single climate driver has direct and indirect effects on insect population dynamics
Ecology Letters (2012) 15: 502–508 ABSTRACT: Weather drives population dynamics directly, through effects on vital rates, or indirectly, through effects on the population’s competitors, predators or prey and thence on vital rates. Indirect effects may include non‐additive interactions with density d...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Ecology letters 2012-05, Vol.15 (5), p.502-508 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 508 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 5 |
| container_start_page | 502 |
| container_title | Ecology letters |
| container_volume | 15 |
| creator | Boggs, Carol L Inouye, David W |
| description | Ecology Letters (2012) 15: 502–508 ABSTRACT: Weather drives population dynamics directly, through effects on vital rates, or indirectly, through effects on the population’s competitors, predators or prey and thence on vital rates. Indirect effects may include non‐additive interactions with density dependence. Detection of climate drivers is critical to predicting climate change effects, but identification of potential drivers may depend on knowing the underlying mechanisms. For the butterfly Speyeria mormonia, one climate driver, snow melt date, has multiple effects on population growth. Snow melt date in year t has density‐dependent indirect effects. Through frost effects, early snow melt decreases floral resources, thence per‐capita nectar availability, which determines fecundity in the lab. Snow melt date in year t + 1 has density‐independent direct effects. These effects explain 84% of the variation in population growth rate. One climate parameter thus has multiple effects on the dynamics of a species with non‐overlapping generations, with one effect not detectable without understanding the underlying mechanism. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2012.01766.x |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_968107258</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1008846302</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5866-809ddda70b59602391796052fa8139c704ddfc7f46cd25d68d2739824d5d28763</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkV9v0zAUxS0EYlvhK0CEhNhLgv_Fdh54QFXZmCp4KBO8WZ7tDJc0KXbC2m_PzVI6iQeEX659_TtH1z4IZQQXBNbbdUG4IDmmXBUUE1pgIoUodo_Q6fHi8XHPvp2gs5TWGMhKkqfohFJOOFHsFK1SaG8bn9kmbEzvMxfDLx-z7yZlLkRv-8y0Lgvt4eDrGkrKuhZ6aexsu-3QmD5Ax-1bswk2PUNPatMk__xQZ-j6w-LL_DJffr74OH-_zG2phMgVrpxzRuKbshIwZUUk1JLWRhFWWYm5c7WVNRfW0dIJ5ahklaLclY4qKdgMvZl8t7H7OfjU601I1jeNaX03JF0JRbCkpQLy_J8kwVgpLhhMMUOv_kLX3RBbeAf4MSEkxxwgNUE2dilFX-tthP-Le3DSY0J6rcfP12MQekxI3yekdyB9cfAfbjbeHYV_IgHg9QEwyZqmjqa1IT1wpQKQj296N3F3ofH7_x5AL5aLcQf6fNKH1PvdUW_iDy0kk6X--ulC80peqZW61HPgX058bTptbiPMdL0CZ4ZJJQihgv0Gh2PB5A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>963667404</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>single climate driver has direct and indirect effects on insect population dynamics</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Boggs, Carol L ; Inouye, David W</creator><creatorcontrib>Boggs, Carol L ; Inouye, David W</creatorcontrib><description>Ecology Letters (2012) 15: 502–508 ABSTRACT: Weather drives population dynamics directly, through effects on vital rates, or indirectly, through effects on the population’s competitors, predators or prey and thence on vital rates. Indirect effects may include non‐additive interactions with density dependence. Detection of climate drivers is critical to predicting climate change effects, but identification of potential drivers may depend on knowing the underlying mechanisms. For the butterfly Speyeria mormonia, one climate driver, snow melt date, has multiple effects on population growth. Snow melt date in year t has density‐dependent indirect effects. Through frost effects, early snow melt decreases floral resources, thence per‐capita nectar availability, which determines fecundity in the lab. Snow melt date in year t + 1 has density‐independent direct effects. These effects explain 84% of the variation in population growth rate. One climate parameter thus has multiple effects on the dynamics of a species with non‐overlapping generations, with one effect not detectable without understanding the underlying mechanism.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1461-023X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1461-0248</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2012.01766.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22414183</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Animal and plant ecology ; Animal populations ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Animals ; Biological and medical sciences ; butterflies ; Butterflies & moths ; Butterflies - physiology ; Climate ; Climate change ; density-dependent indirect effects ; Ecology ; Erigeron ; fecundity ; flower phenology ; Food Preferences ; frost ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; General aspects ; Insecta ; Insects ; Invertebrates ; Lepidoptera ; Models, Biological ; nectar ; pollinator ; Population Density ; Population Dynamics ; population growth ; predators ; Seasons ; Snow ; snow melt timing ; snowmelt ; Speyeria ; Speyeria mormonia ; weather</subject><ispartof>Ecology letters, 2012-05, Vol.15 (5), p.502-508</ispartof><rights>2012 Blackwell Publishing Ltd/CNRS</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>2012 Blackwell Publishing Ltd/CNRS.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5866-809ddda70b59602391796052fa8139c704ddfc7f46cd25d68d2739824d5d28763</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5866-809ddda70b59602391796052fa8139c704ddfc7f46cd25d68d2739824d5d28763</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1461-0248.2012.01766.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1461-0248.2012.01766.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,1412,27905,27906,45555,45556</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=25841448$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22414183$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Boggs, Carol L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Inouye, David W</creatorcontrib><title>single climate driver has direct and indirect effects on insect population dynamics</title><title>Ecology letters</title><addtitle>Ecol Lett</addtitle><description>Ecology Letters (2012) 15: 502–508 ABSTRACT: Weather drives population dynamics directly, through effects on vital rates, or indirectly, through effects on the population’s competitors, predators or prey and thence on vital rates. Indirect effects may include non‐additive interactions with density dependence. Detection of climate drivers is critical to predicting climate change effects, but identification of potential drivers may depend on knowing the underlying mechanisms. For the butterfly Speyeria mormonia, one climate driver, snow melt date, has multiple effects on population growth. Snow melt date in year t has density‐dependent indirect effects. Through frost effects, early snow melt decreases floral resources, thence per‐capita nectar availability, which determines fecundity in the lab. Snow melt date in year t + 1 has density‐independent direct effects. These effects explain 84% of the variation in population growth rate. One climate parameter thus has multiple effects on the dynamics of a species with non‐overlapping generations, with one effect not detectable without understanding the underlying mechanism.</description><subject>Animal and plant ecology</subject><subject>Animal populations</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>butterflies</subject><subject>Butterflies & moths</subject><subject>Butterflies - physiology</subject><subject>Climate</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>density-dependent indirect effects</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Erigeron</subject><subject>fecundity</subject><subject>flower phenology</subject><subject>Food Preferences</subject><subject>frost</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>Insecta</subject><subject>Insects</subject><subject>Invertebrates</subject><subject>Lepidoptera</subject><subject>Models, Biological</subject><subject>nectar</subject><subject>pollinator</subject><subject>Population Density</subject><subject>Population Dynamics</subject><subject>population growth</subject><subject>predators</subject><subject>Seasons</subject><subject>Snow</subject><subject>snow melt timing</subject><subject>snowmelt</subject><subject>Speyeria</subject><subject>Speyeria mormonia</subject><subject>weather</subject><issn>1461-023X</issn><issn>1461-0248</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkV9v0zAUxS0EYlvhK0CEhNhLgv_Fdh54QFXZmCp4KBO8WZ7tDJc0KXbC2m_PzVI6iQeEX659_TtH1z4IZQQXBNbbdUG4IDmmXBUUE1pgIoUodo_Q6fHi8XHPvp2gs5TWGMhKkqfohFJOOFHsFK1SaG8bn9kmbEzvMxfDLx-z7yZlLkRv-8y0Lgvt4eDrGkrKuhZ6aexsu-3QmD5Ax-1bswk2PUNPatMk__xQZ-j6w-LL_DJffr74OH-_zG2phMgVrpxzRuKbshIwZUUk1JLWRhFWWYm5c7WVNRfW0dIJ5ahklaLclY4qKdgMvZl8t7H7OfjU601I1jeNaX03JF0JRbCkpQLy_J8kwVgpLhhMMUOv_kLX3RBbeAf4MSEkxxwgNUE2dilFX-tthP-Le3DSY0J6rcfP12MQekxI3yekdyB9cfAfbjbeHYV_IgHg9QEwyZqmjqa1IT1wpQKQj296N3F3ofH7_x5AL5aLcQf6fNKH1PvdUW_iDy0kk6X--ulC80peqZW61HPgX058bTptbiPMdL0CZ4ZJJQihgv0Gh2PB5A</recordid><startdate>201205</startdate><enddate>201205</enddate><creator>Boggs, Carol L</creator><creator>Inouye, David W</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Blackwell</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201205</creationdate><title>single climate driver has direct and indirect effects on insect population dynamics</title><author>Boggs, Carol L ; Inouye, David W</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5866-809ddda70b59602391796052fa8139c704ddfc7f46cd25d68d2739824d5d28763</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Animal and plant ecology</topic><topic>Animal populations</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>butterflies</topic><topic>Butterflies & moths</topic><topic>Butterflies - physiology</topic><topic>Climate</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>density-dependent indirect effects</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Erigeron</topic><topic>fecundity</topic><topic>flower phenology</topic><topic>Food Preferences</topic><topic>frost</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>Insecta</topic><topic>Insects</topic><topic>Invertebrates</topic><topic>Lepidoptera</topic><topic>Models, Biological</topic><topic>nectar</topic><topic>pollinator</topic><topic>Population Density</topic><topic>Population Dynamics</topic><topic>population growth</topic><topic>predators</topic><topic>Seasons</topic><topic>Snow</topic><topic>snow melt timing</topic><topic>snowmelt</topic><topic>Speyeria</topic><topic>Speyeria mormonia</topic><topic>weather</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Boggs, Carol L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Inouye, David W</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Ecology letters</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Boggs, Carol L</au><au>Inouye, David W</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>single climate driver has direct and indirect effects on insect population dynamics</atitle><jtitle>Ecology letters</jtitle><addtitle>Ecol Lett</addtitle><date>2012-05</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>502</spage><epage>508</epage><pages>502-508</pages><issn>1461-023X</issn><eissn>1461-0248</eissn><abstract>Ecology Letters (2012) 15: 502–508 ABSTRACT: Weather drives population dynamics directly, through effects on vital rates, or indirectly, through effects on the population’s competitors, predators or prey and thence on vital rates. Indirect effects may include non‐additive interactions with density dependence. Detection of climate drivers is critical to predicting climate change effects, but identification of potential drivers may depend on knowing the underlying mechanisms. For the butterfly Speyeria mormonia, one climate driver, snow melt date, has multiple effects on population growth. Snow melt date in year t has density‐dependent indirect effects. Through frost effects, early snow melt decreases floral resources, thence per‐capita nectar availability, which determines fecundity in the lab. Snow melt date in year t + 1 has density‐independent direct effects. These effects explain 84% of the variation in population growth rate. One climate parameter thus has multiple effects on the dynamics of a species with non‐overlapping generations, with one effect not detectable without understanding the underlying mechanism.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>22414183</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1461-0248.2012.01766.x</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1461-023X |
| ispartof | Ecology letters, 2012-05, Vol.15 (5), p.502-508 |
| issn | 1461-023X 1461-0248 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_968107258 |
| source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
| subjects | Animal and plant ecology Animal populations Animal, plant and microbial ecology Animals Biological and medical sciences butterflies Butterflies & moths Butterflies - physiology Climate Climate change density-dependent indirect effects Ecology Erigeron fecundity flower phenology Food Preferences frost Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology General aspects Insecta Insects Invertebrates Lepidoptera Models, Biological nectar pollinator Population Density Population Dynamics population growth predators Seasons Snow snow melt timing snowmelt Speyeria Speyeria mormonia weather |
| title | single climate driver has direct and indirect effects on insect population dynamics |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-18T16%3A54%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=single%20climate%20driver%20has%20direct%20and%20indirect%20effects%20on%20insect%20population%20dynamics&rft.jtitle=Ecology%20letters&rft.au=Boggs,%20Carol%20L&rft.date=2012-05&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=502&rft.epage=508&rft.pages=502-508&rft.issn=1461-023X&rft.eissn=1461-0248&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2012.01766.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1008846302%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=963667404&rft_id=info:pmid/22414183&rfr_iscdi=true |