Product type and word of mouth: a dyadic perspective

Purpose - Strong evidence suggests that word-of-mouth (WOM) communication varies in its influence according to product type; however, empirical research remains deficient. The purpose of this paper is to propose a procedural model to examine the influence of product type on both the effect and sprea...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of research in interactive marketing 2011-01, Vol.5 (2/3), p.189-202
Hauptverfasser: Fang, Cheng-Hsi, Lin, Tom M.Y, Liu, Fangyi, Hsiang Lin, Yu
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 202
container_issue 2/3
container_start_page 189
container_title Journal of research in interactive marketing
container_volume 5
creator Fang, Cheng-Hsi
Lin, Tom M.Y
Liu, Fangyi
Hsiang Lin, Yu
description Purpose - Strong evidence suggests that word-of-mouth (WOM) communication varies in its influence according to product type; however, empirical research remains deficient. The purpose of this paper is to propose a procedural model to examine the influence of product type on both the effect and spread of related WOM information at the same time.Design methodology approach - Using a self-administered questionnaire, a sample of 895 consumers across 16 different products was collected; results were analyzed using structural equation modeling.Findings - WOM was found to be more influential and more widely spread for services than for goods. In addition, although the level of receivers' perceived risk (PR) is generally assumed to be a significant antecedent of WOM influence (WI), the results of the study indicate that PR is not a direct function of WI. Instead, WOM request (WR) mediates the effect of PR on WI.Originality value - To the authors' knowledge, this is the first study to examine the relationship between product type and WOM from a dyadic perspective. Moreover, the authors introduced two important mediators - namely, PR and WR - in the model in order to identify different potential effects of WOM in a seeker-initiated context. The results of this study will enhance knowledge about the influences of WOM information.
doi_str_mv 10.1108/17505931111187802
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_963920893</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2497694891</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-67d92757c4cc705fec34b17720d3f6969573c399e6797dff19e3538a339d11513</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM1LxDAQxYMouKz7B3gLXrxYnWTapvEmi1-woAc9h5gP7NJuatIq-9_bZUVhZd9l5vB7b4ZHyCmDS8agumKigEIi26gSFfADMuGQQyYYwuHvzvkxmaW0hFGIDISckPw5BjuYnvbrzlG9svQrREuDp20Y-vdrqqlda1sb2rmYOmf6-tOdkCOvm-RmP3NKXu9uX-YP2eLp_nF-s8hMzrDPSmElF4UwuTECCu8M5m9MCA4WfSlLWQg0KKUrhRTWeyYdFlhpRGkZKxhOyfk2t4vhY3CpV22djGsavXJhSEqWKDlUEkfybIdchiGuxueUBJBMcLGJY1vIxJBSdF51sW51XCsGalOk-lfk6LnYelzrom7sn2UXVZ31Iw578L0XvgHdkn1k</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>900917271</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Product type and word of mouth: a dyadic perspective</title><source>Emerald Journals</source><source>Standard: Emerald eJournal Premier Collection</source><creator>Fang, Cheng-Hsi ; Lin, Tom M.Y ; Liu, Fangyi ; Hsiang Lin, Yu</creator><creatorcontrib>Fang, Cheng-Hsi ; Lin, Tom M.Y ; Liu, Fangyi ; Hsiang Lin, Yu</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose - Strong evidence suggests that word-of-mouth (WOM) communication varies in its influence according to product type; however, empirical research remains deficient. The purpose of this paper is to propose a procedural model to examine the influence of product type on both the effect and spread of related WOM information at the same time.Design methodology approach - Using a self-administered questionnaire, a sample of 895 consumers across 16 different products was collected; results were analyzed using structural equation modeling.Findings - WOM was found to be more influential and more widely spread for services than for goods. In addition, although the level of receivers' perceived risk (PR) is generally assumed to be a significant antecedent of WOM influence (WI), the results of the study indicate that PR is not a direct function of WI. Instead, WOM request (WR) mediates the effect of PR on WI.Originality value - To the authors' knowledge, this is the first study to examine the relationship between product type and WOM from a dyadic perspective. Moreover, the authors introduced two important mediators - namely, PR and WR - in the model in order to identify different potential effects of WOM in a seeker-initiated context. The results of this study will enhance knowledge about the influences of WOM information.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2040-7122</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2040-7130</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1108/17505931111187802</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bradford: Emerald Group Publishing Limited</publisher><subject>Behavior ; Classification ; Communication ; Consumers ; Customer services ; Dyadics ; Influence ; Interactive ; Marketing ; Mathematical analysis ; Mathematical models ; Receivers ; Spreads ; Structural equation modeling ; Studies ; Word of mouth advertising</subject><ispartof>Journal of research in interactive marketing, 2011-01, Vol.5 (2/3), p.189-202</ispartof><rights>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</rights><rights>Copyright Emerald Group Publishing Limited 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-67d92757c4cc705fec34b17720d3f6969573c399e6797dff19e3538a339d11513</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-67d92757c4cc705fec34b17720d3f6969573c399e6797dff19e3538a339d11513</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/17505931111187802/full/pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gemerald$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/17505931111187802/full/html$$EHTML$$P50$$Gemerald$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,961,11614,21674,27901,27902,52661,52664,53219,53347</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fang, Cheng-Hsi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lin, Tom M.Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Fangyi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hsiang Lin, Yu</creatorcontrib><title>Product type and word of mouth: a dyadic perspective</title><title>Journal of research in interactive marketing</title><description>Purpose - Strong evidence suggests that word-of-mouth (WOM) communication varies in its influence according to product type; however, empirical research remains deficient. The purpose of this paper is to propose a procedural model to examine the influence of product type on both the effect and spread of related WOM information at the same time.Design methodology approach - Using a self-administered questionnaire, a sample of 895 consumers across 16 different products was collected; results were analyzed using structural equation modeling.Findings - WOM was found to be more influential and more widely spread for services than for goods. In addition, although the level of receivers' perceived risk (PR) is generally assumed to be a significant antecedent of WOM influence (WI), the results of the study indicate that PR is not a direct function of WI. Instead, WOM request (WR) mediates the effect of PR on WI.Originality value - To the authors' knowledge, this is the first study to examine the relationship between product type and WOM from a dyadic perspective. Moreover, the authors introduced two important mediators - namely, PR and WR - in the model in order to identify different potential effects of WOM in a seeker-initiated context. The results of this study will enhance knowledge about the influences of WOM information.</description><subject>Behavior</subject><subject>Classification</subject><subject>Communication</subject><subject>Consumers</subject><subject>Customer services</subject><subject>Dyadics</subject><subject>Influence</subject><subject>Interactive</subject><subject>Marketing</subject><subject>Mathematical analysis</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Receivers</subject><subject>Spreads</subject><subject>Structural equation modeling</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Word of mouth advertising</subject><issn>2040-7122</issn><issn>2040-7130</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kM1LxDAQxYMouKz7B3gLXrxYnWTapvEmi1-woAc9h5gP7NJuatIq-9_bZUVhZd9l5vB7b4ZHyCmDS8agumKigEIi26gSFfADMuGQQyYYwuHvzvkxmaW0hFGIDISckPw5BjuYnvbrzlG9svQrREuDp20Y-vdrqqlda1sb2rmYOmf6-tOdkCOvm-RmP3NKXu9uX-YP2eLp_nF-s8hMzrDPSmElF4UwuTECCu8M5m9MCA4WfSlLWQg0KKUrhRTWeyYdFlhpRGkZKxhOyfk2t4vhY3CpV22djGsavXJhSEqWKDlUEkfybIdchiGuxueUBJBMcLGJY1vIxJBSdF51sW51XCsGalOk-lfk6LnYelzrom7sn2UXVZ31Iw578L0XvgHdkn1k</recordid><startdate>20110101</startdate><enddate>20110101</enddate><creator>Fang, Cheng-Hsi</creator><creator>Lin, Tom M.Y</creator><creator>Liu, Fangyi</creator><creator>Hsiang Lin, Yu</creator><general>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYYUZ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110101</creationdate><title>Product type and word of mouth: a dyadic perspective</title><author>Fang, Cheng-Hsi ; Lin, Tom M.Y ; Liu, Fangyi ; Hsiang Lin, Yu</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-67d92757c4cc705fec34b17720d3f6969573c399e6797dff19e3538a339d11513</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Behavior</topic><topic>Classification</topic><topic>Communication</topic><topic>Consumers</topic><topic>Customer services</topic><topic>Dyadics</topic><topic>Influence</topic><topic>Interactive</topic><topic>Marketing</topic><topic>Mathematical analysis</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Receivers</topic><topic>Spreads</topic><topic>Structural equation modeling</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Word of mouth advertising</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fang, Cheng-Hsi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lin, Tom M.Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Fangyi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hsiang Lin, Yu</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Global News &amp; ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Journal of research in interactive marketing</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fang, Cheng-Hsi</au><au>Lin, Tom M.Y</au><au>Liu, Fangyi</au><au>Hsiang Lin, Yu</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Product type and word of mouth: a dyadic perspective</atitle><jtitle>Journal of research in interactive marketing</jtitle><date>2011-01-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>5</volume><issue>2/3</issue><spage>189</spage><epage>202</epage><pages>189-202</pages><issn>2040-7122</issn><eissn>2040-7130</eissn><abstract>Purpose - Strong evidence suggests that word-of-mouth (WOM) communication varies in its influence according to product type; however, empirical research remains deficient. The purpose of this paper is to propose a procedural model to examine the influence of product type on both the effect and spread of related WOM information at the same time.Design methodology approach - Using a self-administered questionnaire, a sample of 895 consumers across 16 different products was collected; results were analyzed using structural equation modeling.Findings - WOM was found to be more influential and more widely spread for services than for goods. In addition, although the level of receivers' perceived risk (PR) is generally assumed to be a significant antecedent of WOM influence (WI), the results of the study indicate that PR is not a direct function of WI. Instead, WOM request (WR) mediates the effect of PR on WI.Originality value - To the authors' knowledge, this is the first study to examine the relationship between product type and WOM from a dyadic perspective. Moreover, the authors introduced two important mediators - namely, PR and WR - in the model in order to identify different potential effects of WOM in a seeker-initiated context. The results of this study will enhance knowledge about the influences of WOM information.</abstract><cop>Bradford</cop><pub>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</pub><doi>10.1108/17505931111187802</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2040-7122
ispartof Journal of research in interactive marketing, 2011-01, Vol.5 (2/3), p.189-202
issn 2040-7122
2040-7130
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_963920893
source Emerald Journals; Standard: Emerald eJournal Premier Collection
subjects Behavior
Classification
Communication
Consumers
Customer services
Dyadics
Influence
Interactive
Marketing
Mathematical analysis
Mathematical models
Receivers
Spreads
Structural equation modeling
Studies
Word of mouth advertising
title Product type and word of mouth: a dyadic perspective
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T19%3A16%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Product%20type%20and%20word%20of%20mouth:%20a%20dyadic%20perspective&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20research%20in%20interactive%20marketing&rft.au=Fang,%20Cheng-Hsi&rft.date=2011-01-01&rft.volume=5&rft.issue=2/3&rft.spage=189&rft.epage=202&rft.pages=189-202&rft.issn=2040-7122&rft.eissn=2040-7130&rft_id=info:doi/10.1108/17505931111187802&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2497694891%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=900917271&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true