Race is Gendered: How Covarying Phenotypes and Stereotypes Bias Sex Categorization

We argue that race and sex categories are psychologically and phenotypically confounded, affecting social categorizations and their efficiency. Sex categorization of faces was facilitated when the race category shared facial phenotypes or stereotypes with the correct sex category (e.g., Asian women...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of personality and social psychology 2012-01, Vol.102 (1), p.116-131
Hauptverfasser: Johnson, Kerri L., Freeman, Jonathan B., Pauker, Kristin
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 131
container_issue 1
container_start_page 116
container_title Journal of personality and social psychology
container_volume 102
creator Johnson, Kerri L.
Freeman, Jonathan B.
Pauker, Kristin
description We argue that race and sex categories are psychologically and phenotypically confounded, affecting social categorizations and their efficiency. Sex categorization of faces was facilitated when the race category shared facial phenotypes or stereotypes with the correct sex category (e.g., Asian women and Black men) but was impaired when the race category shared incompatible phenotypes or stereotypes with the correct sex category (e.g., Asian men and Black women). These patterns were evident in the disambiguation of androgynous faces (Study 1) and the efficiency of judgments (Studies 1, 2, 4, and 5). These patterns emerged due to common facial phenotypes for the categories Black and men (Studies 3 and 5) and due to shared stereotypes among the categories Black and men and the categories Asian and women (Studies 4 and 5). These findings challenge the notion that social categories are perceived independent of one another and show, instead, that race is gendered.
doi_str_mv 10.1037/a0025335
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_964269781</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>964190327</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a601t-e6caac2357f14cab802efd7b7574a808d64fe1a199e9fd6a8e2502aa565e60193</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqN0l9rFDEQAPAgij2r4CeQRRF9cDWT__FND22FgtLq8zKXna1b9nbXZE89P73Z9mpB0PYpyfBjZpIMYw-BvwQu7SvkXGgp9S22AC99CRL0bbbIUVFKDWqP3UvpjHOutBB32Z4AZ_POL9jxMQYq2lQcUF9TpPp1cTj8KJbDd4zbtj8tPn2lfpi2I6UC-7o4mTLand-2mIoT-lkscaLTIba_cGqH_j6702CX6MFu3Wdf3r_7vDwsjz4efFi-OSrRcJhKMgExCKltAyrgynFBTW1XVluFjrvaqIYAwXvyTW3QkdBcIGqjKSfwcp89u8g7xuHbhtJUrdsUqOuwp2GTKm-UMN46uIkEz6Ww10thvfNSzdWf_1eCVLm000bciFonldbX0_yjMH_x3MDjv-jZsIl9fvHKOWNAqPM3evIvBBy4N94rdVU1xCGlSE01xnadByCjah6w6nLAMn20S7hZran-Ay8nKoOnO4ApYNdE7EObrpxWVvDz9l9cOByxGtM2YJza0FEKmxipn3JsnK9bQQVg5G-d9OKH</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>886612419</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Race is Gendered: How Covarying Phenotypes and Stereotypes Bias Sex Categorization</title><source>APA PsycARTICLES</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Johnson, Kerri L. ; Freeman, Jonathan B. ; Pauker, Kristin</creator><contributor>Simpson, Jeffrey</contributor><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Kerri L. ; Freeman, Jonathan B. ; Pauker, Kristin ; Simpson, Jeffrey</creatorcontrib><description>We argue that race and sex categories are psychologically and phenotypically confounded, affecting social categorizations and their efficiency. Sex categorization of faces was facilitated when the race category shared facial phenotypes or stereotypes with the correct sex category (e.g., Asian women and Black men) but was impaired when the race category shared incompatible phenotypes or stereotypes with the correct sex category (e.g., Asian men and Black women). These patterns were evident in the disambiguation of androgynous faces (Study 1) and the efficiency of judgments (Studies 1, 2, 4, and 5). These patterns emerged due to common facial phenotypes for the categories Black and men (Studies 3 and 5) and due to shared stereotypes among the categories Black and men and the categories Asian and women (Studies 4 and 5). These findings challenge the notion that social categories are perceived independent of one another and show, instead, that race is gendered.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-3514</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-1315</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/a0025335</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21875229</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JPSPB2</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, DC: American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>Adult ; Asian people ; Bias ; Biological and medical sciences ; Classification (Cognitive Process) ; Continental Population Groups ; Face ; Female ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Gender ; Gender stereotypes ; Human ; Human Sex Differences ; Humans ; Judgments ; Male ; Perception ; Perception of others ; Phenotype ; Phenotypes ; Psychological Tests ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Race ; Racial and Ethnic Attitudes ; Racial and Ethnic Groups ; Racism ; Sex ; Sex Characteristics ; Sex roles ; Sex Stereotypes ; Social attribution, perception and cognition ; Social Behavior ; Social categories ; Social Categorization ; Social Perception ; Social psychology ; Stereotyped Attitudes ; Stereotypes ; Stereotyping ; Studies ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Journal of personality and social psychology, 2012-01, Vol.102 (1), p.116-131</ispartof><rights>2011 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright American Psychological Association Jan 2012</rights><rights>2011, American Psychological Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a601t-e6caac2357f14cab802efd7b7574a808d64fe1a199e9fd6a8e2502aa565e60193</citedby><orcidid>0000-0002-0848-5159</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,4010,27900,27901,27902,30976,30977,33751,33752</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=25472099$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21875229$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Simpson, Jeffrey</contributor><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Kerri L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Freeman, Jonathan B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pauker, Kristin</creatorcontrib><title>Race is Gendered: How Covarying Phenotypes and Stereotypes Bias Sex Categorization</title><title>Journal of personality and social psychology</title><addtitle>J Pers Soc Psychol</addtitle><description>We argue that race and sex categories are psychologically and phenotypically confounded, affecting social categorizations and their efficiency. Sex categorization of faces was facilitated when the race category shared facial phenotypes or stereotypes with the correct sex category (e.g., Asian women and Black men) but was impaired when the race category shared incompatible phenotypes or stereotypes with the correct sex category (e.g., Asian men and Black women). These patterns were evident in the disambiguation of androgynous faces (Study 1) and the efficiency of judgments (Studies 1, 2, 4, and 5). These patterns emerged due to common facial phenotypes for the categories Black and men (Studies 3 and 5) and due to shared stereotypes among the categories Black and men and the categories Asian and women (Studies 4 and 5). These findings challenge the notion that social categories are perceived independent of one another and show, instead, that race is gendered.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Asian people</subject><subject>Bias</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Classification (Cognitive Process)</subject><subject>Continental Population Groups</subject><subject>Face</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Gender</subject><subject>Gender stereotypes</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Human Sex Differences</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Judgments</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Perception</subject><subject>Perception of others</subject><subject>Phenotype</subject><subject>Phenotypes</subject><subject>Psychological Tests</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Race</subject><subject>Racial and Ethnic Attitudes</subject><subject>Racial and Ethnic Groups</subject><subject>Racism</subject><subject>Sex</subject><subject>Sex Characteristics</subject><subject>Sex roles</subject><subject>Sex Stereotypes</subject><subject>Social attribution, perception and cognition</subject><subject>Social Behavior</subject><subject>Social categories</subject><subject>Social Categorization</subject><subject>Social Perception</subject><subject>Social psychology</subject><subject>Stereotyped Attitudes</subject><subject>Stereotypes</subject><subject>Stereotyping</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0022-3514</issn><issn>1939-1315</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqN0l9rFDEQAPAgij2r4CeQRRF9cDWT__FND22FgtLq8zKXna1b9nbXZE89P73Z9mpB0PYpyfBjZpIMYw-BvwQu7SvkXGgp9S22AC99CRL0bbbIUVFKDWqP3UvpjHOutBB32Z4AZ_POL9jxMQYq2lQcUF9TpPp1cTj8KJbDd4zbtj8tPn2lfpi2I6UC-7o4mTLand-2mIoT-lkscaLTIba_cGqH_j6702CX6MFu3Wdf3r_7vDwsjz4efFi-OSrRcJhKMgExCKltAyrgynFBTW1XVluFjrvaqIYAwXvyTW3QkdBcIGqjKSfwcp89u8g7xuHbhtJUrdsUqOuwp2GTKm-UMN46uIkEz6Ww10thvfNSzdWf_1eCVLm000bciFonldbX0_yjMH_x3MDjv-jZsIl9fvHKOWNAqPM3evIvBBy4N94rdVU1xCGlSE01xnadByCjah6w6nLAMn20S7hZran-Ay8nKoOnO4ApYNdE7EObrpxWVvDz9l9cOByxGtM2YJza0FEKmxipn3JsnK9bQQVg5G-d9OKH</recordid><startdate>201201</startdate><enddate>201201</enddate><creator>Johnson, Kerri L.</creator><creator>Freeman, Jonathan B.</creator><creator>Pauker, Kristin</creator><general>American Psychological Association</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>WZK</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0848-5159</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201201</creationdate><title>Race is Gendered: How Covarying Phenotypes and Stereotypes Bias Sex Categorization</title><author>Johnson, Kerri L. ; Freeman, Jonathan B. ; Pauker, Kristin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a601t-e6caac2357f14cab802efd7b7574a808d64fe1a199e9fd6a8e2502aa565e60193</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Asian people</topic><topic>Bias</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Classification (Cognitive Process)</topic><topic>Continental Population Groups</topic><topic>Face</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Gender</topic><topic>Gender stereotypes</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Human Sex Differences</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Judgments</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Perception</topic><topic>Perception of others</topic><topic>Phenotype</topic><topic>Phenotypes</topic><topic>Psychological Tests</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Race</topic><topic>Racial and Ethnic Attitudes</topic><topic>Racial and Ethnic Groups</topic><topic>Racism</topic><topic>Sex</topic><topic>Sex Characteristics</topic><topic>Sex roles</topic><topic>Sex Stereotypes</topic><topic>Social attribution, perception and cognition</topic><topic>Social Behavior</topic><topic>Social categories</topic><topic>Social Categorization</topic><topic>Social Perception</topic><topic>Social psychology</topic><topic>Stereotyped Attitudes</topic><topic>Stereotypes</topic><topic>Stereotyping</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Kerri L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Freeman, Jonathan B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pauker, Kristin</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><collection>PsycARTICLES (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of personality and social psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Johnson, Kerri L.</au><au>Freeman, Jonathan B.</au><au>Pauker, Kristin</au><au>Simpson, Jeffrey</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Race is Gendered: How Covarying Phenotypes and Stereotypes Bias Sex Categorization</atitle><jtitle>Journal of personality and social psychology</jtitle><addtitle>J Pers Soc Psychol</addtitle><date>2012-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>102</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>116</spage><epage>131</epage><pages>116-131</pages><issn>0022-3514</issn><eissn>1939-1315</eissn><coden>JPSPB2</coden><abstract>We argue that race and sex categories are psychologically and phenotypically confounded, affecting social categorizations and their efficiency. Sex categorization of faces was facilitated when the race category shared facial phenotypes or stereotypes with the correct sex category (e.g., Asian women and Black men) but was impaired when the race category shared incompatible phenotypes or stereotypes with the correct sex category (e.g., Asian men and Black women). These patterns were evident in the disambiguation of androgynous faces (Study 1) and the efficiency of judgments (Studies 1, 2, 4, and 5). These patterns emerged due to common facial phenotypes for the categories Black and men (Studies 3 and 5) and due to shared stereotypes among the categories Black and men and the categories Asian and women (Studies 4 and 5). These findings challenge the notion that social categories are perceived independent of one another and show, instead, that race is gendered.</abstract><cop>Washington, DC</cop><pub>American Psychological Association</pub><pmid>21875229</pmid><doi>10.1037/a0025335</doi><tpages>16</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0848-5159</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-3514
ispartof Journal of personality and social psychology, 2012-01, Vol.102 (1), p.116-131
issn 0022-3514
1939-1315
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_964269781
source APA PsycARTICLES; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); MEDLINE; Sociological Abstracts
subjects Adult
Asian people
Bias
Biological and medical sciences
Classification (Cognitive Process)
Continental Population Groups
Face
Female
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Gender
Gender stereotypes
Human
Human Sex Differences
Humans
Judgments
Male
Perception
Perception of others
Phenotype
Phenotypes
Psychological Tests
Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry
Psychology. Psychophysiology
Race
Racial and Ethnic Attitudes
Racial and Ethnic Groups
Racism
Sex
Sex Characteristics
Sex roles
Sex Stereotypes
Social attribution, perception and cognition
Social Behavior
Social categories
Social Categorization
Social Perception
Social psychology
Stereotyped Attitudes
Stereotypes
Stereotyping
Studies
Young Adult
title Race is Gendered: How Covarying Phenotypes and Stereotypes Bias Sex Categorization
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T15%3A56%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Race%20is%20Gendered:%20How%20Covarying%20Phenotypes%20and%20Stereotypes%20Bias%20Sex%20Categorization&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20personality%20and%20social%20psychology&rft.au=Johnson,%20Kerri%20L.&rft.date=2012-01&rft.volume=102&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=116&rft.epage=131&rft.pages=116-131&rft.issn=0022-3514&rft.eissn=1939-1315&rft.coden=JPSPB2&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/a0025335&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E964190327%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=886612419&rft_id=info:pmid/21875229&rfr_iscdi=true