Analysis of Tidal Marsh Vegetation Patterns in Two Georgia Estuaries Using Aerial Photography and GIS

Aerial photographs and GIS analysis were used to map the distribution of tidal marsh vegetation along the salinity gradients of the estuaries of the Altamaha and Satilla Rivers in coastal Georgia. Vegetation maps were constructed from 1993 U. S. Geological Survey Digital Orthophoto Quarter Quads, 1:...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Estuaries 2004-08, Vol.27 (4), p.670-683
Hauptverfasser: Higinbotham, Carrie B., Alber, Merryl, Chalmers, Alice G.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 683
container_issue 4
container_start_page 670
container_title Estuaries
container_volume 27
creator Higinbotham, Carrie B.
Alber, Merryl
Chalmers, Alice G.
description Aerial photographs and GIS analysis were used to map the distribution of tidal marsh vegetation along the salinity gradients of the estuaries of the Altamaha and Satilla Rivers in coastal Georgia. Vegetation maps were constructed from 1993 U. S. Geological Survey Digital Orthophoto Quarter Quads, 1:77,000-scale color infrared photographs taken in 1974 and 1:24,000-scale black and white photographs taken in 1953. Changes between years were identified using a GIS overlay analysis. Four vegetation classifications were identified and groundtruthed with field surveys: salt marsh (areas containing primarily Spartina alterniflora), brackish marsh (Spartina cynosuroides and S. alterniflora), Juncus (Juncus roemerianus), and fresh marsh (Zizania aquatica, Zizaniopsis miliacae, and others). There was no evidence for an upstream shift in marsh vegetation along the longitudinal axis of either estuary over the time frame of this analysis, which implies there has not been a long-term increase in salinity. Although the inland extent of each marsh zone was further upstream in the Satilla than the Altamaha, they corresponded to similar average high tide salinities in each estuary: areas classified as salt marsh occurred from the mouth up to where average high tide salinity in the water was approximately 15 psu; Juncus ranged from 21 to 1 psu; brackish marsh ranged from 15 to 1 psu; and fresh marsh was upstream of 1 psu. Approximately 63% of the 6,786 ha of tidal marsh vegetation mapped in the Altamaha and 75% of the 10,220 ha mapped in the Satilla remained the same in all 3 yr. Juncus was the dominant classification in the intermediate regions of both estuaries, and shifts between areas classified as Juncus and either brackish or salt marsh constituted the primary vegetation change between 1953 and 1993 (87% of the changes observed in the Altamaha and 95% of those in the Satilla). This analysis suggests that the broad distribution of tidal marsh vegetation along these two estuaries is driven by salinity, but that at the local scale these are dynamic systems with a larger number of factors affecting the frequently changing borders of vegetation patches.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/BF02907652
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_968179263</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>1353478</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>1353478</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c370t-742c5a477ab07345ee17dc6b64a7b4f7cbccb900fed36139a08c41c3807dc11c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90UFrGzEQBWARWoib9tJzDiKQFAqbjFZaaffohsQNJCRQp9dlVtbaMpuVq5EJ_vdVccCQQ08a0DfvMI-xrwIuBYC5-nELZQNGV-URm4iqaorSVPUHNgGhoailMsfsE9EaQDRGmwlz0xGHHXnioedzv8CBP2CkFf_tli5h8mHkT5iSiyNxP_L5a-AzF-LSI7-htMXoHfFn8uOST130ef9pFVJYRtysdhzHBZ_d_frMPvY4kPvy9p6w59ub-fXP4v5xdnc9vS-sNJAKo0pboTIGOzBSVc4Js7C60wpNp3pjO2u7BqB3C6mFbBBqq4SVNWQm8nDCvu1zNzH82TpK7Ysn64YBRxe21Da6FqYptczy4r9SGNOIslIZnr2D67CN-Wg5TehSiRyY0fc9sjEQRde3m-hfMO5aAe2_YtpDMRmfvyUiWRz6iKP1dNjQUAtViuxO925NKcTDv6xyjbX8C7gqlPo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>916241179</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Analysis of Tidal Marsh Vegetation Patterns in Two Georgia Estuaries Using Aerial Photography and GIS</title><source>JSTOR</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Higinbotham, Carrie B. ; Alber, Merryl ; Chalmers, Alice G.</creator><creatorcontrib>Higinbotham, Carrie B. ; Alber, Merryl ; Chalmers, Alice G.</creatorcontrib><description>Aerial photographs and GIS analysis were used to map the distribution of tidal marsh vegetation along the salinity gradients of the estuaries of the Altamaha and Satilla Rivers in coastal Georgia. Vegetation maps were constructed from 1993 U. S. Geological Survey Digital Orthophoto Quarter Quads, 1:77,000-scale color infrared photographs taken in 1974 and 1:24,000-scale black and white photographs taken in 1953. Changes between years were identified using a GIS overlay analysis. Four vegetation classifications were identified and groundtruthed with field surveys: salt marsh (areas containing primarily Spartina alterniflora), brackish marsh (Spartina cynosuroides and S. alterniflora), Juncus (Juncus roemerianus), and fresh marsh (Zizania aquatica, Zizaniopsis miliacae, and others). There was no evidence for an upstream shift in marsh vegetation along the longitudinal axis of either estuary over the time frame of this analysis, which implies there has not been a long-term increase in salinity. Although the inland extent of each marsh zone was further upstream in the Satilla than the Altamaha, they corresponded to similar average high tide salinities in each estuary: areas classified as salt marsh occurred from the mouth up to where average high tide salinity in the water was approximately 15 psu; Juncus ranged from 21 to 1 psu; brackish marsh ranged from 15 to 1 psu; and fresh marsh was upstream of 1 psu. Approximately 63% of the 6,786 ha of tidal marsh vegetation mapped in the Altamaha and 75% of the 10,220 ha mapped in the Satilla remained the same in all 3 yr. Juncus was the dominant classification in the intermediate regions of both estuaries, and shifts between areas classified as Juncus and either brackish or salt marsh constituted the primary vegetation change between 1953 and 1993 (87% of the changes observed in the Altamaha and 95% of those in the Satilla). This analysis suggests that the broad distribution of tidal marsh vegetation along these two estuaries is driven by salinity, but that at the local scale these are dynamic systems with a larger number of factors affecting the frequently changing borders of vegetation patches.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0160-8347</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1559-2723</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1559-2758</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1559-2731</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/BF02907652</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ESTUDO</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Lawrence, KS: Estuarine Research Federation</publisher><subject>Aerial photography ; Animal and plant ecology ; Animal behavior ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Aquatic plants ; Biological and medical sciences ; Brackish ; Brackish water ecosystems ; Estuaries ; Fresh water ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Geographic information systems ; Geological surveys ; Juncus ; Juncus roemerianus ; Marshes ; Plants ; Salinity ; Salt marshes ; Spartina alterniflora ; Spartina cynosuroides ; Synecology ; Tidal analysis ; Tidal marshes ; Upstream ; Vegetation ; Vegetation patterns ; Wetlands ; Zizania aquatica ; Zizaniopsis ; Zizaniopsis miliacea</subject><ispartof>Estuaries, 2004-08, Vol.27 (4), p.670-683</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2004 Estuarine Research Federation</rights><rights>2004 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Estuarine Research Federation 2004</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c370t-742c5a477ab07345ee17dc6b64a7b4f7cbccb900fed36139a08c41c3807dc11c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c370t-742c5a477ab07345ee17dc6b64a7b4f7cbccb900fed36139a08c41c3807dc11c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/1353478$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/1353478$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,804,27926,27927,58019,58252</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=16081421$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Higinbotham, Carrie B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alber, Merryl</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chalmers, Alice G.</creatorcontrib><title>Analysis of Tidal Marsh Vegetation Patterns in Two Georgia Estuaries Using Aerial Photography and GIS</title><title>Estuaries</title><description>Aerial photographs and GIS analysis were used to map the distribution of tidal marsh vegetation along the salinity gradients of the estuaries of the Altamaha and Satilla Rivers in coastal Georgia. Vegetation maps were constructed from 1993 U. S. Geological Survey Digital Orthophoto Quarter Quads, 1:77,000-scale color infrared photographs taken in 1974 and 1:24,000-scale black and white photographs taken in 1953. Changes between years were identified using a GIS overlay analysis. Four vegetation classifications were identified and groundtruthed with field surveys: salt marsh (areas containing primarily Spartina alterniflora), brackish marsh (Spartina cynosuroides and S. alterniflora), Juncus (Juncus roemerianus), and fresh marsh (Zizania aquatica, Zizaniopsis miliacae, and others). There was no evidence for an upstream shift in marsh vegetation along the longitudinal axis of either estuary over the time frame of this analysis, which implies there has not been a long-term increase in salinity. Although the inland extent of each marsh zone was further upstream in the Satilla than the Altamaha, they corresponded to similar average high tide salinities in each estuary: areas classified as salt marsh occurred from the mouth up to where average high tide salinity in the water was approximately 15 psu; Juncus ranged from 21 to 1 psu; brackish marsh ranged from 15 to 1 psu; and fresh marsh was upstream of 1 psu. Approximately 63% of the 6,786 ha of tidal marsh vegetation mapped in the Altamaha and 75% of the 10,220 ha mapped in the Satilla remained the same in all 3 yr. Juncus was the dominant classification in the intermediate regions of both estuaries, and shifts between areas classified as Juncus and either brackish or salt marsh constituted the primary vegetation change between 1953 and 1993 (87% of the changes observed in the Altamaha and 95% of those in the Satilla). This analysis suggests that the broad distribution of tidal marsh vegetation along these two estuaries is driven by salinity, but that at the local scale these are dynamic systems with a larger number of factors affecting the frequently changing borders of vegetation patches.</description><subject>Aerial photography</subject><subject>Animal and plant ecology</subject><subject>Animal behavior</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Aquatic plants</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Brackish</subject><subject>Brackish water ecosystems</subject><subject>Estuaries</subject><subject>Fresh water</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Geographic information systems</subject><subject>Geological surveys</subject><subject>Juncus</subject><subject>Juncus roemerianus</subject><subject>Marshes</subject><subject>Plants</subject><subject>Salinity</subject><subject>Salt marshes</subject><subject>Spartina alterniflora</subject><subject>Spartina cynosuroides</subject><subject>Synecology</subject><subject>Tidal analysis</subject><subject>Tidal marshes</subject><subject>Upstream</subject><subject>Vegetation</subject><subject>Vegetation patterns</subject><subject>Wetlands</subject><subject>Zizania aquatica</subject><subject>Zizaniopsis</subject><subject>Zizaniopsis miliacea</subject><issn>0160-8347</issn><issn>1559-2723</issn><issn>1559-2758</issn><issn>1559-2731</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp90UFrGzEQBWARWoib9tJzDiKQFAqbjFZaaffohsQNJCRQp9dlVtbaMpuVq5EJ_vdVccCQQ08a0DfvMI-xrwIuBYC5-nELZQNGV-URm4iqaorSVPUHNgGhoailMsfsE9EaQDRGmwlz0xGHHXnioedzv8CBP2CkFf_tli5h8mHkT5iSiyNxP_L5a-AzF-LSI7-htMXoHfFn8uOST130ef9pFVJYRtysdhzHBZ_d_frMPvY4kPvy9p6w59ub-fXP4v5xdnc9vS-sNJAKo0pboTIGOzBSVc4Js7C60wpNp3pjO2u7BqB3C6mFbBBqq4SVNWQm8nDCvu1zNzH82TpK7Ysn64YBRxe21Da6FqYptczy4r9SGNOIslIZnr2D67CN-Wg5TehSiRyY0fc9sjEQRde3m-hfMO5aAe2_YtpDMRmfvyUiWRz6iKP1dNjQUAtViuxO925NKcTDv6xyjbX8C7gqlPo</recordid><startdate>20040801</startdate><enddate>20040801</enddate><creator>Higinbotham, Carrie B.</creator><creator>Alber, Merryl</creator><creator>Chalmers, Alice G.</creator><general>Estuarine Research Federation</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>KL.</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20040801</creationdate><title>Analysis of Tidal Marsh Vegetation Patterns in Two Georgia Estuaries Using Aerial Photography and GIS</title><author>Higinbotham, Carrie B. ; Alber, Merryl ; Chalmers, Alice G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c370t-742c5a477ab07345ee17dc6b64a7b4f7cbccb900fed36139a08c41c3807dc11c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Aerial photography</topic><topic>Animal and plant ecology</topic><topic>Animal behavior</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Aquatic plants</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Brackish</topic><topic>Brackish water ecosystems</topic><topic>Estuaries</topic><topic>Fresh water</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Geographic information systems</topic><topic>Geological surveys</topic><topic>Juncus</topic><topic>Juncus roemerianus</topic><topic>Marshes</topic><topic>Plants</topic><topic>Salinity</topic><topic>Salt marshes</topic><topic>Spartina alterniflora</topic><topic>Spartina cynosuroides</topic><topic>Synecology</topic><topic>Tidal analysis</topic><topic>Tidal marshes</topic><topic>Upstream</topic><topic>Vegetation</topic><topic>Vegetation patterns</topic><topic>Wetlands</topic><topic>Zizania aquatica</topic><topic>Zizaniopsis</topic><topic>Zizaniopsis miliacea</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Higinbotham, Carrie B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alber, Merryl</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chalmers, Alice G.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Research Library</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><jtitle>Estuaries</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Higinbotham, Carrie B.</au><au>Alber, Merryl</au><au>Chalmers, Alice G.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Analysis of Tidal Marsh Vegetation Patterns in Two Georgia Estuaries Using Aerial Photography and GIS</atitle><jtitle>Estuaries</jtitle><date>2004-08-01</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>670</spage><epage>683</epage><pages>670-683</pages><issn>0160-8347</issn><issn>1559-2723</issn><eissn>1559-2758</eissn><eissn>1559-2731</eissn><coden>ESTUDO</coden><abstract>Aerial photographs and GIS analysis were used to map the distribution of tidal marsh vegetation along the salinity gradients of the estuaries of the Altamaha and Satilla Rivers in coastal Georgia. Vegetation maps were constructed from 1993 U. S. Geological Survey Digital Orthophoto Quarter Quads, 1:77,000-scale color infrared photographs taken in 1974 and 1:24,000-scale black and white photographs taken in 1953. Changes between years were identified using a GIS overlay analysis. Four vegetation classifications were identified and groundtruthed with field surveys: salt marsh (areas containing primarily Spartina alterniflora), brackish marsh (Spartina cynosuroides and S. alterniflora), Juncus (Juncus roemerianus), and fresh marsh (Zizania aquatica, Zizaniopsis miliacae, and others). There was no evidence for an upstream shift in marsh vegetation along the longitudinal axis of either estuary over the time frame of this analysis, which implies there has not been a long-term increase in salinity. Although the inland extent of each marsh zone was further upstream in the Satilla than the Altamaha, they corresponded to similar average high tide salinities in each estuary: areas classified as salt marsh occurred from the mouth up to where average high tide salinity in the water was approximately 15 psu; Juncus ranged from 21 to 1 psu; brackish marsh ranged from 15 to 1 psu; and fresh marsh was upstream of 1 psu. Approximately 63% of the 6,786 ha of tidal marsh vegetation mapped in the Altamaha and 75% of the 10,220 ha mapped in the Satilla remained the same in all 3 yr. Juncus was the dominant classification in the intermediate regions of both estuaries, and shifts between areas classified as Juncus and either brackish or salt marsh constituted the primary vegetation change between 1953 and 1993 (87% of the changes observed in the Altamaha and 95% of those in the Satilla). This analysis suggests that the broad distribution of tidal marsh vegetation along these two estuaries is driven by salinity, but that at the local scale these are dynamic systems with a larger number of factors affecting the frequently changing borders of vegetation patches.</abstract><cop>Lawrence, KS</cop><pub>Estuarine Research Federation</pub><doi>10.1007/BF02907652</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0160-8347
ispartof Estuaries, 2004-08, Vol.27 (4), p.670-683
issn 0160-8347
1559-2723
1559-2758
1559-2731
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_968179263
source JSTOR; EZB Electronic Journals Library; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Aerial photography
Animal and plant ecology
Animal behavior
Animal, plant and microbial ecology
Aquatic plants
Biological and medical sciences
Brackish
Brackish water ecosystems
Estuaries
Fresh water
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Geographic information systems
Geological surveys
Juncus
Juncus roemerianus
Marshes
Plants
Salinity
Salt marshes
Spartina alterniflora
Spartina cynosuroides
Synecology
Tidal analysis
Tidal marshes
Upstream
Vegetation
Vegetation patterns
Wetlands
Zizania aquatica
Zizaniopsis
Zizaniopsis miliacea
title Analysis of Tidal Marsh Vegetation Patterns in Two Georgia Estuaries Using Aerial Photography and GIS
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-17T19%3A27%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Analysis%20of%20Tidal%20Marsh%20Vegetation%20Patterns%20in%20Two%20Georgia%20Estuaries%20Using%20Aerial%20Photography%20and%20GIS&rft.jtitle=Estuaries&rft.au=Higinbotham,%20Carrie%20B.&rft.date=2004-08-01&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=670&rft.epage=683&rft.pages=670-683&rft.issn=0160-8347&rft.eissn=1559-2758&rft.coden=ESTUDO&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/BF02907652&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E1353478%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=916241179&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=1353478&rfr_iscdi=true