Removing external DNA contamination from arthropod predators destined for molecular gut-content analysis

Ecological research requires large samples for statistical validity, typically hundreds or thousands of individuals, which are most efficiently gathered by mass‐collecting techniques. For the study of interspecific interactions, molecular gut‐content analysis enables detection of arthropod predation...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Molecular ecology resources 2012-05, Vol.12 (3), p.464-469
Hauptverfasser: GREENSTONE, MATTHEW H., WEBER, DONALD C., COUDRON, THOMAS A., PAYTON, MARK E., HU, JING S.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 469
container_issue 3
container_start_page 464
container_title Molecular ecology resources
container_volume 12
creator GREENSTONE, MATTHEW H.
WEBER, DONALD C.
COUDRON, THOMAS A.
PAYTON, MARK E.
HU, JING S.
description Ecological research requires large samples for statistical validity, typically hundreds or thousands of individuals, which are most efficiently gathered by mass‐collecting techniques. For the study of interspecific interactions, molecular gut‐content analysis enables detection of arthropod predation with minimal disruption of community interactions. Field experiments have demonstrated that standard mass‐collection methods, such as sweep netting, vacuum sampling and foliage beating, sometimes lead to contamination of predators with nontarget DNA, thereby compromising resultant gut‐content data. We deliberately contaminated immature Coleomegilla maculata and Podisus maculiventris that had been fed larvae of Leptinotarsa decemlineata by topically applying homogenate of the alternate prey Leptinotarsa juncta. We then attempted to remove contaminating DNA by washing in ethanol or bleach. A 40‐min wash with end‐over‐end rotation in 80% EtOH did not reliably reduce external DNA contamination. Identical treatment with 2.5% commercial bleach removed most externally contaminating DNA without affecting the detectability of the target prey DNA in the gut. Use of this bleaching protocol, perhaps with minor modifications tailored to different predator–prey systems, should reliably eliminate external DNA contamination, thereby alleviating concerns about this possible source of cross‐contamination for mass‐collected arthropod predators destined for molecular gut‐content analysis.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1755-0998.2012.03112.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_993318497</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1008847419</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4672-9a5a92a8a927b8cacd9a9f393d0534c8d977e3151f7aa10d591cfcbe5731334f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkUtv1DAUhS0Eog_4C8gSC9hk8COO7QWLqrQF1A4SAsHOumM7rYckHuwEZv49DlNmwQLhxfWV_J1zr3wQwpQsaDmv1gsqhaiI1mrBCGULwmmp2wfo-PDw8NCrr0foJOc1IQ3Rsn6MjhhjjRK6PkZ3H30ff4ThFvvt6NMAHX6zPMM2DiP0YYAxxAG3KfYY0niX4iY6vEnewRhTxs7nMQze4TYm3MfO26mDhG-nsZod_DBiKJa7HPIT9KiFLvun9_cp-nx58en8bXX94erd-dl1ZetGskqDAM1AlSJXyoJ1GnTLNXdE8Noqp6X0nAraSgBKnNDUtnblheSU87rlp-jF3neT4vep7Gf6kK3vOhh8nLLRmnOqai0L-fKfJCVEqVrWVBf0-V_oOk7zZxVK0IIIJlmh1J6yKeacfGs2KfSQdsXKzLmZtZkjMXM8Zs7N_M7NbIv02f2AadV7dxD-CaoAr_fAz9D53X8bm5uL5dwVfbXXhzz67UEP6ZtpJJfCfFleGSbl--ZGNYbzX1JYtgw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1517415272</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Removing external DNA contamination from arthropod predators destined for molecular gut-content analysis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>GREENSTONE, MATTHEW H. ; WEBER, DONALD C. ; COUDRON, THOMAS A. ; PAYTON, MARK E. ; HU, JING S.</creator><creatorcontrib>GREENSTONE, MATTHEW H. ; WEBER, DONALD C. ; COUDRON, THOMAS A. ; PAYTON, MARK E. ; HU, JING S.</creatorcontrib><description>Ecological research requires large samples for statistical validity, typically hundreds or thousands of individuals, which are most efficiently gathered by mass‐collecting techniques. For the study of interspecific interactions, molecular gut‐content analysis enables detection of arthropod predation with minimal disruption of community interactions. Field experiments have demonstrated that standard mass‐collection methods, such as sweep netting, vacuum sampling and foliage beating, sometimes lead to contamination of predators with nontarget DNA, thereby compromising resultant gut‐content data. We deliberately contaminated immature Coleomegilla maculata and Podisus maculiventris that had been fed larvae of Leptinotarsa decemlineata by topically applying homogenate of the alternate prey Leptinotarsa juncta. We then attempted to remove contaminating DNA by washing in ethanol or bleach. A 40‐min wash with end‐over‐end rotation in 80% EtOH did not reliably reduce external DNA contamination. Identical treatment with 2.5% commercial bleach removed most externally contaminating DNA without affecting the detectability of the target prey DNA in the gut. Use of this bleaching protocol, perhaps with minor modifications tailored to different predator–prey systems, should reliably eliminate external DNA contamination, thereby alleviating concerns about this possible source of cross‐contamination for mass‐collected arthropod predators destined for molecular gut‐content analysis.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1755-098X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1755-0998</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1755-0998.2012.03112.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22268594</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Animals ; Arthropoda ; Coleomegilla maculata ; Coleoptera - physiology ; Content analysis ; Deoxyribonucleic acid ; DNA ; DNA - chemistry ; DNA - genetics ; DNA - isolation &amp; purification ; DNA Contamination ; DNA decontamination ; Gastrointestinal Contents - chemistry ; Heteroptera - physiology ; Leptinotarsa decemlineata ; molecular gut-content analysis ; Molecular Sequence Data ; Podisus maculiventris ; Predatory Behavior ; sampling ; Sequence Analysis, DNA ; Specimen Handling - methods</subject><ispartof>Molecular ecology resources, 2012-05, Vol.12 (3), p.464-469</ispartof><rights>Published 2012. This article is a US Government work and is in the public domain in the USA</rights><rights>Published 2012. This article is a US Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4672-9a5a92a8a927b8cacd9a9f393d0534c8d977e3151f7aa10d591cfcbe5731334f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4672-9a5a92a8a927b8cacd9a9f393d0534c8d977e3151f7aa10d591cfcbe5731334f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1755-0998.2012.03112.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1755-0998.2012.03112.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,782,786,1419,27933,27934,45583,45584</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22268594$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>GREENSTONE, MATTHEW H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WEBER, DONALD C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>COUDRON, THOMAS A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PAYTON, MARK E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HU, JING S.</creatorcontrib><title>Removing external DNA contamination from arthropod predators destined for molecular gut-content analysis</title><title>Molecular ecology resources</title><addtitle>Mol Ecol Resour</addtitle><description>Ecological research requires large samples for statistical validity, typically hundreds or thousands of individuals, which are most efficiently gathered by mass‐collecting techniques. For the study of interspecific interactions, molecular gut‐content analysis enables detection of arthropod predation with minimal disruption of community interactions. Field experiments have demonstrated that standard mass‐collection methods, such as sweep netting, vacuum sampling and foliage beating, sometimes lead to contamination of predators with nontarget DNA, thereby compromising resultant gut‐content data. We deliberately contaminated immature Coleomegilla maculata and Podisus maculiventris that had been fed larvae of Leptinotarsa decemlineata by topically applying homogenate of the alternate prey Leptinotarsa juncta. We then attempted to remove contaminating DNA by washing in ethanol or bleach. A 40‐min wash with end‐over‐end rotation in 80% EtOH did not reliably reduce external DNA contamination. Identical treatment with 2.5% commercial bleach removed most externally contaminating DNA without affecting the detectability of the target prey DNA in the gut. Use of this bleaching protocol, perhaps with minor modifications tailored to different predator–prey systems, should reliably eliminate external DNA contamination, thereby alleviating concerns about this possible source of cross‐contamination for mass‐collected arthropod predators destined for molecular gut‐content analysis.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Arthropoda</subject><subject>Coleomegilla maculata</subject><subject>Coleoptera - physiology</subject><subject>Content analysis</subject><subject>Deoxyribonucleic acid</subject><subject>DNA</subject><subject>DNA - chemistry</subject><subject>DNA - genetics</subject><subject>DNA - isolation &amp; purification</subject><subject>DNA Contamination</subject><subject>DNA decontamination</subject><subject>Gastrointestinal Contents - chemistry</subject><subject>Heteroptera - physiology</subject><subject>Leptinotarsa decemlineata</subject><subject>molecular gut-content analysis</subject><subject>Molecular Sequence Data</subject><subject>Podisus maculiventris</subject><subject>Predatory Behavior</subject><subject>sampling</subject><subject>Sequence Analysis, DNA</subject><subject>Specimen Handling - methods</subject><issn>1755-098X</issn><issn>1755-0998</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkUtv1DAUhS0Eog_4C8gSC9hk8COO7QWLqrQF1A4SAsHOumM7rYckHuwEZv49DlNmwQLhxfWV_J1zr3wQwpQsaDmv1gsqhaiI1mrBCGULwmmp2wfo-PDw8NCrr0foJOc1IQ3Rsn6MjhhjjRK6PkZ3H30ff4ThFvvt6NMAHX6zPMM2DiP0YYAxxAG3KfYY0niX4iY6vEnewRhTxs7nMQze4TYm3MfO26mDhG-nsZod_DBiKJa7HPIT9KiFLvun9_cp-nx58en8bXX94erd-dl1ZetGskqDAM1AlSJXyoJ1GnTLNXdE8Noqp6X0nAraSgBKnNDUtnblheSU87rlp-jF3neT4vep7Gf6kK3vOhh8nLLRmnOqai0L-fKfJCVEqVrWVBf0-V_oOk7zZxVK0IIIJlmh1J6yKeacfGs2KfSQdsXKzLmZtZkjMXM8Zs7N_M7NbIv02f2AadV7dxD-CaoAr_fAz9D53X8bm5uL5dwVfbXXhzz67UEP6ZtpJJfCfFleGSbl--ZGNYbzX1JYtgw</recordid><startdate>201205</startdate><enddate>201205</enddate><creator>GREENSTONE, MATTHEW H.</creator><creator>WEBER, DONALD C.</creator><creator>COUDRON, THOMAS A.</creator><creator>PAYTON, MARK E.</creator><creator>HU, JING S.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201205</creationdate><title>Removing external DNA contamination from arthropod predators destined for molecular gut-content analysis</title><author>GREENSTONE, MATTHEW H. ; WEBER, DONALD C. ; COUDRON, THOMAS A. ; PAYTON, MARK E. ; HU, JING S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4672-9a5a92a8a927b8cacd9a9f393d0534c8d977e3151f7aa10d591cfcbe5731334f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Arthropoda</topic><topic>Coleomegilla maculata</topic><topic>Coleoptera - physiology</topic><topic>Content analysis</topic><topic>Deoxyribonucleic acid</topic><topic>DNA</topic><topic>DNA - chemistry</topic><topic>DNA - genetics</topic><topic>DNA - isolation &amp; purification</topic><topic>DNA Contamination</topic><topic>DNA decontamination</topic><topic>Gastrointestinal Contents - chemistry</topic><topic>Heteroptera - physiology</topic><topic>Leptinotarsa decemlineata</topic><topic>molecular gut-content analysis</topic><topic>Molecular Sequence Data</topic><topic>Podisus maculiventris</topic><topic>Predatory Behavior</topic><topic>sampling</topic><topic>Sequence Analysis, DNA</topic><topic>Specimen Handling - methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>GREENSTONE, MATTHEW H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WEBER, DONALD C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>COUDRON, THOMAS A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PAYTON, MARK E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HU, JING S.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Molecular ecology resources</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>GREENSTONE, MATTHEW H.</au><au>WEBER, DONALD C.</au><au>COUDRON, THOMAS A.</au><au>PAYTON, MARK E.</au><au>HU, JING S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Removing external DNA contamination from arthropod predators destined for molecular gut-content analysis</atitle><jtitle>Molecular ecology resources</jtitle><addtitle>Mol Ecol Resour</addtitle><date>2012-05</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>464</spage><epage>469</epage><pages>464-469</pages><issn>1755-098X</issn><eissn>1755-0998</eissn><abstract>Ecological research requires large samples for statistical validity, typically hundreds or thousands of individuals, which are most efficiently gathered by mass‐collecting techniques. For the study of interspecific interactions, molecular gut‐content analysis enables detection of arthropod predation with minimal disruption of community interactions. Field experiments have demonstrated that standard mass‐collection methods, such as sweep netting, vacuum sampling and foliage beating, sometimes lead to contamination of predators with nontarget DNA, thereby compromising resultant gut‐content data. We deliberately contaminated immature Coleomegilla maculata and Podisus maculiventris that had been fed larvae of Leptinotarsa decemlineata by topically applying homogenate of the alternate prey Leptinotarsa juncta. We then attempted to remove contaminating DNA by washing in ethanol or bleach. A 40‐min wash with end‐over‐end rotation in 80% EtOH did not reliably reduce external DNA contamination. Identical treatment with 2.5% commercial bleach removed most externally contaminating DNA without affecting the detectability of the target prey DNA in the gut. Use of this bleaching protocol, perhaps with minor modifications tailored to different predator–prey systems, should reliably eliminate external DNA contamination, thereby alleviating concerns about this possible source of cross‐contamination for mass‐collected arthropod predators destined for molecular gut‐content analysis.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>22268594</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1755-0998.2012.03112.x</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1755-098X
ispartof Molecular ecology resources, 2012-05, Vol.12 (3), p.464-469
issn 1755-098X
1755-0998
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_993318497
source MEDLINE; Access via Wiley Online Library
subjects Animals
Arthropoda
Coleomegilla maculata
Coleoptera - physiology
Content analysis
Deoxyribonucleic acid
DNA
DNA - chemistry
DNA - genetics
DNA - isolation & purification
DNA Contamination
DNA decontamination
Gastrointestinal Contents - chemistry
Heteroptera - physiology
Leptinotarsa decemlineata
molecular gut-content analysis
Molecular Sequence Data
Podisus maculiventris
Predatory Behavior
sampling
Sequence Analysis, DNA
Specimen Handling - methods
title Removing external DNA contamination from arthropod predators destined for molecular gut-content analysis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-03T04%3A38%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Removing%20external%20DNA%20contamination%20from%20arthropod%20predators%20destined%20for%20molecular%20gut-content%20analysis&rft.jtitle=Molecular%20ecology%20resources&rft.au=GREENSTONE,%20MATTHEW%20H.&rft.date=2012-05&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=464&rft.epage=469&rft.pages=464-469&rft.issn=1755-098X&rft.eissn=1755-0998&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1755-0998.2012.03112.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1008847419%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1517415272&rft_id=info:pmid/22268594&rfr_iscdi=true