Staff interactive style during multisensory storytelling with persons with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities
Background Multisensory storytelling (MSST) is an individualised activity for people with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities (PIMD) in which a story is being told with an emphasis on sensory experiences and social interaction. MSST is a promising approach, but needs more empirical rese...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of intellectual disability research 2012-02, Vol.56 (2), p.167-178 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 178 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 167 |
container_title | Journal of intellectual disability research |
container_volume | 56 |
creator | Penne, A. ten Brug, A. Munde, V. van der Putten, A. Vlaskamp, C. Maes, B. |
description | Background Multisensory storytelling (MSST) is an individualised activity for people with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities (PIMD) in which a story is being told with an emphasis on sensory experiences and social interaction. MSST is a promising approach, but needs more empirical research evidence. In general, there is a lack of research about staff interaction during specific activities with people with PIMD. In the present study, we explored the possibility to describe staff interactive style during MSST making use of a global coding instrument.
Methods Twenty dyads of a person with PIMD and a professional caregiver participated in an observation study. The caregivers received training in MSST and told a multisensory story to their client once a week, for a period of 10 weeks. The first, fifth and last session were recorded on video. Staff interactive style was coded using an adapted version of the Maternal Behavior Rating Scale, with a consensus rating procedure.
Results Professional caregivers scored moderately on the Maternal Behavior Rating Scale. Repeated measures analyses showed no change in time. We did not find a relationship between staff interactive style and client or staff characteristics.
Conclusions The Maternal Behavior Rating Scale contributes to our understanding of staff interactive style during activities with people with PIMD. Specifically for MSST, the moderate scores on the interactive style dimensions were unexpected, because the individualised MSST activity created an optimal situation for high‐quality interaction with people with PIMD. Because the interactive style did not improve through the repetition of the activity either, these results might point to a need for staff training in achieving high‐quality interaction during activities like MSST. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2011.01448.x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_964180796</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ954111</ericid><sourcerecordid>1010709349</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c6158-8b0f56216de892be09c625016b4f4951864fd0fcd04b4e7eeb14c40899715b8a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkl1v0zAYhSMEYt3gHyAUIaFxk_La8efFLmAaZdM0JCji0nIcB1zcpNgJa_n1OG0pEhdsuXASn-ccvbJPluUIpig9rxdTVDJaYC7EFANCU0CEiOn6QTY5CA-zCUhGCszK8ig7jnEBAAwR9jg7woinbcwn2a9PvW6a3LW9Ddr07qfNY7_xNq-H4Nqv-XLwvYu2jV3YJCWtvfV-VG5d_y1f2RC7Nu5_Qtd0Q1tv07y3ph-0z3Xa2KasxlQXdeW8652NT7JHjfbRPt2_T7LP7y7m5--L6w-zy_M314VhiIpCVNBQhhGrrZC4siANwxQQq0hDJEWCkaaGxtRAKmK5tRUihoCQkiNaCV2eZKe73DTfj8HGXi1dNGlA3dpuiCodEhLAJbubRJxyURKUyFf_JZEoMSYItqF3oICAgyyJvAcKgBlQIAl98Q-66IbQpnNUEqOyTDeNEyR2kAldjME2ahXcUodNSlJjkdRCjX1RY1_UWCS1LZJaJ-vzff5QLW19MP5pTgJe7gEdjfZN0K1x8S9HCUMSaOKe7TgbnDnIF1eSkjRAks928q3zdnPv-dTV5cfxK_mLnd_F3q4Pfh2-K8ZLTtWXm5maz-czesPfqln5G5zB_FM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>921330612</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Staff interactive style during multisensory storytelling with persons with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Journals</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>EBSCOhost Education Source</source><creator>Penne, A. ; ten Brug, A. ; Munde, V. ; van der Putten, A. ; Vlaskamp, C. ; Maes, B.</creator><creatorcontrib>Penne, A. ; ten Brug, A. ; Munde, V. ; van der Putten, A. ; Vlaskamp, C. ; Maes, B.</creatorcontrib><description>Background Multisensory storytelling (MSST) is an individualised activity for people with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities (PIMD) in which a story is being told with an emphasis on sensory experiences and social interaction. MSST is a promising approach, but needs more empirical research evidence. In general, there is a lack of research about staff interaction during specific activities with people with PIMD. In the present study, we explored the possibility to describe staff interactive style during MSST making use of a global coding instrument.
Methods Twenty dyads of a person with PIMD and a professional caregiver participated in an observation study. The caregivers received training in MSST and told a multisensory story to their client once a week, for a period of 10 weeks. The first, fifth and last session were recorded on video. Staff interactive style was coded using an adapted version of the Maternal Behavior Rating Scale, with a consensus rating procedure.
Results Professional caregivers scored moderately on the Maternal Behavior Rating Scale. Repeated measures analyses showed no change in time. We did not find a relationship between staff interactive style and client or staff characteristics.
Conclusions The Maternal Behavior Rating Scale contributes to our understanding of staff interactive style during activities with people with PIMD. Specifically for MSST, the moderate scores on the interactive style dimensions were unexpected, because the individualised MSST activity created an optimal situation for high‐quality interaction with people with PIMD. Because the interactive style did not improve through the repetition of the activity either, these results might point to a need for staff training in achieving high‐quality interaction during activities like MSST.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0964-2633</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2788</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2011.01448.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21726327</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JIDREN</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>activities ; Adolescent ; Adult ; Adult and adolescent clinical studies ; Analysis of Variance ; Behavior ; Behavior Rating Scales ; Behavior Therapy ; Biological and medical sciences ; Career Development ; Caregivers ; Carers ; Child ; Child, Preschool ; Coding ; Communication ; Developmental disabilities ; Evaluation Methods ; Evidence ; Humans ; Intellectual deficiency ; Intellectual Disability - complications ; Intellectual Disability - nursing ; Intellectual Disability - psychology ; Intellectual Disability - rehabilitation ; Interaction ; Interpersonal Relationship ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Mentally Disabled Persons - psychology ; Mentally Disabled Persons - rehabilitation ; Middle Aged ; Mothers ; Motor Skills Disorders - complications ; Motor Skills Disorders - nursing ; Motor Skills Disorders - psychology ; Motor Skills Disorders - rehabilitation ; Multiple Disabilities ; Multiply disabled people ; multisensory storytelling ; Narration ; Outcome Assessment (Health Care) ; Professional-Patient Relations ; profound intellectual and multiple disabilities ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychopathology. Psychiatry ; Rating Scales ; Repetition ; Sensory Experience ; Severity of Illness Index ; Social interaction ; staff behaviour ; staff interactive style ; Story Telling ; Storytelling ; Training ; Video Technology ; Videotapes ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Journal of intellectual disability research, 2012-02, Vol.56 (2), p.167-178</ispartof><rights>2011 The Authors. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research © 2011 Blackwell Publishing Ltd</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>2011 The Authors. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research © 2011 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright Blackwell Publishing Ltd. Feb 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c6158-8b0f56216de892be09c625016b4f4951864fd0fcd04b4e7eeb14c40899715b8a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c6158-8b0f56216de892be09c625016b4f4951864fd0fcd04b4e7eeb14c40899715b8a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1365-2788.2011.01448.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1365-2788.2011.01448.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,30999,31000,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ954111$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=25461905$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21726327$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Penne, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ten Brug, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Munde, V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van der Putten, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vlaskamp, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maes, B.</creatorcontrib><title>Staff interactive style during multisensory storytelling with persons with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities</title><title>Journal of intellectual disability research</title><addtitle>J Intellect Disabil Res</addtitle><description>Background Multisensory storytelling (MSST) is an individualised activity for people with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities (PIMD) in which a story is being told with an emphasis on sensory experiences and social interaction. MSST is a promising approach, but needs more empirical research evidence. In general, there is a lack of research about staff interaction during specific activities with people with PIMD. In the present study, we explored the possibility to describe staff interactive style during MSST making use of a global coding instrument.
Methods Twenty dyads of a person with PIMD and a professional caregiver participated in an observation study. The caregivers received training in MSST and told a multisensory story to their client once a week, for a period of 10 weeks. The first, fifth and last session were recorded on video. Staff interactive style was coded using an adapted version of the Maternal Behavior Rating Scale, with a consensus rating procedure.
Results Professional caregivers scored moderately on the Maternal Behavior Rating Scale. Repeated measures analyses showed no change in time. We did not find a relationship between staff interactive style and client or staff characteristics.
Conclusions The Maternal Behavior Rating Scale contributes to our understanding of staff interactive style during activities with people with PIMD. Specifically for MSST, the moderate scores on the interactive style dimensions were unexpected, because the individualised MSST activity created an optimal situation for high‐quality interaction with people with PIMD. Because the interactive style did not improve through the repetition of the activity either, these results might point to a need for staff training in achieving high‐quality interaction during activities like MSST.</description><subject>activities</subject><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Adult and adolescent clinical studies</subject><subject>Analysis of Variance</subject><subject>Behavior</subject><subject>Behavior Rating Scales</subject><subject>Behavior Therapy</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Career Development</subject><subject>Caregivers</subject><subject>Carers</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Coding</subject><subject>Communication</subject><subject>Developmental disabilities</subject><subject>Evaluation Methods</subject><subject>Evidence</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intellectual deficiency</subject><subject>Intellectual Disability - complications</subject><subject>Intellectual Disability - nursing</subject><subject>Intellectual Disability - psychology</subject><subject>Intellectual Disability - rehabilitation</subject><subject>Interaction</subject><subject>Interpersonal Relationship</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Mentally Disabled Persons - psychology</subject><subject>Mentally Disabled Persons - rehabilitation</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Mothers</subject><subject>Motor Skills Disorders - complications</subject><subject>Motor Skills Disorders - nursing</subject><subject>Motor Skills Disorders - psychology</subject><subject>Motor Skills Disorders - rehabilitation</subject><subject>Multiple Disabilities</subject><subject>Multiply disabled people</subject><subject>multisensory storytelling</subject><subject>Narration</subject><subject>Outcome Assessment (Health Care)</subject><subject>Professional-Patient Relations</subject><subject>profound intellectual and multiple disabilities</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychopathology. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Rating Scales</subject><subject>Repetition</subject><subject>Sensory Experience</subject><subject>Severity of Illness Index</subject><subject>Social interaction</subject><subject>staff behaviour</subject><subject>staff interactive style</subject><subject>Story Telling</subject><subject>Storytelling</subject><subject>Training</subject><subject>Video Technology</subject><subject>Videotapes</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0964-2633</issn><issn>1365-2788</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkl1v0zAYhSMEYt3gHyAUIaFxk_La8efFLmAaZdM0JCji0nIcB1zcpNgJa_n1OG0pEhdsuXASn-ccvbJPluUIpig9rxdTVDJaYC7EFANCU0CEiOn6QTY5CA-zCUhGCszK8ig7jnEBAAwR9jg7woinbcwn2a9PvW6a3LW9Ddr07qfNY7_xNq-H4Nqv-XLwvYu2jV3YJCWtvfV-VG5d_y1f2RC7Nu5_Qtd0Q1tv07y3ph-0z3Xa2KasxlQXdeW8652NT7JHjfbRPt2_T7LP7y7m5--L6w-zy_M314VhiIpCVNBQhhGrrZC4siANwxQQq0hDJEWCkaaGxtRAKmK5tRUihoCQkiNaCV2eZKe73DTfj8HGXi1dNGlA3dpuiCodEhLAJbubRJxyURKUyFf_JZEoMSYItqF3oICAgyyJvAcKgBlQIAl98Q-66IbQpnNUEqOyTDeNEyR2kAldjME2ahXcUodNSlJjkdRCjX1RY1_UWCS1LZJaJ-vzff5QLW19MP5pTgJe7gEdjfZN0K1x8S9HCUMSaOKe7TgbnDnIF1eSkjRAks928q3zdnPv-dTV5cfxK_mLnd_F3q4Pfh2-K8ZLTtWXm5maz-czesPfqln5G5zB_FM</recordid><startdate>201202</startdate><enddate>201202</enddate><creator>Penne, A.</creator><creator>ten Brug, A.</creator><creator>Munde, V.</creator><creator>van der Putten, A.</creator><creator>Vlaskamp, C.</creator><creator>Maes, B.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley-Blackwell</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201202</creationdate><title>Staff interactive style during multisensory storytelling with persons with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities</title><author>Penne, A. ; ten Brug, A. ; Munde, V. ; van der Putten, A. ; Vlaskamp, C. ; Maes, B.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c6158-8b0f56216de892be09c625016b4f4951864fd0fcd04b4e7eeb14c40899715b8a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>activities</topic><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Adult and adolescent clinical studies</topic><topic>Analysis of Variance</topic><topic>Behavior</topic><topic>Behavior Rating Scales</topic><topic>Behavior Therapy</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Career Development</topic><topic>Caregivers</topic><topic>Carers</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Coding</topic><topic>Communication</topic><topic>Developmental disabilities</topic><topic>Evaluation Methods</topic><topic>Evidence</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intellectual deficiency</topic><topic>Intellectual Disability - complications</topic><topic>Intellectual Disability - nursing</topic><topic>Intellectual Disability - psychology</topic><topic>Intellectual Disability - rehabilitation</topic><topic>Interaction</topic><topic>Interpersonal Relationship</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Mentally Disabled Persons - psychology</topic><topic>Mentally Disabled Persons - rehabilitation</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Mothers</topic><topic>Motor Skills Disorders - complications</topic><topic>Motor Skills Disorders - nursing</topic><topic>Motor Skills Disorders - psychology</topic><topic>Motor Skills Disorders - rehabilitation</topic><topic>Multiple Disabilities</topic><topic>Multiply disabled people</topic><topic>multisensory storytelling</topic><topic>Narration</topic><topic>Outcome Assessment (Health Care)</topic><topic>Professional-Patient Relations</topic><topic>profound intellectual and multiple disabilities</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychopathology. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Rating Scales</topic><topic>Repetition</topic><topic>Sensory Experience</topic><topic>Severity of Illness Index</topic><topic>Social interaction</topic><topic>staff behaviour</topic><topic>staff interactive style</topic><topic>Story Telling</topic><topic>Storytelling</topic><topic>Training</topic><topic>Video Technology</topic><topic>Videotapes</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Penne, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ten Brug, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Munde, V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van der Putten, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vlaskamp, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maes, B.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of intellectual disability research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Penne, A.</au><au>ten Brug, A.</au><au>Munde, V.</au><au>van der Putten, A.</au><au>Vlaskamp, C.</au><au>Maes, B.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ954111</ericid><atitle>Staff interactive style during multisensory storytelling with persons with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities</atitle><jtitle>Journal of intellectual disability research</jtitle><addtitle>J Intellect Disabil Res</addtitle><date>2012-02</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>56</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>167</spage><epage>178</epage><pages>167-178</pages><issn>0964-2633</issn><eissn>1365-2788</eissn><coden>JIDREN</coden><abstract>Background Multisensory storytelling (MSST) is an individualised activity for people with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities (PIMD) in which a story is being told with an emphasis on sensory experiences and social interaction. MSST is a promising approach, but needs more empirical research evidence. In general, there is a lack of research about staff interaction during specific activities with people with PIMD. In the present study, we explored the possibility to describe staff interactive style during MSST making use of a global coding instrument.
Methods Twenty dyads of a person with PIMD and a professional caregiver participated in an observation study. The caregivers received training in MSST and told a multisensory story to their client once a week, for a period of 10 weeks. The first, fifth and last session were recorded on video. Staff interactive style was coded using an adapted version of the Maternal Behavior Rating Scale, with a consensus rating procedure.
Results Professional caregivers scored moderately on the Maternal Behavior Rating Scale. Repeated measures analyses showed no change in time. We did not find a relationship between staff interactive style and client or staff characteristics.
Conclusions The Maternal Behavior Rating Scale contributes to our understanding of staff interactive style during activities with people with PIMD. Specifically for MSST, the moderate scores on the interactive style dimensions were unexpected, because the individualised MSST activity created an optimal situation for high‐quality interaction with people with PIMD. Because the interactive style did not improve through the repetition of the activity either, these results might point to a need for staff training in achieving high‐quality interaction during activities like MSST.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>21726327</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1365-2788.2011.01448.x</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0964-2633 |
ispartof | Journal of intellectual disability research, 2012-02, Vol.56 (2), p.167-178 |
issn | 0964-2633 1365-2788 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_964180796 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Journals; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); EBSCOhost Education Source |
subjects | activities Adolescent Adult Adult and adolescent clinical studies Analysis of Variance Behavior Behavior Rating Scales Behavior Therapy Biological and medical sciences Career Development Caregivers Carers Child Child, Preschool Coding Communication Developmental disabilities Evaluation Methods Evidence Humans Intellectual deficiency Intellectual Disability - complications Intellectual Disability - nursing Intellectual Disability - psychology Intellectual Disability - rehabilitation Interaction Interpersonal Relationship Male Medical sciences Mentally Disabled Persons - psychology Mentally Disabled Persons - rehabilitation Middle Aged Mothers Motor Skills Disorders - complications Motor Skills Disorders - nursing Motor Skills Disorders - psychology Motor Skills Disorders - rehabilitation Multiple Disabilities Multiply disabled people multisensory storytelling Narration Outcome Assessment (Health Care) Professional-Patient Relations profound intellectual and multiple disabilities Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychopathology. Psychiatry Rating Scales Repetition Sensory Experience Severity of Illness Index Social interaction staff behaviour staff interactive style Story Telling Storytelling Training Video Technology Videotapes Young Adult |
title | Staff interactive style during multisensory storytelling with persons with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T03%3A43%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Staff%20interactive%20style%20during%20multisensory%20storytelling%20with%20persons%20with%20profound%20intellectual%20and%20multiple%20disabilities&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20intellectual%20disability%20research&rft.au=Penne,%20A.&rft.date=2012-02&rft.volume=56&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=167&rft.epage=178&rft.pages=167-178&rft.issn=0964-2633&rft.eissn=1365-2788&rft.coden=JIDREN&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1365-2788.2011.01448.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1010709349%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=921330612&rft_id=info:pmid/21726327&rft_ericid=EJ954111&rfr_iscdi=true |