Securitization and the liberalism of fear

This article seeks to extend securitization theory conceptually and, to a lesser degree, empirically by further developing the relationship between securitization and the politics of fear. Drawing on Shklar's notion of the liberalism of fear, it argues that instead of looking at the ways in whi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Security dialogue 2011-08, Vol.42 (4/5), p.453-463
1. Verfasser: Williams, Michael C.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 463
container_issue 4/5
container_start_page 453
container_title Security dialogue
container_volume 42
creator Williams, Michael C.
description This article seeks to extend securitization theory conceptually and, to a lesser degree, empirically by further developing the relationship between securitization and the politics of fear. Drawing on Shklar's notion of the liberalism of fear, it argues that instead of looking at the ways in which fear can facilitate processes of securitization and the extension of security logics throughout society, the liberalism of fear allows us to see how fear can operate in ways that can actually inhibit processes of securitization. This strategy might accurately be termed 'the securitization of securitization', and the liberalism of fear calls attention to how the fear of fear can in a specific sense be seen as a desecuritizing resource – a countervailing logic against processes of intensification within both 'normal' and 'security' politics.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/0967010611418717
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_964195203</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>26301801</jstor_id><sage_id>10.1177_0967010611418717</sage_id><sourcerecordid>26301801</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c401t-a512022d3533ececff7297db7f6e26dcf605b200910d4afa4fd11189a5c2d73a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkDtPwzAUhS0EEqWwsyBlA4bAvbZjxyOqeEmVGIA5cv2AVGlc7GSAX0-iIAaGMt3hfOfo6iPkFOEKUcprUEICgkDkWEqUe2SGXEDOBId9MhvjfMwPyVFKawAsAMWMXD4708e6q790V4c2063NuneXNfXKRd3UaZMFn3mn4zE58LpJ7uTnzsnr3e3L4iFfPt0_Lm6WueGAXa4LpECpZQVjzjjjvaRK2pX0wlFhjRdQrCiAQrBce829RcRS6cJQK5lmc3I-7W5j-Ohd6qpNnYxrGt260KdKCY6qoMAG8mIniRygpAKo-h9lXPHhKzGiMKEmhpSi89U21hsdPyuEalRd_VU9VPKpkvSbq9ahj-1gaBd_NvHr1IX4u08FAywB2Te7JISv</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1349420069</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Securitization and the liberalism of fear</title><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Williams, Michael C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Williams, Michael C.</creatorcontrib><description>This article seeks to extend securitization theory conceptually and, to a lesser degree, empirically by further developing the relationship between securitization and the politics of fear. Drawing on Shklar's notion of the liberalism of fear, it argues that instead of looking at the ways in which fear can facilitate processes of securitization and the extension of security logics throughout society, the liberalism of fear allows us to see how fear can operate in ways that can actually inhibit processes of securitization. This strategy might accurately be termed 'the securitization of securitization', and the liberalism of fear calls attention to how the fear of fear can in a specific sense be seen as a desecuritizing resource – a countervailing logic against processes of intensification within both 'normal' and 'security' politics.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0967-0106</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1460-3640</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0967010611418717</identifier><identifier>CODEN: SDIAER</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications Ltd</publisher><subject>Amplification ; Conceptualization ; Critical theory ; Cruelty ; Desecuritization ; Emergency regimes ; Empirical analysis ; Fear ; Liberalism ; Logic ; Normal ; Political anxiety ; Political attitudes ; Political debate ; Political philosophy ; Political pluralism ; Political security ; Politics ; Research strategies ; School security ; Securitization ; Security ; Shklar, Judith N ; Social control ; Strategy</subject><ispartof>Security dialogue, 2011-08, Vol.42 (4/5), p.453-463</ispartof><rights>Peace Research Institute Oslo 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c401t-a512022d3533ececff7297db7f6e26dcf605b200910d4afa4fd11189a5c2d73a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c401t-a512022d3533ececff7297db7f6e26dcf605b200910d4afa4fd11189a5c2d73a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26301801$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/26301801$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,21819,27924,27925,43621,43622,58017,58250</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Williams, Michael C.</creatorcontrib><title>Securitization and the liberalism of fear</title><title>Security dialogue</title><description>This article seeks to extend securitization theory conceptually and, to a lesser degree, empirically by further developing the relationship between securitization and the politics of fear. Drawing on Shklar's notion of the liberalism of fear, it argues that instead of looking at the ways in which fear can facilitate processes of securitization and the extension of security logics throughout society, the liberalism of fear allows us to see how fear can operate in ways that can actually inhibit processes of securitization. This strategy might accurately be termed 'the securitization of securitization', and the liberalism of fear calls attention to how the fear of fear can in a specific sense be seen as a desecuritizing resource – a countervailing logic against processes of intensification within both 'normal' and 'security' politics.</description><subject>Amplification</subject><subject>Conceptualization</subject><subject>Critical theory</subject><subject>Cruelty</subject><subject>Desecuritization</subject><subject>Emergency regimes</subject><subject>Empirical analysis</subject><subject>Fear</subject><subject>Liberalism</subject><subject>Logic</subject><subject>Normal</subject><subject>Political anxiety</subject><subject>Political attitudes</subject><subject>Political debate</subject><subject>Political philosophy</subject><subject>Political pluralism</subject><subject>Political security</subject><subject>Politics</subject><subject>Research strategies</subject><subject>School security</subject><subject>Securitization</subject><subject>Security</subject><subject>Shklar, Judith N</subject><subject>Social control</subject><subject>Strategy</subject><issn>0967-0106</issn><issn>1460-3640</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkDtPwzAUhS0EEqWwsyBlA4bAvbZjxyOqeEmVGIA5cv2AVGlc7GSAX0-iIAaGMt3hfOfo6iPkFOEKUcprUEICgkDkWEqUe2SGXEDOBId9MhvjfMwPyVFKawAsAMWMXD4708e6q790V4c2063NuneXNfXKRd3UaZMFn3mn4zE58LpJ7uTnzsnr3e3L4iFfPt0_Lm6WueGAXa4LpECpZQVjzjjjvaRK2pX0wlFhjRdQrCiAQrBce829RcRS6cJQK5lmc3I-7W5j-Ohd6qpNnYxrGt260KdKCY6qoMAG8mIniRygpAKo-h9lXPHhKzGiMKEmhpSi89U21hsdPyuEalRd_VU9VPKpkvSbq9ahj-1gaBd_NvHr1IX4u08FAywB2Te7JISv</recordid><startdate>20110801</startdate><enddate>20110801</enddate><creator>Williams, Michael C.</creator><general>SAGE Publications Ltd</general><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>7UB</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110801</creationdate><title>Securitization and the liberalism of fear</title><author>Williams, Michael C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c401t-a512022d3533ececff7297db7f6e26dcf605b200910d4afa4fd11189a5c2d73a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Amplification</topic><topic>Conceptualization</topic><topic>Critical theory</topic><topic>Cruelty</topic><topic>Desecuritization</topic><topic>Emergency regimes</topic><topic>Empirical analysis</topic><topic>Fear</topic><topic>Liberalism</topic><topic>Logic</topic><topic>Normal</topic><topic>Political anxiety</topic><topic>Political attitudes</topic><topic>Political debate</topic><topic>Political philosophy</topic><topic>Political pluralism</topic><topic>Political security</topic><topic>Politics</topic><topic>Research strategies</topic><topic>School security</topic><topic>Securitization</topic><topic>Security</topic><topic>Shklar, Judith N</topic><topic>Social control</topic><topic>Strategy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Williams, Michael C.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Security dialogue</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Williams, Michael C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Securitization and the liberalism of fear</atitle><jtitle>Security dialogue</jtitle><date>2011-08-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>42</volume><issue>4/5</issue><spage>453</spage><epage>463</epage><pages>453-463</pages><issn>0967-0106</issn><eissn>1460-3640</eissn><coden>SDIAER</coden><abstract>This article seeks to extend securitization theory conceptually and, to a lesser degree, empirically by further developing the relationship between securitization and the politics of fear. Drawing on Shklar's notion of the liberalism of fear, it argues that instead of looking at the ways in which fear can facilitate processes of securitization and the extension of security logics throughout society, the liberalism of fear allows us to see how fear can operate in ways that can actually inhibit processes of securitization. This strategy might accurately be termed 'the securitization of securitization', and the liberalism of fear calls attention to how the fear of fear can in a specific sense be seen as a desecuritizing resource – a countervailing logic against processes of intensification within both 'normal' and 'security' politics.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications Ltd</pub><doi>10.1177/0967010611418717</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0967-0106
ispartof Security dialogue, 2011-08, Vol.42 (4/5), p.453-463
issn 0967-0106
1460-3640
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_964195203
source Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; SAGE Complete A-Z List; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Amplification
Conceptualization
Critical theory
Cruelty
Desecuritization
Emergency regimes
Empirical analysis
Fear
Liberalism
Logic
Normal
Political anxiety
Political attitudes
Political debate
Political philosophy
Political pluralism
Political security
Politics
Research strategies
School security
Securitization
Security
Shklar, Judith N
Social control
Strategy
title Securitization and the liberalism of fear
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T09%3A40%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Securitization%20and%20the%20liberalism%20of%20fear&rft.jtitle=Security%20dialogue&rft.au=Williams,%20Michael%20C.&rft.date=2011-08-01&rft.volume=42&rft.issue=4/5&rft.spage=453&rft.epage=463&rft.pages=453-463&rft.issn=0967-0106&rft.eissn=1460-3640&rft.coden=SDIAER&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0967010611418717&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E26301801%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1349420069&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=26301801&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0967010611418717&rfr_iscdi=true