038$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/41496038$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,801,1414,1430,27913,27914,45563,45564,46398,46822,58006,58239</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=25778438$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22325003$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Narwani, Anita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mazumder, Asit</creatorcontrib><title>Bottom-up effects of species diversity on the functioning and stability of food webs</title><title>The Journal of animal ecology</title><addtitle>J Anim Ecol</addtitle><description>1. The importance of species diversity for the stability of populations, communities and ecosystem functions is a central question in ecology. 2. Biodiversity experiments have shown that diversity can impact both the average and variability of stocks and rates at these levels of ecological organization in single trophic-level ecosystems. Whether these impacts hold in food webs and across trophic levels is still unclear. 3. We asked whether resource species diversity, community composition and consumer feeding selectivity in planktonic food webs impact the stability of resource or consumer populations, community biomass and ecosystem functions. We also tested the relative importance of resource diversity and community composition. 4. We found that resource diversity negatively affected resource population stability, but had no effect on consumer population stability, regardless of the consumer's feeding selectivity. Resource diversity had positive effects on most ecosystem functions and their stability, including primary production, resource biomass and particulate carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus concentrations. 5. Community composition, however, generally explained more variance in population, community and ecosystem properties than species diversity per se. This result points to the importance of the outcomes of particular species interactions and individual species' effect traits in determining food web properties and stability. 6. Among the stabilizing mechanisms tested, an increase in the average resource community biomass with increasing resource diversity had the greatest positive impact on stability. 7. Our results indicate that resource diversity and composition are generally important for the functioning and stability of whole food webs, but do not have straightforward impacts on consumer populations.</description><subject>Animal and plant ecology</subject><subject>Animal ecology</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biomass</subject><subject>Cladocera - physiology</subject><subject>Communities</subject><subject>community composition</subject><subject>Community ecology</subject><subject>consumer feeding selectivity</subject><subject>covariance</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>ecosystem functioning</subject><subject>Ecosystems</subject><subject>Feeding Behavior - physiology</subject><subject>Food Chain</subject><subject>Food chains</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>nutrient accumulation</subject><subject>Phytoplankton</subject><subject>Polyculture</subject><subject>Predation</subject><subject>primary production</subject><subject>Species</subject><subject>Species diversity</subject><subject>Species Specificity</subject><subject>stability</subject><subject>summed variance</subject><subject>synchrony</subject><subject>Synecology</subject><subject>Zooplankton</subject><issn>0021-8790</issn><issn>1365-2656</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkctu1DAYRi0EotPCI4AsJFQ2Cb8vcewNUluVS1XBpqwtx7HBUSYe4qTtvD1OZxgkFqje2JLPd3z5EMIESpLH-64kTFQFFZUoKRBSAlFclfdP0Oqw8RStACgpZK3gCB2n1AFATYE9R0eUMloBsBW6OY_TFNfFvMHOe2enhKPHaeNscAm34daNKUxbHAc8_XTYz4OdQhzC8AObocVpMk3oHwCPfYwtvnNNeoGeedMn93I_n6DvHy9vLj4X198-fbk4uy5sxYgqCDBjeNvWjHhOaqsaLhVwpYStW88qRwWnxGeYS-OVaIRknHAvPQcCLWMn6HTn3Yzx1-zSpNchWdf3ZnBxTloppkDmeCbf_ZckAFJywdSCvvkH7eI8Dvkd2UeVlKoSGZI7yI4xpdF5vRnD2ozbbNJLRbrTSxN6aUIvFemHivR9jr7e--dm7dpD8E8nGXi7B0yypvejGWxIf7mqriVnMnMfdtxd6N320RfQV2dfL5dlFrzaCbo0xfEgyF-sBOQDfgOx8LPm</recordid><startdate>201205</startdate><enddate>201205</enddate><creator>Narwani, Anita</creator><creator>Mazumder, Asit</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Blackwell</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201205</creationdate><title>Bottom-up effects of species diversity on the functioning and stability of food webs</title><author>Narwani, Anita ; Mazumder, Asit</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5319-103aa4dd731f417c9b48904996c7df35e26421fc5348af96b683414f8f4010d33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Animal and plant ecology</topic><topic>Animal ecology</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biomass</topic><topic>Cladocera - physiology</topic><topic>Communities</topic><topic>community composition</topic><topic>Community ecology</topic><topic>consumer feeding selectivity</topic><topic>covariance</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>ecosystem functioning</topic><topic>Ecosystems</topic><topic>Feeding Behavior - physiology</topic><topic>Food Chain</topic><topic>Food chains</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>nutrient accumulation</topic><topic>Phytoplankton</topic><topic>Polyculture</topic><topic>Predation</topic><topic>primary production</topic><topic>Species</topic><topic>Species diversity</topic><topic>Species Specificity</topic><topic>stability</topic><topic>summed variance</topic><topic>synchrony</topic><topic>Synecology</topic><topic>Zooplankton</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Narwani, Anita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mazumder, Asit</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Journal of animal ecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Narwani, Anita</au><au>Mazumder, Asit</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Bottom-up effects of species diversity on the functioning and stability of food webs</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of animal ecology</jtitle><addtitle>J Anim Ecol</addtitle><date>2012-05</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>81</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>701</spage><epage>713</epage><pages>701-713</pages><issn>0021-8790</issn><eissn>1365-2656</eissn><coden>JAECAP</coden><abstract>1. The importance of species diversity for the stability of populations, communities and ecosystem functions is a central question in ecology. 2. Biodiversity experiments have shown that diversity can impact both the average and variability of stocks and rates at these levels of ecological organization in single trophic-level ecosystems. Whether these impacts hold in food webs and across trophic levels is still unclear. 3. We asked whether resource species diversity, community composition and consumer feeding selectivity in planktonic food webs impact the stability of resource or consumer populations, community biomass and ecosystem functions. We also tested the relative importance of resource diversity and community composition. 4. We found that resource diversity negatively affected resource population stability, but had no effect on consumer population stability, regardless of the consumer's feeding selectivity. Resource diversity had positive effects on most ecosystem functions and their stability, including primary production, resource biomass and particulate carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus concentrations. 5. Community composition, however, generally explained more variance in population, community and ecosystem properties than species diversity per se. This result points to the importance of the outcomes of particular species interactions and individual species' effect traits in determining food web properties and stability. 6. Among the stabilizing mechanisms tested, an increase in the average resource community biomass with increasing resource diversity had the greatest positive impact on stability. 7. Our results indicate that resource diversity and composition are generally important for the functioning and stability of whole food webs, but do not have straightforward impacts on consumer populations.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing</pub><pmid>22325003</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1365-2656.2011.01949.x</doi><tpages>13</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0021-8790
ispartof The Journal of animal ecology, 2012-05, Vol.81 (3), p.701-713
issn 0021-8790
1365-2656
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_993908534
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Jstor Complete Legacy; Wiley Free Content
subjects Animal and plant ecology
Animal ecology
Animal, plant and microbial ecology
Animals
Biodiversity
Biological and medical sciences
Biomass
Cladocera - physiology
Communities
community composition
Community ecology
consumer feeding selectivity
covariance
Ecology
ecosystem functioning
Ecosystems
Feeding Behavior - physiology
Food Chain
Food chains
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
General aspects
nutrient accumulation
Phytoplankton
Polyculture
Predation
primary production
Species
Species diversity
Species Specificity
stability
summed variance
synchrony
Synecology
Zooplankton
title Bottom-up effects of species diversity on the functioning and stability of food webs
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T08%3A09%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Bottom-up%20effects%20of%20species%20diversity%20on%20the%20functioning%20and%20stability%20of%20food%20webs&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20animal%20ecology&rft.au=Narwani,%20Anita&rft.date=2012-05&rft.volume=81&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=701&rft.epage=713&rft.pages=701-713&rft.issn=0021-8790&rft.eissn=1365-2656&rft.coden=JAECAP&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1365-2656.2011.01949.x&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E41496038%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=992988956&rft_id=info:pmid/22325003&rft_jstor_id=41496038&rfr_iscdi=true