The Tinnitus Functional Index: Development of a New Clinical Measure for Chronic, Intrusive Tinnitus

OBJECTIVES:Chronic subjective tinnitus is a prevalent condition that causes significant distress to millions of Americans. Effective tinnitus treatments are urgently needed, but evaluating them is hampered by the lack of standardized measures that are validated for both intake assessment and evaluat...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Ear and hearing 2012-03, Vol.33 (2), p.153-176
Hauptverfasser: Meikle, Mary B, Henry, James A, Griest, Susan E, Stewart, Barbara J, Abrams, Harvey B, McArdle, Rachel, Myers, Paula J, Newman, Craig W, Sandridge, Sharon, Turk, Dennis C, Folmer, Robert L, Frederick, Eric J, House, John W, Jacobson, Gary P, Kinney, Sam E, Martin, William H, Nagler, Stephen M, Reich, Gloria E, Searchfield, Grant, Sweetow, Robert, Vernon, Jack A
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 176
container_issue 2
container_start_page 153
container_title Ear and hearing
container_volume 33
creator Meikle, Mary B
Henry, James A
Griest, Susan E
Stewart, Barbara J
Abrams, Harvey B
McArdle, Rachel
Myers, Paula J
Newman, Craig W
Sandridge, Sharon
Turk, Dennis C
Folmer, Robert L
Frederick, Eric J
House, John W
Jacobson, Gary P
Kinney, Sam E
Martin, William H
Nagler, Stephen M
Reich, Gloria E
Searchfield, Grant
Sweetow, Robert
Vernon, Jack A
description OBJECTIVES:Chronic subjective tinnitus is a prevalent condition that causes significant distress to millions of Americans. Effective tinnitus treatments are urgently needed, but evaluating them is hampered by the lack of standardized measures that are validated for both intake assessment and evaluation of treatment outcomes. This work was designed to develop a new self-report questionnaire, the Tinnitus Functional Index (TFI), that would have documented validity both for scaling the severity and negative impact of tinnitus for use in intake assessment and for measuring treatment-related changes in tinnitus (responsiveness) and that would provide comprehensive coverage of multiple tinnitus severity domains. DESIGN:To use preexisting knowledge concerning tinnitus-related problems, an Item Selection Panel (17 expert judges) surveyed the content (175 items) of nine widely used tinnitus questionnaires. From those items, the Panel identified 13 separate domains of tinnitus distress and selected 70 items most likely to be responsive to treatment effects. Eliminating redundant items while retaining good content validity and adding new items to achieve the recommended minimum of 3 to 4 items per domain yielded 43 items, which were then used for constructing TFI Prototype 1.Prototype 1 was tested at five clinics. The 326 participants included consecutive patients receiving tinnitus treatment who provided informed consent—constituting a convenience sample. Construct validity of Prototype 1 as an outcome measure was evaluated by measuring responsiveness of the overall scale and its individual items at 3 and 6 mo follow-up with 65 and 42 participants, respectively. Using a predetermined list of criteria, the 30 best-functioning items were selected for constructing TFI Prototype 2.Prototype 2 was tested at four clinics with 347 participants, including 155 and 86 who provided 3 and 6 mo follow-up data, respectively. Analyses were the same as for Prototype 1. Results were used to select the 25 best-functioning items for the final TFI. RESULTS:Both prototypes and the final TFI displayed strong measurement properties, with few missing data, high validity for scaling of tinnitus severity, and good reliability. All TFI versions exhibited the same eight factors characterizing tinnitus severity and negative impact. Responsiveness, evaluated by computing effect sizes for responses at follow-up, was satisfactory in all TFI versions.In the final TFI, Cronbach’s alpha was 0.97 and
doi_str_mv 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31822f67c0
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_963492161</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>963492161</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3812-58a971f8f6b00a4cd1f73dadbb452e74962a304fcf021b994ec4f741d6aa41f93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkU1vEzEQhi0EomnLP0DIF9RLt_hrvWtuVUqhUksv6dnyeseKwbGDvdvAv6-rBiIxF2tGzzsjPUboPSUXlKju0-XD1QUZCOXAac-Yk50lr9CCtrxvhJTda7QgVMmGMMKO0HEpPwihTEnxFh0xRluphFqgcbUGvPIx-mku-HqOdvIpmoBv4gi_P-MreISQthuIE04OG_wddngZfPS2QndgypwBu5Txcp1TnZ7X5JTn4h8Pe0_RG2dCgXf79wQ9XH9ZLb81t_dfb5aXt43lPWVN2xvVUdc7ORBihB2p6_hoxmEQLYNOKMkMJ8JZRxgdlBJghesEHaUxgjrFT9DZy95tTr9mKJPe-GIhBBMhzUUryYViVNJKihfS5lRKBqe32W9M_qMp0c96ddWr_9dbYx_2B-ZhA-O_0F-fFfi4B0ypglw20fpy4Nq27dqeHO7vUpggl59h3kHWazBhWmtSiwshG1Z_jPDaNc8jxp8A-AaThA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>963492161</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Tinnitus Functional Index: Development of a New Clinical Measure for Chronic, Intrusive Tinnitus</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>Meikle, Mary B ; Henry, James A ; Griest, Susan E ; Stewart, Barbara J ; Abrams, Harvey B ; McArdle, Rachel ; Myers, Paula J ; Newman, Craig W ; Sandridge, Sharon ; Turk, Dennis C ; Folmer, Robert L ; Frederick, Eric J ; House, John W ; Jacobson, Gary P ; Kinney, Sam E ; Martin, William H ; Nagler, Stephen M ; Reich, Gloria E ; Searchfield, Grant ; Sweetow, Robert ; Vernon, Jack A</creator><creatorcontrib>Meikle, Mary B ; Henry, James A ; Griest, Susan E ; Stewart, Barbara J ; Abrams, Harvey B ; McArdle, Rachel ; Myers, Paula J ; Newman, Craig W ; Sandridge, Sharon ; Turk, Dennis C ; Folmer, Robert L ; Frederick, Eric J ; House, John W ; Jacobson, Gary P ; Kinney, Sam E ; Martin, William H ; Nagler, Stephen M ; Reich, Gloria E ; Searchfield, Grant ; Sweetow, Robert ; Vernon, Jack A</creatorcontrib><description>OBJECTIVES:Chronic subjective tinnitus is a prevalent condition that causes significant distress to millions of Americans. Effective tinnitus treatments are urgently needed, but evaluating them is hampered by the lack of standardized measures that are validated for both intake assessment and evaluation of treatment outcomes. This work was designed to develop a new self-report questionnaire, the Tinnitus Functional Index (TFI), that would have documented validity both for scaling the severity and negative impact of tinnitus for use in intake assessment and for measuring treatment-related changes in tinnitus (responsiveness) and that would provide comprehensive coverage of multiple tinnitus severity domains. DESIGN:To use preexisting knowledge concerning tinnitus-related problems, an Item Selection Panel (17 expert judges) surveyed the content (175 items) of nine widely used tinnitus questionnaires. From those items, the Panel identified 13 separate domains of tinnitus distress and selected 70 items most likely to be responsive to treatment effects. Eliminating redundant items while retaining good content validity and adding new items to achieve the recommended minimum of 3 to 4 items per domain yielded 43 items, which were then used for constructing TFI Prototype 1.Prototype 1 was tested at five clinics. The 326 participants included consecutive patients receiving tinnitus treatment who provided informed consent—constituting a convenience sample. Construct validity of Prototype 1 as an outcome measure was evaluated by measuring responsiveness of the overall scale and its individual items at 3 and 6 mo follow-up with 65 and 42 participants, respectively. Using a predetermined list of criteria, the 30 best-functioning items were selected for constructing TFI Prototype 2.Prototype 2 was tested at four clinics with 347 participants, including 155 and 86 who provided 3 and 6 mo follow-up data, respectively. Analyses were the same as for Prototype 1. Results were used to select the 25 best-functioning items for the final TFI. RESULTS:Both prototypes and the final TFI displayed strong measurement properties, with few missing data, high validity for scaling of tinnitus severity, and good reliability. All TFI versions exhibited the same eight factors characterizing tinnitus severity and negative impact. Responsiveness, evaluated by computing effect sizes for responses at follow-up, was satisfactory in all TFI versions.In the final TFI, Cronbach’s alpha was 0.97 and test–retest reliability 0.78. Convergent validity (r = 0.86 with Tinnitus Handicap Inventory [THI]; r = 0.75 with Visual Analog Scale [VAS]) and discriminant validity (r = 0.56 with Beck Depression Inventory-Primary Care [BDI-PC]) were good. The final TFI was successful at detecting improvement from the initial clinic visit to 3 mo with moderate to large effect sizes and from initial to 6 mo with large effect sizes. Effect sizes for the TFI were generally larger than those obtained for the VAS and THI. After careful evaluation, a 13-point reduction was considered a preliminary criterion for meaningful reduction in TFI outcome scores. CONCLUSIONS:The TFI should be useful in both clinical and research settings because of its responsiveness to treatment-related change, validity for scaling the overall severity of tinnitus, and comprehensive coverage of multiple domains of tinnitus severity.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0196-0202</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1538-4667</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31822f67c0</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22156949</identifier><identifier>CODEN: EAHEDS</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hagerstown, MD: Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins, Inc</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Chronic Disease ; Depression - diagnosis ; Ear, auditive nerve, cochleovestibular tract, facial nerve: diseases, semeiology ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Medical History Taking - standards ; Medical sciences ; Non tumoral diseases ; Otorhinolaryngology. Stomatology ; Reproducibility of Results ; Self Report - standards ; Severity of Illness Index ; Surveys and Questionnaires - standards ; Tinnitus - diagnosis ; Tinnitus - physiopathology ; Tinnitus - psychology</subject><ispartof>Ear and hearing, 2012-03, Vol.33 (2), p.153-176</ispartof><rights>2012 Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins, Inc.</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3812-58a971f8f6b00a4cd1f73dadbb452e74962a304fcf021b994ec4f741d6aa41f93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3812-58a971f8f6b00a4cd1f73dadbb452e74962a304fcf021b994ec4f741d6aa41f93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=25557580$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22156949$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Meikle, Mary B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Henry, James A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Griest, Susan E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stewart, Barbara J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abrams, Harvey B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McArdle, Rachel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Myers, Paula J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Newman, Craig W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sandridge, Sharon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Turk, Dennis C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Folmer, Robert L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frederick, Eric J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>House, John W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jacobson, Gary P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kinney, Sam E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martin, William H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nagler, Stephen M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reich, Gloria E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Searchfield, Grant</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sweetow, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vernon, Jack A</creatorcontrib><title>The Tinnitus Functional Index: Development of a New Clinical Measure for Chronic, Intrusive Tinnitus</title><title>Ear and hearing</title><addtitle>Ear Hear</addtitle><description>OBJECTIVES:Chronic subjective tinnitus is a prevalent condition that causes significant distress to millions of Americans. Effective tinnitus treatments are urgently needed, but evaluating them is hampered by the lack of standardized measures that are validated for both intake assessment and evaluation of treatment outcomes. This work was designed to develop a new self-report questionnaire, the Tinnitus Functional Index (TFI), that would have documented validity both for scaling the severity and negative impact of tinnitus for use in intake assessment and for measuring treatment-related changes in tinnitus (responsiveness) and that would provide comprehensive coverage of multiple tinnitus severity domains. DESIGN:To use preexisting knowledge concerning tinnitus-related problems, an Item Selection Panel (17 expert judges) surveyed the content (175 items) of nine widely used tinnitus questionnaires. From those items, the Panel identified 13 separate domains of tinnitus distress and selected 70 items most likely to be responsive to treatment effects. Eliminating redundant items while retaining good content validity and adding new items to achieve the recommended minimum of 3 to 4 items per domain yielded 43 items, which were then used for constructing TFI Prototype 1.Prototype 1 was tested at five clinics. The 326 participants included consecutive patients receiving tinnitus treatment who provided informed consent—constituting a convenience sample. Construct validity of Prototype 1 as an outcome measure was evaluated by measuring responsiveness of the overall scale and its individual items at 3 and 6 mo follow-up with 65 and 42 participants, respectively. Using a predetermined list of criteria, the 30 best-functioning items were selected for constructing TFI Prototype 2.Prototype 2 was tested at four clinics with 347 participants, including 155 and 86 who provided 3 and 6 mo follow-up data, respectively. Analyses were the same as for Prototype 1. Results were used to select the 25 best-functioning items for the final TFI. RESULTS:Both prototypes and the final TFI displayed strong measurement properties, with few missing data, high validity for scaling of tinnitus severity, and good reliability. All TFI versions exhibited the same eight factors characterizing tinnitus severity and negative impact. Responsiveness, evaluated by computing effect sizes for responses at follow-up, was satisfactory in all TFI versions.In the final TFI, Cronbach’s alpha was 0.97 and test–retest reliability 0.78. Convergent validity (r = 0.86 with Tinnitus Handicap Inventory [THI]; r = 0.75 with Visual Analog Scale [VAS]) and discriminant validity (r = 0.56 with Beck Depression Inventory-Primary Care [BDI-PC]) were good. The final TFI was successful at detecting improvement from the initial clinic visit to 3 mo with moderate to large effect sizes and from initial to 6 mo with large effect sizes. Effect sizes for the TFI were generally larger than those obtained for the VAS and THI. After careful evaluation, a 13-point reduction was considered a preliminary criterion for meaningful reduction in TFI outcome scores. CONCLUSIONS:The TFI should be useful in both clinical and research settings because of its responsiveness to treatment-related change, validity for scaling the overall severity of tinnitus, and comprehensive coverage of multiple domains of tinnitus severity.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Chronic Disease</subject><subject>Depression - diagnosis</subject><subject>Ear, auditive nerve, cochleovestibular tract, facial nerve: diseases, semeiology</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Medical History Taking - standards</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Non tumoral diseases</subject><subject>Otorhinolaryngology. Stomatology</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Self Report - standards</subject><subject>Severity of Illness Index</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires - standards</subject><subject>Tinnitus - diagnosis</subject><subject>Tinnitus - physiopathology</subject><subject>Tinnitus - psychology</subject><issn>0196-0202</issn><issn>1538-4667</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkU1vEzEQhi0EomnLP0DIF9RLt_hrvWtuVUqhUksv6dnyeseKwbGDvdvAv6-rBiIxF2tGzzsjPUboPSUXlKju0-XD1QUZCOXAac-Yk50lr9CCtrxvhJTda7QgVMmGMMKO0HEpPwihTEnxFh0xRluphFqgcbUGvPIx-mku-HqOdvIpmoBv4gi_P-MreISQthuIE04OG_wddngZfPS2QndgypwBu5Txcp1TnZ7X5JTn4h8Pe0_RG2dCgXf79wQ9XH9ZLb81t_dfb5aXt43lPWVN2xvVUdc7ORBihB2p6_hoxmEQLYNOKMkMJ8JZRxgdlBJghesEHaUxgjrFT9DZy95tTr9mKJPe-GIhBBMhzUUryYViVNJKihfS5lRKBqe32W9M_qMp0c96ddWr_9dbYx_2B-ZhA-O_0F-fFfi4B0ypglw20fpy4Nq27dqeHO7vUpggl59h3kHWazBhWmtSiwshG1Z_jPDaNc8jxp8A-AaThA</recordid><startdate>201203</startdate><enddate>201203</enddate><creator>Meikle, Mary B</creator><creator>Henry, James A</creator><creator>Griest, Susan E</creator><creator>Stewart, Barbara J</creator><creator>Abrams, Harvey B</creator><creator>McArdle, Rachel</creator><creator>Myers, Paula J</creator><creator>Newman, Craig W</creator><creator>Sandridge, Sharon</creator><creator>Turk, Dennis C</creator><creator>Folmer, Robert L</creator><creator>Frederick, Eric J</creator><creator>House, John W</creator><creator>Jacobson, Gary P</creator><creator>Kinney, Sam E</creator><creator>Martin, William H</creator><creator>Nagler, Stephen M</creator><creator>Reich, Gloria E</creator><creator>Searchfield, Grant</creator><creator>Sweetow, Robert</creator><creator>Vernon, Jack A</creator><general>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins, Inc</general><general>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201203</creationdate><title>The Tinnitus Functional Index: Development of a New Clinical Measure for Chronic, Intrusive Tinnitus</title><author>Meikle, Mary B ; Henry, James A ; Griest, Susan E ; Stewart, Barbara J ; Abrams, Harvey B ; McArdle, Rachel ; Myers, Paula J ; Newman, Craig W ; Sandridge, Sharon ; Turk, Dennis C ; Folmer, Robert L ; Frederick, Eric J ; House, John W ; Jacobson, Gary P ; Kinney, Sam E ; Martin, William H ; Nagler, Stephen M ; Reich, Gloria E ; Searchfield, Grant ; Sweetow, Robert ; Vernon, Jack A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3812-58a971f8f6b00a4cd1f73dadbb452e74962a304fcf021b994ec4f741d6aa41f93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Chronic Disease</topic><topic>Depression - diagnosis</topic><topic>Ear, auditive nerve, cochleovestibular tract, facial nerve: diseases, semeiology</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Medical History Taking - standards</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Non tumoral diseases</topic><topic>Otorhinolaryngology. Stomatology</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Self Report - standards</topic><topic>Severity of Illness Index</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires - standards</topic><topic>Tinnitus - diagnosis</topic><topic>Tinnitus - physiopathology</topic><topic>Tinnitus - psychology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Meikle, Mary B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Henry, James A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Griest, Susan E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stewart, Barbara J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abrams, Harvey B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McArdle, Rachel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Myers, Paula J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Newman, Craig W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sandridge, Sharon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Turk, Dennis C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Folmer, Robert L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frederick, Eric J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>House, John W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jacobson, Gary P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kinney, Sam E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martin, William H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nagler, Stephen M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reich, Gloria E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Searchfield, Grant</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sweetow, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vernon, Jack A</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Ear and hearing</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Meikle, Mary B</au><au>Henry, James A</au><au>Griest, Susan E</au><au>Stewart, Barbara J</au><au>Abrams, Harvey B</au><au>McArdle, Rachel</au><au>Myers, Paula J</au><au>Newman, Craig W</au><au>Sandridge, Sharon</au><au>Turk, Dennis C</au><au>Folmer, Robert L</au><au>Frederick, Eric J</au><au>House, John W</au><au>Jacobson, Gary P</au><au>Kinney, Sam E</au><au>Martin, William H</au><au>Nagler, Stephen M</au><au>Reich, Gloria E</au><au>Searchfield, Grant</au><au>Sweetow, Robert</au><au>Vernon, Jack A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Tinnitus Functional Index: Development of a New Clinical Measure for Chronic, Intrusive Tinnitus</atitle><jtitle>Ear and hearing</jtitle><addtitle>Ear Hear</addtitle><date>2012-03</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>33</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>153</spage><epage>176</epage><pages>153-176</pages><issn>0196-0202</issn><eissn>1538-4667</eissn><coden>EAHEDS</coden><abstract>OBJECTIVES:Chronic subjective tinnitus is a prevalent condition that causes significant distress to millions of Americans. Effective tinnitus treatments are urgently needed, but evaluating them is hampered by the lack of standardized measures that are validated for both intake assessment and evaluation of treatment outcomes. This work was designed to develop a new self-report questionnaire, the Tinnitus Functional Index (TFI), that would have documented validity both for scaling the severity and negative impact of tinnitus for use in intake assessment and for measuring treatment-related changes in tinnitus (responsiveness) and that would provide comprehensive coverage of multiple tinnitus severity domains. DESIGN:To use preexisting knowledge concerning tinnitus-related problems, an Item Selection Panel (17 expert judges) surveyed the content (175 items) of nine widely used tinnitus questionnaires. From those items, the Panel identified 13 separate domains of tinnitus distress and selected 70 items most likely to be responsive to treatment effects. Eliminating redundant items while retaining good content validity and adding new items to achieve the recommended minimum of 3 to 4 items per domain yielded 43 items, which were then used for constructing TFI Prototype 1.Prototype 1 was tested at five clinics. The 326 participants included consecutive patients receiving tinnitus treatment who provided informed consent—constituting a convenience sample. Construct validity of Prototype 1 as an outcome measure was evaluated by measuring responsiveness of the overall scale and its individual items at 3 and 6 mo follow-up with 65 and 42 participants, respectively. Using a predetermined list of criteria, the 30 best-functioning items were selected for constructing TFI Prototype 2.Prototype 2 was tested at four clinics with 347 participants, including 155 and 86 who provided 3 and 6 mo follow-up data, respectively. Analyses were the same as for Prototype 1. Results were used to select the 25 best-functioning items for the final TFI. RESULTS:Both prototypes and the final TFI displayed strong measurement properties, with few missing data, high validity for scaling of tinnitus severity, and good reliability. All TFI versions exhibited the same eight factors characterizing tinnitus severity and negative impact. Responsiveness, evaluated by computing effect sizes for responses at follow-up, was satisfactory in all TFI versions.In the final TFI, Cronbach’s alpha was 0.97 and test–retest reliability 0.78. Convergent validity (r = 0.86 with Tinnitus Handicap Inventory [THI]; r = 0.75 with Visual Analog Scale [VAS]) and discriminant validity (r = 0.56 with Beck Depression Inventory-Primary Care [BDI-PC]) were good. The final TFI was successful at detecting improvement from the initial clinic visit to 3 mo with moderate to large effect sizes and from initial to 6 mo with large effect sizes. Effect sizes for the TFI were generally larger than those obtained for the VAS and THI. After careful evaluation, a 13-point reduction was considered a preliminary criterion for meaningful reduction in TFI outcome scores. CONCLUSIONS:The TFI should be useful in both clinical and research settings because of its responsiveness to treatment-related change, validity for scaling the overall severity of tinnitus, and comprehensive coverage of multiple domains of tinnitus severity.</abstract><cop>Hagerstown, MD</cop><pub>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins, Inc</pub><pmid>22156949</pmid><doi>10.1097/AUD.0b013e31822f67c0</doi><tpages>24</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0196-0202
ispartof Ear and hearing, 2012-03, Vol.33 (2), p.153-176
issn 0196-0202
1538-4667
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_963492161
source MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete
subjects Biological and medical sciences
Chronic Disease
Depression - diagnosis
Ear, auditive nerve, cochleovestibular tract, facial nerve: diseases, semeiology
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Medical History Taking - standards
Medical sciences
Non tumoral diseases
Otorhinolaryngology. Stomatology
Reproducibility of Results
Self Report - standards
Severity of Illness Index
Surveys and Questionnaires - standards
Tinnitus - diagnosis
Tinnitus - physiopathology
Tinnitus - psychology
title The Tinnitus Functional Index: Development of a New Clinical Measure for Chronic, Intrusive Tinnitus
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T10%3A00%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Tinnitus%20Functional%20Index:%20Development%20of%20a%20New%20Clinical%20Measure%20for%20Chronic,%20Intrusive%20Tinnitus&rft.jtitle=Ear%20and%20hearing&rft.au=Meikle,%20Mary%20B&rft.date=2012-03&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=153&rft.epage=176&rft.pages=153-176&rft.issn=0196-0202&rft.eissn=1538-4667&rft.coden=EAHEDS&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/AUD.0b013e31822f67c0&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E963492161%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=963492161&rft_id=info:pmid/22156949&rfr_iscdi=true