Futility, Autonomy, and Cost in End-of-Life Care
This paper uses the controversy over the denial of care on futility grounds as a window into the broader issue of the role of cost in decisions about treatment near the end of life. The focus is on a topic that has not received the attention it deserves: the difference between refusing medical treat...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | The Journal of law, medicine & ethics medicine & ethics, 2011-06, Vol.39 (2), p.172-182 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 182 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 172 |
| container_title | The Journal of law, medicine & ethics |
| container_volume | 39 |
| creator | Baily, Mary Ann |
| description | This paper uses the controversy over the denial of care on futility grounds as a window into the broader issue of the role of cost in decisions about treatment near the end of life. The focus is on a topic that has not received the attention it deserves: the difference between refusing medical treatment and demanding it. The author discusses health care reform and the ethics of cost control, arguing that we cannot achieve universal access to quality care at affordable care without better public understanding of the moral legitimacy of taking cost into account in health care decisions, even decisions at the end of life. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1748-720X.2011.00586.x |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_964244013</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A257216926</galeid><sage_id>10.1111_j.1748-720X.2011.00586.x</sage_id><sourcerecordid>A257216926</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c7786-55d04b9dd0f863f8fb9111e23c1ef97de69dd09318a230ca01b00fa68619d21f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkt2O0zAQhSMEYn_gFVAkJBASCR67tpMLLkq2W0DZXSRA7J3lJnY3JY2XOBHt2zOhpVBUwToXHsXfGc-MTxCEQGLA9WoRgxwlkaTkOqYEICaEJyJe3QuOdwf3MSaSRQCEHwUn3i8IIUCZeBgcUeACONDjgJz3XVVX3fplOO4717glRropw8z5LqyacNKUkbNRXlkTZro1j4IHVtfePN7up8Hn88mn7G2UX03fZeM8KqRMRMR5SUaztCyJTQSziZ2lWLihrABjU1kaMZylDBJNGSk0gRkhVotEQFpSsOw0eL7Je9u6b73xnVpWvjB1rRvjeq9SMaKjEQH2XzIRgjNgEpB8-he5cH3bYBuKSkYSxhH7Tc11bVTVWNe1uhhyqjHlkoJIqUAqOkDNTWNaXbvG2Ap_7_HxAR6_0iyr4qDgxZ4Amc6surnuPfY0zf9VzJYtXF2buVH4MNnVPv_sD_7G6Lq78a5GK7jG74PJBixa531rrLptq6Vu1wqIGqyoFmpwnBocpwYrqp9WVCuUPtkOu58tTbkT_vIeAq83wHfsfH3nxOp9fjHBCPV8o_cae9y95B0K2w6r8jik3b26_aqEZJKrL5dT9fHy7M2H7PpCcfYD39kDGQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2730835137</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Futility, Autonomy, and Cost in End-of-Life Care</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><creator>Baily, Mary Ann</creator><creatorcontrib>Baily, Mary Ann</creatorcontrib><description>This paper uses the controversy over the denial of care on futility grounds as a window into the broader issue of the role of cost in decisions about treatment near the end of life. The focus is on a topic that has not received the attention it deserves: the difference between refusing medical treatment and demanding it. The author discusses health care reform and the ethics of cost control, arguing that we cannot achieve universal access to quality care at affordable care without better public understanding of the moral legitimacy of taking cost into account in health care decisions, even decisions at the end of life.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1073-1105</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1748-720X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1748-720X.2011.00586.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21561512</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Bioethics ; Care and treatment ; Cost ; Cost control ; Decision making ; Ethics ; Families & family life ; Family - psychology ; Government regulation ; Health care access ; Health Care Costs ; Health care industry ; Health Care Rationing ; Health technology assessment ; Hospice care ; Humans ; Law ; Laws, regulations and rules ; Litigation ; Medical care, Cost of ; Medical Futility - ethics ; Medical service ; Medical treatment ; Medicine ; Palliative care ; Personal Autonomy ; Physician patient relationships ; Professional Autonomy ; Responsibilities ; Right to refuse treatment ; Terminal care ; Terminal Care - economics ; Terminal Care - ethics ; Treatment Refusal ; United States ; Values</subject><ispartof>The Journal of law, medicine & ethics, 2011-06, Vol.39 (2), p.172-182</ispartof><rights>2011 American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics</rights><rights>2011 American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics, Inc.</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2011 Sage Publications, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © American Society of Law, Medicine and Ethics 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c7786-55d04b9dd0f863f8fb9111e23c1ef97de69dd09318a230ca01b00fa68619d21f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c7786-55d04b9dd0f863f8fb9111e23c1ef97de69dd09318a230ca01b00fa68619d21f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1748-720X.2011.00586.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1748-720X.2011.00586.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27842,27843,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21561512$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Baily, Mary Ann</creatorcontrib><title>Futility, Autonomy, and Cost in End-of-Life Care</title><title>The Journal of law, medicine & ethics</title><addtitle>J Law Med Ethics</addtitle><description>This paper uses the controversy over the denial of care on futility grounds as a window into the broader issue of the role of cost in decisions about treatment near the end of life. The focus is on a topic that has not received the attention it deserves: the difference between refusing medical treatment and demanding it. The author discusses health care reform and the ethics of cost control, arguing that we cannot achieve universal access to quality care at affordable care without better public understanding of the moral legitimacy of taking cost into account in health care decisions, even decisions at the end of life.</description><subject>Bioethics</subject><subject>Care and treatment</subject><subject>Cost</subject><subject>Cost control</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Ethics</subject><subject>Families & family life</subject><subject>Family - psychology</subject><subject>Government regulation</subject><subject>Health care access</subject><subject>Health Care Costs</subject><subject>Health care industry</subject><subject>Health Care Rationing</subject><subject>Health technology assessment</subject><subject>Hospice care</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Law</subject><subject>Laws, regulations and rules</subject><subject>Litigation</subject><subject>Medical care, Cost of</subject><subject>Medical Futility - ethics</subject><subject>Medical service</subject><subject>Medical treatment</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Palliative care</subject><subject>Personal Autonomy</subject><subject>Physician patient relationships</subject><subject>Professional Autonomy</subject><subject>Responsibilities</subject><subject>Right to refuse treatment</subject><subject>Terminal care</subject><subject>Terminal Care - economics</subject><subject>Terminal Care - ethics</subject><subject>Treatment Refusal</subject><subject>United States</subject><subject>Values</subject><issn>1073-1105</issn><issn>1748-720X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>AVQMV</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>K50</sourceid><sourceid>M1D</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkt2O0zAQhSMEYn_gFVAkJBASCR67tpMLLkq2W0DZXSRA7J3lJnY3JY2XOBHt2zOhpVBUwToXHsXfGc-MTxCEQGLA9WoRgxwlkaTkOqYEICaEJyJe3QuOdwf3MSaSRQCEHwUn3i8IIUCZeBgcUeACONDjgJz3XVVX3fplOO4717glRropw8z5LqyacNKUkbNRXlkTZro1j4IHVtfePN7up8Hn88mn7G2UX03fZeM8KqRMRMR5SUaztCyJTQSziZ2lWLihrABjU1kaMZylDBJNGSk0gRkhVotEQFpSsOw0eL7Je9u6b73xnVpWvjB1rRvjeq9SMaKjEQH2XzIRgjNgEpB8-he5cH3bYBuKSkYSxhH7Tc11bVTVWNe1uhhyqjHlkoJIqUAqOkDNTWNaXbvG2Ap_7_HxAR6_0iyr4qDgxZ4Amc6surnuPfY0zf9VzJYtXF2buVH4MNnVPv_sD_7G6Lq78a5GK7jG74PJBixa531rrLptq6Vu1wqIGqyoFmpwnBocpwYrqp9WVCuUPtkOu58tTbkT_vIeAq83wHfsfH3nxOp9fjHBCPV8o_cae9y95B0K2w6r8jik3b26_aqEZJKrL5dT9fHy7M2H7PpCcfYD39kDGQ</recordid><startdate>20110622</startdate><enddate>20110622</enddate><creator>Baily, Mary Ann</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications, Inc</general><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8GL</scope><scope>ILT</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AM</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>AABKS</scope><scope>ABSDQ</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AVQMV</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGRYB</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K50</scope><scope>K7.</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>M0O</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1D</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110622</creationdate><title>Futility, Autonomy, and Cost in End-of-Life Care</title><author>Baily, Mary Ann</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c7786-55d04b9dd0f863f8fb9111e23c1ef97de69dd09318a230ca01b00fa68619d21f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Bioethics</topic><topic>Care and treatment</topic><topic>Cost</topic><topic>Cost control</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Ethics</topic><topic>Families & family life</topic><topic>Family - psychology</topic><topic>Government regulation</topic><topic>Health care access</topic><topic>Health Care Costs</topic><topic>Health care industry</topic><topic>Health Care Rationing</topic><topic>Health technology assessment</topic><topic>Hospice care</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Law</topic><topic>Laws, regulations and rules</topic><topic>Litigation</topic><topic>Medical care, Cost of</topic><topic>Medical Futility - ethics</topic><topic>Medical service</topic><topic>Medical treatment</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Palliative care</topic><topic>Personal Autonomy</topic><topic>Physician patient relationships</topic><topic>Professional Autonomy</topic><topic>Responsibilities</topic><topic>Right to refuse treatment</topic><topic>Terminal care</topic><topic>Terminal Care - economics</topic><topic>Terminal Care - ethics</topic><topic>Treatment Refusal</topic><topic>United States</topic><topic>Values</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Baily, Mary Ann</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: High School</collection><collection>Gale OneFile: LegalTrac</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>Criminal Justice Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Philosophy Collection</collection><collection>Philosophy Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Arts Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Criminology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Art, Design & Architecture Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Arts & Humanities Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Journal of law, medicine & ethics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Baily, Mary Ann</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Futility, Autonomy, and Cost in End-of-Life Care</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of law, medicine & ethics</jtitle><addtitle>J Law Med Ethics</addtitle><date>2011-06-22</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>39</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>172</spage><epage>182</epage><pages>172-182</pages><issn>1073-1105</issn><eissn>1748-720X</eissn><abstract>This paper uses the controversy over the denial of care on futility grounds as a window into the broader issue of the role of cost in decisions about treatment near the end of life. The focus is on a topic that has not received the attention it deserves: the difference between refusing medical treatment and demanding it. The author discusses health care reform and the ethics of cost control, arguing that we cannot achieve universal access to quality care at affordable care without better public understanding of the moral legitimacy of taking cost into account in health care decisions, even decisions at the end of life.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>21561512</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1748-720X.2011.00586.x</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1073-1105 |
| ispartof | The Journal of law, medicine & ethics, 2011-06, Vol.39 (2), p.172-182 |
| issn | 1073-1105 1748-720X |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_964244013 |
| source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; PAIS Index; HeinOnline Law Journal Library |
| subjects | Bioethics Care and treatment Cost Cost control Decision making Ethics Families & family life Family - psychology Government regulation Health care access Health Care Costs Health care industry Health Care Rationing Health technology assessment Hospice care Humans Law Laws, regulations and rules Litigation Medical care, Cost of Medical Futility - ethics Medical service Medical treatment Medicine Palliative care Personal Autonomy Physician patient relationships Professional Autonomy Responsibilities Right to refuse treatment Terminal care Terminal Care - economics Terminal Care - ethics Treatment Refusal United States Values |
| title | Futility, Autonomy, and Cost in End-of-Life Care |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T15%3A20%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Futility,%20Autonomy,%20and%20Cost%20in%20End-of-Life%20Care&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20law,%20medicine%20&%20ethics&rft.au=Baily,%20Mary%20Ann&rft.date=2011-06-22&rft.volume=39&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=172&rft.epage=182&rft.pages=172-182&rft.issn=1073-1105&rft.eissn=1748-720X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1748-720X.2011.00586.x&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA257216926%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2730835137&rft_id=info:pmid/21561512&rft_galeid=A257216926&rft_sage_id=10.1111_j.1748-720X.2011.00586.x&rfr_iscdi=true |