Limits of pine forest distribution at the treeline: herbivory matters

Herbivores can affect future forest composition by feeding selectivity. At temperature-sensitive treelines, herbivory can exacerbate or constrain climate-driven distributional shifts in tree species. This study analyses the impact of herbivory in a Mediterranean treeline of widespread Pinus sylvestr...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Plant ecology 2012-03, Vol.213 (3), p.459-469
Hauptverfasser: Herrero, A., Zamora, R., Castro, J., Hódar, J. A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 469
container_issue 3
container_start_page 459
container_title Plant ecology
container_volume 213
creator Herrero, A.
Zamora, R.
Castro, J.
Hódar, J. A.
description Herbivores can affect future forest composition by feeding selectivity. At temperature-sensitive treelines, herbivory can exacerbate or constrain climate-driven distributional shifts in tree species. This study analyses the impact of herbivory in a Mediterranean treeline of widespread Pinus sylvestris and P. nigra pinewoods, testing whether herbivory damage reinforces or inhibits the climatic responses of these trees. We used naturally occurring sapling pairs of similar size and age of both species, thereby isolating plant characteristics from environmental effects in herbivore behaviour. Herbivory damage by ungulates proved higher than that caused by insects in saplings of both species. Low plant density and extreme abiotic conditions at the treeline could in part be responsible for the observed low incidence of insect herbivory. Ungulates preferred P. sylvestris over P. nigra, implying heavier browsing damage for a large number of P. sylvestris saplings, suffering reduced internode growth as a consequence. In addition, P. sylvestris could not compensate height-growth reductions due to browsing with higher growth rate than P. nigra. In fact, P. sylvestris showed similar or lower relative height growth with respect to P. nigra. Under a scenario of increasing aridity and maintenance of ungulate populations, the upward migration of P. sylvestris in its southern range could be restricted by higher drought vulnerability than P. nigra, a situation exacerbated by ungulate herbivory. Our results indicate that ungulate herbivory reinforces climatic response of coexisting P. sylvestris and P. nigra at treeline, favouring a potential change in community dominance towards Mediterranean P. nigra.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s11258-011-9993-0
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_968169677</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A361241536</galeid><jstor_id>41429065</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>A361241536</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-6bd6fa351a872215ecf8a68d09062e21150905f4abc4992b9329efeb1925b4483</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kctKxDAUhosoeH0AF0Jw46qak1sbdyLeYMCNrkPaOdEMbTMmGcG3N1JRcCFZ5BC-L_nJX1XHQM-B0uYiATDZ1hSg1lrzmm5VeyAbXksq2XaZeStrynizW-2ntKK0WFzuVTcLP_qcSHBk7SckLkRMmSx9ytF3m-zDRGwm-RVJjohDYS7JK8bOv4f4QUabM8Z0WO04OyQ8-t4Pqufbm6fr-3rxePdwfbWoe0HbXKtuqZzlEmzbMAYSe9da1S6ppoohA5Blkk7Yrhdas05zptFhB5rJToiWH1Rn873rGN42JagZfepxGOyEYZOMVi0orZqmkKd_yFXYxKmEM5oppbTQskDnM_RiBzR-ciFH25e1xNH3YULny_kVV8AESK6KALPQx5BSRGfW0Y82fhig5qsHM_dgSg_mqwdDi8NmJxV2esH4m-Q_6WSWVimH-POKAMHKX0n-CVkAks4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>926669495</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Limits of pine forest distribution at the treeline: herbivory matters</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Herrero, A. ; Zamora, R. ; Castro, J. ; Hódar, J. A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Herrero, A. ; Zamora, R. ; Castro, J. ; Hódar, J. A.</creatorcontrib><description>Herbivores can affect future forest composition by feeding selectivity. At temperature-sensitive treelines, herbivory can exacerbate or constrain climate-driven distributional shifts in tree species. This study analyses the impact of herbivory in a Mediterranean treeline of widespread Pinus sylvestris and P. nigra pinewoods, testing whether herbivory damage reinforces or inhibits the climatic responses of these trees. We used naturally occurring sapling pairs of similar size and age of both species, thereby isolating plant characteristics from environmental effects in herbivore behaviour. Herbivory damage by ungulates proved higher than that caused by insects in saplings of both species. Low plant density and extreme abiotic conditions at the treeline could in part be responsible for the observed low incidence of insect herbivory. Ungulates preferred P. sylvestris over P. nigra, implying heavier browsing damage for a large number of P. sylvestris saplings, suffering reduced internode growth as a consequence. In addition, P. sylvestris could not compensate height-growth reductions due to browsing with higher growth rate than P. nigra. In fact, P. sylvestris showed similar or lower relative height growth with respect to P. nigra. Under a scenario of increasing aridity and maintenance of ungulate populations, the upward migration of P. sylvestris in its southern range could be restricted by higher drought vulnerability than P. nigra, a situation exacerbated by ungulate herbivory. Our results indicate that ungulate herbivory reinforces climatic response of coexisting P. sylvestris and P. nigra at treeline, favouring a potential change in community dominance towards Mediterranean P. nigra.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1385-0237</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-5052</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11258-011-9993-0</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer</publisher><subject>Abiotic stress ; Age ; Animal behavior ; Applied Ecology ; Biodiversity ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Browsing ; Climate ; Climate change ; Climate models ; Community &amp; Population Ecology ; Coniferous forests ; Dominance ; Drought ; Droughts ; Ecology ; Environmental effects ; Feeding ; Forests ; Growth rate ; Herbivores ; Herbivory ; Infestation ; Insects ; Internodes ; Life Sciences ; Migration ; Phytophagous insects ; Pine trees ; Pinus sylvestris ; Plant Ecology ; Plant species ; Planting density ; Saplings ; Terrestial Ecology ; Timberlines ; Treeline ; Trees ; Ungulates</subject><ispartof>Plant ecology, 2012-03, Vol.213 (3), p.459-469</ispartof><rights>2012 Springer</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2012 Springer</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-6bd6fa351a872215ecf8a68d09062e21150905f4abc4992b9329efeb1925b4483</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-6bd6fa351a872215ecf8a68d09062e21150905f4abc4992b9329efeb1925b4483</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/41429065$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/41429065$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27903,27904,41467,42536,51298,57996,58229</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Herrero, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zamora, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Castro, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hódar, J. A.</creatorcontrib><title>Limits of pine forest distribution at the treeline: herbivory matters</title><title>Plant ecology</title><addtitle>Plant Ecol</addtitle><description>Herbivores can affect future forest composition by feeding selectivity. At temperature-sensitive treelines, herbivory can exacerbate or constrain climate-driven distributional shifts in tree species. This study analyses the impact of herbivory in a Mediterranean treeline of widespread Pinus sylvestris and P. nigra pinewoods, testing whether herbivory damage reinforces or inhibits the climatic responses of these trees. We used naturally occurring sapling pairs of similar size and age of both species, thereby isolating plant characteristics from environmental effects in herbivore behaviour. Herbivory damage by ungulates proved higher than that caused by insects in saplings of both species. Low plant density and extreme abiotic conditions at the treeline could in part be responsible for the observed low incidence of insect herbivory. Ungulates preferred P. sylvestris over P. nigra, implying heavier browsing damage for a large number of P. sylvestris saplings, suffering reduced internode growth as a consequence. In addition, P. sylvestris could not compensate height-growth reductions due to browsing with higher growth rate than P. nigra. In fact, P. sylvestris showed similar or lower relative height growth with respect to P. nigra. Under a scenario of increasing aridity and maintenance of ungulate populations, the upward migration of P. sylvestris in its southern range could be restricted by higher drought vulnerability than P. nigra, a situation exacerbated by ungulate herbivory. Our results indicate that ungulate herbivory reinforces climatic response of coexisting P. sylvestris and P. nigra at treeline, favouring a potential change in community dominance towards Mediterranean P. nigra.</description><subject>Abiotic stress</subject><subject>Age</subject><subject>Animal behavior</subject><subject>Applied Ecology</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Browsing</subject><subject>Climate</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Climate models</subject><subject>Community &amp; Population Ecology</subject><subject>Coniferous forests</subject><subject>Dominance</subject><subject>Drought</subject><subject>Droughts</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Environmental effects</subject><subject>Feeding</subject><subject>Forests</subject><subject>Growth rate</subject><subject>Herbivores</subject><subject>Herbivory</subject><subject>Infestation</subject><subject>Insects</subject><subject>Internodes</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Migration</subject><subject>Phytophagous insects</subject><subject>Pine trees</subject><subject>Pinus sylvestris</subject><subject>Plant Ecology</subject><subject>Plant species</subject><subject>Planting density</subject><subject>Saplings</subject><subject>Terrestial Ecology</subject><subject>Timberlines</subject><subject>Treeline</subject><subject>Trees</subject><subject>Ungulates</subject><issn>1385-0237</issn><issn>1573-5052</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kctKxDAUhosoeH0AF0Jw46qak1sbdyLeYMCNrkPaOdEMbTMmGcG3N1JRcCFZ5BC-L_nJX1XHQM-B0uYiATDZ1hSg1lrzmm5VeyAbXksq2XaZeStrynizW-2ntKK0WFzuVTcLP_qcSHBk7SckLkRMmSx9ytF3m-zDRGwm-RVJjohDYS7JK8bOv4f4QUabM8Z0WO04OyQ8-t4Pqufbm6fr-3rxePdwfbWoe0HbXKtuqZzlEmzbMAYSe9da1S6ppoohA5Blkk7Yrhdas05zptFhB5rJToiWH1Rn873rGN42JagZfepxGOyEYZOMVi0orZqmkKd_yFXYxKmEM5oppbTQskDnM_RiBzR-ciFH25e1xNH3YULny_kVV8AESK6KALPQx5BSRGfW0Y82fhig5qsHM_dgSg_mqwdDi8NmJxV2esH4m-Q_6WSWVimH-POKAMHKX0n-CVkAks4</recordid><startdate>20120301</startdate><enddate>20120301</enddate><creator>Herrero, A.</creator><creator>Zamora, R.</creator><creator>Castro, J.</creator><creator>Hódar, J. A.</creator><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7U6</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120301</creationdate><title>Limits of pine forest distribution at the treeline: herbivory matters</title><author>Herrero, A. ; Zamora, R. ; Castro, J. ; Hódar, J. A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-6bd6fa351a872215ecf8a68d09062e21150905f4abc4992b9329efeb1925b4483</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Abiotic stress</topic><topic>Age</topic><topic>Animal behavior</topic><topic>Applied Ecology</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Browsing</topic><topic>Climate</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Climate models</topic><topic>Community &amp; Population Ecology</topic><topic>Coniferous forests</topic><topic>Dominance</topic><topic>Drought</topic><topic>Droughts</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Environmental effects</topic><topic>Feeding</topic><topic>Forests</topic><topic>Growth rate</topic><topic>Herbivores</topic><topic>Herbivory</topic><topic>Infestation</topic><topic>Insects</topic><topic>Internodes</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Migration</topic><topic>Phytophagous insects</topic><topic>Pine trees</topic><topic>Pinus sylvestris</topic><topic>Plant Ecology</topic><topic>Plant species</topic><topic>Planting density</topic><topic>Saplings</topic><topic>Terrestial Ecology</topic><topic>Timberlines</topic><topic>Treeline</topic><topic>Trees</topic><topic>Ungulates</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Herrero, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zamora, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Castro, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hódar, J. A.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Plant ecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Herrero, A.</au><au>Zamora, R.</au><au>Castro, J.</au><au>Hódar, J. A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Limits of pine forest distribution at the treeline: herbivory matters</atitle><jtitle>Plant ecology</jtitle><stitle>Plant Ecol</stitle><date>2012-03-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>213</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>459</spage><epage>469</epage><pages>459-469</pages><issn>1385-0237</issn><eissn>1573-5052</eissn><abstract>Herbivores can affect future forest composition by feeding selectivity. At temperature-sensitive treelines, herbivory can exacerbate or constrain climate-driven distributional shifts in tree species. This study analyses the impact of herbivory in a Mediterranean treeline of widespread Pinus sylvestris and P. nigra pinewoods, testing whether herbivory damage reinforces or inhibits the climatic responses of these trees. We used naturally occurring sapling pairs of similar size and age of both species, thereby isolating plant characteristics from environmental effects in herbivore behaviour. Herbivory damage by ungulates proved higher than that caused by insects in saplings of both species. Low plant density and extreme abiotic conditions at the treeline could in part be responsible for the observed low incidence of insect herbivory. Ungulates preferred P. sylvestris over P. nigra, implying heavier browsing damage for a large number of P. sylvestris saplings, suffering reduced internode growth as a consequence. In addition, P. sylvestris could not compensate height-growth reductions due to browsing with higher growth rate than P. nigra. In fact, P. sylvestris showed similar or lower relative height growth with respect to P. nigra. Under a scenario of increasing aridity and maintenance of ungulate populations, the upward migration of P. sylvestris in its southern range could be restricted by higher drought vulnerability than P. nigra, a situation exacerbated by ungulate herbivory. Our results indicate that ungulate herbivory reinforces climatic response of coexisting P. sylvestris and P. nigra at treeline, favouring a potential change in community dominance towards Mediterranean P. nigra.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer</pub><doi>10.1007/s11258-011-9993-0</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1385-0237
ispartof Plant ecology, 2012-03, Vol.213 (3), p.459-469
issn 1385-0237
1573-5052
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_968169677
source Jstor Complete Legacy; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals
subjects Abiotic stress
Age
Animal behavior
Applied Ecology
Biodiversity
Biomedical and Life Sciences
Browsing
Climate
Climate change
Climate models
Community & Population Ecology
Coniferous forests
Dominance
Drought
Droughts
Ecology
Environmental effects
Feeding
Forests
Growth rate
Herbivores
Herbivory
Infestation
Insects
Internodes
Life Sciences
Migration
Phytophagous insects
Pine trees
Pinus sylvestris
Plant Ecology
Plant species
Planting density
Saplings
Terrestial Ecology
Timberlines
Treeline
Trees
Ungulates
title Limits of pine forest distribution at the treeline: herbivory matters
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T01%3A55%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Limits%20of%20pine%20forest%20distribution%20at%20the%20treeline:%20herbivory%20matters&rft.jtitle=Plant%20ecology&rft.au=Herrero,%20A.&rft.date=2012-03-01&rft.volume=213&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=459&rft.epage=469&rft.pages=459-469&rft.issn=1385-0237&rft.eissn=1573-5052&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11258-011-9993-0&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA361241536%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=926669495&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A361241536&rft_jstor_id=41429065&rfr_iscdi=true