Multifinality in Implicit Choice

This research examines the possibility that people's choices in the service of an explicit focal goal may also reflect their tendency to fulfill implicit background goals and in that sense are multifinal. We carried out 5 experimental studies to investigate this notion. In Experiment 1, a prime...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of personality and social psychology 2011-11, Vol.101 (5), p.1124-1137
Hauptverfasser: WOO YOUNG CHUN, SLEETH-KEPPLER, David, KRUGLANSKI, Arie W, FRIEDMAN, Ronald S
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1137
container_issue 5
container_start_page 1124
container_title Journal of personality and social psychology
container_volume 101
creator WOO YOUNG CHUN
SLEETH-KEPPLER, David
KRUGLANSKI, Arie W
FRIEDMAN, Ronald S
description This research examines the possibility that people's choices in the service of an explicit focal goal may also reflect their tendency to fulfill implicit background goals and in that sense are multifinal. We carried out 5 experimental studies to investigate this notion. In Experiment 1, a primed implicit goal affected individuals' choices even when those avowedly served an explicit "focal" goal. Experiment 2 replicated this finding with a different type of implicit goals. Experiment 3 found that primed implicit goals had no effect on choices where the options that served them undermined the explicit goal. Experiment 4 found that a primed implicit goal served by a multifinal option does not privilege it over a unifinal option if that goal had been already attained by a different means. Finally, Experiment 5, via 3 types of control groups, showed that choices were affected by both the explicit and implicit goals in isolation, and they shifted toward multifinality when these goals were conjointly present. The discussion considers the integrative potential of the multifinality framework and its implications for a variety of phenomena in the domain of motivated cognition.
doi_str_mv 10.1037/a0023778
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_964269327</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>867472719</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c463t-119e0333328e2920e5549d85d5580a61b6f5f1db600bf0495640dc756907b2be3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqN0ctKAzEUBuAgiq1V8AlkEEQ3oyf3yVKKl0LFja6HTCbBlLnUycyib2-KrQUX1WwC4eM_5PwInWO4xUDlnQYgVMrsAI2xoirFFPNDNI6vJKUcsxE6CWEBAIwTcoxGBHPJJKFjlLwMVe-db3Tl-1Xim2RWLytvfJ9MP1pv7Ck6croK9mxzT9D748Pb9Dmdvz7Npvfz1DBB-xRjZYHGQzJLFAHLOVNlxkvOM9ACF8Jxh8tCABQOmOKCQWkkFwpkQQpLJ-j6O3fZtZ-DDX1e-2BsVenGtkPIlWBEKErkfyTOhODwtwSIqYSrKG_2Shw3Gb9IpYj08hddtEMX97fOEyCxwnIfysR69ZHthpquDaGzLl92vtbdKo7L173m214jvdjkDUVtyx-4LTKCqw3QwejKdboxPuwcEyQDwukXum6jEg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>867472719</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Multifinality in Implicit Choice</title><source>APA PsycARTICLES</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>WOO YOUNG CHUN ; SLEETH-KEPPLER, David ; KRUGLANSKI, Arie W ; FRIEDMAN, Ronald S</creator><creatorcontrib>WOO YOUNG CHUN ; SLEETH-KEPPLER, David ; KRUGLANSKI, Arie W ; FRIEDMAN, Ronald S</creatorcontrib><description>This research examines the possibility that people's choices in the service of an explicit focal goal may also reflect their tendency to fulfill implicit background goals and in that sense are multifinal. We carried out 5 experimental studies to investigate this notion. In Experiment 1, a primed implicit goal affected individuals' choices even when those avowedly served an explicit "focal" goal. Experiment 2 replicated this finding with a different type of implicit goals. Experiment 3 found that primed implicit goals had no effect on choices where the options that served them undermined the explicit goal. Experiment 4 found that a primed implicit goal served by a multifinal option does not privilege it over a unifinal option if that goal had been already attained by a different means. Finally, Experiment 5, via 3 types of control groups, showed that choices were affected by both the explicit and implicit goals in isolation, and they shifted toward multifinality when these goals were conjointly present. The discussion considers the integrative potential of the multifinality framework and its implications for a variety of phenomena in the domain of motivated cognition.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-3514</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-1315</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/a0023778</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21574723</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JPSPB2</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, DC: American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>Adult ; Awareness - physiology ; Behavioural psychology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Choice Behavior ; Choice Behavior - physiology ; Choices ; Cognition ; Cognition &amp; reasoning ; Experimental psychology ; Experiments ; Female ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Goals ; Human ; Humans ; Implicit Learning ; Isolation ; Male ; Motivation ; Motivation - physiology ; Objectives ; Perception ; Personality. Affectivity ; Privilege ; Psychological Tests ; Psychology ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Self Concept ; Social psychology ; Systems Theory ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Journal of personality and social psychology, 2011-11, Vol.101 (5), p.1124-1137</ispartof><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>2011, American Psychological Association</rights><rights>Copyright American Psychological Association Nov 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c463t-119e0333328e2920e5549d85d5580a61b6f5f1db600bf0495640dc756907b2be3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,30976,30977,33751,33752</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=24628025$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21574723$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>WOO YOUNG CHUN</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SLEETH-KEPPLER, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KRUGLANSKI, Arie W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FRIEDMAN, Ronald S</creatorcontrib><title>Multifinality in Implicit Choice</title><title>Journal of personality and social psychology</title><addtitle>J Pers Soc Psychol</addtitle><description>This research examines the possibility that people's choices in the service of an explicit focal goal may also reflect their tendency to fulfill implicit background goals and in that sense are multifinal. We carried out 5 experimental studies to investigate this notion. In Experiment 1, a primed implicit goal affected individuals' choices even when those avowedly served an explicit "focal" goal. Experiment 2 replicated this finding with a different type of implicit goals. Experiment 3 found that primed implicit goals had no effect on choices where the options that served them undermined the explicit goal. Experiment 4 found that a primed implicit goal served by a multifinal option does not privilege it over a unifinal option if that goal had been already attained by a different means. Finally, Experiment 5, via 3 types of control groups, showed that choices were affected by both the explicit and implicit goals in isolation, and they shifted toward multifinality when these goals were conjointly present. The discussion considers the integrative potential of the multifinality framework and its implications for a variety of phenomena in the domain of motivated cognition.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Awareness - physiology</subject><subject>Behavioural psychology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Choice Behavior</subject><subject>Choice Behavior - physiology</subject><subject>Choices</subject><subject>Cognition</subject><subject>Cognition &amp; reasoning</subject><subject>Experimental psychology</subject><subject>Experiments</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Goals</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Implicit Learning</subject><subject>Isolation</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Motivation</subject><subject>Motivation - physiology</subject><subject>Objectives</subject><subject>Perception</subject><subject>Personality. Affectivity</subject><subject>Privilege</subject><subject>Psychological Tests</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Self Concept</subject><subject>Social psychology</subject><subject>Systems Theory</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0022-3514</issn><issn>1939-1315</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqN0ctKAzEUBuAgiq1V8AlkEEQ3oyf3yVKKl0LFja6HTCbBlLnUycyib2-KrQUX1WwC4eM_5PwInWO4xUDlnQYgVMrsAI2xoirFFPNDNI6vJKUcsxE6CWEBAIwTcoxGBHPJJKFjlLwMVe-db3Tl-1Xim2RWLytvfJ9MP1pv7Ck6croK9mxzT9D748Pb9Dmdvz7Npvfz1DBB-xRjZYHGQzJLFAHLOVNlxkvOM9ACF8Jxh8tCABQOmOKCQWkkFwpkQQpLJ-j6O3fZtZ-DDX1e-2BsVenGtkPIlWBEKErkfyTOhODwtwSIqYSrKG_2Shw3Gb9IpYj08hddtEMX97fOEyCxwnIfysR69ZHthpquDaGzLl92vtbdKo7L173m214jvdjkDUVtyx-4LTKCqw3QwejKdboxPuwcEyQDwukXum6jEg</recordid><startdate>20111101</startdate><enddate>20111101</enddate><creator>WOO YOUNG CHUN</creator><creator>SLEETH-KEPPLER, David</creator><creator>KRUGLANSKI, Arie W</creator><creator>FRIEDMAN, Ronald S</creator><general>American Psychological Association</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>WZK</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20111101</creationdate><title>Multifinality in Implicit Choice</title><author>WOO YOUNG CHUN ; SLEETH-KEPPLER, David ; KRUGLANSKI, Arie W ; FRIEDMAN, Ronald S</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c463t-119e0333328e2920e5549d85d5580a61b6f5f1db600bf0495640dc756907b2be3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Awareness - physiology</topic><topic>Behavioural psychology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Choice Behavior</topic><topic>Choice Behavior - physiology</topic><topic>Choices</topic><topic>Cognition</topic><topic>Cognition &amp; reasoning</topic><topic>Experimental psychology</topic><topic>Experiments</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Goals</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Implicit Learning</topic><topic>Isolation</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Motivation</topic><topic>Motivation - physiology</topic><topic>Objectives</topic><topic>Perception</topic><topic>Personality. Affectivity</topic><topic>Privilege</topic><topic>Psychological Tests</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Self Concept</topic><topic>Social psychology</topic><topic>Systems Theory</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>WOO YOUNG CHUN</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SLEETH-KEPPLER, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KRUGLANSKI, Arie W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FRIEDMAN, Ronald S</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>APA PsycArticles®</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of personality and social psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>WOO YOUNG CHUN</au><au>SLEETH-KEPPLER, David</au><au>KRUGLANSKI, Arie W</au><au>FRIEDMAN, Ronald S</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Multifinality in Implicit Choice</atitle><jtitle>Journal of personality and social psychology</jtitle><addtitle>J Pers Soc Psychol</addtitle><date>2011-11-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>101</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1124</spage><epage>1137</epage><pages>1124-1137</pages><issn>0022-3514</issn><eissn>1939-1315</eissn><coden>JPSPB2</coden><abstract>This research examines the possibility that people's choices in the service of an explicit focal goal may also reflect their tendency to fulfill implicit background goals and in that sense are multifinal. We carried out 5 experimental studies to investigate this notion. In Experiment 1, a primed implicit goal affected individuals' choices even when those avowedly served an explicit "focal" goal. Experiment 2 replicated this finding with a different type of implicit goals. Experiment 3 found that primed implicit goals had no effect on choices where the options that served them undermined the explicit goal. Experiment 4 found that a primed implicit goal served by a multifinal option does not privilege it over a unifinal option if that goal had been already attained by a different means. Finally, Experiment 5, via 3 types of control groups, showed that choices were affected by both the explicit and implicit goals in isolation, and they shifted toward multifinality when these goals were conjointly present. The discussion considers the integrative potential of the multifinality framework and its implications for a variety of phenomena in the domain of motivated cognition.</abstract><cop>Washington, DC</cop><pub>American Psychological Association</pub><pmid>21574723</pmid><doi>10.1037/a0023778</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-3514
ispartof Journal of personality and social psychology, 2011-11, Vol.101 (5), p.1124-1137
issn 0022-3514
1939-1315
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_964269327
source APA PsycARTICLES; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); MEDLINE; Sociological Abstracts
subjects Adult
Awareness - physiology
Behavioural psychology
Biological and medical sciences
Choice Behavior
Choice Behavior - physiology
Choices
Cognition
Cognition & reasoning
Experimental psychology
Experiments
Female
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Goals
Human
Humans
Implicit Learning
Isolation
Male
Motivation
Motivation - physiology
Objectives
Perception
Personality. Affectivity
Privilege
Psychological Tests
Psychology
Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry
Psychology. Psychophysiology
Self Concept
Social psychology
Systems Theory
Young Adult
title Multifinality in Implicit Choice
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-12T10%3A19%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Multifinality%20in%20Implicit%20Choice&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20personality%20and%20social%20psychology&rft.au=WOO%20YOUNG%20CHUN&rft.date=2011-11-01&rft.volume=101&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1124&rft.epage=1137&rft.pages=1124-1137&rft.issn=0022-3514&rft.eissn=1939-1315&rft.coden=JPSPB2&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/a0023778&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E867472719%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=867472719&rft_id=info:pmid/21574723&rfr_iscdi=true