Staff interactive style during multisensory storytelling with persons with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities

Background  Multisensory storytelling (MSST) is an individualised activity for people with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities (PIMD) in which a story is being told with an emphasis on sensory experiences and social interaction. MSST is a promising approach, but needs more empirical rese...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of intellectual disability research 2012-02, Vol.56 (2), p.167-178
Hauptverfasser: Penne, A., ten Brug, A., Munde, V., van der Putten, A., Vlaskamp, C., Maes, B.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 178
container_issue 2
container_start_page 167
container_title Journal of intellectual disability research
container_volume 56
creator Penne, A.
ten Brug, A.
Munde, V.
van der Putten, A.
Vlaskamp, C.
Maes, B.
description Background  Multisensory storytelling (MSST) is an individualised activity for people with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities (PIMD) in which a story is being told with an emphasis on sensory experiences and social interaction. MSST is a promising approach, but needs more empirical research evidence. In general, there is a lack of research about staff interaction during specific activities with people with PIMD. In the present study, we explored the possibility to describe staff interactive style during MSST making use of a global coding instrument. Methods  Twenty dyads of a person with PIMD and a professional caregiver participated in an observation study. The caregivers received training in MSST and told a multisensory story to their client once a week, for a period of 10 weeks. The first, fifth and last session were recorded on video. Staff interactive style was coded using an adapted version of the Maternal Behavior Rating Scale, with a consensus rating procedure. Results  Professional caregivers scored moderately on the Maternal Behavior Rating Scale. Repeated measures analyses showed no change in time. We did not find a relationship between staff interactive style and client or staff characteristics. Conclusions  The Maternal Behavior Rating Scale contributes to our understanding of staff interactive style during activities with people with PIMD. Specifically for MSST, the moderate scores on the interactive style dimensions were unexpected, because the individualised MSST activity created an optimal situation for high‐quality interaction with people with PIMD. Because the interactive style did not improve through the repetition of the activity either, these results might point to a need for staff training in achieving high‐quality interaction during activities like MSST.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2011.01448.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_964180796</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ954111</ericid><sourcerecordid>1010709349</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c6158-8b0f56216de892be09c625016b4f4951864fd0fcd04b4e7eeb14c40899715b8a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkl1v0zAYhSMEYt3gHyAUIaFxk_La8efFLmAaZdM0JCji0nIcB1zcpNgJa_n1OG0pEhdsuXASn-ccvbJPluUIpig9rxdTVDJaYC7EFANCU0CEiOn6QTY5CA-zCUhGCszK8ig7jnEBAAwR9jg7woinbcwn2a9PvW6a3LW9Ddr07qfNY7_xNq-H4Nqv-XLwvYu2jV3YJCWtvfV-VG5d_y1f2RC7Nu5_Qtd0Q1tv07y3ph-0z3Xa2KasxlQXdeW8652NT7JHjfbRPt2_T7LP7y7m5--L6w-zy_M314VhiIpCVNBQhhGrrZC4siANwxQQq0hDJEWCkaaGxtRAKmK5tRUihoCQkiNaCV2eZKe73DTfj8HGXi1dNGlA3dpuiCodEhLAJbubRJxyURKUyFf_JZEoMSYItqF3oICAgyyJvAcKgBlQIAl98Q-66IbQpnNUEqOyTDeNEyR2kAldjME2ahXcUodNSlJjkdRCjX1RY1_UWCS1LZJaJ-vzff5QLW19MP5pTgJe7gEdjfZN0K1x8S9HCUMSaOKe7TgbnDnIF1eSkjRAks928q3zdnPv-dTV5cfxK_mLnd_F3q4Pfh2-K8ZLTtWXm5maz-czesPfqln5G5zB_FM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>921330612</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Staff interactive style during multisensory storytelling with persons with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Journals</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>EBSCOhost Education Source</source><creator>Penne, A. ; ten Brug, A. ; Munde, V. ; van der Putten, A. ; Vlaskamp, C. ; Maes, B.</creator><creatorcontrib>Penne, A. ; ten Brug, A. ; Munde, V. ; van der Putten, A. ; Vlaskamp, C. ; Maes, B.</creatorcontrib><description>Background  Multisensory storytelling (MSST) is an individualised activity for people with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities (PIMD) in which a story is being told with an emphasis on sensory experiences and social interaction. MSST is a promising approach, but needs more empirical research evidence. In general, there is a lack of research about staff interaction during specific activities with people with PIMD. In the present study, we explored the possibility to describe staff interactive style during MSST making use of a global coding instrument. Methods  Twenty dyads of a person with PIMD and a professional caregiver participated in an observation study. The caregivers received training in MSST and told a multisensory story to their client once a week, for a period of 10 weeks. The first, fifth and last session were recorded on video. Staff interactive style was coded using an adapted version of the Maternal Behavior Rating Scale, with a consensus rating procedure. Results  Professional caregivers scored moderately on the Maternal Behavior Rating Scale. Repeated measures analyses showed no change in time. We did not find a relationship between staff interactive style and client or staff characteristics. Conclusions  The Maternal Behavior Rating Scale contributes to our understanding of staff interactive style during activities with people with PIMD. Specifically for MSST, the moderate scores on the interactive style dimensions were unexpected, because the individualised MSST activity created an optimal situation for high‐quality interaction with people with PIMD. Because the interactive style did not improve through the repetition of the activity either, these results might point to a need for staff training in achieving high‐quality interaction during activities like MSST.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0964-2633</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2788</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2011.01448.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21726327</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JIDREN</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>activities ; Adolescent ; Adult ; Adult and adolescent clinical studies ; Analysis of Variance ; Behavior ; Behavior Rating Scales ; Behavior Therapy ; Biological and medical sciences ; Career Development ; Caregivers ; Carers ; Child ; Child, Preschool ; Coding ; Communication ; Developmental disabilities ; Evaluation Methods ; Evidence ; Humans ; Intellectual deficiency ; Intellectual Disability - complications ; Intellectual Disability - nursing ; Intellectual Disability - psychology ; Intellectual Disability - rehabilitation ; Interaction ; Interpersonal Relationship ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Mentally Disabled Persons - psychology ; Mentally Disabled Persons - rehabilitation ; Middle Aged ; Mothers ; Motor Skills Disorders - complications ; Motor Skills Disorders - nursing ; Motor Skills Disorders - psychology ; Motor Skills Disorders - rehabilitation ; Multiple Disabilities ; Multiply disabled people ; multisensory storytelling ; Narration ; Outcome Assessment (Health Care) ; Professional-Patient Relations ; profound intellectual and multiple disabilities ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychopathology. Psychiatry ; Rating Scales ; Repetition ; Sensory Experience ; Severity of Illness Index ; Social interaction ; staff behaviour ; staff interactive style ; Story Telling ; Storytelling ; Training ; Video Technology ; Videotapes ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Journal of intellectual disability research, 2012-02, Vol.56 (2), p.167-178</ispartof><rights>2011 The Authors. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research © 2011 Blackwell Publishing Ltd</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>2011 The Authors. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research © 2011 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright Blackwell Publishing Ltd. Feb 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c6158-8b0f56216de892be09c625016b4f4951864fd0fcd04b4e7eeb14c40899715b8a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c6158-8b0f56216de892be09c625016b4f4951864fd0fcd04b4e7eeb14c40899715b8a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1365-2788.2011.01448.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1365-2788.2011.01448.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,30999,31000,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ954111$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=25461905$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21726327$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Penne, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ten Brug, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Munde, V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van der Putten, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vlaskamp, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maes, B.</creatorcontrib><title>Staff interactive style during multisensory storytelling with persons with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities</title><title>Journal of intellectual disability research</title><addtitle>J Intellect Disabil Res</addtitle><description>Background  Multisensory storytelling (MSST) is an individualised activity for people with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities (PIMD) in which a story is being told with an emphasis on sensory experiences and social interaction. MSST is a promising approach, but needs more empirical research evidence. In general, there is a lack of research about staff interaction during specific activities with people with PIMD. In the present study, we explored the possibility to describe staff interactive style during MSST making use of a global coding instrument. Methods  Twenty dyads of a person with PIMD and a professional caregiver participated in an observation study. The caregivers received training in MSST and told a multisensory story to their client once a week, for a period of 10 weeks. The first, fifth and last session were recorded on video. Staff interactive style was coded using an adapted version of the Maternal Behavior Rating Scale, with a consensus rating procedure. Results  Professional caregivers scored moderately on the Maternal Behavior Rating Scale. Repeated measures analyses showed no change in time. We did not find a relationship between staff interactive style and client or staff characteristics. Conclusions  The Maternal Behavior Rating Scale contributes to our understanding of staff interactive style during activities with people with PIMD. Specifically for MSST, the moderate scores on the interactive style dimensions were unexpected, because the individualised MSST activity created an optimal situation for high‐quality interaction with people with PIMD. Because the interactive style did not improve through the repetition of the activity either, these results might point to a need for staff training in achieving high‐quality interaction during activities like MSST.</description><subject>activities</subject><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Adult and adolescent clinical studies</subject><subject>Analysis of Variance</subject><subject>Behavior</subject><subject>Behavior Rating Scales</subject><subject>Behavior Therapy</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Career Development</subject><subject>Caregivers</subject><subject>Carers</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Coding</subject><subject>Communication</subject><subject>Developmental disabilities</subject><subject>Evaluation Methods</subject><subject>Evidence</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intellectual deficiency</subject><subject>Intellectual Disability - complications</subject><subject>Intellectual Disability - nursing</subject><subject>Intellectual Disability - psychology</subject><subject>Intellectual Disability - rehabilitation</subject><subject>Interaction</subject><subject>Interpersonal Relationship</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Mentally Disabled Persons - psychology</subject><subject>Mentally Disabled Persons - rehabilitation</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Mothers</subject><subject>Motor Skills Disorders - complications</subject><subject>Motor Skills Disorders - nursing</subject><subject>Motor Skills Disorders - psychology</subject><subject>Motor Skills Disorders - rehabilitation</subject><subject>Multiple Disabilities</subject><subject>Multiply disabled people</subject><subject>multisensory storytelling</subject><subject>Narration</subject><subject>Outcome Assessment (Health Care)</subject><subject>Professional-Patient Relations</subject><subject>profound intellectual and multiple disabilities</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychopathology. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Rating Scales</subject><subject>Repetition</subject><subject>Sensory Experience</subject><subject>Severity of Illness Index</subject><subject>Social interaction</subject><subject>staff behaviour</subject><subject>staff interactive style</subject><subject>Story Telling</subject><subject>Storytelling</subject><subject>Training</subject><subject>Video Technology</subject><subject>Videotapes</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0964-2633</issn><issn>1365-2788</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkl1v0zAYhSMEYt3gHyAUIaFxk_La8efFLmAaZdM0JCji0nIcB1zcpNgJa_n1OG0pEhdsuXASn-ccvbJPluUIpig9rxdTVDJaYC7EFANCU0CEiOn6QTY5CA-zCUhGCszK8ig7jnEBAAwR9jg7woinbcwn2a9PvW6a3LW9Ddr07qfNY7_xNq-H4Nqv-XLwvYu2jV3YJCWtvfV-VG5d_y1f2RC7Nu5_Qtd0Q1tv07y3ph-0z3Xa2KasxlQXdeW8652NT7JHjfbRPt2_T7LP7y7m5--L6w-zy_M314VhiIpCVNBQhhGrrZC4siANwxQQq0hDJEWCkaaGxtRAKmK5tRUihoCQkiNaCV2eZKe73DTfj8HGXi1dNGlA3dpuiCodEhLAJbubRJxyURKUyFf_JZEoMSYItqF3oICAgyyJvAcKgBlQIAl98Q-66IbQpnNUEqOyTDeNEyR2kAldjME2ahXcUodNSlJjkdRCjX1RY1_UWCS1LZJaJ-vzff5QLW19MP5pTgJe7gEdjfZN0K1x8S9HCUMSaOKe7TgbnDnIF1eSkjRAks928q3zdnPv-dTV5cfxK_mLnd_F3q4Pfh2-K8ZLTtWXm5maz-czesPfqln5G5zB_FM</recordid><startdate>201202</startdate><enddate>201202</enddate><creator>Penne, A.</creator><creator>ten Brug, A.</creator><creator>Munde, V.</creator><creator>van der Putten, A.</creator><creator>Vlaskamp, C.</creator><creator>Maes, B.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley-Blackwell</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201202</creationdate><title>Staff interactive style during multisensory storytelling with persons with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities</title><author>Penne, A. ; ten Brug, A. ; Munde, V. ; van der Putten, A. ; Vlaskamp, C. ; Maes, B.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c6158-8b0f56216de892be09c625016b4f4951864fd0fcd04b4e7eeb14c40899715b8a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>activities</topic><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Adult and adolescent clinical studies</topic><topic>Analysis of Variance</topic><topic>Behavior</topic><topic>Behavior Rating Scales</topic><topic>Behavior Therapy</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Career Development</topic><topic>Caregivers</topic><topic>Carers</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Coding</topic><topic>Communication</topic><topic>Developmental disabilities</topic><topic>Evaluation Methods</topic><topic>Evidence</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intellectual deficiency</topic><topic>Intellectual Disability - complications</topic><topic>Intellectual Disability - nursing</topic><topic>Intellectual Disability - psychology</topic><topic>Intellectual Disability - rehabilitation</topic><topic>Interaction</topic><topic>Interpersonal Relationship</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Mentally Disabled Persons - psychology</topic><topic>Mentally Disabled Persons - rehabilitation</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Mothers</topic><topic>Motor Skills Disorders - complications</topic><topic>Motor Skills Disorders - nursing</topic><topic>Motor Skills Disorders - psychology</topic><topic>Motor Skills Disorders - rehabilitation</topic><topic>Multiple Disabilities</topic><topic>Multiply disabled people</topic><topic>multisensory storytelling</topic><topic>Narration</topic><topic>Outcome Assessment (Health Care)</topic><topic>Professional-Patient Relations</topic><topic>profound intellectual and multiple disabilities</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychopathology. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Rating Scales</topic><topic>Repetition</topic><topic>Sensory Experience</topic><topic>Severity of Illness Index</topic><topic>Social interaction</topic><topic>staff behaviour</topic><topic>staff interactive style</topic><topic>Story Telling</topic><topic>Storytelling</topic><topic>Training</topic><topic>Video Technology</topic><topic>Videotapes</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Penne, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ten Brug, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Munde, V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van der Putten, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vlaskamp, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maes, B.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of intellectual disability research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Penne, A.</au><au>ten Brug, A.</au><au>Munde, V.</au><au>van der Putten, A.</au><au>Vlaskamp, C.</au><au>Maes, B.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ954111</ericid><atitle>Staff interactive style during multisensory storytelling with persons with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities</atitle><jtitle>Journal of intellectual disability research</jtitle><addtitle>J Intellect Disabil Res</addtitle><date>2012-02</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>56</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>167</spage><epage>178</epage><pages>167-178</pages><issn>0964-2633</issn><eissn>1365-2788</eissn><coden>JIDREN</coden><abstract>Background  Multisensory storytelling (MSST) is an individualised activity for people with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities (PIMD) in which a story is being told with an emphasis on sensory experiences and social interaction. MSST is a promising approach, but needs more empirical research evidence. In general, there is a lack of research about staff interaction during specific activities with people with PIMD. In the present study, we explored the possibility to describe staff interactive style during MSST making use of a global coding instrument. Methods  Twenty dyads of a person with PIMD and a professional caregiver participated in an observation study. The caregivers received training in MSST and told a multisensory story to their client once a week, for a period of 10 weeks. The first, fifth and last session were recorded on video. Staff interactive style was coded using an adapted version of the Maternal Behavior Rating Scale, with a consensus rating procedure. Results  Professional caregivers scored moderately on the Maternal Behavior Rating Scale. Repeated measures analyses showed no change in time. We did not find a relationship between staff interactive style and client or staff characteristics. Conclusions  The Maternal Behavior Rating Scale contributes to our understanding of staff interactive style during activities with people with PIMD. Specifically for MSST, the moderate scores on the interactive style dimensions were unexpected, because the individualised MSST activity created an optimal situation for high‐quality interaction with people with PIMD. Because the interactive style did not improve through the repetition of the activity either, these results might point to a need for staff training in achieving high‐quality interaction during activities like MSST.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>21726327</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1365-2788.2011.01448.x</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0964-2633
ispartof Journal of intellectual disability research, 2012-02, Vol.56 (2), p.167-178
issn 0964-2633
1365-2788
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_964180796
source MEDLINE; Wiley Journals; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); EBSCOhost Education Source
subjects activities
Adolescent
Adult
Adult and adolescent clinical studies
Analysis of Variance
Behavior
Behavior Rating Scales
Behavior Therapy
Biological and medical sciences
Career Development
Caregivers
Carers
Child
Child, Preschool
Coding
Communication
Developmental disabilities
Evaluation Methods
Evidence
Humans
Intellectual deficiency
Intellectual Disability - complications
Intellectual Disability - nursing
Intellectual Disability - psychology
Intellectual Disability - rehabilitation
Interaction
Interpersonal Relationship
Male
Medical sciences
Mentally Disabled Persons - psychology
Mentally Disabled Persons - rehabilitation
Middle Aged
Mothers
Motor Skills Disorders - complications
Motor Skills Disorders - nursing
Motor Skills Disorders - psychology
Motor Skills Disorders - rehabilitation
Multiple Disabilities
Multiply disabled people
multisensory storytelling
Narration
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Professional-Patient Relations
profound intellectual and multiple disabilities
Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry
Psychopathology. Psychiatry
Rating Scales
Repetition
Sensory Experience
Severity of Illness Index
Social interaction
staff behaviour
staff interactive style
Story Telling
Storytelling
Training
Video Technology
Videotapes
Young Adult
title Staff interactive style during multisensory storytelling with persons with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T03%3A43%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Staff%20interactive%20style%20during%20multisensory%20storytelling%20with%20persons%20with%20profound%20intellectual%20and%20multiple%20disabilities&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20intellectual%20disability%20research&rft.au=Penne,%20A.&rft.date=2012-02&rft.volume=56&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=167&rft.epage=178&rft.pages=167-178&rft.issn=0964-2633&rft.eissn=1365-2788&rft.coden=JIDREN&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1365-2788.2011.01448.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1010709349%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=921330612&rft_id=info:pmid/21726327&rft_ericid=EJ954111&rfr_iscdi=true