Established native perennial grasses out-compete an invasive annual grass regardless of soil water and nutrient availability
Competition and resource availability influence invasions into native perennial grasslands by nonnative annual grasses such as Bromus tectorum. In two greenhouse experiments we examined the influence of competition, water availability, and elevated nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) availability on gro...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Plant ecology 2012-03, Vol.213 (3), p.445-457 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 457 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 445 |
| container_title | Plant ecology |
| container_volume | 213 |
| creator | McGlone, Christopher M. Sieg, Carolyn Hull Kolb, Thomas E. Nietupsky, Ty |
| description | Competition and resource availability influence invasions into native perennial grasslands by nonnative annual grasses such as Bromus tectorum. In two greenhouse experiments we examined the influence of competition, water availability, and elevated nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) availability on growth and reproduction of the invasive annual grass B. tectorum and two native perennial grasses (Elymus elymoides, Pascopyrum smithii). Bromus tectorum aboveground biomass and seed production were significantly reduced when grown with one or more established native perennial grasses. Conversely, average seed weight and germination were significantly lower in the B. tectorum monoculture than in competition native perennial grasses. Intraspecific competition reduced per-plant production of both established native grasses, whereas interspecific competition from B. tectorum increased production. Established native perennial grasses were highly competitive against B. tectorum, regardless of water, N, or P availability. Bromus tectorum reproductive potential (viable seed production) was not significantly influenced by any experimental manipulation, except for competition with P. smithii. In all cases, B. tectorum per-plant production of viable seeds exceeded parental replacement. Our results show that established plants of Elymus elymoides and Pascopyrum smithii compete successfully against B. tectorum over a wide range of soil resource availability. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11258-011-9992-1 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_968169654</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A361241534</galeid><jstor_id>41429064</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>A361241534</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-8b413578d8d62d0dfe0a2c922cf1ad03cfbeb246a77a78f042a92503df7be9093</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kUtr3TAQRk1JIWnSH5BFQXTTlVM9LNlahpA-INBNsxZje3Sri650K8m3BPrjK-M-oIswixnEOaOBr2muGb1hlPbvM2NcDi1lrNVa85a9aC6Y7EUrqeRndRaDbCkX_XnzKuc9pdUS8qL5eZ8LjN7lbziTAMWdkBwxYQgOPNklyBkziUtpp3g4YkECgbhwgrySEMLyByMJd5Bmj3WMluToPPkBBVOl6uqlJIehEDiB8zA678rTVfPSgs_4-ne_bB4_3H-9-9Q-fPn4-e72oZ06OpR2GDsmZD_Mw6z4TGeLFPikOZ8sg5mKyY448k5B30M_WNpx0FxSMdt-RE21uGzebXuPKX5fMBdzcHlC7yFgXLLRamBKK9lV8u1_5D4uKdTjjOZKKS3pCt1s0A48GhdsLAmmWjMe3BQDWlffb4VivGNSrALbhCnFnBNac0zuAOnJMGrW-MwWn6nxmTU-w6rDNydXNuww_bvkOenNJu1zienvLx3ruKaqE78Aleuo3Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>926669504</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Established native perennial grasses out-compete an invasive annual grass regardless of soil water and nutrient availability</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>McGlone, Christopher M. ; Sieg, Carolyn Hull ; Kolb, Thomas E. ; Nietupsky, Ty</creator><creatorcontrib>McGlone, Christopher M. ; Sieg, Carolyn Hull ; Kolb, Thomas E. ; Nietupsky, Ty</creatorcontrib><description>Competition and resource availability influence invasions into native perennial grasslands by nonnative annual grasses such as Bromus tectorum. In two greenhouse experiments we examined the influence of competition, water availability, and elevated nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) availability on growth and reproduction of the invasive annual grass B. tectorum and two native perennial grasses (Elymus elymoides, Pascopyrum smithii). Bromus tectorum aboveground biomass and seed production were significantly reduced when grown with one or more established native perennial grasses. Conversely, average seed weight and germination were significantly lower in the B. tectorum monoculture than in competition native perennial grasses. Intraspecific competition reduced per-plant production of both established native grasses, whereas interspecific competition from B. tectorum increased production. Established native perennial grasses were highly competitive against B. tectorum, regardless of water, N, or P availability. Bromus tectorum reproductive potential (viable seed production) was not significantly influenced by any experimental manipulation, except for competition with P. smithii. In all cases, B. tectorum per-plant production of viable seeds exceeded parental replacement. Our results show that established plants of Elymus elymoides and Pascopyrum smithii compete successfully against B. tectorum over a wide range of soil resource availability.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1385-0237</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-5052</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11258-011-9992-1</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer</publisher><subject>Aboveground biomass ; Applied Ecology ; Atmospheric carbon dioxide ; Biodiversity ; Biological competition ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Bromus tectorum ; Community & Population Ecology ; Competition ; Ecology ; Elymus elymoides ; Evaluation ; Germination ; Grasses ; Grasslands ; Life Sciences ; Moisture content ; Monoculture ; Nitrogen ; Nonnative species ; Nutrient availability ; Perennials ; Phosphorus ; Plant competition ; Plant Ecology ; Plant production ; Plant reproduction ; Plants ; Resource availability ; Root biomass ; Seed industry ; Seed production ; Soil moisture ; Soil water ; Terrestial Ecology ; Water ; Water availability ; Water treatment</subject><ispartof>Plant ecology, 2012-03, Vol.213 (3), p.445-457</ispartof><rights>2012 Springer</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2012 Springer</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-8b413578d8d62d0dfe0a2c922cf1ad03cfbeb246a77a78f042a92503df7be9093</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-8b413578d8d62d0dfe0a2c922cf1ad03cfbeb246a77a78f042a92503df7be9093</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/41429064$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/41429064$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27903,27904,41467,42536,51297,57995,58228</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>McGlone, Christopher M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sieg, Carolyn Hull</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kolb, Thomas E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nietupsky, Ty</creatorcontrib><title>Established native perennial grasses out-compete an invasive annual grass regardless of soil water and nutrient availability</title><title>Plant ecology</title><addtitle>Plant Ecol</addtitle><description>Competition and resource availability influence invasions into native perennial grasslands by nonnative annual grasses such as Bromus tectorum. In two greenhouse experiments we examined the influence of competition, water availability, and elevated nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) availability on growth and reproduction of the invasive annual grass B. tectorum and two native perennial grasses (Elymus elymoides, Pascopyrum smithii). Bromus tectorum aboveground biomass and seed production were significantly reduced when grown with one or more established native perennial grasses. Conversely, average seed weight and germination were significantly lower in the B. tectorum monoculture than in competition native perennial grasses. Intraspecific competition reduced per-plant production of both established native grasses, whereas interspecific competition from B. tectorum increased production. Established native perennial grasses were highly competitive against B. tectorum, regardless of water, N, or P availability. Bromus tectorum reproductive potential (viable seed production) was not significantly influenced by any experimental manipulation, except for competition with P. smithii. In all cases, B. tectorum per-plant production of viable seeds exceeded parental replacement. Our results show that established plants of Elymus elymoides and Pascopyrum smithii compete successfully against B. tectorum over a wide range of soil resource availability.</description><subject>Aboveground biomass</subject><subject>Applied Ecology</subject><subject>Atmospheric carbon dioxide</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Biological competition</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Bromus tectorum</subject><subject>Community & Population Ecology</subject><subject>Competition</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Elymus elymoides</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Germination</subject><subject>Grasses</subject><subject>Grasslands</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Moisture content</subject><subject>Monoculture</subject><subject>Nitrogen</subject><subject>Nonnative species</subject><subject>Nutrient availability</subject><subject>Perennials</subject><subject>Phosphorus</subject><subject>Plant competition</subject><subject>Plant Ecology</subject><subject>Plant production</subject><subject>Plant reproduction</subject><subject>Plants</subject><subject>Resource availability</subject><subject>Root biomass</subject><subject>Seed industry</subject><subject>Seed production</subject><subject>Soil moisture</subject><subject>Soil water</subject><subject>Terrestial Ecology</subject><subject>Water</subject><subject>Water availability</subject><subject>Water treatment</subject><issn>1385-0237</issn><issn>1573-5052</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kUtr3TAQRk1JIWnSH5BFQXTTlVM9LNlahpA-INBNsxZje3Sri650K8m3BPrjK-M-oIswixnEOaOBr2muGb1hlPbvM2NcDi1lrNVa85a9aC6Y7EUrqeRndRaDbCkX_XnzKuc9pdUS8qL5eZ8LjN7lbziTAMWdkBwxYQgOPNklyBkziUtpp3g4YkECgbhwgrySEMLyByMJd5Bmj3WMluToPPkBBVOl6uqlJIehEDiB8zA678rTVfPSgs_4-ne_bB4_3H-9-9Q-fPn4-e72oZ06OpR2GDsmZD_Mw6z4TGeLFPikOZ8sg5mKyY448k5B30M_WNpx0FxSMdt-RE21uGzebXuPKX5fMBdzcHlC7yFgXLLRamBKK9lV8u1_5D4uKdTjjOZKKS3pCt1s0A48GhdsLAmmWjMe3BQDWlffb4VivGNSrALbhCnFnBNac0zuAOnJMGrW-MwWn6nxmTU-w6rDNydXNuww_bvkOenNJu1zienvLx3ruKaqE78Aleuo3Q</recordid><startdate>20120301</startdate><enddate>20120301</enddate><creator>McGlone, Christopher M.</creator><creator>Sieg, Carolyn Hull</creator><creator>Kolb, Thomas E.</creator><creator>Nietupsky, Ty</creator><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>KL.</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120301</creationdate><title>Established native perennial grasses out-compete an invasive annual grass regardless of soil water and nutrient availability</title><author>McGlone, Christopher M. ; Sieg, Carolyn Hull ; Kolb, Thomas E. ; Nietupsky, Ty</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-8b413578d8d62d0dfe0a2c922cf1ad03cfbeb246a77a78f042a92503df7be9093</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Aboveground biomass</topic><topic>Applied Ecology</topic><topic>Atmospheric carbon dioxide</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Biological competition</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Bromus tectorum</topic><topic>Community & Population Ecology</topic><topic>Competition</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Elymus elymoides</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Germination</topic><topic>Grasses</topic><topic>Grasslands</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Moisture content</topic><topic>Monoculture</topic><topic>Nitrogen</topic><topic>Nonnative species</topic><topic>Nutrient availability</topic><topic>Perennials</topic><topic>Phosphorus</topic><topic>Plant competition</topic><topic>Plant Ecology</topic><topic>Plant production</topic><topic>Plant reproduction</topic><topic>Plants</topic><topic>Resource availability</topic><topic>Root biomass</topic><topic>Seed industry</topic><topic>Seed production</topic><topic>Soil moisture</topic><topic>Soil water</topic><topic>Terrestial Ecology</topic><topic>Water</topic><topic>Water availability</topic><topic>Water treatment</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>McGlone, Christopher M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sieg, Carolyn Hull</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kolb, Thomas E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nietupsky, Ty</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><jtitle>Plant ecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>McGlone, Christopher M.</au><au>Sieg, Carolyn Hull</au><au>Kolb, Thomas E.</au><au>Nietupsky, Ty</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Established native perennial grasses out-compete an invasive annual grass regardless of soil water and nutrient availability</atitle><jtitle>Plant ecology</jtitle><stitle>Plant Ecol</stitle><date>2012-03-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>213</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>445</spage><epage>457</epage><pages>445-457</pages><issn>1385-0237</issn><eissn>1573-5052</eissn><abstract>Competition and resource availability influence invasions into native perennial grasslands by nonnative annual grasses such as Bromus tectorum. In two greenhouse experiments we examined the influence of competition, water availability, and elevated nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) availability on growth and reproduction of the invasive annual grass B. tectorum and two native perennial grasses (Elymus elymoides, Pascopyrum smithii). Bromus tectorum aboveground biomass and seed production were significantly reduced when grown with one or more established native perennial grasses. Conversely, average seed weight and germination were significantly lower in the B. tectorum monoculture than in competition native perennial grasses. Intraspecific competition reduced per-plant production of both established native grasses, whereas interspecific competition from B. tectorum increased production. Established native perennial grasses were highly competitive against B. tectorum, regardless of water, N, or P availability. Bromus tectorum reproductive potential (viable seed production) was not significantly influenced by any experimental manipulation, except for competition with P. smithii. In all cases, B. tectorum per-plant production of viable seeds exceeded parental replacement. Our results show that established plants of Elymus elymoides and Pascopyrum smithii compete successfully against B. tectorum over a wide range of soil resource availability.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer</pub><doi>10.1007/s11258-011-9992-1</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1385-0237 |
| ispartof | Plant ecology, 2012-03, Vol.213 (3), p.445-457 |
| issn | 1385-0237 1573-5052 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_968169654 |
| source | Jstor Complete Legacy; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
| subjects | Aboveground biomass Applied Ecology Atmospheric carbon dioxide Biodiversity Biological competition Biomedical and Life Sciences Bromus tectorum Community & Population Ecology Competition Ecology Elymus elymoides Evaluation Germination Grasses Grasslands Life Sciences Moisture content Monoculture Nitrogen Nonnative species Nutrient availability Perennials Phosphorus Plant competition Plant Ecology Plant production Plant reproduction Plants Resource availability Root biomass Seed industry Seed production Soil moisture Soil water Terrestial Ecology Water Water availability Water treatment |
| title | Established native perennial grasses out-compete an invasive annual grass regardless of soil water and nutrient availability |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-26T14%3A14%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Established%20native%20perennial%20grasses%20out-compete%20an%20invasive%20annual%20grass%20regardless%20of%20soil%20water%20and%20nutrient%20availability&rft.jtitle=Plant%20ecology&rft.au=McGlone,%20Christopher%20M.&rft.date=2012-03-01&rft.volume=213&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=445&rft.epage=457&rft.pages=445-457&rft.issn=1385-0237&rft.eissn=1573-5052&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11258-011-9992-1&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA361241534%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=926669504&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A361241534&rft_jstor_id=41429064&rfr_iscdi=true |