Chemical and physical factors associated with yellow perch abundance in Great Lakes coastal wetlands: patterns within and among wetland types

Great Lakes coastal wetlands provide important spawning and nursery habitat as well as abundant food resources for yellow perch ( Perca flavescens ). We examined multiple years of fyke-net data from wetlands along Lakes Huron and Michigan to describe yellow perch distribution in drowned river mouth...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Wetlands ecology and management 2012-04, Vol.20 (2), p.137-150
Hauptverfasser: Parker, Aaron D., Cooper, Matthew J., Ruetz, Carl R., Coulter, David P., Uzarski, Donald G.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 150
container_issue 2
container_start_page 137
container_title Wetlands ecology and management
container_volume 20
creator Parker, Aaron D.
Cooper, Matthew J.
Ruetz, Carl R.
Coulter, David P.
Uzarski, Donald G.
description Great Lakes coastal wetlands provide important spawning and nursery habitat as well as abundant food resources for yellow perch ( Perca flavescens ). We examined multiple years of fyke-net data from wetlands along Lakes Huron and Michigan to describe yellow perch distribution in drowned river mouth (DRM) and coastal fringing systems. Principal components analysis and multi-response permutation procedures indicated that DRM wetlands (yellow perch CPUE = 0.2) were eutrophic systems that often exhibit high temperatures and periods of hypoxia, whereas coastal fringing wetlands (yellow perch CPUE = 32.1) were less productive. Among the coastal fringing systems, Saginaw Bay (Lake Huron), displayed characteristics of being more productive and had more yellow perch. Most yellow perch captured in Saginaw Bay were age-0, suggesting that it was an important nursery habitat. Among DRM ecosystems, we found that the downstream lake macrohabitats contained more yellow perch than upstream wetlands; however, there was no significant difference in abiotic characteristics to explain the higher catches in lakes. We hypothesize that yellow perch were more prevalent in wetlands with intermediate productivity during summer because these systems provide abundant food resources without the harsh conditions associated with highly eutrophic wetlands.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s11273-012-9250-x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_968177000</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>968177000</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-5237ac1da6add7bc92bf3216c5562ac1be53660ec5fdf3aa332938da20be4b423</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc1q3DAURkVpINMkD5Cd6KYrN_qxLbu7MrRpYCCbZC2u5euMU4_k6mqYzEPknavJpAQKWYmLznd0xcfYpRRfpRDmiqRURhdCqqJVlSiePrCFrEyeGl1-ZAvRKl2UTS1P2SeiRyFyqpUL9rxc42Z0MHHwPZ_Xe3oZBnApROJAFNwICXu-G9Oa73Gawo7PGN2aQ7f1PXiHfPT8OiIkvoLfSNwFoJQtO0xT1tI3PkNKGD29WDJ9eAw2wT_8Y3jaz0jn7GSAifDi9Txj9z9_3C1_Favb65vl91XhdGlSUSltwMkeauh707lWdYNWsnZVVat80WGl61qgq4Z-0ABaq1Y3PSjRYdmVSp-xL0fvHMOfLVKym5Fc_ht4DFuybd1IY4QQmfz8H_kYttHn5WyrmlIaqcsMySPkYiCKONg5jhuIeyuFPdRjj_XYXI891GOfckYdM5RZ_4DxTfx-6C9s6pYM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>928417134</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Chemical and physical factors associated with yellow perch abundance in Great Lakes coastal wetlands: patterns within and among wetland types</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Parker, Aaron D. ; Cooper, Matthew J. ; Ruetz, Carl R. ; Coulter, David P. ; Uzarski, Donald G.</creator><creatorcontrib>Parker, Aaron D. ; Cooper, Matthew J. ; Ruetz, Carl R. ; Coulter, David P. ; Uzarski, Donald G.</creatorcontrib><description>Great Lakes coastal wetlands provide important spawning and nursery habitat as well as abundant food resources for yellow perch ( Perca flavescens ). We examined multiple years of fyke-net data from wetlands along Lakes Huron and Michigan to describe yellow perch distribution in drowned river mouth (DRM) and coastal fringing systems. Principal components analysis and multi-response permutation procedures indicated that DRM wetlands (yellow perch CPUE = 0.2) were eutrophic systems that often exhibit high temperatures and periods of hypoxia, whereas coastal fringing wetlands (yellow perch CPUE = 32.1) were less productive. Among the coastal fringing systems, Saginaw Bay (Lake Huron), displayed characteristics of being more productive and had more yellow perch. Most yellow perch captured in Saginaw Bay were age-0, suggesting that it was an important nursery habitat. Among DRM ecosystems, we found that the downstream lake macrohabitats contained more yellow perch than upstream wetlands; however, there was no significant difference in abiotic characteristics to explain the higher catches in lakes. We hypothesize that yellow perch were more prevalent in wetlands with intermediate productivity during summer because these systems provide abundant food resources without the harsh conditions associated with highly eutrophic wetlands.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0923-4861</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1572-9834</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11273-012-9250-x</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Chemicals ; Coasts ; Conservation Biology/Ecology ; Environmental Law/Policy/Ecojustice ; Eutrophication ; Fish ; Food resources ; Freshwater ; Freshwater &amp; Marine Ecology ; High temperature ; Hydrology/Water Resources ; Hypoxia ; Lakes ; Life Sciences ; Marine &amp; Freshwater Sciences ; Original Paper ; Perca flavescens ; Principal components analysis ; River mouth ; Spawning ; Water Quality/Water Pollution ; Wetlands</subject><ispartof>Wetlands ecology and management, 2012-04, Vol.20 (2), p.137-150</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-5237ac1da6add7bc92bf3216c5562ac1be53660ec5fdf3aa332938da20be4b423</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-5237ac1da6add7bc92bf3216c5562ac1be53660ec5fdf3aa332938da20be4b423</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11273-012-9250-x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11273-012-9250-x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Parker, Aaron D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cooper, Matthew J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ruetz, Carl R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coulter, David P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Uzarski, Donald G.</creatorcontrib><title>Chemical and physical factors associated with yellow perch abundance in Great Lakes coastal wetlands: patterns within and among wetland types</title><title>Wetlands ecology and management</title><addtitle>Wetlands Ecol Manage</addtitle><description>Great Lakes coastal wetlands provide important spawning and nursery habitat as well as abundant food resources for yellow perch ( Perca flavescens ). We examined multiple years of fyke-net data from wetlands along Lakes Huron and Michigan to describe yellow perch distribution in drowned river mouth (DRM) and coastal fringing systems. Principal components analysis and multi-response permutation procedures indicated that DRM wetlands (yellow perch CPUE = 0.2) were eutrophic systems that often exhibit high temperatures and periods of hypoxia, whereas coastal fringing wetlands (yellow perch CPUE = 32.1) were less productive. Among the coastal fringing systems, Saginaw Bay (Lake Huron), displayed characteristics of being more productive and had more yellow perch. Most yellow perch captured in Saginaw Bay were age-0, suggesting that it was an important nursery habitat. Among DRM ecosystems, we found that the downstream lake macrohabitats contained more yellow perch than upstream wetlands; however, there was no significant difference in abiotic characteristics to explain the higher catches in lakes. We hypothesize that yellow perch were more prevalent in wetlands with intermediate productivity during summer because these systems provide abundant food resources without the harsh conditions associated with highly eutrophic wetlands.</description><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Chemicals</subject><subject>Coasts</subject><subject>Conservation Biology/Ecology</subject><subject>Environmental Law/Policy/Ecojustice</subject><subject>Eutrophication</subject><subject>Fish</subject><subject>Food resources</subject><subject>Freshwater</subject><subject>Freshwater &amp; Marine Ecology</subject><subject>High temperature</subject><subject>Hydrology/Water Resources</subject><subject>Hypoxia</subject><subject>Lakes</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Marine &amp; Freshwater Sciences</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Perca flavescens</subject><subject>Principal components analysis</subject><subject>River mouth</subject><subject>Spawning</subject><subject>Water Quality/Water Pollution</subject><subject>Wetlands</subject><issn>0923-4861</issn><issn>1572-9834</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kc1q3DAURkVpINMkD5Cd6KYrN_qxLbu7MrRpYCCbZC2u5euMU4_k6mqYzEPknavJpAQKWYmLznd0xcfYpRRfpRDmiqRURhdCqqJVlSiePrCFrEyeGl1-ZAvRKl2UTS1P2SeiRyFyqpUL9rxc42Z0MHHwPZ_Xe3oZBnApROJAFNwICXu-G9Oa73Gawo7PGN2aQ7f1PXiHfPT8OiIkvoLfSNwFoJQtO0xT1tI3PkNKGD29WDJ9eAw2wT_8Y3jaz0jn7GSAifDi9Txj9z9_3C1_Favb65vl91XhdGlSUSltwMkeauh707lWdYNWsnZVVat80WGl61qgq4Z-0ABaq1Y3PSjRYdmVSp-xL0fvHMOfLVKym5Fc_ht4DFuybd1IY4QQmfz8H_kYttHn5WyrmlIaqcsMySPkYiCKONg5jhuIeyuFPdRjj_XYXI891GOfckYdM5RZ_4DxTfx-6C9s6pYM</recordid><startdate>20120401</startdate><enddate>20120401</enddate><creator>Parker, Aaron D.</creator><creator>Cooper, Matthew J.</creator><creator>Ruetz, Carl R.</creator><creator>Coulter, David P.</creator><creator>Uzarski, Donald G.</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PHGZM</scope><scope>PHGZT</scope><scope>PKEHL</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQGLB</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>KL.</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120401</creationdate><title>Chemical and physical factors associated with yellow perch abundance in Great Lakes coastal wetlands: patterns within and among wetland types</title><author>Parker, Aaron D. ; Cooper, Matthew J. ; Ruetz, Carl R. ; Coulter, David P. ; Uzarski, Donald G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-5237ac1da6add7bc92bf3216c5562ac1be53660ec5fdf3aa332938da20be4b423</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Chemicals</topic><topic>Coasts</topic><topic>Conservation Biology/Ecology</topic><topic>Environmental Law/Policy/Ecojustice</topic><topic>Eutrophication</topic><topic>Fish</topic><topic>Food resources</topic><topic>Freshwater</topic><topic>Freshwater &amp; Marine Ecology</topic><topic>High temperature</topic><topic>Hydrology/Water Resources</topic><topic>Hypoxia</topic><topic>Lakes</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Marine &amp; Freshwater Sciences</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Perca flavescens</topic><topic>Principal components analysis</topic><topic>River mouth</topic><topic>Spawning</topic><topic>Water Quality/Water Pollution</topic><topic>Wetlands</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Parker, Aaron D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cooper, Matthew J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ruetz, Carl R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coulter, David P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Uzarski, Donald G.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution &amp; Environmental Quality</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Applied &amp; Life Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><jtitle>Wetlands ecology and management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Parker, Aaron D.</au><au>Cooper, Matthew J.</au><au>Ruetz, Carl R.</au><au>Coulter, David P.</au><au>Uzarski, Donald G.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Chemical and physical factors associated with yellow perch abundance in Great Lakes coastal wetlands: patterns within and among wetland types</atitle><jtitle>Wetlands ecology and management</jtitle><stitle>Wetlands Ecol Manage</stitle><date>2012-04-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>137</spage><epage>150</epage><pages>137-150</pages><issn>0923-4861</issn><eissn>1572-9834</eissn><abstract>Great Lakes coastal wetlands provide important spawning and nursery habitat as well as abundant food resources for yellow perch ( Perca flavescens ). We examined multiple years of fyke-net data from wetlands along Lakes Huron and Michigan to describe yellow perch distribution in drowned river mouth (DRM) and coastal fringing systems. Principal components analysis and multi-response permutation procedures indicated that DRM wetlands (yellow perch CPUE = 0.2) were eutrophic systems that often exhibit high temperatures and periods of hypoxia, whereas coastal fringing wetlands (yellow perch CPUE = 32.1) were less productive. Among the coastal fringing systems, Saginaw Bay (Lake Huron), displayed characteristics of being more productive and had more yellow perch. Most yellow perch captured in Saginaw Bay were age-0, suggesting that it was an important nursery habitat. Among DRM ecosystems, we found that the downstream lake macrohabitats contained more yellow perch than upstream wetlands; however, there was no significant difference in abiotic characteristics to explain the higher catches in lakes. We hypothesize that yellow perch were more prevalent in wetlands with intermediate productivity during summer because these systems provide abundant food resources without the harsh conditions associated with highly eutrophic wetlands.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s11273-012-9250-x</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0923-4861
ispartof Wetlands ecology and management, 2012-04, Vol.20 (2), p.137-150
issn 0923-4861
1572-9834
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_968177000
source SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Biomedical and Life Sciences
Chemicals
Coasts
Conservation Biology/Ecology
Environmental Law/Policy/Ecojustice
Eutrophication
Fish
Food resources
Freshwater
Freshwater & Marine Ecology
High temperature
Hydrology/Water Resources
Hypoxia
Lakes
Life Sciences
Marine & Freshwater Sciences
Original Paper
Perca flavescens
Principal components analysis
River mouth
Spawning
Water Quality/Water Pollution
Wetlands
title Chemical and physical factors associated with yellow perch abundance in Great Lakes coastal wetlands: patterns within and among wetland types
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T17%3A02%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Chemical%20and%20physical%20factors%20associated%20with%20yellow%20perch%20abundance%20in%20Great%20Lakes%20coastal%20wetlands:%20patterns%20within%20and%20among%20wetland%20types&rft.jtitle=Wetlands%20ecology%20and%20management&rft.au=Parker,%20Aaron%20D.&rft.date=2012-04-01&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=137&rft.epage=150&rft.pages=137-150&rft.issn=0923-4861&rft.eissn=1572-9834&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11273-012-9250-x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E968177000%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=928417134&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true