Three‐Year Outcomes From BENEFIT‐EXT: A Phase III Study of Belatacept Versus Cyclosporine in Recipients of Extended Criteria Donor Kidneys

Recipients of extended‐criteria donor (ECD) kidneys have poorer long‐term outcomes compared to standard‐criteria donor kidney recipients. We report 3‐year outcomes from a randomized, phase III study in recipients of de novo ECD kidneys (n = 543) assigned (1:1:1) to either a more intensive (MI) or le...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American journal of transplantation 2012-03, Vol.12 (3), p.630-639
Hauptverfasser: Medina Pestana, J. O., Grinyo, J. M., Vanrenterghem, Y., Becker, T., Campistol, J. M., Florman, S., Garcia, V. D., Kamar, N., Lang, P., Manfro, R. C., Massari, P., Rial, M. D. C., Schnitzler, M. A., Vitko, S., Duan, T., Block, A., Harler, M. B., Durrbach, A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Recipients of extended‐criteria donor (ECD) kidneys have poorer long‐term outcomes compared to standard‐criteria donor kidney recipients. We report 3‐year outcomes from a randomized, phase III study in recipients of de novo ECD kidneys (n = 543) assigned (1:1:1) to either a more intensive (MI) or less intensive (LI) belatacept regimen, or cyclosporine. Three hundred twenty‐three patients completed treatment by year 3. Patient survival with a functioning graft was comparable between groups (80% in MI, 82% in LI, 80% in cyclosporine). Mean calculated GFR (cGFR) was 11 mL/min higher in belatacept‐treated versus cyclosporine‐treated patients (42.7 in MI, 42.2 in LI, 31.5 mL/min in cyclosporine). More cyclosporine‐treated patients (44%) progressed to GFR
ISSN:1600-6135
1600-6143
DOI:10.1111/j.1600-6143.2011.03914.x