Early Patient Experience with an Electro-Anatomic Navigation System Dedicated to Device Lead Implantation: Feasibility and Safety

Introduction:  Fluoroscopy‐guided pacing lead placement has well‐recognized limitations and risks. We studied the safety and feasibility of using a novel electromagnetic navigation system specifically designed to guide pacemaker and implantable cardioverter defibrillator lead placement. Methods:  Tw...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Pacing and clinical electrophysiology 2012-04, Vol.35 (4), p.385-391
Hauptverfasser: MANLUCU, JAIMIE, YEE, RAYMOND, SKANES, ALLAN C., GARDESKI, KENNETH C., NEIDERT, MICHAEL R., KELLEY, JAMES F., KLEIN, GEORGE J., KRAHN, ANDREW D., GULA, LORNE J., LEONG-SIT, PETER, VERARD, LAURENT G., WU, KEVIN T.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 391
container_issue 4
container_start_page 385
container_title Pacing and clinical electrophysiology
container_volume 35
creator MANLUCU, JAIMIE
YEE, RAYMOND
SKANES, ALLAN C.
GARDESKI, KENNETH C.
NEIDERT, MICHAEL R.
KELLEY, JAMES F.
KLEIN, GEORGE J.
KRAHN, ANDREW D.
GULA, LORNE J.
LEONG-SIT, PETER
VERARD, LAURENT G.
WU, KEVIN T.
description Introduction:  Fluoroscopy‐guided pacing lead placement has well‐recognized limitations and risks. We studied the safety and feasibility of using a novel electromagnetic navigation system specifically designed to guide pacemaker and implantable cardioverter defibrillator lead placement. Methods:  Twenty‐four patients (mean age of 54 ± 34 years) underwent the study protocol; 16 before electrophysiology study and eight before device implantation. The navigational deflectable sheath assembly was introduced via the subclavian vein and advanced to seven prespecified targets within the right heart chambers. The time taken to reach each target site was measured. Results:  All seven prespecified targets were successfully reached by 21 of 24 patients (88%). The total time required to complete the study protocol ranged from 3.21 to 15.25 minutes (average 8.9 minutes), with an associated mean fluoroscopy time of 50 ± 36 seconds. In three of the 24 patients, this navigation system was successfully used to guide right ventricular pacing lead placement. The average total procedure time for these devices was 97.8 minutes (excluding the study protocol), with an average associated fluoroscopy time of 6.93 minutes. These procedures were well tolerated and no periprocedural complications were noted. Conclusions:  This study suggests that this novel electro‐anatomic navigation system is a viable and safe alternative to traditional fluoroscopy‐guided lead implantation. Further studies are required to determine the absolute reduction in radiation exposure and increased efficiency relative to current standard fluoroscopic techniques. PACE 2012; 35:385–391)
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2011.03307.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_993319170</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>993319170</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4377-b43a0f8c1dec389fb3417b4a0fc14249ed84d0c5653c29824b400ffbb560e8a93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkc1v0zAYxi0EYmXwLyBfEKcEfyWOOSBVXVYmdWPShna0HMcBl3x0trs1R_5znLXrrvji1_bvefz6MQAQoxTH8WWd4oyhpMCZSAnCOEWUIp7uXoHZ8eA1mCHMeFLQQpyAd96vEUI5YtlbcEIIETlheAb-lsq1I7xWwZo-wHK3MS5W2sBHG35D1cOyNTq4IZn3Kgyd1fBKPdhfkR96eDP6YDp4ZmqrVTA1DENcPNgoXxlVw4tu06o-PMFf4blR3la2tWGMxjW8UY0J43vwplGtNx8O8yn4eV7eLr4nqx_Li8V8lWhGOU8qRhVqCo1ro-OLmooyzCsW9zRmhAlTF6xGOsszqokoCKsYQk1TVVmOTKEEPQWf974bN9xvjQ-ys16bNjZohq2XQlCKBeYoksWe1G7w3plGbpztlBslRnLKX67lFLOcYpZT_vIpf7mL0o-HS7ZVZ-qj8DnwCHw6AMpr1TZO9dr6Fy7jvCCYRO7bnnu0rRn_uwF5PV-UUxkNkr2BjV-0Oxoo90fmnPJM3l0tpbi9XKG7s0u5pP8AMRuxLQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>993319170</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Early Patient Experience with an Electro-Anatomic Navigation System Dedicated to Device Lead Implantation: Feasibility and Safety</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>MANLUCU, JAIMIE ; YEE, RAYMOND ; SKANES, ALLAN C. ; GARDESKI, KENNETH C. ; NEIDERT, MICHAEL R. ; KELLEY, JAMES F. ; KLEIN, GEORGE J. ; KRAHN, ANDREW D. ; GULA, LORNE J. ; LEONG-SIT, PETER ; VERARD, LAURENT G. ; WU, KEVIN T.</creator><creatorcontrib>MANLUCU, JAIMIE ; YEE, RAYMOND ; SKANES, ALLAN C. ; GARDESKI, KENNETH C. ; NEIDERT, MICHAEL R. ; KELLEY, JAMES F. ; KLEIN, GEORGE J. ; KRAHN, ANDREW D. ; GULA, LORNE J. ; LEONG-SIT, PETER ; VERARD, LAURENT G. ; WU, KEVIN T.</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction:  Fluoroscopy‐guided pacing lead placement has well‐recognized limitations and risks. We studied the safety and feasibility of using a novel electromagnetic navigation system specifically designed to guide pacemaker and implantable cardioverter defibrillator lead placement. Methods:  Twenty‐four patients (mean age of 54 ± 34 years) underwent the study protocol; 16 before electrophysiology study and eight before device implantation. The navigational deflectable sheath assembly was introduced via the subclavian vein and advanced to seven prespecified targets within the right heart chambers. The time taken to reach each target site was measured. Results:  All seven prespecified targets were successfully reached by 21 of 24 patients (88%). The total time required to complete the study protocol ranged from 3.21 to 15.25 minutes (average 8.9 minutes), with an associated mean fluoroscopy time of 50 ± 36 seconds. In three of the 24 patients, this navigation system was successfully used to guide right ventricular pacing lead placement. The average total procedure time for these devices was 97.8 minutes (excluding the study protocol), with an average associated fluoroscopy time of 6.93 minutes. These procedures were well tolerated and no periprocedural complications were noted. Conclusions:  This study suggests that this novel electro‐anatomic navigation system is a viable and safe alternative to traditional fluoroscopy‐guided lead implantation. Further studies are required to determine the absolute reduction in radiation exposure and increased efficiency relative to current standard fluoroscopic techniques. PACE 2012; 35:385–391)</description><identifier>ISSN: 0147-8389</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1540-8159</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2011.03307.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22296241</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Malden, USA: Blackwell Publishing Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cardiac Surgical Procedures - adverse effects ; Cardiac Surgical Procedures - instrumentation ; Cardiac Surgical Procedures - methods ; Electrodes, Implanted ; Electromagnetic Fields ; electromagnetic navigation ; Female ; Heart Ventricles - surgery ; Humans ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; pacing ; radiation ; Radiotherapy. Instrumental treatment. Physiotherapy. Reeducation. Rehabilitation, orthophony, crenotherapy. Diet therapy and various other treatments (general aspects) ; Treatment Outcome ; virtual fluoroscopy ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Pacing and clinical electrophysiology, 2012-04, Vol.35 (4), p.385-391</ispartof><rights>2012, The Authors. Journal compilation ©2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4377-b43a0f8c1dec389fb3417b4a0fc14249ed84d0c5653c29824b400ffbb560e8a93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4377-b43a0f8c1dec389fb3417b4a0fc14249ed84d0c5653c29824b400ffbb560e8a93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1540-8159.2011.03307.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1540-8159.2011.03307.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1416,27922,27923,45572,45573</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=25778212$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22296241$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>MANLUCU, JAIMIE</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>YEE, RAYMOND</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SKANES, ALLAN C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GARDESKI, KENNETH C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>NEIDERT, MICHAEL R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KELLEY, JAMES F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KLEIN, GEORGE J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KRAHN, ANDREW D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GULA, LORNE J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LEONG-SIT, PETER</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>VERARD, LAURENT G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WU, KEVIN T.</creatorcontrib><title>Early Patient Experience with an Electro-Anatomic Navigation System Dedicated to Device Lead Implantation: Feasibility and Safety</title><title>Pacing and clinical electrophysiology</title><addtitle>Pacing Clin Electrophysiol</addtitle><description>Introduction:  Fluoroscopy‐guided pacing lead placement has well‐recognized limitations and risks. We studied the safety and feasibility of using a novel electromagnetic navigation system specifically designed to guide pacemaker and implantable cardioverter defibrillator lead placement. Methods:  Twenty‐four patients (mean age of 54 ± 34 years) underwent the study protocol; 16 before electrophysiology study and eight before device implantation. The navigational deflectable sheath assembly was introduced via the subclavian vein and advanced to seven prespecified targets within the right heart chambers. The time taken to reach each target site was measured. Results:  All seven prespecified targets were successfully reached by 21 of 24 patients (88%). The total time required to complete the study protocol ranged from 3.21 to 15.25 minutes (average 8.9 minutes), with an associated mean fluoroscopy time of 50 ± 36 seconds. In three of the 24 patients, this navigation system was successfully used to guide right ventricular pacing lead placement. The average total procedure time for these devices was 97.8 minutes (excluding the study protocol), with an average associated fluoroscopy time of 6.93 minutes. These procedures were well tolerated and no periprocedural complications were noted. Conclusions:  This study suggests that this novel electro‐anatomic navigation system is a viable and safe alternative to traditional fluoroscopy‐guided lead implantation. Further studies are required to determine the absolute reduction in radiation exposure and increased efficiency relative to current standard fluoroscopic techniques. PACE 2012; 35:385–391)</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cardiac Surgical Procedures - adverse effects</subject><subject>Cardiac Surgical Procedures - instrumentation</subject><subject>Cardiac Surgical Procedures - methods</subject><subject>Electrodes, Implanted</subject><subject>Electromagnetic Fields</subject><subject>electromagnetic navigation</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Heart Ventricles - surgery</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>pacing</subject><subject>radiation</subject><subject>Radiotherapy. Instrumental treatment. Physiotherapy. Reeducation. Rehabilitation, orthophony, crenotherapy. Diet therapy and various other treatments (general aspects)</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>virtual fluoroscopy</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0147-8389</issn><issn>1540-8159</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkc1v0zAYxi0EYmXwLyBfEKcEfyWOOSBVXVYmdWPShna0HMcBl3x0trs1R_5znLXrrvji1_bvefz6MQAQoxTH8WWd4oyhpMCZSAnCOEWUIp7uXoHZ8eA1mCHMeFLQQpyAd96vEUI5YtlbcEIIETlheAb-lsq1I7xWwZo-wHK3MS5W2sBHG35D1cOyNTq4IZn3Kgyd1fBKPdhfkR96eDP6YDp4ZmqrVTA1DENcPNgoXxlVw4tu06o-PMFf4blR3la2tWGMxjW8UY0J43vwplGtNx8O8yn4eV7eLr4nqx_Li8V8lWhGOU8qRhVqCo1ro-OLmooyzCsW9zRmhAlTF6xGOsszqokoCKsYQk1TVVmOTKEEPQWf974bN9xvjQ-ys16bNjZohq2XQlCKBeYoksWe1G7w3plGbpztlBslRnLKX67lFLOcYpZT_vIpf7mL0o-HS7ZVZ-qj8DnwCHw6AMpr1TZO9dr6Fy7jvCCYRO7bnnu0rRn_uwF5PV-UUxkNkr2BjV-0Oxoo90fmnPJM3l0tpbi9XKG7s0u5pP8AMRuxLQ</recordid><startdate>201204</startdate><enddate>201204</enddate><creator>MANLUCU, JAIMIE</creator><creator>YEE, RAYMOND</creator><creator>SKANES, ALLAN C.</creator><creator>GARDESKI, KENNETH C.</creator><creator>NEIDERT, MICHAEL R.</creator><creator>KELLEY, JAMES F.</creator><creator>KLEIN, GEORGE J.</creator><creator>KRAHN, ANDREW D.</creator><creator>GULA, LORNE J.</creator><creator>LEONG-SIT, PETER</creator><creator>VERARD, LAURENT G.</creator><creator>WU, KEVIN T.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Inc</general><general>Wiley</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201204</creationdate><title>Early Patient Experience with an Electro-Anatomic Navigation System Dedicated to Device Lead Implantation: Feasibility and Safety</title><author>MANLUCU, JAIMIE ; YEE, RAYMOND ; SKANES, ALLAN C. ; GARDESKI, KENNETH C. ; NEIDERT, MICHAEL R. ; KELLEY, JAMES F. ; KLEIN, GEORGE J. ; KRAHN, ANDREW D. ; GULA, LORNE J. ; LEONG-SIT, PETER ; VERARD, LAURENT G. ; WU, KEVIN T.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4377-b43a0f8c1dec389fb3417b4a0fc14249ed84d0c5653c29824b400ffbb560e8a93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cardiac Surgical Procedures - adverse effects</topic><topic>Cardiac Surgical Procedures - instrumentation</topic><topic>Cardiac Surgical Procedures - methods</topic><topic>Electrodes, Implanted</topic><topic>Electromagnetic Fields</topic><topic>electromagnetic navigation</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Heart Ventricles - surgery</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>pacing</topic><topic>radiation</topic><topic>Radiotherapy. Instrumental treatment. Physiotherapy. Reeducation. Rehabilitation, orthophony, crenotherapy. Diet therapy and various other treatments (general aspects)</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>virtual fluoroscopy</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>MANLUCU, JAIMIE</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>YEE, RAYMOND</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SKANES, ALLAN C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GARDESKI, KENNETH C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>NEIDERT, MICHAEL R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KELLEY, JAMES F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KLEIN, GEORGE J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KRAHN, ANDREW D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GULA, LORNE J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LEONG-SIT, PETER</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>VERARD, LAURENT G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WU, KEVIN T.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Pacing and clinical electrophysiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>MANLUCU, JAIMIE</au><au>YEE, RAYMOND</au><au>SKANES, ALLAN C.</au><au>GARDESKI, KENNETH C.</au><au>NEIDERT, MICHAEL R.</au><au>KELLEY, JAMES F.</au><au>KLEIN, GEORGE J.</au><au>KRAHN, ANDREW D.</au><au>GULA, LORNE J.</au><au>LEONG-SIT, PETER</au><au>VERARD, LAURENT G.</au><au>WU, KEVIN T.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Early Patient Experience with an Electro-Anatomic Navigation System Dedicated to Device Lead Implantation: Feasibility and Safety</atitle><jtitle>Pacing and clinical electrophysiology</jtitle><addtitle>Pacing Clin Electrophysiol</addtitle><date>2012-04</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>385</spage><epage>391</epage><pages>385-391</pages><issn>0147-8389</issn><eissn>1540-8159</eissn><abstract>Introduction:  Fluoroscopy‐guided pacing lead placement has well‐recognized limitations and risks. We studied the safety and feasibility of using a novel electromagnetic navigation system specifically designed to guide pacemaker and implantable cardioverter defibrillator lead placement. Methods:  Twenty‐four patients (mean age of 54 ± 34 years) underwent the study protocol; 16 before electrophysiology study and eight before device implantation. The navigational deflectable sheath assembly was introduced via the subclavian vein and advanced to seven prespecified targets within the right heart chambers. The time taken to reach each target site was measured. Results:  All seven prespecified targets were successfully reached by 21 of 24 patients (88%). The total time required to complete the study protocol ranged from 3.21 to 15.25 minutes (average 8.9 minutes), with an associated mean fluoroscopy time of 50 ± 36 seconds. In three of the 24 patients, this navigation system was successfully used to guide right ventricular pacing lead placement. The average total procedure time for these devices was 97.8 minutes (excluding the study protocol), with an average associated fluoroscopy time of 6.93 minutes. These procedures were well tolerated and no periprocedural complications were noted. Conclusions:  This study suggests that this novel electro‐anatomic navigation system is a viable and safe alternative to traditional fluoroscopy‐guided lead implantation. Further studies are required to determine the absolute reduction in radiation exposure and increased efficiency relative to current standard fluoroscopic techniques. PACE 2012; 35:385–391)</abstract><cop>Malden, USA</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Inc</pub><pmid>22296241</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1540-8159.2011.03307.x</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0147-8389
ispartof Pacing and clinical electrophysiology, 2012-04, Vol.35 (4), p.385-391
issn 0147-8389
1540-8159
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_993319170
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library All Journals
subjects Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Biological and medical sciences
Cardiac Surgical Procedures - adverse effects
Cardiac Surgical Procedures - instrumentation
Cardiac Surgical Procedures - methods
Electrodes, Implanted
Electromagnetic Fields
electromagnetic navigation
Female
Heart Ventricles - surgery
Humans
Male
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
pacing
radiation
Radiotherapy. Instrumental treatment. Physiotherapy. Reeducation. Rehabilitation, orthophony, crenotherapy. Diet therapy and various other treatments (general aspects)
Treatment Outcome
virtual fluoroscopy
Young Adult
title Early Patient Experience with an Electro-Anatomic Navigation System Dedicated to Device Lead Implantation: Feasibility and Safety
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T19%3A29%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Early%20Patient%20Experience%20with%20an%20Electro-Anatomic%20Navigation%20System%20Dedicated%20to%20Device%20Lead%20Implantation:%20Feasibility%20and%20Safety&rft.jtitle=Pacing%20and%20clinical%20electrophysiology&rft.au=MANLUCU,%20JAIMIE&rft.date=2012-04&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=385&rft.epage=391&rft.pages=385-391&rft.issn=0147-8389&rft.eissn=1540-8159&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1540-8159.2011.03307.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E993319170%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=993319170&rft_id=info:pmid/22296241&rfr_iscdi=true