Race is Gendered: How Covarying Phenotypes and Stereotypes Bias Sex Categorization
We argue that race and sex categories are psychologically and phenotypically confounded, affecting social categorizations and their efficiency. Sex categorization of faces was facilitated when the race category shared facial phenotypes or stereotypes with the correct sex category (e.g., Asian women...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of personality and social psychology 2012-01, Vol.102 (1), p.116-131 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 131 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 116 |
container_title | Journal of personality and social psychology |
container_volume | 102 |
creator | Johnson, Kerri L. Freeman, Jonathan B. Pauker, Kristin |
description | We argue that race and sex categories are psychologically and phenotypically confounded, affecting social categorizations and their efficiency. Sex categorization of faces was facilitated when the race category shared facial phenotypes or stereotypes with the correct sex category (e.g., Asian women and Black men) but was impaired when the race category shared incompatible phenotypes or stereotypes with the correct sex category (e.g., Asian men and Black women). These patterns were evident in the disambiguation of androgynous faces (Study 1) and the efficiency of judgments (Studies 1, 2, 4, and 5). These patterns emerged due to common facial phenotypes for the categories Black and men (Studies 3 and 5) and due to shared stereotypes among the categories Black and men and the categories Asian and women (Studies 4 and 5). These findings challenge the notion that social categories are perceived independent of one another and show, instead, that race is gendered. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1037/a0025335 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_964269781</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>964190327</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a601t-e6caac2357f14cab802efd7b7574a808d64fe1a199e9fd6a8e2502aa565e60193</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqN0l9rFDEQAPAgij2r4CeQRRF9cDWT__FND22FgtLq8zKXna1b9nbXZE89P73Z9mpB0PYpyfBjZpIMYw-BvwQu7SvkXGgp9S22AC99CRL0bbbIUVFKDWqP3UvpjHOutBB32Z4AZ_POL9jxMQYq2lQcUF9TpPp1cTj8KJbDd4zbtj8tPn2lfpi2I6UC-7o4mTLand-2mIoT-lkscaLTIba_cGqH_j6702CX6MFu3Wdf3r_7vDwsjz4efFi-OSrRcJhKMgExCKltAyrgynFBTW1XVluFjrvaqIYAwXvyTW3QkdBcIGqjKSfwcp89u8g7xuHbhtJUrdsUqOuwp2GTKm-UMN46uIkEz6Ww10thvfNSzdWf_1eCVLm000bciFonldbX0_yjMH_x3MDjv-jZsIl9fvHKOWNAqPM3evIvBBy4N94rdVU1xCGlSE01xnadByCjah6w6nLAMn20S7hZran-Ay8nKoOnO4ApYNdE7EObrpxWVvDz9l9cOByxGtM2YJza0FEKmxipn3JsnK9bQQVg5G-d9OKH</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>886612419</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Race is Gendered: How Covarying Phenotypes and Stereotypes Bias Sex Categorization</title><source>APA PsycARTICLES</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Johnson, Kerri L. ; Freeman, Jonathan B. ; Pauker, Kristin</creator><contributor>Simpson, Jeffrey</contributor><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Kerri L. ; Freeman, Jonathan B. ; Pauker, Kristin ; Simpson, Jeffrey</creatorcontrib><description>We argue that race and sex categories are psychologically and phenotypically confounded, affecting social categorizations and their efficiency. Sex categorization of faces was facilitated when the race category shared facial phenotypes or stereotypes with the correct sex category (e.g., Asian women and Black men) but was impaired when the race category shared incompatible phenotypes or stereotypes with the correct sex category (e.g., Asian men and Black women). These patterns were evident in the disambiguation of androgynous faces (Study 1) and the efficiency of judgments (Studies 1, 2, 4, and 5). These patterns emerged due to common facial phenotypes for the categories Black and men (Studies 3 and 5) and due to shared stereotypes among the categories Black and men and the categories Asian and women (Studies 4 and 5). These findings challenge the notion that social categories are perceived independent of one another and show, instead, that race is gendered.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-3514</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-1315</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/a0025335</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21875229</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JPSPB2</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, DC: American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>Adult ; Asian people ; Bias ; Biological and medical sciences ; Classification (Cognitive Process) ; Continental Population Groups ; Face ; Female ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Gender ; Gender stereotypes ; Human ; Human Sex Differences ; Humans ; Judgments ; Male ; Perception ; Perception of others ; Phenotype ; Phenotypes ; Psychological Tests ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Race ; Racial and Ethnic Attitudes ; Racial and Ethnic Groups ; Racism ; Sex ; Sex Characteristics ; Sex roles ; Sex Stereotypes ; Social attribution, perception and cognition ; Social Behavior ; Social categories ; Social Categorization ; Social Perception ; Social psychology ; Stereotyped Attitudes ; Stereotypes ; Stereotyping ; Studies ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Journal of personality and social psychology, 2012-01, Vol.102 (1), p.116-131</ispartof><rights>2011 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright American Psychological Association Jan 2012</rights><rights>2011, American Psychological Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a601t-e6caac2357f14cab802efd7b7574a808d64fe1a199e9fd6a8e2502aa565e60193</citedby><orcidid>0000-0002-0848-5159</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,4010,27900,27901,27902,30976,30977,33751,33752</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=25472099$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21875229$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Simpson, Jeffrey</contributor><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Kerri L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Freeman, Jonathan B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pauker, Kristin</creatorcontrib><title>Race is Gendered: How Covarying Phenotypes and Stereotypes Bias Sex Categorization</title><title>Journal of personality and social psychology</title><addtitle>J Pers Soc Psychol</addtitle><description>We argue that race and sex categories are psychologically and phenotypically confounded, affecting social categorizations and their efficiency. Sex categorization of faces was facilitated when the race category shared facial phenotypes or stereotypes with the correct sex category (e.g., Asian women and Black men) but was impaired when the race category shared incompatible phenotypes or stereotypes with the correct sex category (e.g., Asian men and Black women). These patterns were evident in the disambiguation of androgynous faces (Study 1) and the efficiency of judgments (Studies 1, 2, 4, and 5). These patterns emerged due to common facial phenotypes for the categories Black and men (Studies 3 and 5) and due to shared stereotypes among the categories Black and men and the categories Asian and women (Studies 4 and 5). These findings challenge the notion that social categories are perceived independent of one another and show, instead, that race is gendered.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Asian people</subject><subject>Bias</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Classification (Cognitive Process)</subject><subject>Continental Population Groups</subject><subject>Face</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Gender</subject><subject>Gender stereotypes</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Human Sex Differences</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Judgments</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Perception</subject><subject>Perception of others</subject><subject>Phenotype</subject><subject>Phenotypes</subject><subject>Psychological Tests</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Race</subject><subject>Racial and Ethnic Attitudes</subject><subject>Racial and Ethnic Groups</subject><subject>Racism</subject><subject>Sex</subject><subject>Sex Characteristics</subject><subject>Sex roles</subject><subject>Sex Stereotypes</subject><subject>Social attribution, perception and cognition</subject><subject>Social Behavior</subject><subject>Social categories</subject><subject>Social Categorization</subject><subject>Social Perception</subject><subject>Social psychology</subject><subject>Stereotyped Attitudes</subject><subject>Stereotypes</subject><subject>Stereotyping</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0022-3514</issn><issn>1939-1315</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqN0l9rFDEQAPAgij2r4CeQRRF9cDWT__FND22FgtLq8zKXna1b9nbXZE89P73Z9mpB0PYpyfBjZpIMYw-BvwQu7SvkXGgp9S22AC99CRL0bbbIUVFKDWqP3UvpjHOutBB32Z4AZ_POL9jxMQYq2lQcUF9TpPp1cTj8KJbDd4zbtj8tPn2lfpi2I6UC-7o4mTLand-2mIoT-lkscaLTIba_cGqH_j6702CX6MFu3Wdf3r_7vDwsjz4efFi-OSrRcJhKMgExCKltAyrgynFBTW1XVluFjrvaqIYAwXvyTW3QkdBcIGqjKSfwcp89u8g7xuHbhtJUrdsUqOuwp2GTKm-UMN46uIkEz6Ww10thvfNSzdWf_1eCVLm000bciFonldbX0_yjMH_x3MDjv-jZsIl9fvHKOWNAqPM3evIvBBy4N94rdVU1xCGlSE01xnadByCjah6w6nLAMn20S7hZran-Ay8nKoOnO4ApYNdE7EObrpxWVvDz9l9cOByxGtM2YJza0FEKmxipn3JsnK9bQQVg5G-d9OKH</recordid><startdate>201201</startdate><enddate>201201</enddate><creator>Johnson, Kerri L.</creator><creator>Freeman, Jonathan B.</creator><creator>Pauker, Kristin</creator><general>American Psychological Association</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>WZK</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0848-5159</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201201</creationdate><title>Race is Gendered: How Covarying Phenotypes and Stereotypes Bias Sex Categorization</title><author>Johnson, Kerri L. ; Freeman, Jonathan B. ; Pauker, Kristin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a601t-e6caac2357f14cab802efd7b7574a808d64fe1a199e9fd6a8e2502aa565e60193</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Asian people</topic><topic>Bias</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Classification (Cognitive Process)</topic><topic>Continental Population Groups</topic><topic>Face</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Gender</topic><topic>Gender stereotypes</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Human Sex Differences</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Judgments</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Perception</topic><topic>Perception of others</topic><topic>Phenotype</topic><topic>Phenotypes</topic><topic>Psychological Tests</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Race</topic><topic>Racial and Ethnic Attitudes</topic><topic>Racial and Ethnic Groups</topic><topic>Racism</topic><topic>Sex</topic><topic>Sex Characteristics</topic><topic>Sex roles</topic><topic>Sex Stereotypes</topic><topic>Social attribution, perception and cognition</topic><topic>Social Behavior</topic><topic>Social categories</topic><topic>Social Categorization</topic><topic>Social Perception</topic><topic>Social psychology</topic><topic>Stereotyped Attitudes</topic><topic>Stereotypes</topic><topic>Stereotyping</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Kerri L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Freeman, Jonathan B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pauker, Kristin</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><collection>PsycARTICLES (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of personality and social psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Johnson, Kerri L.</au><au>Freeman, Jonathan B.</au><au>Pauker, Kristin</au><au>Simpson, Jeffrey</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Race is Gendered: How Covarying Phenotypes and Stereotypes Bias Sex Categorization</atitle><jtitle>Journal of personality and social psychology</jtitle><addtitle>J Pers Soc Psychol</addtitle><date>2012-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>102</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>116</spage><epage>131</epage><pages>116-131</pages><issn>0022-3514</issn><eissn>1939-1315</eissn><coden>JPSPB2</coden><abstract>We argue that race and sex categories are psychologically and phenotypically confounded, affecting social categorizations and their efficiency. Sex categorization of faces was facilitated when the race category shared facial phenotypes or stereotypes with the correct sex category (e.g., Asian women and Black men) but was impaired when the race category shared incompatible phenotypes or stereotypes with the correct sex category (e.g., Asian men and Black women). These patterns were evident in the disambiguation of androgynous faces (Study 1) and the efficiency of judgments (Studies 1, 2, 4, and 5). These patterns emerged due to common facial phenotypes for the categories Black and men (Studies 3 and 5) and due to shared stereotypes among the categories Black and men and the categories Asian and women (Studies 4 and 5). These findings challenge the notion that social categories are perceived independent of one another and show, instead, that race is gendered.</abstract><cop>Washington, DC</cop><pub>American Psychological Association</pub><pmid>21875229</pmid><doi>10.1037/a0025335</doi><tpages>16</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0848-5159</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-3514 |
ispartof | Journal of personality and social psychology, 2012-01, Vol.102 (1), p.116-131 |
issn | 0022-3514 1939-1315 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_964269781 |
source | APA PsycARTICLES; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); MEDLINE; Sociological Abstracts |
subjects | Adult Asian people Bias Biological and medical sciences Classification (Cognitive Process) Continental Population Groups Face Female Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Gender Gender stereotypes Human Human Sex Differences Humans Judgments Male Perception Perception of others Phenotype Phenotypes Psychological Tests Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychology. Psychophysiology Race Racial and Ethnic Attitudes Racial and Ethnic Groups Racism Sex Sex Characteristics Sex roles Sex Stereotypes Social attribution, perception and cognition Social Behavior Social categories Social Categorization Social Perception Social psychology Stereotyped Attitudes Stereotypes Stereotyping Studies Young Adult |
title | Race is Gendered: How Covarying Phenotypes and Stereotypes Bias Sex Categorization |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T15%3A56%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Race%20is%20Gendered:%20How%20Covarying%20Phenotypes%20and%20Stereotypes%20Bias%20Sex%20Categorization&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20personality%20and%20social%20psychology&rft.au=Johnson,%20Kerri%20L.&rft.date=2012-01&rft.volume=102&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=116&rft.epage=131&rft.pages=116-131&rft.issn=0022-3514&rft.eissn=1939-1315&rft.coden=JPSPB2&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/a0025335&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E964190327%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=886612419&rft_id=info:pmid/21875229&rfr_iscdi=true |