Toward a New Literary History
The past twenty years witnessed a dramatic transformation in Arabic literature studies in the United States. In the early 1990s, the field was still almost exclusively a satellite of area studies and largely bound by Orientalist historical and epistemological paradigms. Graduate students—even those...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of Middle East studies 2011-11, Vol.43 (4), p.734-736 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 736 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 734 |
container_title | International journal of Middle East studies |
container_volume | 43 |
creator | Selim, Samah |
description | The past twenty years witnessed a dramatic transformation in Arabic literature studies in the United States. In the early 1990s, the field was still almost exclusively a satellite of area studies and largely bound by Orientalist historical and epistemological paradigms. Graduate students—even those wishing to focus entirely on modern literature—were trained to competence in the entire span of the Arabic literary tradition starting with pre-Islamic times, and secondary research languages were still rooted in the philological tradition of classical scholarship. The standard requirement was German, with Spanish as a distant second for those interested in Andalusia, but rarely French, say, or Italian or Russian. Other Middle Eastern languages were mainly conceived as primary-text languages rather than research languages. Philology, traditional literary history, and New Criticism formed the methodological boundaries of research. “Theory”—even when it purported to speak of the world outside Europe—was something that was generated by departments of English and comparative literature on the other side of campus, and crossings were rare and complicated in both the disciplinary and the institutional sense. Of course, one branch of “theory”—postcolonial studies—made its way into area studies much faster than the more eclectic offshoots of continental philosophy, for obvious reasons. From nationalism studies to subaltern studies, from Benedict Anderson to Gayatri Spivak, the wave of postcolonial critical theory that swept through U.S. academia in the 1980s and 1990s sparked an uprising in area studies at large and particularly in the literature disciplines. One of the first casualties of this uprising was the old historical paradigm itself: narratives of rise and fall, golden ages, and ages of decadence. Slowly but surely, scholars began to question the entire epistemological edifice through which Arabic literary history had been constructed by Orientalism. It was through the postcolonial theory of the 1980s that Arabic literature came to a broader rapprochement with poststructuralism: Foucault, Derrida, Ricoeur, Jameson, and White, to name a few of the major thinkers who began to transform the field in the late 1990s. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1017/S0020743811000973 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_964194763</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S0020743811000973</cupid><jstor_id>41308754</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>41308754</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c403t-6de16ccf95a559b8d2bb82beedbdba143bf737e45adc0252188b0bb34b2ad1fa3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtLAzEUhYMoWKs_wEVhcKOb0XvzmCRLKb6g6MK6HpJJRqa0nZpMKf33ZmhRUHSVxfnOd8kh5BzhGgHlzSsABcmZQgQALdkBGSCXmBdMwSEZ9HHe58fkJMZZzwiqBmQ0bTcmuMxkz36TTZrOBxO22WMTuzZsT8lRbebRn-3fIXm7v5uOH_PJy8PT-HaSVxxYlxfOY1FVtRZGCG2Vo9Yqar131lmDnNlaMum5MK4CKigqZcFaxi01DmvDhuRy512F9mPtY1cumlj5-dwsfbuOpS44ai4Llsirf0kEppTWmvboxQ901q7DMv2j1ECl4FrzBOEOqkIbY_B1uQrNIk2QTGW_bPlr2dQZ7TqzfqSvAkcGKmlTzvZOs7Chce_--_Lf1k_-tYG5</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>902754994</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Toward a New Literary History</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Cambridge Journals</source><creator>Selim, Samah</creator><creatorcontrib>Selim, Samah</creatorcontrib><description>The past twenty years witnessed a dramatic transformation in Arabic literature studies in the United States. In the early 1990s, the field was still almost exclusively a satellite of area studies and largely bound by Orientalist historical and epistemological paradigms. Graduate students—even those wishing to focus entirely on modern literature—were trained to competence in the entire span of the Arabic literary tradition starting with pre-Islamic times, and secondary research languages were still rooted in the philological tradition of classical scholarship. The standard requirement was German, with Spanish as a distant second for those interested in Andalusia, but rarely French, say, or Italian or Russian. Other Middle Eastern languages were mainly conceived as primary-text languages rather than research languages. Philology, traditional literary history, and New Criticism formed the methodological boundaries of research. “Theory”—even when it purported to speak of the world outside Europe—was something that was generated by departments of English and comparative literature on the other side of campus, and crossings were rare and complicated in both the disciplinary and the institutional sense. Of course, one branch of “theory”—postcolonial studies—made its way into area studies much faster than the more eclectic offshoots of continental philosophy, for obvious reasons. From nationalism studies to subaltern studies, from Benedict Anderson to Gayatri Spivak, the wave of postcolonial critical theory that swept through U.S. academia in the 1980s and 1990s sparked an uprising in area studies at large and particularly in the literature disciplines. One of the first casualties of this uprising was the old historical paradigm itself: narratives of rise and fall, golden ages, and ages of decadence. Slowly but surely, scholars began to question the entire epistemological edifice through which Arabic literary history had been constructed by Orientalism. It was through the postcolonial theory of the 1980s that Arabic literature came to a broader rapprochement with poststructuralism: Foucault, Derrida, Ricoeur, Jameson, and White, to name a few of the major thinkers who began to transform the field in the late 1990s.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0020-7438</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1471-6380</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S0020743811000973</identifier><identifier>CODEN: IJMECN</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, USA: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Arab people ; Arabic language ; Arabic literature ; Area Studies ; Boundaries ; College students ; Comparative literature ; Critical theory ; Criticism ; Cultural instruction ; Deconstruction ; English language ; Epistemology ; Ethnographic studies ; Europe ; French language ; German language ; Graduate students ; Historical text analysis ; History ; Islam ; Italy ; Languages ; Literary criticism ; Literary genres ; Literary history ; Literature ; Modern literature ; Narratives ; Nationalism ; Orientalism ; Philology ; Philosophy ; Post structuralist linguistics ; Postcolonial literature ; Postcolonialism ; Rapprochement ; Russian language ; Scholarship ; Spanish language ; Textual criticism ; Theory and Arabic Literature in the United States ; World literature</subject><ispartof>International journal of Middle East studies, 2011-11, Vol.43 (4), p.734-736</ispartof><rights>Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011</rights><rights>Cambridge University Press 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c403t-6de16ccf95a559b8d2bb82beedbdba143bf737e45adc0252188b0bb34b2ad1fa3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c403t-6de16ccf95a559b8d2bb82beedbdba143bf737e45adc0252188b0bb34b2ad1fa3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/41308754$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0020743811000973/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,314,776,780,799,12824,27901,27902,55603,57992,58225</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Selim, Samah</creatorcontrib><title>Toward a New Literary History</title><title>International journal of Middle East studies</title><description>The past twenty years witnessed a dramatic transformation in Arabic literature studies in the United States. In the early 1990s, the field was still almost exclusively a satellite of area studies and largely bound by Orientalist historical and epistemological paradigms. Graduate students—even those wishing to focus entirely on modern literature—were trained to competence in the entire span of the Arabic literary tradition starting with pre-Islamic times, and secondary research languages were still rooted in the philological tradition of classical scholarship. The standard requirement was German, with Spanish as a distant second for those interested in Andalusia, but rarely French, say, or Italian or Russian. Other Middle Eastern languages were mainly conceived as primary-text languages rather than research languages. Philology, traditional literary history, and New Criticism formed the methodological boundaries of research. “Theory”—even when it purported to speak of the world outside Europe—was something that was generated by departments of English and comparative literature on the other side of campus, and crossings were rare and complicated in both the disciplinary and the institutional sense. Of course, one branch of “theory”—postcolonial studies—made its way into area studies much faster than the more eclectic offshoots of continental philosophy, for obvious reasons. From nationalism studies to subaltern studies, from Benedict Anderson to Gayatri Spivak, the wave of postcolonial critical theory that swept through U.S. academia in the 1980s and 1990s sparked an uprising in area studies at large and particularly in the literature disciplines. One of the first casualties of this uprising was the old historical paradigm itself: narratives of rise and fall, golden ages, and ages of decadence. Slowly but surely, scholars began to question the entire epistemological edifice through which Arabic literary history had been constructed by Orientalism. It was through the postcolonial theory of the 1980s that Arabic literature came to a broader rapprochement with poststructuralism: Foucault, Derrida, Ricoeur, Jameson, and White, to name a few of the major thinkers who began to transform the field in the late 1990s.</description><subject>Arab people</subject><subject>Arabic language</subject><subject>Arabic literature</subject><subject>Area Studies</subject><subject>Boundaries</subject><subject>College students</subject><subject>Comparative literature</subject><subject>Critical theory</subject><subject>Criticism</subject><subject>Cultural instruction</subject><subject>Deconstruction</subject><subject>English language</subject><subject>Epistemology</subject><subject>Ethnographic studies</subject><subject>Europe</subject><subject>French language</subject><subject>German language</subject><subject>Graduate students</subject><subject>Historical text analysis</subject><subject>History</subject><subject>Islam</subject><subject>Italy</subject><subject>Languages</subject><subject>Literary criticism</subject><subject>Literary genres</subject><subject>Literary history</subject><subject>Literature</subject><subject>Modern literature</subject><subject>Narratives</subject><subject>Nationalism</subject><subject>Orientalism</subject><subject>Philology</subject><subject>Philosophy</subject><subject>Post structuralist linguistics</subject><subject>Postcolonial literature</subject><subject>Postcolonialism</subject><subject>Rapprochement</subject><subject>Russian language</subject><subject>Scholarship</subject><subject>Spanish language</subject><subject>Textual criticism</subject><subject>Theory and Arabic Literature in the United States</subject><subject>World literature</subject><issn>0020-7438</issn><issn>1471-6380</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>AVQMV</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>K50</sourceid><sourceid>M1D</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kEtLAzEUhYMoWKs_wEVhcKOb0XvzmCRLKb6g6MK6HpJJRqa0nZpMKf33ZmhRUHSVxfnOd8kh5BzhGgHlzSsABcmZQgQALdkBGSCXmBdMwSEZ9HHe58fkJMZZzwiqBmQ0bTcmuMxkz36TTZrOBxO22WMTuzZsT8lRbebRn-3fIXm7v5uOH_PJy8PT-HaSVxxYlxfOY1FVtRZGCG2Vo9Yqar131lmDnNlaMum5MK4CKigqZcFaxi01DmvDhuRy512F9mPtY1cumlj5-dwsfbuOpS44ai4Llsirf0kEppTWmvboxQ901q7DMv2j1ECl4FrzBOEOqkIbY_B1uQrNIk2QTGW_bPlr2dQZ7TqzfqSvAkcGKmlTzvZOs7Chce_--_Lf1k_-tYG5</recordid><startdate>20111101</startdate><enddate>20111101</enddate><creator>Selim, Samah</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88F</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AIMQZ</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AVQMV</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>GB0</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K50</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>LIQON</scope><scope>M1D</scope><scope>M1Q</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20111101</creationdate><title>Toward a New Literary History</title><author>Selim, Samah</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c403t-6de16ccf95a559b8d2bb82beedbdba143bf737e45adc0252188b0bb34b2ad1fa3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Arab people</topic><topic>Arabic language</topic><topic>Arabic literature</topic><topic>Area Studies</topic><topic>Boundaries</topic><topic>College students</topic><topic>Comparative literature</topic><topic>Critical theory</topic><topic>Criticism</topic><topic>Cultural instruction</topic><topic>Deconstruction</topic><topic>English language</topic><topic>Epistemology</topic><topic>Ethnographic studies</topic><topic>Europe</topic><topic>French language</topic><topic>German language</topic><topic>Graduate students</topic><topic>Historical text analysis</topic><topic>History</topic><topic>Islam</topic><topic>Italy</topic><topic>Languages</topic><topic>Literary criticism</topic><topic>Literary genres</topic><topic>Literary history</topic><topic>Literature</topic><topic>Modern literature</topic><topic>Narratives</topic><topic>Nationalism</topic><topic>Orientalism</topic><topic>Philology</topic><topic>Philosophy</topic><topic>Post structuralist linguistics</topic><topic>Postcolonial literature</topic><topic>Postcolonialism</topic><topic>Rapprochement</topic><topic>Russian language</topic><topic>Scholarship</topic><topic>Spanish language</topic><topic>Textual criticism</topic><topic>Theory and Arabic Literature in the United States</topic><topic>World literature</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Selim, Samah</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Military Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Arts Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>DELNET Social Sciences & Humanities Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Art, Design & Architecture Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature - U.S. Customers Only</collection><collection>Arts & Humanities Database</collection><collection>Military Database</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>International journal of Middle East studies</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Selim, Samah</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Toward a New Literary History</atitle><jtitle>International journal of Middle East studies</jtitle><date>2011-11-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>43</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>734</spage><epage>736</epage><pages>734-736</pages><issn>0020-7438</issn><eissn>1471-6380</eissn><coden>IJMECN</coden><abstract>The past twenty years witnessed a dramatic transformation in Arabic literature studies in the United States. In the early 1990s, the field was still almost exclusively a satellite of area studies and largely bound by Orientalist historical and epistemological paradigms. Graduate students—even those wishing to focus entirely on modern literature—were trained to competence in the entire span of the Arabic literary tradition starting with pre-Islamic times, and secondary research languages were still rooted in the philological tradition of classical scholarship. The standard requirement was German, with Spanish as a distant second for those interested in Andalusia, but rarely French, say, or Italian or Russian. Other Middle Eastern languages were mainly conceived as primary-text languages rather than research languages. Philology, traditional literary history, and New Criticism formed the methodological boundaries of research. “Theory”—even when it purported to speak of the world outside Europe—was something that was generated by departments of English and comparative literature on the other side of campus, and crossings were rare and complicated in both the disciplinary and the institutional sense. Of course, one branch of “theory”—postcolonial studies—made its way into area studies much faster than the more eclectic offshoots of continental philosophy, for obvious reasons. From nationalism studies to subaltern studies, from Benedict Anderson to Gayatri Spivak, the wave of postcolonial critical theory that swept through U.S. academia in the 1980s and 1990s sparked an uprising in area studies at large and particularly in the literature disciplines. One of the first casualties of this uprising was the old historical paradigm itself: narratives of rise and fall, golden ages, and ages of decadence. Slowly but surely, scholars began to question the entire epistemological edifice through which Arabic literary history had been constructed by Orientalism. It was through the postcolonial theory of the 1980s that Arabic literature came to a broader rapprochement with poststructuralism: Foucault, Derrida, Ricoeur, Jameson, and White, to name a few of the major thinkers who began to transform the field in the late 1990s.</abstract><cop>New York, USA</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S0020743811000973</doi><tpages>3</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0020-7438 |
ispartof | International journal of Middle East studies, 2011-11, Vol.43 (4), p.734-736 |
issn | 0020-7438 1471-6380 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_964194763 |
source | Jstor Complete Legacy; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Cambridge Journals |
subjects | Arab people Arabic language Arabic literature Area Studies Boundaries College students Comparative literature Critical theory Criticism Cultural instruction Deconstruction English language Epistemology Ethnographic studies Europe French language German language Graduate students Historical text analysis History Islam Italy Languages Literary criticism Literary genres Literary history Literature Modern literature Narratives Nationalism Orientalism Philology Philosophy Post structuralist linguistics Postcolonial literature Postcolonialism Rapprochement Russian language Scholarship Spanish language Textual criticism Theory and Arabic Literature in the United States World literature |
title | Toward a New Literary History |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T04%3A25%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Toward%20a%20New%20Literary%20History&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20Middle%20East%20studies&rft.au=Selim,%20Samah&rft.date=2011-11-01&rft.volume=43&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=734&rft.epage=736&rft.pages=734-736&rft.issn=0020-7438&rft.eissn=1471-6380&rft.coden=IJMECN&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S0020743811000973&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E41308754%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=902754994&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_S0020743811000973&rft_jstor_id=41308754&rfr_iscdi=true |