How does network structure affect partnerships for promoting physical activity? Evidence from Brazil and Colombia
The objective of this study was to describe the network structure and factors associated with collaboration in two networks that promote physical activity (PA) in Brazil and Colombia. Organizations that focus on studying and promoting PA in Brazil (35) and Colombia (53) were identified using a modif...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Social science & medicine (1982) 2011-11, Vol.73 (9), p.1365-1370 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1370 |
---|---|
container_issue | 9 |
container_start_page | 1365 |
container_title | Social science & medicine (1982) |
container_volume | 73 |
creator | Parra, Diana C. Dauti, Marsela Harris, Jenine K. Reyes, Lissette Malta, Deborah C. Brownson, Ross C. Quintero, Mario A. Pratt, Michael |
description | The objective of this study was to describe the network structure and factors associated with collaboration in two networks that promote physical activity (PA) in Brazil and Colombia. Organizations that focus on studying and promoting PA in Brazil (35) and Colombia (53) were identified using a modified one-step reputational snowball sampling process. Participants completed an on-line survey between December 2008 and March 2009 for the Brazil network, and between April and June 2009 for the Colombia network. Network stochastic modeling was used to investigate the likelihood of reported inter-organizational collaboration. While structural features of networks were significant predictors of collaboration within each network, the coefficients and other network characteristics differed. Brazil’s PA network was decentralized with a larger number of shared partnerships. Colombia’s PA network was centralized and collaboration was influenced by perceived importance of peer organizations. On average, organizations in the PA network of Colombia reported facing more barriers (1.5 vs. 2.5 barriers) for collaboration. Future studies should focus on how these different network structures affect the implementation and uptake of evidence-based PA interventions.
► Increasing partnership formation between research and practice based organizations seems to be a priority for physical activity promotion in Brazil and Colombia. ► As geographical distance between organizations negatively affects collaboration, alternative methods of interaction should be explored. ► Network analysis can contribute to the understanding and development of more sustainable and efficient partnerships. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.08.020 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_964198089</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0277953611005272</els_id><sourcerecordid>964194888</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c556t-62753997eb1f6516f85b6d0fa652997d5963eea5731cc2502da8f144ad26bc693</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkktv1DAQgC0EosvCXwALCcElix_xIydUVoUiVeICZ8vxg3pJ4tROtlp-PY52CxIH2pMtz-fxeOYD4BVGG4wwf7_b5GiyCb2zG4Iw3iC5QQQ9AissBa0YrcVjsEJEiKphlJ-BZznvEEIYSfoUnBHc1KhsV-DmMt5CG12Gg5tuY_oJ85RmM83JQe29MxMcdZoGl_J1GDP0McExxT5OYfgBx-tDDkZ3UJsp7MN0-AAv9sG6wTjoCwU_Jv0rlPBg4TZ2sW-Dfg6eeN1l9-K0rsH3TxfftpfV1dfPX7bnV5VhjE8VJ4LRphGuxZ4zzL1kLbfIa85IObas4dQ5zQTFxhCGiNXS47rWlvDW8Iauwdtj3lLuzezypPqQjes6Pbg4Z9XwGjcSyQeStZTyfhJRzjES-AEkKjPieMn57r8krplkRODy0zV4_Q-6i3MaSheVbIRsSp9YgcQRMinmnJxXYwq9TgeFkVrkUTv1Rx61yKOQVEWecvPlKf3cLrG7e3e2FODNCdC5TN0nPZiQ_3I1J7Q0oHDnR86V-e6DS6q8tkhhQypGKRvDvcX8BjAq5e8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>897896515</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>How does network structure affect partnerships for promoting physical activity? Evidence from Brazil and Colombia</title><source>ScienceDirect</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Parra, Diana C. ; Dauti, Marsela ; Harris, Jenine K. ; Reyes, Lissette ; Malta, Deborah C. ; Brownson, Ross C. ; Quintero, Mario A. ; Pratt, Michael</creator><creatorcontrib>Parra, Diana C. ; Dauti, Marsela ; Harris, Jenine K. ; Reyes, Lissette ; Malta, Deborah C. ; Brownson, Ross C. ; Quintero, Mario A. ; Pratt, Michael</creatorcontrib><description>The objective of this study was to describe the network structure and factors associated with collaboration in two networks that promote physical activity (PA) in Brazil and Colombia. Organizations that focus on studying and promoting PA in Brazil (35) and Colombia (53) were identified using a modified one-step reputational snowball sampling process. Participants completed an on-line survey between December 2008 and March 2009 for the Brazil network, and between April and June 2009 for the Colombia network. Network stochastic modeling was used to investigate the likelihood of reported inter-organizational collaboration. While structural features of networks were significant predictors of collaboration within each network, the coefficients and other network characteristics differed. Brazil’s PA network was decentralized with a larger number of shared partnerships. Colombia’s PA network was centralized and collaboration was influenced by perceived importance of peer organizations. On average, organizations in the PA network of Colombia reported facing more barriers (1.5 vs. 2.5 barriers) for collaboration. Future studies should focus on how these different network structures affect the implementation and uptake of evidence-based PA interventions.
► Increasing partnership formation between research and practice based organizations seems to be a priority for physical activity promotion in Brazil and Colombia. ► As geographical distance between organizations negatively affects collaboration, alternative methods of interaction should be explored. ► Network analysis can contribute to the understanding and development of more sustainable and efficient partnerships.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0277-9536</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-5347</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.08.020</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21940083</identifier><identifier>CODEN: SSMDEP</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Brazil ; Collaboration ; Colombia ; Community Networks ; Constraints ; Cooperation ; Data Collection ; Evidence Based Practice ; Exercise ; GUIA ; Health Promotion ; Humans ; Internet ; Intervention ; Medical sciences ; Miscellaneous ; Network analysis ; Organizational Case Studies ; Partnerships ; Peer groups ; Peers ; Physical activity ; Physical Fitness ; Public health. Hygiene ; Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine ; Redcolaf ; Social networks ; Social theory</subject><ispartof>Social science & medicine (1982), 2011-11, Vol.73 (9), p.1365-1370</ispartof><rights>2011 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Pergamon Press Inc. Nov 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c556t-62753997eb1f6516f85b6d0fa652997d5963eea5731cc2502da8f144ad26bc693</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c556t-62753997eb1f6516f85b6d0fa652997d5963eea5731cc2502da8f144ad26bc693</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.08.020$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,33774,33775,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=24623366$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21940083$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Parra, Diana C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dauti, Marsela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harris, Jenine K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reyes, Lissette</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Malta, Deborah C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brownson, Ross C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Quintero, Mario A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pratt, Michael</creatorcontrib><title>How does network structure affect partnerships for promoting physical activity? Evidence from Brazil and Colombia</title><title>Social science & medicine (1982)</title><addtitle>Soc Sci Med</addtitle><description>The objective of this study was to describe the network structure and factors associated with collaboration in two networks that promote physical activity (PA) in Brazil and Colombia. Organizations that focus on studying and promoting PA in Brazil (35) and Colombia (53) were identified using a modified one-step reputational snowball sampling process. Participants completed an on-line survey between December 2008 and March 2009 for the Brazil network, and between April and June 2009 for the Colombia network. Network stochastic modeling was used to investigate the likelihood of reported inter-organizational collaboration. While structural features of networks were significant predictors of collaboration within each network, the coefficients and other network characteristics differed. Brazil’s PA network was decentralized with a larger number of shared partnerships. Colombia’s PA network was centralized and collaboration was influenced by perceived importance of peer organizations. On average, organizations in the PA network of Colombia reported facing more barriers (1.5 vs. 2.5 barriers) for collaboration. Future studies should focus on how these different network structures affect the implementation and uptake of evidence-based PA interventions.
► Increasing partnership formation between research and practice based organizations seems to be a priority for physical activity promotion in Brazil and Colombia. ► As geographical distance between organizations negatively affects collaboration, alternative methods of interaction should be explored. ► Network analysis can contribute to the understanding and development of more sustainable and efficient partnerships.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Brazil</subject><subject>Collaboration</subject><subject>Colombia</subject><subject>Community Networks</subject><subject>Constraints</subject><subject>Cooperation</subject><subject>Data Collection</subject><subject>Evidence Based Practice</subject><subject>Exercise</subject><subject>GUIA</subject><subject>Health Promotion</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Internet</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Miscellaneous</subject><subject>Network analysis</subject><subject>Organizational Case Studies</subject><subject>Partnerships</subject><subject>Peer groups</subject><subject>Peers</subject><subject>Physical activity</subject><subject>Physical Fitness</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</subject><subject>Redcolaf</subject><subject>Social networks</subject><subject>Social theory</subject><issn>0277-9536</issn><issn>1873-5347</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkktv1DAQgC0EosvCXwALCcElix_xIydUVoUiVeICZ8vxg3pJ4tROtlp-PY52CxIH2pMtz-fxeOYD4BVGG4wwf7_b5GiyCb2zG4Iw3iC5QQQ9AissBa0YrcVjsEJEiKphlJ-BZznvEEIYSfoUnBHc1KhsV-DmMt5CG12Gg5tuY_oJ85RmM83JQe29MxMcdZoGl_J1GDP0McExxT5OYfgBx-tDDkZ3UJsp7MN0-AAv9sG6wTjoCwU_Jv0rlPBg4TZ2sW-Dfg6eeN1l9-K0rsH3TxfftpfV1dfPX7bnV5VhjE8VJ4LRphGuxZ4zzL1kLbfIa85IObas4dQ5zQTFxhCGiNXS47rWlvDW8Iauwdtj3lLuzezypPqQjes6Pbg4Z9XwGjcSyQeStZTyfhJRzjES-AEkKjPieMn57r8krplkRODy0zV4_Q-6i3MaSheVbIRsSp9YgcQRMinmnJxXYwq9TgeFkVrkUTv1Rx61yKOQVEWecvPlKf3cLrG7e3e2FODNCdC5TN0nPZiQ_3I1J7Q0oHDnR86V-e6DS6q8tkhhQypGKRvDvcX8BjAq5e8</recordid><startdate>20111101</startdate><enddate>20111101</enddate><creator>Parra, Diana C.</creator><creator>Dauti, Marsela</creator><creator>Harris, Jenine K.</creator><creator>Reyes, Lissette</creator><creator>Malta, Deborah C.</creator><creator>Brownson, Ross C.</creator><creator>Quintero, Mario A.</creator><creator>Pratt, Michael</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><general>Pergamon Press Inc</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U3</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>WZK</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20111101</creationdate><title>How does network structure affect partnerships for promoting physical activity? Evidence from Brazil and Colombia</title><author>Parra, Diana C. ; Dauti, Marsela ; Harris, Jenine K. ; Reyes, Lissette ; Malta, Deborah C. ; Brownson, Ross C. ; Quintero, Mario A. ; Pratt, Michael</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c556t-62753997eb1f6516f85b6d0fa652997d5963eea5731cc2502da8f144ad26bc693</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Brazil</topic><topic>Collaboration</topic><topic>Colombia</topic><topic>Community Networks</topic><topic>Constraints</topic><topic>Cooperation</topic><topic>Data Collection</topic><topic>Evidence Based Practice</topic><topic>Exercise</topic><topic>GUIA</topic><topic>Health Promotion</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Internet</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Miscellaneous</topic><topic>Network analysis</topic><topic>Organizational Case Studies</topic><topic>Partnerships</topic><topic>Peer groups</topic><topic>Peers</topic><topic>Physical activity</topic><topic>Physical Fitness</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</topic><topic>Redcolaf</topic><topic>Social networks</topic><topic>Social theory</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Parra, Diana C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dauti, Marsela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harris, Jenine K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reyes, Lissette</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Malta, Deborah C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brownson, Ross C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Quintero, Mario A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pratt, Michael</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Social Services Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Social science & medicine (1982)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Parra, Diana C.</au><au>Dauti, Marsela</au><au>Harris, Jenine K.</au><au>Reyes, Lissette</au><au>Malta, Deborah C.</au><au>Brownson, Ross C.</au><au>Quintero, Mario A.</au><au>Pratt, Michael</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>How does network structure affect partnerships for promoting physical activity? Evidence from Brazil and Colombia</atitle><jtitle>Social science & medicine (1982)</jtitle><addtitle>Soc Sci Med</addtitle><date>2011-11-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>73</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>1365</spage><epage>1370</epage><pages>1365-1370</pages><issn>0277-9536</issn><eissn>1873-5347</eissn><coden>SSMDEP</coden><abstract>The objective of this study was to describe the network structure and factors associated with collaboration in two networks that promote physical activity (PA) in Brazil and Colombia. Organizations that focus on studying and promoting PA in Brazil (35) and Colombia (53) were identified using a modified one-step reputational snowball sampling process. Participants completed an on-line survey between December 2008 and March 2009 for the Brazil network, and between April and June 2009 for the Colombia network. Network stochastic modeling was used to investigate the likelihood of reported inter-organizational collaboration. While structural features of networks were significant predictors of collaboration within each network, the coefficients and other network characteristics differed. Brazil’s PA network was decentralized with a larger number of shared partnerships. Colombia’s PA network was centralized and collaboration was influenced by perceived importance of peer organizations. On average, organizations in the PA network of Colombia reported facing more barriers (1.5 vs. 2.5 barriers) for collaboration. Future studies should focus on how these different network structures affect the implementation and uptake of evidence-based PA interventions.
► Increasing partnership formation between research and practice based organizations seems to be a priority for physical activity promotion in Brazil and Colombia. ► As geographical distance between organizations negatively affects collaboration, alternative methods of interaction should be explored. ► Network analysis can contribute to the understanding and development of more sustainable and efficient partnerships.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>21940083</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.08.020</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0277-9536 |
ispartof | Social science & medicine (1982), 2011-11, Vol.73 (9), p.1365-1370 |
issn | 0277-9536 1873-5347 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_964198089 |
source | ScienceDirect; MEDLINE; Sociological Abstracts |
subjects | Biological and medical sciences Brazil Collaboration Colombia Community Networks Constraints Cooperation Data Collection Evidence Based Practice Exercise GUIA Health Promotion Humans Internet Intervention Medical sciences Miscellaneous Network analysis Organizational Case Studies Partnerships Peer groups Peers Physical activity Physical Fitness Public health. Hygiene Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine Redcolaf Social networks Social theory |
title | How does network structure affect partnerships for promoting physical activity? Evidence from Brazil and Colombia |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T19%3A47%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=How%20does%20network%20structure%20affect%20partnerships%20for%20promoting%20physical%20activity?%20Evidence%20from%20Brazil%20and%20Colombia&rft.jtitle=Social%20science%20&%20medicine%20(1982)&rft.au=Parra,%20Diana%20C.&rft.date=2011-11-01&rft.volume=73&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=1365&rft.epage=1370&rft.pages=1365-1370&rft.issn=0277-9536&rft.eissn=1873-5347&rft.coden=SSMDEP&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.08.020&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E964194888%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=897896515&rft_id=info:pmid/21940083&rft_els_id=S0277953611005272&rfr_iscdi=true |