The effect of level of forage and oil supplement on biohydrogenation intermediates and bacteria in continuous cultures
The objective of this study was to investigate how level of forage and oils in ruminant animals’ diet affect selected strains of ruminal bacteria believed to be involved in biohydrogenation (BH). Four continuous culture fermenters were used in 4×4 Latin square design with a 2×2 factorial arrangement...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Animal feed science and technology 2012-02, Vol.171 (2-4), p.108-116 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 116 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2-4 |
container_start_page | 108 |
container_title | Animal feed science and technology |
container_volume | 171 |
creator | Gudla, P AbuGhazaleh, A.A Ishlak, A Jones, K |
description | The objective of this study was to investigate how level of forage and oils in ruminant animals’ diet affect selected strains of ruminal bacteria believed to be involved in biohydrogenation (BH). Four continuous culture fermenters were used in 4×4 Latin square design with a 2×2 factorial arrangement over four consecutive periods of 10 days each. The experimental diets used in this study were: high forage diet (700:300g/kg (DM basis) forage to concentrate; HFC), high forage with oil supplement (HFO), high forage diet (300:700g/kg (DM basis) forage to concentrate; LFC), and high forage with oil supplement (HFO). The oil supplement was a blend of fish oil (FO) and soybean oil (SBO) added at 10 and 20g/kg DM, respectively. Acetate concentration was greater (P |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2011.10.004 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_968167527</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0377840111004184</els_id><sourcerecordid>968167527</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-802cbf86d3910478bdc6264a39f33c69616b9493e74fb71a7f1c3f6d27449d823</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc2OFCEUhYnRxHb0GWRjXFXLXwO11ImjJpO4cGZNKLj00KGhhapO5u2l7InudAW55zuXkwNCmJItJVR-OGxtjgHANxe3jFDax1tCxDO0oVrxgTEqn6MN4UoNWhD6Er1q7UAIZZqzDTrfPQCGEMDNuASc4AxpvYRS7R6wzR6XmHBbTqcER8idyniK5eHR17KHbOfYBzHPUI_go52h_TZN1vVRtF3CruQ55qUsDbslzUuF9hq9CDY1ePN0XqH7m89311-H2-9fvl1_vB2cYHoeNGFuClp6PlIilJ68k0wKy8fAuZOjpHIaxchBiTApalWgjgfpmRJi9JrxK_T-svdUy88F2myOsTlIyWboecwoNZVqx1Qn9YV0tbRWIZhTjUdbHw0lZm3aHMzfps3a9Kr0prv13dMjtjmbQrXZxfbHz3ZipcbOvb1wwRZj97Uz9z_6oi4TLpVW_ySo3gndiU8XAnpr5wjV9DSQXe--9j80vsT_B_4Fcgqs-g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>968167527</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The effect of level of forage and oil supplement on biohydrogenation intermediates and bacteria in continuous cultures</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Gudla, P ; AbuGhazaleh, A.A ; Ishlak, A ; Jones, K</creator><creatorcontrib>Gudla, P ; AbuGhazaleh, A.A ; Ishlak, A ; Jones, K</creatorcontrib><description><![CDATA[The objective of this study was to investigate how level of forage and oils in ruminant animals’ diet affect selected strains of ruminal bacteria believed to be involved in biohydrogenation (BH). Four continuous culture fermenters were used in 4×4 Latin square design with a 2×2 factorial arrangement over four consecutive periods of 10 days each. The experimental diets used in this study were: high forage diet (700:300g/kg (DM basis) forage to concentrate; HFC), high forage with oil supplement (HFO), high forage diet (300:700g/kg (DM basis) forage to concentrate; LFC), and high forage with oil supplement (HFO). The oil supplement was a blend of fish oil (FO) and soybean oil (SBO) added at 10 and 20g/kg DM, respectively. Acetate concentration was greater (P<0.01) with the high forage diets whereas propionate concentration was greater (P<0.02) with the low forage diets and both decreased (P<0.05) with oil supplementation. The concentrations of t11 C18:1 (vaccenic acid, VA) and c9t11 conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) were greater (P<0.01) with the high than the low forage diets and concentrations increased (P<0.01) with oil supplementation particularly when added with the high forage diet. The concentrations of t10 C18:1 and t10c12 CLA were greater (P<0.01) with the low than the high forage diets and concentrations increased (P<0.01) with oil supplementation particularly when added with the low forage diet. The DNA abundance of Butyrivibrio fibrisolvens, Ruminococcus albus, Ruminococcus flavefaciens, Anaerovibrio lipolytica and Butyrivibrio proteoclasticum were greater (P<0.03) with the high than the low forage diets. Oil supplementation reduced (P<0.05) the DNA abundance only for R. flavefaciens, B. fibrisolvens and R. albus especially when added with the high forage diet. Results from this study suggest that the greater trans fatty acids (FA) production seen with the high forage diets may be related to greater activity of B. fibrisolvens, R. flavefaciens and R. albus, and B. proteoclasticum appears to play a minor role in the production of C18:0 from trans C18:1.]]></description><identifier>ISSN: 0377-8401</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2216</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2011.10.004</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AFSTDH</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Anaerovibrio lipolytica ; Anaerovibrio lipolyticus ; animals ; Bacteria ; Biohydrogenation ; Biological and medical sciences ; Butyrivibrio fibrisolvens ; conjugated linoleic acid ; DNA ; experimental diets ; Feed and pet food industries ; Fermenters ; fish oils ; Food industries ; forage ; Forage level ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; hydrofluorocarbons ; Oil ; rumen bacteria ; Ruminantia ; Ruminococcus albus ; Ruminococcus flavefaciens ; soybean oil ; trans fatty acids ; vaccenic acid</subject><ispartof>Animal feed science and technology, 2012-02, Vol.171 (2-4), p.108-116</ispartof><rights>2011</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-802cbf86d3910478bdc6264a39f33c69616b9493e74fb71a7f1c3f6d27449d823</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-802cbf86d3910478bdc6264a39f33c69616b9493e74fb71a7f1c3f6d27449d823</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2011.10.004$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=25400439$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gudla, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>AbuGhazaleh, A.A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ishlak, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jones, K</creatorcontrib><title>The effect of level of forage and oil supplement on biohydrogenation intermediates and bacteria in continuous cultures</title><title>Animal feed science and technology</title><description><![CDATA[The objective of this study was to investigate how level of forage and oils in ruminant animals’ diet affect selected strains of ruminal bacteria believed to be involved in biohydrogenation (BH). Four continuous culture fermenters were used in 4×4 Latin square design with a 2×2 factorial arrangement over four consecutive periods of 10 days each. The experimental diets used in this study were: high forage diet (700:300g/kg (DM basis) forage to concentrate; HFC), high forage with oil supplement (HFO), high forage diet (300:700g/kg (DM basis) forage to concentrate; LFC), and high forage with oil supplement (HFO). The oil supplement was a blend of fish oil (FO) and soybean oil (SBO) added at 10 and 20g/kg DM, respectively. Acetate concentration was greater (P<0.01) with the high forage diets whereas propionate concentration was greater (P<0.02) with the low forage diets and both decreased (P<0.05) with oil supplementation. The concentrations of t11 C18:1 (vaccenic acid, VA) and c9t11 conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) were greater (P<0.01) with the high than the low forage diets and concentrations increased (P<0.01) with oil supplementation particularly when added with the high forage diet. The concentrations of t10 C18:1 and t10c12 CLA were greater (P<0.01) with the low than the high forage diets and concentrations increased (P<0.01) with oil supplementation particularly when added with the low forage diet. The DNA abundance of Butyrivibrio fibrisolvens, Ruminococcus albus, Ruminococcus flavefaciens, Anaerovibrio lipolytica and Butyrivibrio proteoclasticum were greater (P<0.03) with the high than the low forage diets. Oil supplementation reduced (P<0.05) the DNA abundance only for R. flavefaciens, B. fibrisolvens and R. albus especially when added with the high forage diet. Results from this study suggest that the greater trans fatty acids (FA) production seen with the high forage diets may be related to greater activity of B. fibrisolvens, R. flavefaciens and R. albus, and B. proteoclasticum appears to play a minor role in the production of C18:0 from trans C18:1.]]></description><subject>Anaerovibrio lipolytica</subject><subject>Anaerovibrio lipolyticus</subject><subject>animals</subject><subject>Bacteria</subject><subject>Biohydrogenation</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Butyrivibrio fibrisolvens</subject><subject>conjugated linoleic acid</subject><subject>DNA</subject><subject>experimental diets</subject><subject>Feed and pet food industries</subject><subject>Fermenters</subject><subject>fish oils</subject><subject>Food industries</subject><subject>forage</subject><subject>Forage level</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>hydrofluorocarbons</subject><subject>Oil</subject><subject>rumen bacteria</subject><subject>Ruminantia</subject><subject>Ruminococcus albus</subject><subject>Ruminococcus flavefaciens</subject><subject>soybean oil</subject><subject>trans fatty acids</subject><subject>vaccenic acid</subject><issn>0377-8401</issn><issn>1873-2216</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkc2OFCEUhYnRxHb0GWRjXFXLXwO11ImjJpO4cGZNKLj00KGhhapO5u2l7InudAW55zuXkwNCmJItJVR-OGxtjgHANxe3jFDax1tCxDO0oVrxgTEqn6MN4UoNWhD6Er1q7UAIZZqzDTrfPQCGEMDNuASc4AxpvYRS7R6wzR6XmHBbTqcER8idyniK5eHR17KHbOfYBzHPUI_go52h_TZN1vVRtF3CruQ55qUsDbslzUuF9hq9CDY1ePN0XqH7m89311-H2-9fvl1_vB2cYHoeNGFuClp6PlIilJ68k0wKy8fAuZOjpHIaxchBiTApalWgjgfpmRJi9JrxK_T-svdUy88F2myOsTlIyWboecwoNZVqx1Qn9YV0tbRWIZhTjUdbHw0lZm3aHMzfps3a9Kr0prv13dMjtjmbQrXZxfbHz3ZipcbOvb1wwRZj97Uz9z_6oi4TLpVW_ySo3gndiU8XAnpr5wjV9DSQXe--9j80vsT_B_4Fcgqs-g</recordid><startdate>20120210</startdate><enddate>20120210</enddate><creator>Gudla, P</creator><creator>AbuGhazaleh, A.A</creator><creator>Ishlak, A</creator><creator>Jones, K</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>H98</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>P64</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120210</creationdate><title>The effect of level of forage and oil supplement on biohydrogenation intermediates and bacteria in continuous cultures</title><author>Gudla, P ; AbuGhazaleh, A.A ; Ishlak, A ; Jones, K</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-802cbf86d3910478bdc6264a39f33c69616b9493e74fb71a7f1c3f6d27449d823</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Anaerovibrio lipolytica</topic><topic>Anaerovibrio lipolyticus</topic><topic>animals</topic><topic>Bacteria</topic><topic>Biohydrogenation</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Butyrivibrio fibrisolvens</topic><topic>conjugated linoleic acid</topic><topic>DNA</topic><topic>experimental diets</topic><topic>Feed and pet food industries</topic><topic>Fermenters</topic><topic>fish oils</topic><topic>Food industries</topic><topic>forage</topic><topic>Forage level</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>hydrofluorocarbons</topic><topic>Oil</topic><topic>rumen bacteria</topic><topic>Ruminantia</topic><topic>Ruminococcus albus</topic><topic>Ruminococcus flavefaciens</topic><topic>soybean oil</topic><topic>trans fatty acids</topic><topic>vaccenic acid</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gudla, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>AbuGhazaleh, A.A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ishlak, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jones, K</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Aquaculture Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Animal feed science and technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gudla, P</au><au>AbuGhazaleh, A.A</au><au>Ishlak, A</au><au>Jones, K</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The effect of level of forage and oil supplement on biohydrogenation intermediates and bacteria in continuous cultures</atitle><jtitle>Animal feed science and technology</jtitle><date>2012-02-10</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>171</volume><issue>2-4</issue><spage>108</spage><epage>116</epage><pages>108-116</pages><issn>0377-8401</issn><eissn>1873-2216</eissn><coden>AFSTDH</coden><abstract><![CDATA[The objective of this study was to investigate how level of forage and oils in ruminant animals’ diet affect selected strains of ruminal bacteria believed to be involved in biohydrogenation (BH). Four continuous culture fermenters were used in 4×4 Latin square design with a 2×2 factorial arrangement over four consecutive periods of 10 days each. The experimental diets used in this study were: high forage diet (700:300g/kg (DM basis) forage to concentrate; HFC), high forage with oil supplement (HFO), high forage diet (300:700g/kg (DM basis) forage to concentrate; LFC), and high forage with oil supplement (HFO). The oil supplement was a blend of fish oil (FO) and soybean oil (SBO) added at 10 and 20g/kg DM, respectively. Acetate concentration was greater (P<0.01) with the high forage diets whereas propionate concentration was greater (P<0.02) with the low forage diets and both decreased (P<0.05) with oil supplementation. The concentrations of t11 C18:1 (vaccenic acid, VA) and c9t11 conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) were greater (P<0.01) with the high than the low forage diets and concentrations increased (P<0.01) with oil supplementation particularly when added with the high forage diet. The concentrations of t10 C18:1 and t10c12 CLA were greater (P<0.01) with the low than the high forage diets and concentrations increased (P<0.01) with oil supplementation particularly when added with the low forage diet. The DNA abundance of Butyrivibrio fibrisolvens, Ruminococcus albus, Ruminococcus flavefaciens, Anaerovibrio lipolytica and Butyrivibrio proteoclasticum were greater (P<0.03) with the high than the low forage diets. Oil supplementation reduced (P<0.05) the DNA abundance only for R. flavefaciens, B. fibrisolvens and R. albus especially when added with the high forage diet. Results from this study suggest that the greater trans fatty acids (FA) production seen with the high forage diets may be related to greater activity of B. fibrisolvens, R. flavefaciens and R. albus, and B. proteoclasticum appears to play a minor role in the production of C18:0 from trans C18:1.]]></abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2011.10.004</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0377-8401 |
ispartof | Animal feed science and technology, 2012-02, Vol.171 (2-4), p.108-116 |
issn | 0377-8401 1873-2216 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_968167527 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete |
subjects | Anaerovibrio lipolytica Anaerovibrio lipolyticus animals Bacteria Biohydrogenation Biological and medical sciences Butyrivibrio fibrisolvens conjugated linoleic acid DNA experimental diets Feed and pet food industries Fermenters fish oils Food industries forage Forage level Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology hydrofluorocarbons Oil rumen bacteria Ruminantia Ruminococcus albus Ruminococcus flavefaciens soybean oil trans fatty acids vaccenic acid |
title | The effect of level of forage and oil supplement on biohydrogenation intermediates and bacteria in continuous cultures |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T08%3A03%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20effect%20of%20level%20of%20forage%20and%20oil%20supplement%20on%20biohydrogenation%20intermediates%20and%20bacteria%20in%20continuous%20cultures&rft.jtitle=Animal%20feed%20science%20and%20technology&rft.au=Gudla,%20P&rft.date=2012-02-10&rft.volume=171&rft.issue=2-4&rft.spage=108&rft.epage=116&rft.pages=108-116&rft.issn=0377-8401&rft.eissn=1873-2216&rft.coden=AFSTDH&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2011.10.004&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E968167527%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=968167527&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0377840111004184&rfr_iscdi=true |