Limits of pine forest distribution at the treeline: herbivory matters
Herbivores can affect future forest composition by feeding selectivity. At temperature-sensitive treelines, herbivory can exacerbate or constrain climate-driven distributional shifts in tree species. This study analyses the impact of herbivory in a Mediterranean treeline of widespread Pinus sylvestr...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Plant ecology 2012-03, Vol.213 (3), p.459-469 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 469 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 459 |
container_title | Plant ecology |
container_volume | 213 |
creator | Herrero, A. Zamora, R. Castro, J. Hódar, J. A. |
description | Herbivores can affect future forest composition by feeding selectivity. At temperature-sensitive treelines, herbivory can exacerbate or constrain climate-driven distributional shifts in tree species. This study analyses the impact of herbivory in a Mediterranean treeline of widespread Pinus sylvestris and P. nigra pinewoods, testing whether herbivory damage reinforces or inhibits the climatic responses of these trees. We used naturally occurring sapling pairs of similar size and age of both species, thereby isolating plant characteristics from environmental effects in herbivore behaviour. Herbivory damage by ungulates proved higher than that caused by insects in saplings of both species. Low plant density and extreme abiotic conditions at the treeline could in part be responsible for the observed low incidence of insect herbivory. Ungulates preferred P. sylvestris over P. nigra, implying heavier browsing damage for a large number of P. sylvestris saplings, suffering reduced internode growth as a consequence. In addition, P. sylvestris could not compensate height-growth reductions due to browsing with higher growth rate than P. nigra. In fact, P. sylvestris showed similar or lower relative height growth with respect to P. nigra. Under a scenario of increasing aridity and maintenance of ungulate populations, the upward migration of P. sylvestris in its southern range could be restricted by higher drought vulnerability than P. nigra, a situation exacerbated by ungulate herbivory. Our results indicate that ungulate herbivory reinforces climatic response of coexisting P. sylvestris and P. nigra at treeline, favouring a potential change in community dominance towards Mediterranean P. nigra. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11258-011-9993-0 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_968169677</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A361241536</galeid><jstor_id>41429065</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>A361241536</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-6bd6fa351a872215ecf8a68d09062e21150905f4abc4992b9329efeb1925b4483</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kctKxDAUhosoeH0AF0Jw46qak1sbdyLeYMCNrkPaOdEMbTMmGcG3N1JRcCFZ5BC-L_nJX1XHQM-B0uYiATDZ1hSg1lrzmm5VeyAbXksq2XaZeStrynizW-2ntKK0WFzuVTcLP_qcSHBk7SckLkRMmSx9ytF3m-zDRGwm-RVJjohDYS7JK8bOv4f4QUabM8Z0WO04OyQ8-t4Pqufbm6fr-3rxePdwfbWoe0HbXKtuqZzlEmzbMAYSe9da1S6ppoohA5Blkk7Yrhdas05zptFhB5rJToiWH1Rn873rGN42JagZfepxGOyEYZOMVi0orZqmkKd_yFXYxKmEM5oppbTQskDnM_RiBzR-ciFH25e1xNH3YULny_kVV8AESK6KALPQx5BSRGfW0Y82fhig5qsHM_dgSg_mqwdDi8NmJxV2esH4m-Q_6WSWVimH-POKAMHKX0n-CVkAks4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>926669495</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Limits of pine forest distribution at the treeline: herbivory matters</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Herrero, A. ; Zamora, R. ; Castro, J. ; Hódar, J. A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Herrero, A. ; Zamora, R. ; Castro, J. ; Hódar, J. A.</creatorcontrib><description>Herbivores can affect future forest composition by feeding selectivity. At temperature-sensitive treelines, herbivory can exacerbate or constrain climate-driven distributional shifts in tree species. This study analyses the impact of herbivory in a Mediterranean treeline of widespread Pinus sylvestris and P. nigra pinewoods, testing whether herbivory damage reinforces or inhibits the climatic responses of these trees. We used naturally occurring sapling pairs of similar size and age of both species, thereby isolating plant characteristics from environmental effects in herbivore behaviour. Herbivory damage by ungulates proved higher than that caused by insects in saplings of both species. Low plant density and extreme abiotic conditions at the treeline could in part be responsible for the observed low incidence of insect herbivory. Ungulates preferred P. sylvestris over P. nigra, implying heavier browsing damage for a large number of P. sylvestris saplings, suffering reduced internode growth as a consequence. In addition, P. sylvestris could not compensate height-growth reductions due to browsing with higher growth rate than P. nigra. In fact, P. sylvestris showed similar or lower relative height growth with respect to P. nigra. Under a scenario of increasing aridity and maintenance of ungulate populations, the upward migration of P. sylvestris in its southern range could be restricted by higher drought vulnerability than P. nigra, a situation exacerbated by ungulate herbivory. Our results indicate that ungulate herbivory reinforces climatic response of coexisting P. sylvestris and P. nigra at treeline, favouring a potential change in community dominance towards Mediterranean P. nigra.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1385-0237</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-5052</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11258-011-9993-0</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer</publisher><subject>Abiotic stress ; Age ; Animal behavior ; Applied Ecology ; Biodiversity ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Browsing ; Climate ; Climate change ; Climate models ; Community & Population Ecology ; Coniferous forests ; Dominance ; Drought ; Droughts ; Ecology ; Environmental effects ; Feeding ; Forests ; Growth rate ; Herbivores ; Herbivory ; Infestation ; Insects ; Internodes ; Life Sciences ; Migration ; Phytophagous insects ; Pine trees ; Pinus sylvestris ; Plant Ecology ; Plant species ; Planting density ; Saplings ; Terrestial Ecology ; Timberlines ; Treeline ; Trees ; Ungulates</subject><ispartof>Plant ecology, 2012-03, Vol.213 (3), p.459-469</ispartof><rights>2012 Springer</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2012 Springer</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-6bd6fa351a872215ecf8a68d09062e21150905f4abc4992b9329efeb1925b4483</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-6bd6fa351a872215ecf8a68d09062e21150905f4abc4992b9329efeb1925b4483</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/41429065$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/41429065$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27903,27904,41467,42536,51298,57996,58229</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Herrero, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zamora, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Castro, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hódar, J. A.</creatorcontrib><title>Limits of pine forest distribution at the treeline: herbivory matters</title><title>Plant ecology</title><addtitle>Plant Ecol</addtitle><description>Herbivores can affect future forest composition by feeding selectivity. At temperature-sensitive treelines, herbivory can exacerbate or constrain climate-driven distributional shifts in tree species. This study analyses the impact of herbivory in a Mediterranean treeline of widespread Pinus sylvestris and P. nigra pinewoods, testing whether herbivory damage reinforces or inhibits the climatic responses of these trees. We used naturally occurring sapling pairs of similar size and age of both species, thereby isolating plant characteristics from environmental effects in herbivore behaviour. Herbivory damage by ungulates proved higher than that caused by insects in saplings of both species. Low plant density and extreme abiotic conditions at the treeline could in part be responsible for the observed low incidence of insect herbivory. Ungulates preferred P. sylvestris over P. nigra, implying heavier browsing damage for a large number of P. sylvestris saplings, suffering reduced internode growth as a consequence. In addition, P. sylvestris could not compensate height-growth reductions due to browsing with higher growth rate than P. nigra. In fact, P. sylvestris showed similar or lower relative height growth with respect to P. nigra. Under a scenario of increasing aridity and maintenance of ungulate populations, the upward migration of P. sylvestris in its southern range could be restricted by higher drought vulnerability than P. nigra, a situation exacerbated by ungulate herbivory. Our results indicate that ungulate herbivory reinforces climatic response of coexisting P. sylvestris and P. nigra at treeline, favouring a potential change in community dominance towards Mediterranean P. nigra.</description><subject>Abiotic stress</subject><subject>Age</subject><subject>Animal behavior</subject><subject>Applied Ecology</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Browsing</subject><subject>Climate</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Climate models</subject><subject>Community & Population Ecology</subject><subject>Coniferous forests</subject><subject>Dominance</subject><subject>Drought</subject><subject>Droughts</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Environmental effects</subject><subject>Feeding</subject><subject>Forests</subject><subject>Growth rate</subject><subject>Herbivores</subject><subject>Herbivory</subject><subject>Infestation</subject><subject>Insects</subject><subject>Internodes</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Migration</subject><subject>Phytophagous insects</subject><subject>Pine trees</subject><subject>Pinus sylvestris</subject><subject>Plant Ecology</subject><subject>Plant species</subject><subject>Planting density</subject><subject>Saplings</subject><subject>Terrestial Ecology</subject><subject>Timberlines</subject><subject>Treeline</subject><subject>Trees</subject><subject>Ungulates</subject><issn>1385-0237</issn><issn>1573-5052</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kctKxDAUhosoeH0AF0Jw46qak1sbdyLeYMCNrkPaOdEMbTMmGcG3N1JRcCFZ5BC-L_nJX1XHQM-B0uYiATDZ1hSg1lrzmm5VeyAbXksq2XaZeStrynizW-2ntKK0WFzuVTcLP_qcSHBk7SckLkRMmSx9ytF3m-zDRGwm-RVJjohDYS7JK8bOv4f4QUabM8Z0WO04OyQ8-t4Pqufbm6fr-3rxePdwfbWoe0HbXKtuqZzlEmzbMAYSe9da1S6ppoohA5Blkk7Yrhdas05zptFhB5rJToiWH1Rn873rGN42JagZfepxGOyEYZOMVi0orZqmkKd_yFXYxKmEM5oppbTQskDnM_RiBzR-ciFH25e1xNH3YULny_kVV8AESK6KALPQx5BSRGfW0Y82fhig5qsHM_dgSg_mqwdDi8NmJxV2esH4m-Q_6WSWVimH-POKAMHKX0n-CVkAks4</recordid><startdate>20120301</startdate><enddate>20120301</enddate><creator>Herrero, A.</creator><creator>Zamora, R.</creator><creator>Castro, J.</creator><creator>Hódar, J. A.</creator><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7U6</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120301</creationdate><title>Limits of pine forest distribution at the treeline: herbivory matters</title><author>Herrero, A. ; Zamora, R. ; Castro, J. ; Hódar, J. A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-6bd6fa351a872215ecf8a68d09062e21150905f4abc4992b9329efeb1925b4483</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Abiotic stress</topic><topic>Age</topic><topic>Animal behavior</topic><topic>Applied Ecology</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Browsing</topic><topic>Climate</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Climate models</topic><topic>Community & Population Ecology</topic><topic>Coniferous forests</topic><topic>Dominance</topic><topic>Drought</topic><topic>Droughts</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Environmental effects</topic><topic>Feeding</topic><topic>Forests</topic><topic>Growth rate</topic><topic>Herbivores</topic><topic>Herbivory</topic><topic>Infestation</topic><topic>Insects</topic><topic>Internodes</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Migration</topic><topic>Phytophagous insects</topic><topic>Pine trees</topic><topic>Pinus sylvestris</topic><topic>Plant Ecology</topic><topic>Plant species</topic><topic>Planting density</topic><topic>Saplings</topic><topic>Terrestial Ecology</topic><topic>Timberlines</topic><topic>Treeline</topic><topic>Trees</topic><topic>Ungulates</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Herrero, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zamora, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Castro, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hódar, J. A.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Plant ecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Herrero, A.</au><au>Zamora, R.</au><au>Castro, J.</au><au>Hódar, J. A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Limits of pine forest distribution at the treeline: herbivory matters</atitle><jtitle>Plant ecology</jtitle><stitle>Plant Ecol</stitle><date>2012-03-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>213</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>459</spage><epage>469</epage><pages>459-469</pages><issn>1385-0237</issn><eissn>1573-5052</eissn><abstract>Herbivores can affect future forest composition by feeding selectivity. At temperature-sensitive treelines, herbivory can exacerbate or constrain climate-driven distributional shifts in tree species. This study analyses the impact of herbivory in a Mediterranean treeline of widespread Pinus sylvestris and P. nigra pinewoods, testing whether herbivory damage reinforces or inhibits the climatic responses of these trees. We used naturally occurring sapling pairs of similar size and age of both species, thereby isolating plant characteristics from environmental effects in herbivore behaviour. Herbivory damage by ungulates proved higher than that caused by insects in saplings of both species. Low plant density and extreme abiotic conditions at the treeline could in part be responsible for the observed low incidence of insect herbivory. Ungulates preferred P. sylvestris over P. nigra, implying heavier browsing damage for a large number of P. sylvestris saplings, suffering reduced internode growth as a consequence. In addition, P. sylvestris could not compensate height-growth reductions due to browsing with higher growth rate than P. nigra. In fact, P. sylvestris showed similar or lower relative height growth with respect to P. nigra. Under a scenario of increasing aridity and maintenance of ungulate populations, the upward migration of P. sylvestris in its southern range could be restricted by higher drought vulnerability than P. nigra, a situation exacerbated by ungulate herbivory. Our results indicate that ungulate herbivory reinforces climatic response of coexisting P. sylvestris and P. nigra at treeline, favouring a potential change in community dominance towards Mediterranean P. nigra.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer</pub><doi>10.1007/s11258-011-9993-0</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1385-0237 |
ispartof | Plant ecology, 2012-03, Vol.213 (3), p.459-469 |
issn | 1385-0237 1573-5052 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_968169677 |
source | Jstor Complete Legacy; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals |
subjects | Abiotic stress Age Animal behavior Applied Ecology Biodiversity Biomedical and Life Sciences Browsing Climate Climate change Climate models Community & Population Ecology Coniferous forests Dominance Drought Droughts Ecology Environmental effects Feeding Forests Growth rate Herbivores Herbivory Infestation Insects Internodes Life Sciences Migration Phytophagous insects Pine trees Pinus sylvestris Plant Ecology Plant species Planting density Saplings Terrestial Ecology Timberlines Treeline Trees Ungulates |
title | Limits of pine forest distribution at the treeline: herbivory matters |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T01%3A55%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Limits%20of%20pine%20forest%20distribution%20at%20the%20treeline:%20herbivory%20matters&rft.jtitle=Plant%20ecology&rft.au=Herrero,%20A.&rft.date=2012-03-01&rft.volume=213&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=459&rft.epage=469&rft.pages=459-469&rft.issn=1385-0237&rft.eissn=1573-5052&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11258-011-9993-0&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA361241536%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=926669495&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A361241536&rft_jstor_id=41429065&rfr_iscdi=true |